[Bug 1563089] Re: Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

2016-07-05 Thread Martin Pitt
The wily update was not verified in half a year, and wily is almost EOL.
So I removed the -proposed package.

** Changed in: corosync (Ubuntu Wily)
   Status: Fix Committed => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563089

Title:
  Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/corosync/+bug/1563089/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1563089] Re: Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

2016-04-13 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package corosync - 2.3.3-1ubuntu3

---
corosync (2.3.3-1ubuntu3) trusty; urgency=medium

  * debian/patches/Totempg-Fix-memory-leak.patch: Fixes memory leak on
Totempg. (LP: #1563089).

 -- Jorge Niedbalski   Tue, 05 Apr 2016
10:01:37 +0200

** Changed in: corosync (Ubuntu Trusty)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563089

Title:
  Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/corosync/+bug/1563089/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1563089] Re: Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

2016-04-06 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
Based on my latest comment, I am marking the Trusty version as
verification-done-trusty

** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done-trusty verification-needed-wily

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563089

Title:
  Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/corosync/+bug/1563089/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1563089] Re: Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

2016-04-06 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
Hello,

I ran the verification for the Trusty version.

root@juju-niedbalski-sec-machine-15:/home/ubuntu# dpkg -l|grep corosync
ii  corosync 2.3.3-1ubuntu3
amd64Standards-based cluster framework (daemon and modules)
ii  libcorosync-common4  2.3.3-1ubuntu3
amd64Standards-based cluster framework, common library

I configured a 3 nodes nova-cloud-controller environment related with
hacluster.

ubuntu@niedbalski-sec-bastion:~/openstack-charm-testing/bundles/dev$ juju run 
--service nova-cloud-controller "sudo corosync-quorumtool -s|grep votes"
- MachineId: "15"
  Stdout: |
Expected votes:   3
Total votes:  3
  UnitId: nova-cloud-controller/0
- MachineId: "28"
  Stdout: |
Expected votes:   3
Total votes:  3
  UnitId: nova-cloud-controller/1
- MachineId: "29"
  Stdout: |
Expected votes:   3
Total votes:  3
  UnitId: nova-cloud-controller/2

I changed the transport mode to UDP by setting:

$ juju set hacluster-ncc corosync_transport=udpu

After this, I moved to the primary node (the one that holds the virtual ip 
address) and I applied the TC
rules, while monitoring the memory usage of the corosync process (multiple 
times)

root@juju-niedbalski-sec-machine-15:/home/ubuntu# tc qdisc add dev eth0 root 
netem delay 550ms
root@juju-niedbalski-sec-machine-15:/home/ubuntu# tc qdisc del dev eth0 root 
netem

Apr  6 17:57:37 juju-niedbalski-sec-machine-15 cib[14387]:  warning: 
cib_process_request: Completed cib_apply_diff operation for section 'all': 
Application of an update diff failed (rc=-206, origin=local/cibadmin/2, 
version=0.27.1)
Apr  6 18:04:12 juju-niedbalski-sec-machine-15 corosync[14376]:  [MAIN  ] 
Completed service synchronization, ready to provide service.
Apr  6 18:04:13 juju-niedbalski-sec-machine-15 corosync[18645]:  [MAIN  ] 
Completed service synchronization, ready to provide service.
Apr  6 18:06:27 juju-niedbalski-sec-machine-15 corosync[18645]:  [MAIN  ] 
Completed service synchronization, ready to provide service.
Apr  6 18:06:28 juju-niedbalski-sec-machine-15 corosync[19528]:  [MAIN  ] 
Completed service synchronization, ready to provide service.
Apr  6 18:07:48 juju-niedbalski-sec-machine-15 corosync[19985]:  [MAIN  ] 
Completed service synchronization, ready to provide service.
Apr  6 18:07:49 juju-niedbalski-sec-machine-15 corosync[19985]:  [MAIN  ] 
Completed service synchronization, ready to provide service.
Apr  6 18:08:16 juju-niedbalski-sec-machine-15 corosync[19985]:  [MAIN  ] 
Completed service synchronization, ready to provide service.
Apr  6 18:08:59 juju-niedbalski-sec-machine-15 corosync[19985]:  [MAIN  ] 
Completed service synchronization, ready to provide service.
Apr  6 18:09:38 juju-niedbalski-sec-machine-15 corosync[19985]:  [MAIN  ] 
Completed service synchronization, ready to provide 
service.

After 5 minutes of observation on the corosync process by using:

 $ sudo while true; do ps -o vsz,rss -p $(pgrep corosync) 2>&1 | grep -E
'.*[0-9]+.*' | tee -a memory-usage.log && sleep 1; done

I don't see any substantial memory usage increase.

root@juju-niedbalski-sec-machine-15:/home/ubuntu# more memory-usage.log 
135584  3928
135584  3928
135584  3928
135584  3928
135584  3928
135584  3928
135584  3928
135584  3928
135584  3928
135584  3928
135584  3928
135584  3928
135584  3928
135584  3928
135584  3928
135584  3928
135584  3928
135584  3928
135584  3928
135584  3928

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563089

Title:
  Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/corosync/+bug/1563089/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1563089] Re: Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

2016-04-06 Thread Chris J Arges
Hello Jorge, or anyone else affected,

Accepted corosync into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/corosync/2.3.3-1ubuntu3 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this update
out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the
bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to
verification-failed.  In either case, details of your testing will help
us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: corosync (Ubuntu Trusty)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

** Changed in: corosync (Ubuntu Wily)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563089

Title:
  Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/corosync/+bug/1563089/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1563089] Re: Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

2016-04-05 Thread Louis Bouchard
Fix accepted to the development release.

Fix sponsored for Trusty and wily; unsubscribing the Ubuntu-sponsor team

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563089

Title:
  Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/corosync/+bug/1563089/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1563089] Re: Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

2016-04-04 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package corosync - 2.3.5-3ubuntu1

---
corosync (2.3.5-3ubuntu1) xenial; urgency=high

  * debian/patches/Totempg-Fix-memory-leak.patch: Fixes memory leak on
Totempg. (LP: #1563089).

 -- Jorge Niedbalski   Fri, 01 Apr 2016
15:52:13 +0200

** Changed in: corosync (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563089

Title:
  Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/corosync/+bug/1563089/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1563089] Re: Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

2016-04-01 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Patch added: "Trusty Patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/corosync/+bug/1563089/+attachment/4619423/+files/fix-lp-1563089-trusty.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563089

Title:
  Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/corosync/+bug/1563089/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1563089] Re: Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

2016-04-01 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Patch added: "Wily Pathc"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/corosync/+bug/1563089/+attachment/4619421/+files/fix-lp-1563089-wily.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563089

Title:
  Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/corosync/+bug/1563089/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1563089] Re: Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

2016-03-31 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Patch removed: "Xenial Patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/corosync/+bug/1563089/+attachment/4617458/+files/fix-lp-1563089-xenial.debdiff

** Patch added: "Xenial Patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/corosync/+bug/1563089/+attachment/4618461/+files/fix-lp-1563089-xenial.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563089

Title:
  Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/corosync/+bug/1563089/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1563089] Re: Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

2016-03-30 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
The attachment "Xenial Patch" seems to be a debdiff.  The ubuntu-
sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can
review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff.  If the attachment isn't a
patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the
"patch" tag, and if you are member of the ~ubuntu-sponsors, unsubscribe
the team.

[This is an automated message performed by a Launchpad user owned by
~brian-murray, for any issue please contact him.]

** Tags added: patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563089

Title:
  Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/corosync/+bug/1563089/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1563089] Re: Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

2016-03-30 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Patch added: "Xenial Patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/corosync/+bug/1563089/+attachment/4617458/+files/fix-lp-1563089-xenial.debdiff

** Changed in: corosync (Ubuntu Wily)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: corosync (Ubuntu Wily)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: corosync (Ubuntu Wily)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Jorge Niedbalski (niedbalski)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563089

Title:
  Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/corosync/+bug/1563089/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1563089] Re: Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

2016-03-30 Thread Chris J Arges
** Also affects: corosync (Ubuntu Wily)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563089

Title:
  Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/corosync/+bug/1563089/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1563089] Re: Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

2016-03-30 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Changed in: corosync (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: corosync (Ubuntu Trusty)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: corosync (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: corosync (Ubuntu Trusty)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: corosync (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Jorge Niedbalski (niedbalski)

** Changed in: corosync (Ubuntu Trusty)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Jorge Niedbalski (niedbalski)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563089

Title:
  Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/corosync/+bug/1563089/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1563089] Re: Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

2016-03-30 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Description changed:

  [Environment]
  
  Trusty 14.04.3
  
  Packages:
  
  ii  corosync 2.3.3-1ubuntu1
amd64Standards-based cluster framework (daemon and modules)
  ii  libcorosync-common4  2.3.3-1ubuntu1
amd64Standards-based cluster framework, common library
  
  [Reproducer]
- 
  
  1) I deployed an HA environment using this bundle 
(http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ost-maintainers/openstack-charm-testing/trunk/view/head:/bundles/dev/next-ha.yaml)
  with a 3 nodes installation of cinder related to an HACluster subordinate 
unit.
  
  $ juju-deployer -c next-ha.yaml -w 600 trusty-kilo
  
  2) I changed the default corosync transport mode to unicast.
  
  $ juju set cinder-hacluster corosync_transport=udpu
  
  3) I assured that the 3 units were quorated
  
- cinder/0# corosync-quorumtool 
+ cinder/0# corosync-quorumtool
  Votequorum information
  --
  Expected votes:   3
  Highest expected: 3
  Total votes:  3
- Quorum:   2  
- Flags:Quorate 
+ Quorum:   2
+ Flags:Quorate
  
  Membership information
  --
- Nodeid  Votes Name
-   1002  1 10.5.1.57 (local)
-   1001  1 10.5.1.58
-   1000  1 10.5.1.59
+ Nodeid  Votes Name
+   1002  1 10.5.1.57 (local)
+   1001  1 10.5.1.58
+   1000  1 10.5.1.59
  
  The primary unit was holding the VIP resource 10.5.105.1/16
  
- root@juju-niedbalski-sec-machine-4:/home/ubuntu# ip addr 
+ root@juju-niedbalski-sec-machine-4:/home/ubuntu# ip addr
  2: eth0:  mtu 1500 qdisc netem state UP 
group default qlen 1000
- link/ether fa:16:3e:d2:19:6f brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
- inet 10.5.1.57/16 brd 10.5.255.255 scope global eth0
-valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
- inet 10.5.105.1/16 brd 10.5.255.255 scope global secondary eth0
-valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
+ link/ether fa:16:3e:d2:19:6f brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
+ inet 10.5.1.57/16 brd 10.5.255.255 scope global eth0
+    valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
+ inet 10.5.105.1/16 brd 10.5.255.255 scope global secondary eth0
+    valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
  
  4) I manually added a TC queue for the eth0 interface on the node
  holding the VIP resource, introducing a 350 ms delay.
  
  $ sudo tc qdisc add dev eth0 root netem delay 350ms
  
- 5) Right after adding the 350ms on the cinder/0 unit, the corosync process 
informs that one of the processors failed, and is forming a new 
+ 5) Right after adding the 350ms on the cinder/0 unit, the corosync process 
informs that one of the processors failed, and is forming a new
  cluster configuration.
-  
+ 
  Mar 28 21:57:41 juju-niedbalski-sec-machine-5 corosync[4584]:  [TOTEM ] A 
processor failed, forming new configuration.
  Mar 28 22:00:48 juju-niedbalski-sec-machine-5 corosync[4584]:  [TOTEM ] A new 
membership (10.5.1.57:11628) was formed. Members
  Mar 28 22:00:48 juju-niedbalski-sec-machine-5 corosync[4584]:  [QUORUM] 
Members[3]: 1002 1001 1000
  Mar 28 22:00:48 juju-niedbalski-sec-machine-5 corosync[4584]:  [MAIN  ] 
Completed service synchronization, ready to provide service.
  
  This happens on all of the units.
  
  6) After receiving this message, I remove the queue from eth0:
  
  $ sudo tc qdisk del dev eth0 root netem
  
  Then, the following statement is written in the master node:
  
  Mar 28 22:00:48 juju-niedbalski-sec-machine-4 corosync[9630]:  [TOTEM ] A new 
membership (10.5.1.57:11628) was formed. Members
  Mar 28 22:00:48 juju-niedbalski-sec-machine-4 corosync[9630]:  [QUORUM] 
Members[3]: 1002 1001 1000
  Mar 28 22:00:48 juju-niedbalski-sec-machine-4 corosync[9630]:  [MAIN  ] 
Completed service synchronization, ready to provide service.
  
- 
- 7) While executing 5 and 6 repeatedly, I ran the following command to track 
the SZ and RSS memory usage of the
+ 7) While executing 5 and 6 repeatedly, I ran the following command to track 
the VSZ and RSS memory usage of the
  corosync process:
  
  root@juju-niedbalski-sec-machine-4:/home/ubuntu# tc qdisc add dev eth0 root 
netem delay 350ms
  root@juju-niedbalski-sec-machine-4:/home/ubuntu# tc qdisc del dev eth0 root 
netem
  
- $ sudo while true; do ps -o sz,rss -p $(pgrep corosync) 2>&1 | grep -E
+ $ sudo while true; do ps -o vsz,rss -p $(pgrep corosync) 2>&1 | grep -E
  '.*[0-9]+.*' | tee -a memory-usage.log && sleep 1; done
  
- The results shows that both sz and rss are increased over time at a high
- ratio.
+ The results shows that both vsz and rss are increased over time at a
+ high ratio.
  
  25476 4036
  
  ... (after 5 minutes).
  
  135644 10352
  
  [Fix]
  
- So preliminary based on this reproducer, I think that this commit 
(https://github.com/corosync/corosync/commit/600fb4084adcbfe7678b44a83fa8f3d3550f48b9)
 
+ So preliminary based on this reproducer, I think that

[Bug 1563089] Re: Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

2016-03-29 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Summary changed:

- Memory Leak when new configuration is formed.
+ Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

** Tags added: sts-needs-review

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563089

Title:
  Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/corosync/+bug/1563089/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1563089] Re: Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

2016-03-29 Thread Louis Bouchard
** Also affects: corosync (Ubuntu Trusty)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563089

Title:
  Memory Leak when new cluster configuration is formed.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/corosync/+bug/1563089/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs