[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock
Flock has been discontinued after Flock Inc has been acquired by Zynga. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flock_%28web_browser%29 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933 Title: [needs-packaging] flock To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/124933/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock
** Changed in: debian Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933 Title: [needs-packaging] flock To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/124933/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock
Marcus from Flock dev reported a few interesting points that I think bear repeating here: "'Sulfur' is not a code name, it is the the unbranded version you are looking for.. "I have expended effort in removing proprietary logos, images and text from this unbranded build, but that task is not complete. I also watch the commits to try to catch any hard-coding of the work "Flock" in new code... "Note that it is not only Flock IP that may turn up, it is also Mozilla IP. Both need to be taken care of. "While not related to branding, there is a second point worth mentioning: Ubuntu would like to package Flock as XULRunner application, to avoid repetitive inclusion of common code. Flock uses a modified XULRunner code base, which makes circumventing that redundancy non- trivial. "Personally, I have always wanted to see a proper Ubuntu package for Flock; it's just not that easy. I'm available and willing to help, but my primary obligation is of course to do the things that Flock, the company, wants to see move forward." So it looks like what we need is: 1) An answer from MOTU on how they feel about divorcing flock-browser (let's be clear on referencing the package name henceforth "flock" is of course out of the question! ;) ) from XULRunner so that the customized XULRunner can coexist with the default library other XULRunner apps are using 2) Contributions to the Flock team by interested parties wanting to help root the IP out of the "Sulfur" (i.e., non-branded) build 3) ??? 4) Profit! I'm guessing from what's been said here that MOTU will want to refer this upstream, though I don't know how much interest there is at that level. I'm interested, but am way behind on the packaging side of things, and have a number of items on my plate as it is, so if anyone out there is up for stepping up to this, that'd be swell. -- [needs-packaging] flock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock
Submitted to Flock, please vote up this feature request: https://bugzilla.flock.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16384 ** Bug watch added: bugzilla.flock.com/ #16384 https://bugzilla.flock.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16384 -- [needs-packaging] flock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock
Agreed with Alexander. I will refer this bug upstream to Flock, asking them to consider a free branding edition (think IceWeasel). -- [needs-packaging] flock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock
I hope this is resolved! I'd love to see flock on Ubuntu! -- [needs-packaging] flock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 01:39:36PM -, Przemysław Kulczycki wrote: > They do. If you won't use the branding compile switch, Flock will > compile as Sulphur (or other codename) just like Firefox will compile to > Bon Echo, Grand Paradiso or whatever the current codename is. > The problem with such codenames is that they are not static. So we package "sulphur" now, we have to dump that package when flock codename changes to "phospor" or something. What upstreams should provide is a decent static free branding that will be maintained over major versions. - Alexander -- [needs-packaging] flock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock
They do. If you won't use the branding compile switch, Flock will compile as Sulphur (or other codename) just like Firefox will compile to Bon Echo, Grand Paradiso or whatever the current codename is. -- [needs-packaging] flock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock
unlikely that anyone of the ubuntu-mozillateam will actively work on this. flock developers could provide a free branding. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- [needs-packaging] flock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock
I used to maintain a packaging branch for flock 2 and to provide preview debs in my PPA but I stopped as there are legal issues not acceptable for Ubuntu, issues that have apparently no chance to be solved. I just linked the branch to this bug as a reference but I don't intend to work on it again, unless of course the situation evolves. I propose to tag this bug "won't fix". -- [needs-packaging] flock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock
Hi schnollk, ubuntu-desktop does not deal with packaging requests. Only a MOTU would be really able to answer, but I would guess it has not been worked on because it has not, yet, been accepted on Debian. ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: Ubuntu Desktop (ubuntu-desktop) => (unassigned) ** Tags added: auto-search -- [needs-packaging] flock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock
here is a more direct link to the deb at getdeb than the category one by leoquant: http://www.getdeb.net/app/Flock -- [needs-packaging] flock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock
assigning to team I think most appropriate from those I found in hope for responce/comments ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop (ubuntu-desktop) -- [needs-packaging] flock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock
one year without any "official" comment on why flock hasn't been added to offic. repos. yet nor why it shouldn't. To be honest I'm disappointed. There are even people offering packaging help if mentored! Can anyone with Ubuntu inside knowledge comment on this, please? I'd like to know if there has been discussion and if so what Ubuntu users ought to expect in the near future about how and when/why not flock will be seen in Ubuntu's official repos. Cheers. -- [needs-packaging] flock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock
: http://www.flock.com/node/62014 and the award for the best social webbrowser. -- [needs-packaging] flock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock
I'd also love to see Flock added to the repos and would be willing to help with packaging if I could get some direction. -- [needs-packaging] flock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock
+1 Vote -- [needs-packaging] flock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock
=Flock is a social web browser, a GPL fork of Firefox integrated with many social sites like Flickr, del.icio.us, etc. It also has tools for writing your blog.= a perfect "open-id" webbrowser. -- [needs-packaging] flock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock
Flock is now at version 1.1 and a really useful and handy web browser. The get-deb version is brilliant but the icon used in the gnome menu is incorrect. Any chance of this being added to the Ubuntu repos any time soon? -- [needs-packaging] flock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Confirmed -- [needs-packaging] flock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock
flock is packaged: getdeb: http://www.getdeb.net/category.php?id=7 but indeed not in the offic. repos.of ubuntu. -- [needs-packaging] flock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock
** Changed in: Debian Status: Unknown => New -- [needs-packaging] flock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #335459 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=335459 ** Also affects: Debian via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=335459 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- [needs-packaging] flock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock
https://lists.flock.com/pipermail/flock-dev/2007-March/000967.html This thread at Flock-dev mailing list might be useful for somene who will want to package Flock. -- [needs-packaging] flock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock
** Changed in: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- [needs-packaging] flock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124933] Re: [needs-packaging] flock
** Tags added: needs-packaging -- [needs-packaging] flock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs