[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock

2012-02-24 Thread Przemysław Kulczycki
Flock has been discontinued after Flock Inc has been acquired by Zynga.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flock_%28web_browser%29

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933

Title:
  [needs-packaging] flock

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/124933/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock

2011-08-11 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: debian
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933

Title:
  [needs-packaging] flock

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/124933/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock

2009-04-09 Thread Ron Adams
Marcus from Flock dev reported a few interesting points that I think bear 
repeating here:
"'Sulfur' is not a code name, it is the the unbranded version you are looking 
for..

"I have expended effort in removing proprietary logos, images and text
from this unbranded build, but that task is not complete. I also watch
the commits to try to catch any hard-coding of the work "Flock" in new
code...

"Note that it is not only Flock IP that may turn up, it is also Mozilla
IP. Both need to be taken care of.

"While not related to branding, there is a second point worth
mentioning: Ubuntu would like to package Flock as XULRunner application,
to avoid repetitive inclusion of common code. Flock uses a modified
XULRunner code base, which makes circumventing that redundancy non-
trivial.

"Personally, I have always wanted to see a proper Ubuntu package for Flock; it's
just not that easy. I'm available and willing to help, but my primary
obligation is of course to do the things that Flock, the company, wants to see
move forward."

So it looks like what we need is:
1) An answer from MOTU on how they feel about divorcing flock-browser (let's be 
clear on referencing the package name henceforth "flock" is of course out of 
the question! ;) ) from XULRunner so that the customized XULRunner can coexist 
with the default library other XULRunner apps are using

2) Contributions to the Flock team by interested parties wanting to help
root the IP out of the "Sulfur" (i.e., non-branded) build

3) ???

4) Profit!

I'm guessing from what's been said here that MOTU will want to refer
this upstream, though I don't know how much interest there is at that
level. I'm interested, but am way behind on the packaging side of
things, and have a number of items on my plate as it is, so if anyone
out there is up for stepping up to this, that'd be swell.

-- 
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock

2009-04-09 Thread Ron Adams
Submitted to Flock, please vote up this feature request:
https://bugzilla.flock.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16384

** Bug watch added: bugzilla.flock.com/ #16384
   https://bugzilla.flock.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16384

-- 
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock

2009-04-03 Thread Ron Adams
Agreed with Alexander. I will refer this bug upstream to Flock, asking
them to consider a free branding edition (think IceWeasel).

-- 
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock

2008-11-22 Thread jacobroecker
I hope this is resolved!  I'd love to see flock on Ubuntu!

-- 
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock

2008-10-27 Thread Alexander Sack
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 01:39:36PM -, Przemysław Kulczycki wrote:
> They do. If you won't use the branding compile switch, Flock will
> compile as Sulphur (or other codename) just like Firefox will compile to
> Bon Echo, Grand Paradiso or whatever the current codename is.
> 

The problem with such codenames is that they are not static. So we
package "sulphur" now, we have to dump that package when flock
codename changes to "phospor" or something.

What upstreams should provide is a decent static free branding that
will be maintained over major versions.

 - Alexander

-- 
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock

2008-10-27 Thread Przemysław Kulczycki
They do. If you won't use the branding compile switch, Flock will
compile as Sulphur (or other codename) just like Firefox will compile to
Bon Echo, Grand Paradiso or whatever the current codename is.

-- 
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock

2008-10-27 Thread Alexander Sack
unlikely that anyone of the ubuntu-mozillateam will actively work on
this. flock developers could provide a free branding.

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix

-- 
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock

2008-10-24 Thread Fabien Tassin
I used to maintain a packaging branch for flock 2 and to provide preview
debs in my PPA but I stopped as there are legal issues not acceptable
for Ubuntu, issues that have apparently no chance to be solved.

I just linked the branch to this bug as a reference but I don't intend
to work on it again, unless of course the situation evolves.

I propose to tag this bug "won't fix".

-- 
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock

2008-09-05 Thread hggdh
Hi schnollk,

ubuntu-desktop does not deal with packaging requests. Only a MOTU would
be really able to answer, but I would guess it has not been worked on
because it has not, yet, been accepted on Debian.

** Changed in: ubuntu
 Assignee: Ubuntu Desktop (ubuntu-desktop) => (unassigned)

** Tags added: auto-search

-- 
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock

2008-07-10 Thread schnollk
here is a more direct link to the deb at getdeb than the category one by 
leoquant:
http://www.getdeb.net/app/Flock

-- 
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock

2008-07-10 Thread schnollk
assigning to team I think most appropriate from those I found in hope
for responce/comments

** Changed in: ubuntu
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop (ubuntu-desktop)

-- 
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock

2008-07-10 Thread schnollk
one year without any "official" comment on why flock hasn't been added
to offic. repos. yet nor why it shouldn't. To be honest I'm
disappointed. There are even people offering packaging help if mentored!

Can anyone with Ubuntu inside knowledge comment on this, please? I'd
like to know if there has been discussion and if so what Ubuntu users
ought to expect in the near future about how and when/why not flock will
be seen in Ubuntu's official repos.

Cheers.

-- 
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock

2008-05-30 Thread leoquant
: http://www.flock.com/node/62014  and the award for the best social
webbrowser.

-- 
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock

2008-05-27 Thread sewmyheadon
I'd also love to see Flock added to the repos and would be willing to
help with packaging if I could get some direction.

-- 
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock

2008-04-23 Thread Kristopher
+1 Vote

-- 
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock

2008-04-08 Thread leoquant
=Flock is a social web browser, a GPL fork of Firefox integrated with many 
social sites like Flickr, del.icio.us, etc. It also has tools for writing your 
blog.=
a perfect "open-id" webbrowser.

-- 
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock

2008-03-24 Thread Charles Brophy
Flock is now at version 1.1 and a really useful and handy web browser.
The get-deb version is brilliant but the icon used in the gnome menu is
incorrect. Any chance of this being added to the Ubuntu repos any time
soon?

-- 
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock

2007-11-29 Thread Brian Murray
** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock

2007-07-13 Thread leoquant
flock is packaged: getdeb: http://www.getdeb.net/category.php?id=7
but indeed not in the offic. repos.of ubuntu.

-- 
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock

2007-07-12 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: Debian
   Status: Unknown => New

-- 
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock

2007-07-10 Thread Przemysław Kulczycki
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #335459
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=335459

** Also affects: Debian via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=335459
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock

2007-07-10 Thread Przemysław Kulczycki
https://lists.flock.com/pipermail/flock-dev/2007-March/000967.html
This thread at Flock-dev mailing list might be useful for somene who will want 
to package Flock.

-- 
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock

2007-07-09 Thread Michael Bienia
** Changed in: Ubuntu
   Importance: Undecided => Wishlist

-- 
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock

2007-07-09 Thread Przemysław Kulczycki
** Tags added: needs-packaging

-- 
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs