[Bug 1206824] Re: bogus network proxies might cause: Clearsigned file isn't valid, got 'NODATA' (does the network require authentication?)

2015-01-27 Thread Michiel Blokzijl
I just wanted to add a comment, for any others who come to this via
Google.

I also hit this exact same error, but it turned out not to be caused
directly by the network proxy. I had just run apt-add-repository, and
that had failed to import the GPG key:

root@buildhost:/home/mblokzij/ws-qvpc# add-apt-repository ppa:x2go/stable
 Quick howto to turn your machine into an X2Go server:
...
gpg: keyring `/tmp/tmpf3fzey4y/secring.gpg' created
gpg: keyring `/tmp/tmpf3fzey4y/pubring.gpg' created
gpg: requesting key 0A53F9FD from hkp server keyserver.ubuntu.com
gpgkeys: key A7D8D681B1C07FE41499323D7CDE3A860A53F9FD can't be retrieved
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
gpg: Total number processed: 0

Note the last line.

After manually importing the key, apt-get update ran fine. I used:

apt-key adv --recv-keys --keyserver keys.gnupg.net  0A53F9FD

I realise I used a different keyserver, but I copy/pasted the key id
from the logs above.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206824

Title:
  bogus network proxies might cause: Clearsigned file isn't valid, got
  'NODATA' (does the network require authentication?)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1206824/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1206824] Re: bogus network proxies might cause: Clearsigned file isn't valid, got 'NODATA' (does the network require authentication?)

2013-12-01 Thread jl451
can this message not stoped apt-get update ? I have many reps in
sources.list, not only http://archive.getdeb.net

Get:2 http://archive.getdeb.net oneiric-getdeb InRelease [4555 B]
Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net saucy InRelease
Splitting up 
/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.getdeb.net_ubuntu_dists_oneiric-getdeb_InRelease
 into data and signature failedIgn http://archive.getdeb.net oneiric-getdeb 
InRelease
E: GPG error: http://archive.getdeb.net oneiric-getdeb InRelease: Clearsigned 
file isn't valid, got 'NODATA' (does the network require authentication?)
Command exited with non-zero status 100

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206824

Title:
  bogus network proxies might cause: Clearsigned file isn't valid, got
  'NODATA' (does the network require authentication?)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1206824/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1206824] Re: bogus network proxies might cause: Clearsigned file isn't valid, got 'NODATA' (does the network require authentication?)

2013-08-01 Thread Brian Murray
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206824

Title:
  bogus network proxies might cause: Clearsigned file isn't valid, got
  'NODATA' (does the network require authentication?)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1206824/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1206824] Re: bogus network proxies might cause: Clearsigned file isn't valid, got 'NODATA' (does the network require authentication?)

2013-07-31 Thread David Kalnischkies
So, what do you suggest? The hint "does the network require
authentication?" is already a wild guess as this can happen for
temporary down servers (e.g. "Down for maintenance"), 'longtime down'
servers (e.g. domain grabber got the domain), the network you are on
requires you to authenticate (first time, again, after X minutes, for
specific domains), the network has a pre-processing proxy to reduce
traffic/enforce restrictions/parental control, the archive software
really produced invalid files or you are under attack …

The sentence is easily 400 characters long and hasn't mentioned a single
"solution" yet even though for all different things need (not) to be
done.

If anyone can provide a better hint than the current which will fit on
one line feel free tell us, but I don't expect that we can do anything
reasonable to detect which one of the various possible problems that
could be.

(It might first sound like we could detect "normal" vs. "restricted"
archives as it seems to happen here, but APT really has no idea what the
difference is, further more these could be on different mirrors, used
via a proxy… so while this is "easy" (really?) to detect for a human,
its close to impossible in code)

I have some hope for "511 Network Authentication Required" (
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6585#section-6 ), but I haven't seen it
implemented so far [APT has no specific support for it so far, but works
as intended by default as any client should do].

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206824

Title:
  bogus network proxies might cause: Clearsigned file isn't valid, got
  'NODATA' (does the network require authentication?)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1206824/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1206824] Re: bogus network proxies might cause: Clearsigned file isn't valid, got 'NODATA' (does the network require authentication?)

2013-07-31 Thread Steve Langasek
This hotel network is particularly special; even after you authenticate
to the web portal, it's blocking archive.canonical.com as "restricted"
content.  This contributes to the confusion, because most of the lists
get downloaded without fine, then there's this cryptic message.

FWIW the actual contents of the partial InRelease file in this case are
a one-line, malformed HTML file that does a meta refresh.

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206824

Title:
  bogus network proxies might cause: Clearsigned file isn't valid, got
  'NODATA' (does the network require authentication?)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1206824/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs