[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2020-03-18 Thread Chong Eva
Apparently, I've done a stupid thing and forgot my Ubuntu Server in AWS
is Server 14. I've upgraded the ubuntu to 16.04 a few months back, but
forgot that it's supposed to be still Ubuntu Server 14.

So I followed the guide https://docs.aws.amazon.com/vpc/latest/userguide
/vpc-migrate-ipv6.html and followed the steps in Ubuntu Server 16. This
got me locked out of my own server, and no matter what I tried
(rebooting, assigned new private IP, tried pinging from other servers in
the same subnet), I still can't get in. SSH ends up in Operation timed
out. I've locked myself out.

I even tried creating an AMI and launch the image into a new instance
but still it won't work, maybe because the network interfaces files are
backed up into the image as well?

What can I do to regain access to my server?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2019-05-25 Thread Dan Streetman
** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: Triaged => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2019-04-04 Thread Dan Streetman
** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Dan Streetman (ddstreet) => (unassigned)

** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu Precise)
 Assignee: Dan Streetman (ddstreet) => (unassigned)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2016-09-24 Thread Dan Streetman
** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Streetman (ddstreet)

** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu Precise)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Streetman (ddstreet)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2015-11-10 Thread Thiago Martins
So, nobody will look into this anymore (apparently), are we moving to
systemd's networkd (16.04) to "fix" this? I'm so tired of ifupdown...
:-P

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2015-11-09 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu Precise)
 Assignee: Stéphane Graber (stgraber) => (unassigned)

** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Stéphane Graber (stgraber) => (unassigned)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2015-10-05 Thread Corin Langosch
This is still broken on latest ubuntu server 14.04.  No wonder that ipv6
gets no adoption when one needs hours (or dig through bug reports) to
get a basic ipv4/ipv6 dual stack setup working.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2015-07-23 Thread davygrvy
This seems to work for me

$ cat /etc/network/interfaces
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet dhcp
iface eth0 inet6 dhcp
up sysctl net.ipv6.conf.$IFACE.accept_ra=1
up rdisc6 $IFACE

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2015-07-23 Thread davygrvy
broke for me in current 14.04

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2015-06-17 Thread Halvor Lyche Strandvoll
This is still not working in Ubuntu 14.04. Please fix this :-)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2014-03-26 Thread Klaus Steinberger
Please fix it also in Precise (12.04) !

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2014-03-03 Thread Thiago Martins
Fixed in the latest Ubuntu 14.04!

Also, it is recommend to install the package: "apt-get install rdnssd",
otherwise, Ubuntu will ignore the RDNSS from your Router Advertisement.

I have right now, a perfect IPv6-Only network, powered by "Router
Advertisement with RDNSS" (from PFSense 2.1) and Ubuntu Servers 14.04,
no need for DHCPv6!

Cheers!
Thiago

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2014-01-24 Thread Thiago Martins
Guys, sorry if I was rude before... Too much things happening at the
same time today...:-P

I just installed a PFSense 2.1 with IPv6 and, for my surprise, Debian
and Ubuntu Server are the only two operating systems that doesn't work
"out-of-the-box" in a IPv6-Only network...

Ubuntu Desktop, Windows 7, Mac, are okay in a IPv6-Only env... Debian
and Ubuntu (during the installation process, and even after) doesn't.


I mean, I tried to Install Ubuntu using the following scenarios:


1- SLAAC Unmanaged (no RDNSS) - Ubuntu Server have IPv6 addr without DNS 
resolution, of course (expected) - connectivity okay;

2- SLAAC Unmanaged + RDNSS - Ubuntu Server have IPv6 but no DNS name
resolution (i.e. it ignore RDNSS entries from RadvD) - connectivity
okay;

3- SLAAC Managed + DHCPv6 Statefull - Ubuntu Server (or Debian) get its
IPv6 addr, DNS servers too but, the connectivity only starts after
"ping6 my_ipv6_gateway" - NO CONNECTIVITY UNTIL PING6 GATEWAY!!


So, I'm seeing that there is no option to install Ubuntu (or Debian) in a 
IPv6-Only network without suffering some issues (that can be fixed after 
install, I know, but it is annoying). Also, we need a IPv6-Enabled NTP server 
too...=P

I'm okay with SLAAC-Only deployments but, huge organizations seems to
require DHCPv6 for getting more info about its network services
automatically and SLAAC doesn't provides it (not designed for it)...

As I said, my IPv6 router is a brand new PFSense 2.1 with "RadvD +
DHCPv6 (on LAN)" and it is working fine, since I have more machines here
working smoothly with IPv6 from behind it. For each scenario above, I've
reconfigured PFSense to match it (Managed - Unmanaged / with - without
DHCPv6).

NOTE: There is no IPv4 on this enviroment.

Best!
Thiago

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2014-01-24 Thread Thiago Martins
BTW, Debian testing also suffer from this problem.

I'm seeing 3 main problems (Ubuntu / Debian with IPv6):


1- ifupdown doesn't have support for:

  * statefull (SLAAC + DHCPv6);

 * conectivity only starts after "ping6 gateway_ip";

 * impossible to manage "IPv6 Aliases", since there is no need to
"eth0:X, eth0:Y, etc"...


So, in the end of the day, if you want to use IPv6 (SLAAC + DHCPv6) with Ubuntu 
or Debian, it is better to configure it outside of /etc/network/interfaces. Or, 
don't use DHCPv6 and stick only with "SLAAC-Stateless + DNS" and forget about 
DHCPv6.

Again, this problem must be fixed ASAP.

Best,
Thiago

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2014-01-24 Thread Thiago Martins
This bug is still not fixed in Ubuntu 14.04.

It is VERY annoying.

It is almost impossible to use IPv6 (SLAAC + DHCPv6) on Ubuntu Server...
Ubuntu Desktop works fine.

I'm trying it this way as a workaround:

---
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet6 dhcp
   accept_ra 1
---

But, this triggers another problem, the connectivity only begin to work,
after I "ping6 IP_OF_GATEAY" first. If I try to "ping6 google.com", it
does NOT work.

It is sad that we're in 2014 and Ubuntu Server (and probably Debian)
isn't ready for IPv6 networks.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2014-01-24 Thread Thiago Martins
This problem must have maximum priority!!!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2013-09-02 Thread Peter Silva
Please fix for 12.04.  prevents deployment of IPv6 at any organization
(please don't tell me anyone with a managed network is going to do
SLAAC.)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2013-06-16 Thread Halvor Lyche Strandvoll
This bug is till not fixed in Ubuntu 12.04 :( May you guys fix it soon?
:)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2013-02-23 Thread ruff
ps> this will fix dhcp6 release hang, not original default route issue.
srry for hijacking

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2013-02-23 Thread ruff
An easy fix here will be to use following tweak
iface wlan0 inet dhcp
   
iface wlan0 inet6 dhcp
accept_ra 1
autoconf 1
pre-down wpa_cli -i$IFACE reconnect 2>/dev/null

this way it will try pre-down before starting down action. Pre-down
eventually fails since wpa is already dead.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2013-02-11 Thread Andrew Collins
I'd like to request a backport of this for 12.04 LTS as well, this issue
has forced me to move to NetworkManager on my server instead of
ifupdown, as DHCPv6 stateful support is seriously broken unless I
manually add default routes.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2013-01-14 Thread Matthew Hall
P.S.: I just found a possible workaround for the fact that configuring
accept_ra does not work. In addition to the above one, up sysctl
net.ipv6.conf.$IFACE.accept_ra=1, you can install the ndisc6 package and
add up /bin/rdisc6 $IFACE to cause a manual discovery from userspace.
However I'm not sure if the kernel will also get the response and
process it. Maybe someone who knows more on this part could comment...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2013-01-14 Thread Matthew Hall
Hello,

This bug is crippling IPv6 on my machine.

Would it be possible to get this fixed for 12.04 LTS?

Thanks,
Matthew.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2012-12-11 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/ifupdown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2012-12-11 Thread Simon Leinen
I stumbled over this as well.  Fortunately we use Ubuntu 12.10, so I
could use the "accept_ra 1" workaround to fix the issue (missing default
routes when using stateful DHCPv6 to obtain address).

But, on POLA grounds, I agree with Ray Soucy (rps-u) that

The accept_ra option should default to 1 not 0

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2012-10-23 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Also affects: ifupdown (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu Precise)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Stéphane Graber (stgraber)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2012-09-21 Thread Ray Soucy
So will it not be fixed in LTS?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2012-09-21 Thread Stéphane Graber
The fix was pushed in Ubuntu 12.10 as 0.7ubuntu1, 0.7~beta2ubuntu8
doesn't contain the fix so it's perfectly normal for you not to have the
expected behaviour.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2012-09-21 Thread Ray Soucy
Can we change the status of this bug so it doesn't show up as "Fix
Released"

It needs more attention.

> Ok, found new conf parameters for dhcp stanza accept_ra and 
> autoconf - that solves RA issue. Still investigating release.

I tried adding the "accept_ra 1" option to /etc/network/interfaces and
it was ignored by ifupdown:

iface eth0 inet6 dhcp
accept_ra 1

The accept_ra option should default to 1 not 0
Also, the dhclient release bug is annoying as well.  The workarounds in the 
description don't seem to work completely either (dhclient doesn't like seeing 
the interface bounce while it's making a request).

I have ifupdown listed as package version 0.7~beta2ubuntu8 for amd64

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2012-07-23 Thread Halvor Lyche Strandvoll
This is a important issue, hope for a fix really soon. I'm not able to
use dhcpv6 :(

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2012-07-14 Thread ruff
Ok, here's verbose dump below. Down sequence is executed in the same order as 
up, although should be in reverse. And to check whether list of remaining 
interface definitions is empty for any given interface to avoid setting link 
down. That way dhcp6 will be released first, then dhcp4 release and finally wpa 
termination and link down. 
Don't know if anyone can produce a patch for that nw source file though %(

Configuring interface wlan0=wlan0 (inet)
run-parts --verbose /etc/network/if-down.d
run-parts: executing /etc/network/if-down.d/resolvconf
run-parts: executing /etc/network/if-down.d/upstart
run-parts: executing /etc/network/if-down.d/wpasupplicant
dhclient -v -r -pf /run/dhclient.wlan0.pid -lf 
/var/lib/dhcp/dhclient.wlan0.leases wlan0
Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client 4.2.4
Copyright 2004-2012 Internet Systems Consortium.
All rights reserved.
For info, please visit https://www.isc.org/software/dhcp/

Listening on LPF/wlan0/xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
Sending on   LPF/wlan0/xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
Sending on   Socket/fallback
DHCPRELEASE on wlan0 to aa.aa.aa.aa port 67
ip link set dev wlan0 down
run-parts --verbose /etc/network/if-post-down.d
run-parts: executing /etc/network/if-post-down.d/avahi-daemon
run-parts: executing /etc/network/if-post-down.d/bridge
run-parts: executing /etc/network/if-post-down.d/wireless-tools
run-parts: executing /etc/network/if-post-down.d/wpasupplicant
wpa_supplicant: terminating wpa_supplicant daemon via pidfile 
/var/run/wpa_supplicant.wlan0.pid
Stopped /sbin/wpa_supplicant (pid 9677).
wpa_supplicant: removing 
/run/sendsigs.omit.d/wpasupplicant.wpa_supplicant.wlan0.pid
Configuring interface wlan0=wlan0 (inet6)
run-parts --verbose /etc/network/if-down.d
run-parts: executing /etc/network/if-down.d/resolvconf
run-parts: executing /etc/network/if-down.d/upstart
run-parts: executing /etc/network/if-down.d/wpasupplicant
dhclient -6 -r -pf /run/dhclient6.wlan0.pid -lf 
/var/lib/dhcp/dhclient6.wlan0.leases wlan0
RTNETLINK answers: Cannot assign requested address
RTNETLINK answers: Cannot assign requested address
RTNETLINK answers: Cannot assign requested address

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2012-07-14 Thread ruff
Ok, found new conf parameters for dhcp stanza accept_ra and autoconf -
that solves RA issue. Still investigating release.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2012-07-14 Thread ruff
ii  ifupdown  0.7.1ubuntu2  
  amd64high level tools to configure network interfaces
The same behaviour - after ifup accept_ra is 0, on ifdown - dhcp cleint for v6 
still times out

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2012-07-03 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package ifupdown - 0.7ubuntu1

---
ifupdown (0.7ubuntu1) quantal-proposed; urgency=low

  * Resynchronise with Debian experimental.  Remaining changes:
(LP: #298488, LP: #663352)
- ifupdown.nw: Use 100 as default route metric unless an explicit metric
  parameter is set in /etc/network/interface.
- If the /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf file is present
  but doesn't have the "ifupdown:managed" the previous upload instructed
  the iniparser to return -1, which evaluates to TRUE. We instead instruct
  it to return 0, as we shouldn't prevent ifupdown from managing the
  interfaces in that case, as NM won't either. (LP: #281984)
- debian/postinst: If the loopback interface is missing from the config
  in /etc/network/interfaces, add it on upgrade.
- Add jobs and hooks for upstart.
  * Cherry-pick commit 011d5904c09d from upstream, fixing cases where the
error messages wouldn't be triggered (caused test failure).
  * Cherry-pick commit 7c1a226cc995 from upstream, adds support for two
options on dhcpv6 (accept_ra and autoconf) (LP: #1013597)
  * Cherry-pick commit 5af7e814faee from upstream, fixing a failure in the
example script generate-interfaces.pl (LP: #286808)
  * Cherry-pick commit a1f8efc4d93f from upstream, add --no-scripts as a
parameter to ifup/ifdown, allowing the user to bypass the the scripts
in /etc/network/if-*.d/ (LP: #258782)

ifupdown (0.7) unstable; urgency=low

  * Accept duplicate options in /etc/network/interfaces, join them using
a newline as a delimiter.
  * If an interface isn't defined, but mentioned in auto or allow statement,
don't mention it in ifquery output.
  * Change shortcut for --exclude to -X (was -e previously).
  * Make ifquery return false if the interface isn't defined.
  * Fix typos in the changelog.
  * Calculate broadcast address internally.
  * Allow concurrent netmask specification in both address (using CIDR
notation) and netmask for IPv6 (Closes: #674775).
  * Add preferred-lifetime setting for IPv6.
  * Pass -w and -e options to sysctl so we still can configure an interface
even if IPv6 SLAAC options can't be set for some reason.
  * Port to GNU/Hurd (thanks to Svante Signell, closes: #296115).
  * Chdir to root when executing external programs (Closes: #361964).
  * Remove updetach from PPP method (Closes: #675016).
  * Configure hotplug interfaces only if they're running (thanks to Evgeni
Golov, closes: #673658).
  * Rewrite NEWS file (Closes: #673688).
  * Update examples (Closes: #340992).
  * Update tests.
  * Update README.

ifupdown (0.7~rc3) unstable; urgency=low

  * Upload to unstable.
  * Don't refer to README from netbase any more.
  * Internal changes:
- Make set_variable() able to set variables conditionally.
- Improve conversions interface.
- Add some support for interface link configuration.
- Don't leak memory in some functions.
  * Configure VLANs automatically (Closes: #520436).
  * Calculate netmask internally, so even if a user haven't supplied
one or have used CIDR notation, hook scripts will have it properly
specified in IF_NETMASK environment variable.
  * Declare Breaks/Replaces relationship against netbase << 5.0.
  * Merge changes from Ubuntu (thanks to Stéphane Graber):
- Mark package as Multi-Arch: foreign.
- Update statefile paths in the 'contrib' scripts and in the
  noweb source.
  * Temporarily unapply patch for #547587.
  * Update tests.
 -- Stephane GraberThu, 28 Jun 2012 17:21:45 -0400

** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2012-06-28 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Stéphane Graber (stgraber)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2012-06-28 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013597] Re: No default route for stateful DHCPv6

2012-06-15 Thread Juha Aatrokoski
** Description changed:

  The default route cannot be provided via DHCPv6, it must be obtained
  from router advertisements. However, when using the dhcp method for
  inet6 in /etc/network/interfaces (e.g. "iface eth0 inet6 dhcp"), ifup
  will set net.ipv6.conf..accept_ra=0, resulting in no default
  route for IPv6. Instead, it should explicitly set accept_ra=1.
  
  A workaround is to set it in a post-up script. However, Linux apparently
  only sends router solicitations when the interface is brought up, so if
  unsolicited RA:s are infrequent the host will be without a default route
- until the next RA. This can be worked around by "blinking" the interface
- down-up.
+ until the next RA.
  
  Another problem is that when bringing the interface down on dual-stack
  hosts, there will be a long timeout. This is because bringing down IPv4
  also brings the interface link down, and afterwards dhclient cannot
  release the DHCPv6 lease due to the link being down ("RTNETLINK answers:
  Cannot assign requested address"). The workaround is to bring the link
  back up before bringing IPv6 down.
  
  So the workarounds (which obviously should not be needed) for a dual-
  stack dhcp client look like this:
  
  iface eth0 inet dhcp
  iface eth0 inet6 dhcp
- up sysctl net.ipv6.conf.$IFACE.accept_ra=1
- up ip link set dev $IFACE down
- up ip link set dev $IFACE up
- pre-down ip link set dev $IFACE up
+ up sysctl net.ipv6.conf.$IFACE.accept_ra=1
+ pre-down ip link set dev $IFACE up

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013597

Title:
  No default route for stateful DHCPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1013597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs