[Bug 100019] Re: Segfault in Samba
** Changed in: samba Importance: Unknown => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/100019 Title: Segfault in Samba -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 100019] Re: Segfault in Samba
Acked - it appears to catch the condition gracefully in hardy. [2008/04/06 20:48:13, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(711) Netbios nameserver version 3.0.28a started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2008 [2008/04/06 20:48:13, 0] nmbd/nmbd_subnetdb.c:create_subnets(245) create_subnets: unable to create any subnet from given interfaces. nmbd is terminating [2008/04/06 20:48:13, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(785) ERROR: Failed when creating subnet lists. Exiting. -- Segfault in Samba https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/100019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 100019] Re: Segfault in Samba
Hello, I believe this is fixed in hardy. If possible could you please check. Thanks chuck ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- Segfault in Samba https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/100019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 100019] Re: Segfault in Samba
** Changed in: samba (upstream) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- Segfault in Samba https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/100019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 100019] Re: Segfault in Samba
** Changed in: samba (upstream) Status: Unknown => Confirmed -- Segfault in Samba https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/100019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 100019] Re: Segfault in Samba
>The smb.conf had been set to eth0, when in the new motherboard, the NIC comes >up as eth1. This still has to be a bug; I >dont think a segfault is the >desired behavior if an cf /etc/iftab why it's eth1 now. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Needs Info => Confirmed ** Bug watch added: Samba Bugzilla #3634 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3634 ** Also affects: samba (upstream) via https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3634 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Assignee: didier => (unassigned) -- Segfault in Samba https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/100019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 100019] Re: Segfault in Samba
Well, I seem to have found the problem in the process of gathering the requested info. The smb.conf had been set to eth0, when in the new motherboard, the NIC comes up as eth1. This still has to be a bug; I dont think a segfault is the desired behavior if an interface becomes unavailable, but suffice it to say fixing the interface config has fixed the crashing. -- Segfault in Samba https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/100019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 100019] Re: Segfault in Samba
hi, can you add: - your /etc/samba/smb.conf if you've modified it? At least the first lines where interfaces is set. - var/log/nmbd.log*, if you can try to find output with the same date than the core it'd be great (maybe around 7 AM ?) >From the source there's actually a bug in nmbd if no workgroups are available but fixing it will only make nmbd exit cleanly. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => didier Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info -- Segfault in Samba https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/100019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
