[Bug 109197] Re: kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor
I was hesitating a bit, but apparently this bug has been fixed, conservative is now considered a "dynamic" cpufreq policy. ** Changed in: guidance-power-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Fix Released -- kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109197 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 109197] Re: kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor
The most important point of this bugreport was to get conservative support into guidance-power-manager, not necessarily as the preferred- over-ondemand one. But without ondemand, conservative should be the alternative, not powersave as that is not a dynamic cpufreq policy at all. -- kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109197 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 109197] Re: kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor
David I share your view, but there seems to be much new information showing it other wise. I'll try to measure my power drain and battery duration to see if I can get a better view on this subject. -- kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109197 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 109197] Re: kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor
The cpufreq developers disagree on that. And I strongly disagree on that. On my notebook, 1000MHz is a lot faster that 800MHz, because it makes the memory clock and access-time much faster. It's not just the CPU that scales up. But anyone should understand that conservative is still better that performance. At least when I filed the bug, either ondemand, userspace, performance or powersave was the cpufreq policy for "dynamic" in that order. -- kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109197 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 109197] Re: kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor
According to Matthew Garrett (http://mjg59.livejournal.com/88608.html) the default should be to not set any other profile other then ondemand. -- kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109197 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 109197] Re: kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor
According to Matthew Garrett (http://mjg59.livejournal.com/88608.htm) the default should be to not set any other profile other then ondemand. ** Changed in: guidance-power-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109197 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 109197] Re: kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor
Needs to get moved to the KDE4 port and looked at. No, it never got done. ** Changed in: guidance-power-manager (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: kde-guidance => guidance-power-manager Importance: Undecided => Wishlist Status: Invalid => New -- kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109197 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 109197] Re: kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor
Did this ever get done? Why is it invalid? -- kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109197 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 109197] Re: kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor
I can do it too, I just wanted to prevent that two people write a different version of the same patch... -- kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109197 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is a bug contact for kde-guidance in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 109197] Re: kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor
I would agree that David's proposal is fine, so we would only redefine the meaning of Dynamic to try the following modes (in this order): - on AC: ondemand, conservative, userspace - on battery: conservative, ondemand, userspace I can work on this patch for Feisty+1 (probably in next day or two). -- kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109197 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is a bug contact for kde-guidance in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 109197] Re: kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor
On Monday 23 April 2007 20:46:21 DavidG wrote: > that's fine with me. It wouldn't hurt either to use "conservative" in > both situations, but I'd prefer to use "ondemand" on AC. > > Who writes the patch? You asked for it :-) I've some serious time constraints at the moment, so it would take some time. I can help with testing, of course. (Which I would have to do anyway.) Just privmail me for further details (sebas kde org). -- sebas -- kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109197 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is a bug contact for kde-guidance in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 109197] Re: kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor
that's fine with me. It wouldn't hurt either to use "conservative" in both situations, but I'd prefer to use "ondemand" on AC. Who writes the patch? -- kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109197 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is a bug contact for kde-guidance in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 109197] Re: kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor
On Monday 23 April 2007 16:35:53 DavidG wrote: > FYI, "conservative" is a dynamic governor optimized for battery usage. > "ondemand" is a dynamic governor optimized for AC usage... IMHO, it's no > loss using "conservative" on AC power. On battery, when using "ondemand" > instead of "conservative" on my laptop, it costs me at least half an > hour of battery time! So the following would make sense: - user setting 'dynamic' - we use to 'ondemand' on AC - we use 'conservative' on battery What do you think about this? -- sebas -- kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109197 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is a bug contact for kde-guidance in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 109197] Re: kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor
- We seem to be using "userspace" at the moment as a fallback for ondemand (see powermanage.py). Removing this is out of the scope of this bug/feature-request. - "powersave" is not a dynamic governor, it is plain the slowest frequency possible. (In contrary to Performance, which is plain the fastest frequency). See Documentation/cpu-freq/governors.txt in any recent kernel: -- The CPUfreq governor "conservative", much like the "ondemand" governor, sets the CPU depending on the current usage. It differs in behaviour in that it gracefully increases and decreases the CPU speed rather than jumping to max speed the moment there is any load on the CPU. This behaviour more suitable in a battery powered environment. -- -- kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109197 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 109197] Re: kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor
Hi David, The lines starting with "action" use tabs (but as you state, there is some inconsistency in the released code as well (it's fixed in SVN already, that's also why I double-checked). I do not understand your rationale, however. For example: - Why should we use 'userspace' at all (there is no option to set the cpufrequency directly, which is the whole point of that governor) - What is the advantage of 'conservative' over 'powersave' (I guess that would be the easiest to follow path)? Cheers! -- kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109197 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 109197] Re: kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor
FYI, "conservative" is a dynamic governor optimized for battery usage. "ondemand" is a dynamic governor optimized for AC usage... IMHO, it's no loss using "conservative" on AC power. On battery, when using "ondemand" instead of "conservative" on my laptop, it costs me at least half an hour of battery time! -- kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109197 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 109197] Re: kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor
Hi Sebas, Odd, kate shows no spaces/tabs inconsistencies at all... As a python hacker I know how important this is. Maybe a upload/download bug? (The only thing I can find is some trailing spaces on the original and existing trivial inconsistencies... ;-) ) Anyway, I agree Powermanager should be kept simple. However, I don't but that does not mean you should ignore the "conservative" governor. I propose this change: On AC, use ['dynamic', 'conservative', 'userspace'] in that order. On Battery, use ['conservative', 'dynamic', 'userspace'] in that order. Greetings, David -- kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109197 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is a bug contact for kde-guidance in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 109197] Re: kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor
Hi David, First, thanks for the patch. There are some tab/space issues in there, this *might* work, but it's broken -- don't mix space with tabs in python scripts. As to the actual functionality: I'm inclined to not merge it. Powermanager should be kept simple, we decided (together with usability folks) that we don't want a one-to-one mapping of cpufreq governors with cpu frequency policies. Instead, we decided to offer dynamic (basically what ondemand does), performance and powersave. I think adding "conservative" would be confusing to the user. Cheers, -- sebas ** Changed in: kde-guidance (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => sebas Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected -- kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109197 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is a bug contact for kde-guidance in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 109197] Re: kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor
** Attachment added: "[diff 2/2] add support for "conservative" cpufreq gouvernor to guidance-power-manager.py" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7390145/guidance-power-manager.diff -- kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109197 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 109197] Re: kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor
** Attachment added: "[diff 1/2] add support for "conservative" cpufreq gouvernor to powermanage.py" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7390138/powermanage.diff -- kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109197 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
