[Bug 1310058] Re: ecryptfs-setup-swap hints after reboot
I had the same problem after installing Kubuntu 14.04 64bit. During the installation process I mounted an existing home partition encrypted with ecryptfs. Result: The swap partition was not available/mounted. After manually implementing syscon-hh's solution in the first post, all is well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1310058 Title: ecryptfs-setup-swap hints after reboot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ecryptfs-utils/+bug/1310058/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1310058] Re: ecryptfs-setup-swap hints after reboot
I should have added that sudo blkid reported a different UUID for the swap partition than the one used in /etc/crypttab. Replacing that one with the UUID reported by blkid did not solve the problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1310058 Title: ecryptfs-setup-swap hints after reboot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ecryptfs-utils/+bug/1310058/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1065110] Re: krusader fails to enter .zip archive with Error: krarc is disabled
Just download the respective Debian package from http://packages.debian.org/experimental/krusader -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1065110 Title: krusader fails to enter .zip archive with Error: krarc is disabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krusader/+bug/1065110/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1134492] Re: xserver-xorg-lts-quantal breaks Kubuntu
Re #9: Sorry for the late response. I tested it with the newest version 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.10 and it still doesn't work as expected. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1134492 Title: xserver-xorg-lts-quantal breaks Kubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1134492/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1134492] Re: xserver-xorg-lts-quantal breaks Kubuntu
Nobody? Really? I mean, Kubuntu 12.04 is an LTS version, too. That a (semi-)official upgrade suggestion dismantles it and nobody seems to care, is rather weird, IMO. BTW: Other Ubuntu flavours like Xubuntu, Lubuntu etc. might also be affected although I haven't checked that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1134492 Title: xserver-xorg-lts-quantal breaks Kubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-lts-quantal/+bug/1134492/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1134492] Re: xserver-xorg-lts-quantal breaks Kubuntu
And it's enabled on my system, too. However, libgl1-mesa-glx-lts-quantal won't be installed by Muon, Synaptic or apt-get. Only if I *manually* add libgl1-mesa-glx-lts-quantal : sudo apt-get install xserver-xorg-lts-quantal libgl1-mesa-glx-lts- quantal ... kubuntu-desktop etc. won't be removed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1134492 Title: xserver-xorg-lts-quantal breaks Kubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-lts-quantal/+bug/1134492/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1134492] Re: xserver-xorg-lts-quantal breaks Kubuntu
The attachment shows what aptitude reports. ** Attachment added: aptitude.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-lts-quantal/+bug/1134492/+attachment/3634501/+files/aptitude.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1134492 Title: xserver-xorg-lts-quantal breaks Kubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-lts-quantal/+bug/1134492/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1133453] Re: xserver-xorg-lts-quantal breaks Kubuntu
** Changed in: lowmem (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1133453 Title: xserver-xorg-lts-quantal breaks Kubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lowmem/+bug/1133453/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1134492] [NEW] xserver-xorg-lts-quantal breaks Kubuntu
Public bug reported: Installing xserver-xorg-lts-quantal as suggested on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/LTSEnablementStack breaks Kubuntu 12.04 as crucial KDE packages like kubuntu-desktop, kdm etc. will be removed. ** Affects: xorg-lts-quantal (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: lts_update.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1134492/+attachment/3549760/+files/lts_update.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1134492 Title: xserver-xorg-lts-quantal breaks Kubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-lts-quantal/+bug/1134492/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1134492] Re: xserver-xorg-lts-quantal breaks Kubuntu
** Description changed: Installing xserver-xorg-lts-quantal as suggested on - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/LTSEnablementStack breaks Kubuntu as - crucial KDE packages like kubuntu-desktop, kdm etc. will be removed. + https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/LTSEnablementStack breaks Kubuntu 12.04 + as crucial KDE packages like kubuntu-desktop, kdm etc. will be removed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1134492 Title: xserver-xorg-lts-quantal breaks Kubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-lts-quantal/+bug/1134492/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1133453] [NEW] xserver-xorg-lts-quantal breaks Kubuntu
Public bug reported: Installing xserver-xorg-lts-quantal (and linux-generic-lts-quantal) as suggested on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/LTSEnablementStack breaks Kubuntu as crucial KDE packages like kubuntu-desktop, kdm etc. will be removed. ** Affects: lowmem (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: lts_update.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1133453/+attachment/3547787/+files/lts_update.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1133453 Title: xserver-xorg-lts-quantal breaks Kubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lowmem/+bug/1133453/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1133453] Re: xserver-xorg-lts-quantal breaks Kubuntu
Oops - I somehow got here in lowmem erroneously. Sorry! How can I delete or move it to the right section? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1133453 Title: xserver-xorg-lts-quantal breaks Kubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lowmem/+bug/1133453/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052098] Re: AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cupsd
Jamie, I'm sorry but I've just done a release upgrade to Quantal. I guess your suggestion won't give us new insights now, will it? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052098 Title: AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cupsd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1052098/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052098] Re: AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cupsd
Sure - see the attachment. ** Attachment added: cups.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1052098/+attachment/3347820/+files/cups.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052098 Title: AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cupsd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1052098/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052098] Re: AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cupsd
Jamie, now I'm confused. As a matter of fact, /etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.sbin.cupsd here is completely empty. And, yes, I commented out # capability block_suspend, in /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cupsd in order to avoid this bug. I noticed that it was shown in the attachment under ##included local/usr.sbin.cupsd - but again, /etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.sbin.cupsd is empty on my system. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052098 Title: AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cupsd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1052098/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052098] Re: AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cupsd
** Attachment added: apparmor_1.d.tar.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1052098/+attachment/3348830/+files/apparmor_1.d.tar.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052098 Title: AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cupsd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1052098/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052098] Re: AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cupsd
@Jamie: I understand, that explains it. Thanks a lot! I'm using cips 1.5.3-0ubuntu4 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052098 Title: AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cupsd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1052098/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052098] Re: AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cupsd
It happened again. I finetuned the Thunderbird profile with aa-logprof, and again it wanted to modify the cupsd profile by adding that capability. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052098 Title: AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cupsd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1052098/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052098] Re: AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cupsd
It also happened when I tweaked my Google Chrome profile with aa- logprof. I chose Finish. Anyway, /var/log/syslog says: [ 5303.439870] type=1400 audit(1348065251.369:4090): apparmor=DENIED operation=capable parent=1 profile=/usr/sbin/cupsd pid=1235 comm=cupsd pid=1235 comm=cupsd capability=36 capname=block_suspend -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052098 Title: AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cupsd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1052098/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052098] Re: AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cupsd
I think I found the culprit: I was modifying an AppArmor profile for Thunderbird. When I executed aa-logprof, I got the following message: Enforce-mode changes: Profile:/usr/sbin/cupsd Capability: block_suspend Severity: unexpected capability rank input: CAP_BLOCK_SUSPEND If you select Allow, you will run into the problem mentioned above. I've no idea why creating/modifying a Thunderbird profile affects the cupsd profile and why that capability is added. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052098 Title: AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cupsd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1052098/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052098] Re: AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cupsd
@jdstrand: Ubuntu 3.5.0-14.18~precise1-generic 3.5.3 I've added https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/q-lts-backport to my repositories. Perhaps related to that one? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052098 Title: AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cupsd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1052098/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052098] [NEW] AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cupsd
Public bug reported: My HP printer suddenly didn't work anymore, and /var/log/syslog reported for udev-configure-printer: failed to connect to CUPS server; giving up I decided to reinstall cups and hplip and got the following error messages: AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cupsd in /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cupsd at line 18: Invalid capability block_suspend. ... and: start: Job failed to start invoke-rc.d: initscript cups, action start failed. ... resulting in errors related to dpkg (dependencies problems). After commenting out the line capability block_suspend, in /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cupsd, all is well: Reinstalling cups and hplip was successful and my printer works again. ** Affects: apparmor (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052098 Title: AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cupsd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1052098/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052098] Re: AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cupsd
Forgot to mention that I'm using Kubuntu 12.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052098 Title: AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cupsd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1052098/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 712584] Re: Firefox-4.0: AppArmor blocks access to nvidia devices
@Sami Mäkinen: Fully ACK. It seems that AppArmor doesn't have a high priority for Ubuntu developers. It's time to think about moving to, e.g., Tomoyo. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712584 Title: Firefox-4.0: AppArmor blocks access to nvidia devices To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/712584/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 825231] [NEW] apparmor: denied read access to /etc/ld.so.preload in several profiles
Public bug reported:
Starting some time ago I've been getting apparmor error messages
affecting several pofiles which are in enforce mode. In all these error
messages read access to /etc/ld.so.preload is denied.
According to the kernel protocol the affected profiles on my system are:
/sbin/dhclient
/usr/lib/NetworkManager/nm-dhcp-client.action
/usr/sbin/cupsd
/usr/sbin/mysqld-akonadi
/usr/sbin/mysqld-akonadi///usr/sbin/mysqld
/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser
/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser//chromium_browser_sandbox
/usr/lib/firefox-5.0/firefox{,*[^s][^h]}
As mentioned I had not observed these errors until lately. Something
must have changed in the meantime.
** Affects: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/825231
Title:
apparmor: denied read access to /etc/ld.so.preload in several profiles
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/825231/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 825231] Re: apparmor: denied read access to /etc/ld.so.preload in several profiles
Forgot to mention that I'm using Kubuntu 11,04 with KDE 4.7 and kernel 3.0.0-8 from the xorg-edgers ppa. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/825231 Title: apparmor: denied read access to /etc/ld.so.preload in several profiles To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/825231/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 712584] Re: Firefox-4.0: AppArmor blocks access to nvidia devices
Jamie, why don't you want to add these devices? I mean most Nvidia card users should be affected by this problem. But not all of them are able to debug AppArmor and to edit the related profile - they would probably chose to NOT use this FF profile at all. I'm not sure if that's really what we want. And adding these devices would not open a new security hole (compared to not using the profile) as anybody has read/write permission for these files anyhow. So quite frankly I don't really understand your rationale. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712584 Title: Firefox-4.0: AppArmor blocks access to nvidia devices -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 712584] Re: Firefox-4.0: AppArmor blocks access to nvidia devices
Or, as a general question: Why don't add rules that don't hurt but improve the acceptance of AppArmor? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712584 Title: Firefox-4.0: AppArmor blocks access to nvidia devices -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 712584] Re: Firefox-4.0: AppArmor errors on certain websites
This issue is not yet fixed in the apparmor profile for FF 4.0 b13. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712584 Title: Firefox-4.0: AppArmor errors on certain websites -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 712584] [NEW] Firefox-4.0: AppArmor errors on certain websites
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: apparmor
with Firefox 4.0 (currently b12 from the ppa but it happened also with previous
betas) on Ubuntu 10.10 I'm getting AppArmor error messages like:
type=1400 audit(1296725581.050:58): apparmor=DENIED operation=open parent=1
profile=/usr/lib/firefox-4.0-4.0b12prefirefox{,*[^s][^h]}
name=/dev/nvidiactl pid=2996 comm=firefox-4.0-bin requested_mask=rw
denied_mask=rw fsuid=1000 ouid=0
on certain websites, e.g., http://bodybrowser.googlelabs.com. On that website
the images were not displayed until I added
/dev/nvidiactl rw,
/dev/nvidia0 rw,
to the usr.bin.firefox-4.0 profile.
Since I cannot imagine that this is specific to my system (I guess it
has something to do with hardware acceleration, and a similar problem
might exist for AMD cards) I suggest to add this to that profile by
default.
Note that after adding above lines to the profile I still got errors
like:
type=1400 audit(1296749585.779:69): apparmor=DENIED operation=open
parent=1 profile=/usr/lib/firefox-4.0-4.0b12pre/firefox{,*[^s][^h]}
name=/proc/interrupts pid=3035 comm=firefox-4.0-bin
requested_mask=r denied_mask=r fsuid=1000 ouid=0
although I couldn't notice any further problems. Nevertheless it might
make sense to also add
/proc/interrupts r,
to the profile.
** Affects: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712584
Title:
Firefox-4.0: AppArmor errors on certain websites
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 614699] Re: Qt 4.7.0 breaks QX11EmbedWidget
Will this fix be backported to Lucid? -- Qt 4.7.0 breaks QX11EmbedWidget https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614699 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 375422] Re: apparmor fails to load at startup
While apparmor works in Karmic with kernel 2.6.31.x, the mentioned error comes up when using the 2.6.32.x mainline kernel. Any idea how to fix this? -- apparmor fails to load at startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375422 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 476550] Re: [Karmic] openjdk 6b16-1.6.1-1ubuntu3 freezes Firefox 3.5.x
Unfortunately today the problem is back ... ** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- [Karmic] openjdk 6b16-1.6.1-1ubuntu3 freezes Firefox 3.5.x https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/476550 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 476550] Re: [Karmic] openjdk 6b16-1.6.1-1ubuntu3 freezes Firefox 3.5.x
The problem persists with openjdk 6b16-1.6.1-3ubuntu1. Am I really the only one with this error? I'm surprised that nobody seems to be interested. -- [Karmic] openjdk 6b16-1.6.1-1ubuntu3 freezes Firefox 3.5.x https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/476550 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 476550] Re: [Karmic] openjdk 6b16-1.6.1-1ubuntu3 freezes Firefox 3.5.x
Problem solved. I installed Karmic anew using the Alternate CD. Previously I had installed it anew using the Live CD (with formatting the root partition and mounting the existing home partition). After all I don't know what caused and fixed the error. It's working now as expected. ** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- [Karmic] openjdk 6b16-1.6.1-1ubuntu3 freezes Firefox 3.5.x https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/476550 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 455112] Re: VirtualBox performance is much worse when Intel VT-x is enabled
@Michał Gołębiowski: I can confirm that this problem didn't exist in Jaunty where Virtualbox ran very well with SMP (2 cpus) enabled (and, of course, VT-x which is required for SMP). I have an Intel Core2Duo E8400 with 3 GHz. Now under Karmic the situation is considerably worse: With SMP enabled, VB runs very slowly on my machine. Going back to 1 cpu and leaving VT-x enabled improves the performance a bit (but still not comparable with Jaunty), and disabling VT-x makes it worse again. So something has changed in Karmic under the hood and not for the better ... -- VirtualBox performance is much worse when Intel VT-x is enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 455112] Re: VirtualBox performance is much worse when Intel VT-x is enabled
I forgot to mention one thing: In the Virtualbox forums there are some posters who wrote that installing the real time kernel (incl. headers) improved the performance of Virtualbox considerably. I tried, and it didn't make a difference for me. But it might be worth a try for others. (Note, however, that the real time kernel is a universe package - personally I don't want to have the kernel of all packages from the universe repos.) Nevertheless the positive experience by the above mentioned users suggests that the problem might be kernel related. -- VirtualBox performance is much worse when Intel VT-x is enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 404827] Re: Firefox doesn't warn about Attack Sites!?
@Micah Gersten: I've only installed FF 3.5.4 in Jaunty and the fix works. But perhaps it's because I added https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu- mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa -- Firefox doesn't warn about Attack Sites!? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404827 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 409559] Re: version 1.6.0_15 is available
Since Jamie proposed to use OpenJDK as an alternative: I don't know about Firefox 3.0, but OpenJDK doesn't work properly under FF 3.5 - see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.5/+bug/359407 - and doesn't work at all under FF 3.6 (it doesn't even show up under about:plugins). So much for alternatives ... -- version 1.6.0_15 is available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409559 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 409559] Re: version 1.6.0_15 is available
Yes, it's more than sad. It's rather a breach of trust. Is there another way to ring the alarm bell? Pjotr is right that this is a structural problem. Considering the subscribers to this bug, I wonder why his posting in the MOTU list was even necessary. And I'm beginning to wonder how many other packages that aren't that prominent like the java one have security leaks that have not been patched, either. I mean, if such a serious bug is neglected (against better judgement) everything is possible. -- version 1.6.0_15 is available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409559 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 409559] Re: version 1.6.0_15 is available
@Matthias Klose: It must be possible to critisize something without being a developer. IMO, it's a breach of trust from a user's perspective. Why? 1. A patch is available for Karmic (and in some ppa's). Even without being a developer, I cannot imagine that it's so difficult to provide a patched version for other Ubuntu versions too. 2. Ubuntu has always been promoted as a safe OS that patches security leaks as fast as possible. But now we have a situation where a package with a serious leak has not been patched for several weeks although it's used by hundreds of thousands of users. 3. Nobody said that you, Matthias, or somebody else is the culprit. But if the Ubuntu Security Team and others are subscribed to this bug which has been open for weeks and there is still no reaction, something is terribly wrong. That's what Pjotr meant when he was talking about a structural problem. Is it a lack of manpower? Considering all these facts, you should not be too astonished that someone who's been a convinced Ubuntu advocate for years is becoming more and more irritated. -- version 1.6.0_15 is available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409559 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 409559] Re: version 1.6.0_15 is available
@Pjotr: Couldn't agree more. This is a disaster from a security viewpoint. We're always telling Windows users that they need something like Secunia PSI to make sure that they will keep their applications updated. And we're telling them: Switch to Ubuntu, and you won't have this problem. - And now this disaster for such a widely used package (thanks Johan for the figures). Pjotr is right that this seems to be a structural problem. I'm anxious to see the reaction on MOTU. -- version 1.6.0_15 is available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409559 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 411733] Re: sun-java6 should be updated to 6u15
I agree with xor. The java packages are critical applications used by many people. Not applying the updates that fix their vulnerabilities in due time undermines the reputation of Ubuntu as a secure operating system. Fixing them only in Karmic is definitely not enough. And the solution proposed by James Stansell is surely not suitable for the ordinary user (who doesn't know about this problem in the first place). -- sun-java6 should be updated to 6u15 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411733 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 411733] Re: sun-java6 should be updated to 6u15
Yes, it's available for Karmic but unfortunately not for Jaunty and earlier. And Sun has just released 6u16 which doesn't contain any new fixes for security vulnerabilities, though. -- sun-java6 should be updated to 6u15 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411733 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 404827] Re: Firefox doesn't warn about Attack Sites!?
Thanks - the fix works for 3.5 and 3.6. Great! -- Firefox doesn't warn about Attack Sites!? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404827 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 397907] Re: Something wrong with the security function in Shiretoko (Firefox 3.5).
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 404827 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404827 My remark above was related to FF 3.6a1pre but the bug still exists in the new 3.6a2pre. -- Something wrong with the security function in Shiretoko (Firefox 3.5). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397907 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 397907] Re: Something wrong with the security function in Shiretoko (Firefox 3.5).
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 404827 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404827 ... and also in v. 3.5.3pre -- Something wrong with the security function in Shiretoko (Firefox 3.5). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397907 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 377560] Re: [karmic] Digikam does not display anything in the main pane
I can confirm that beta1 works for me although I haven't tested it thoroughly for other bugs. -- [karmic] Digikam does not display anything in the main pane https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 377560] Re: [karmic] Digikam does not display anything in the main pane
I can confirm that beta1 works for me with KDE 4.3 final although I haven't tested it thoroughly for other bugs. -- [karmic] Digikam does not display anything in the main pane https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to digikam in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 386715] Re: Digikam not working with kde 4.3 beta 2
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 377560 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377560 The ppa version doesn't work here. The only way to make it work is using the method described on http://www.csamuel.org/2009/05/23/digikam- problem-with-kde-43-beta-1. Downgrading marble is no option as various other packages would be removed (kdeplasma-addons, plasma-wallpaper- addons). -- Digikam not working with kde 4.3 beta 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to digikam in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 397907] Re: Something wrong with the security function in Shiretoko (Firefox 3.5).
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 404827 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404827 FF 3.6 Minefield from the ppa shows the same behaviour - no warning on the above mentioned site. -- Something wrong with the security function in Shiretoko (Firefox 3.5). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397907 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 395893] Re: plasma-desktop crashes randomly
Thanks. The fix works for me - no more crashes. -- plasma-desktop crashes randomly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395893 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdebase-workspace in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195221] Re: Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection
** Attachment added: uname-a.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14600561/uname-a.log -- Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195221] Re: Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection
** Attachment added: version.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14600572/version.log -- Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195221] Re: Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection
** Attachment added: dmesg.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14600574/dmesg.log -- Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195221] Re: Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection
** Attachment added: lspci-vvnn.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14600589/lspci-vvnn.log -- Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195221] Re: Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection
Leann, I installed kernel 2.6.25.1 as advised. Didn't solve the problem, though. My harddisks are still addressed as UDMA2 and performance is as bad as with 2.6.24. BTW: KDE wouldn't start with the new kernel (I'm using Kubuntu). All I got was the console. -- Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195221] Re: Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection
Sorry - I forgot to add that I have a MSI 915P/G Neo2 motherboard with a VIA6410 IDE Raid Controller. -- Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195221] Re: Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection
I'm having the same problem using Hardy. Any chance to write a patch like pad's one for Gutsy mentioned in comment #8 above? -- Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
