[Bug 132002] Re: libportaudio packaging very confusing
As suggested in #3 above, this solution may work: The clean solution to this issue is to install libjack-jackd2-dev *before* installing portaudio19-dev. I have a note on this, available on request. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132002 Title: libportaudio packaging very confusing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/portaudio19/+bug/132002/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132002] Re: libportaudio packaging very confusing
Looks like this is still unresolved. I have OBS Studio installed, and apt suggests removing it (and a lot of other stuff) for being able to install pyaudio/portaudio19-dev. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132002 Title: libportaudio packaging very confusing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/portaudio19/+bug/132002/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132002] Re: libportaudio packaging very confusing
** Changed in: portaudio19 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Opinion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132002 Title: libportaudio packaging very confusing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/portaudio19/+bug/132002/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 132002] Re: libportaudio packaging very confusing
I believe Debian has done it this way, because of the way extra symbols are checked for as a part of jack. libjack0 has the API that all apps should be able to use, and if apps want any additiona featrues from jack2, they check for the various symbols. So going from the Debian pkg-multimedia discussion I read a few months back, this is in fact by design. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132002 Title: libportaudio packaging very confusing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/portaudio19/+bug/132002/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132002] Re: libportaudio packaging very confusing
We should check if the build-dep for libjack-dev should be "upgraded" to libjack-jackd2-dev. Has anyone done this in a pbuilder/schroot? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132002 Title: libportaudio packaging very confusing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/portaudio19/+bug/132002/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132002] Re: libportaudio packaging very confusing
portaudio19-dev depends on libjack-dev which indirectly suggest installation of jackd1. By installing libkjack-jackd2-dev before installing portaudio19-dev this dependency will already be met, and you can install it without having to downgrade jackd. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132002 Title: libportaudio packaging very confusing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/portaudio19/+bug/132002/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132002] Re: libportaudio packaging very confusing
I have a problem related to this I believe. I wish to compile a program using portaudio19, but if I install libportaudio19-dev, it requires me to remove jack and jack2 and those development files, and I want to keep those. Right now there is a package libportaudio2 that seems to be the shared libraries for v19 (and maybe it should be called that as well), and it coexists with v18 just fine, but as soon as I try to install the -dev files it wants to remove jack, etc. Why does non -dev code get removed when I install a -dev package? What is going on? Is there a way around this other than building from source the v19 portaudio project into /usr/local/ and if I do that, are there likely to be side effects? Rob -- libportaudio packaging very confusing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132002 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132002] Re: libportaudio packaging very confusing
Totally agree. At the very least, portaudio19-dev and libportaudio-dev should conflict with each other - since the last one installed will overwrite portaudio.h with their own version. -- libportaudio packaging very confusing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132002 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132002] Re: libportaudio packaging very confusing
** Changed in: portaudio19 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- libportaudio packaging very confusing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132002 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
