[Bug 1269197] Re: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons
Many thanks Thomas, this looks fine! I'll do a test-build and sponsor with a fixed version number (ubuntu1, not ubuntu0.1). ** Changed in: wireshark (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1269197 Title: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wireshark/+bug/1269197/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1269197] Re: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons
** Changed in: wireshark (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1269197 Title: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wireshark/+bug/1269197/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1269197] Re: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons
I am aware Upstream has this fixed, but unless 1.10.6 is in Debian before February 20, it'll not make it in here. It will make it here, we usually monitor and sync bug fixes from Debian during most of the development cycle. Fixing Ubuntu-specific FTBFS bugs directly is also fine, of course (Debian sid doesn't have Gtk 3.10 yet). ** Bug watch added: Wireshark Bugzilla #9340 http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9340 ** Also affects: wireshark via http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9340 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1269197 Title: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/wireshark/+bug/1269197/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1269197] Re: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons
This bug was fixed in the package wireshark - 1.10.5-1ubuntu1 --- wireshark (1.10.5-1ubuntu1) trusty; urgency=low * Include new patches to fix FTBFS issues: (LP: #1269197) + debian/patches/allow-deprecated-gtk-functions.patch: - Incorporate upstream changes to fix the FTBFS caused by functions deprecated in GTK 3.10 and newer. + debian/patches/fix-g_memmove-ftbfs-issues.patch: - Replace instances of C99 `g_memmove()` with C90 `memmove()` to fix additional FTBFS issues. * Update maintainer field. -- Thomas Ward tew...@ubuntu.com Tue, 14 Jan 2014 19:15:46 -0500 ** Changed in: wireshark (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1269197 Title: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/wireshark/+bug/1269197/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1269197] Re: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons
@Thomas: Thank you for the patch. I have just uploaded wireshark 1.10.5-2 incorporating it to unstable. While GTK+3.10 in not in unstable, it is in experimental and fixing FTBFS with it in other packages is definitely something to be fixed in unstable even before upstreams take action. In similar cases feel free to contact me/BTS to have the fix applied in Debian, too. I noticed this bug a few hours later than it got fixed. Evan was right, giving some more time (maybe a full day ;-)) to me to notice the bug and fix it in Debian would have allowed Ubuntu to simply sync the new package. Thank you again for the patch and the test builds anyway. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1269197 Title: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/wireshark/+bug/1269197/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1269197] Re: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons
I am setting a High importance on it according to the wiki documentation of Bug Importance (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance). This is because the FTBFS prevents the software version from building and working. ** Summary changed: - Wireshark FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons + Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons ** Tags added: ftbfs ** Changed in: wireshark (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1269197 Title: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wireshark/+bug/1269197/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1269197] Re: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons
Hi, thanks for the detailed report. Just so you're aware, I have added the appropriate upstream fixes to Wireshark's stable backport list, so Wireshark 1.10.6 (whenever it is released) should compile correctly without any patches. Unfortunately Wireshark doesn't have an Ubuntu-specific maintainer at this point, so I would suggest that you forward this report to Debian. Cheers, Evan -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1269197 Title: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wireshark/+bug/1269197/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1269197] Re: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons
Evan: I am aware Upstream has this fixed, but unless 1.10.6 is in Debian before February 20, it'll not make it in here, so in the off chance that 1.10.6 isn't an option, this patch should fix the FTBFS in trusty- proposed. (I'm also aware that upstream has this fix because that's where I looked first for this bugfix :P) I am also aware that there is no Ubuntu maintainer for wireshark, like many other packages in Ubuntu universe. That's why the Ubuntu Sponsors Team is subscribed to this, so they can poke the patch into trusty- proposed to fix the FTBFS there. That does not require any official Ubuntu maintainer for the package either. I have many examples of this, as well, with the uploads I've had sponsored for nginx and znc, which also have no Ubuntu maintainer. I may consider forwarding this to Debian, but the question I have first is, does this FTBFS in Debian? If it does, I'll forward this information to Debian along with the patch I authored, if it does not, then I don't have to bother Debian unnecessarily. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1269197 Title: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wireshark/+bug/1269197/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1269197] Re: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons
I made a mistake in the initial debdiff. I've attached one that includes this bug number so it gets autoclosed if/when the debdiff is included. ** Patch removed: Debdiff to fix the FTBFS https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wireshark/+bug/1269197/+attachment/3948853/+files/wireshark_1.10.5-1_ftbfs_fix_trusty-proposed.debdiff ** Patch added: Debdiff to fix the FTBFS (includes bug number reference to here) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wireshark/+bug/1269197/+attachment/3948988/+files/wireshark_1.10.5-1_ftbfs_fix_trusty-proposed.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1269197 Title: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wireshark/+bug/1269197/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1269197] Re: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons
Sorry, missed the ubuntu-sponsors subscription. Debian is currently building with GTK 3.8, so it works for them (for now). I don't know when they plan to migrate to 3.10, but it's been out since September so I expect they'll move soonish. I believe Balint (debian maintainer) monitors ubuntu bugs as well, so you might not have to do anything at all. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1269197 Title: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wireshark/+bug/1269197/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
