[Bug 1634236] Re: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634236 Title: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1634236/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1634236] Re: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak
This bug was fixed in the package snapd - 2.16+16.10ubuntu1.2 --- snapd (2.16+16.10ubuntu1.2) yakkety; urgency=medium * debian/control: - also add a dependency to "snap-confine" to unbreak armhf (LP: #1634236) -- Michael Vogt Tue, 18 Oct 2016 20:29:56 +0200 ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu Yakkety) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634236 Title: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1634236/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1634236] Re: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak
This bug was fixed in the package snapd - 2.16ubuntu3 --- snapd (2.16ubuntu3) xenial; urgency=medium * debian/control: - also add a dependency to "snap-confine" to unbreak armhf (LP: #1634236) snapd (2.16ubuntu2) xenial; urgency=medium * fix FTBFS on powerpc by ensuring that share/ is available in the source tree snapd (2.16ubuntu1) xenial; urgency=medium * debian/control: - fix version dependency of ubuntu-core-launcher to unbreak armhf (LP: #1634236) -- Michael Vogt Tue, 18 Oct 2016 20:27:50 +0200 ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634236 Title: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1634236/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1634236] Re: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak
Verified pass, the new snapd (2.16ubuntu3) depends on the right version of snap-confine (>= 1.0.43). Thanks ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634236 Title: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1634236/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1634236] Re: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak
Hello Michael, The new snapd in proposed updates the dependency of ubuntu-core-launcher, but not snap-confine, I just upgraded snapd, but the snap-confine is still the old version (1.0.38-0ubuntu0.16.04.4), only ubuntu-core-launcher is upgraded to the latest one (1.0.43-0ubuntu1~16.04.1), could you please help to check the dependency? thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634236 Title: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1634236/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1634236] Re: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak
Hello Michael, or anyone else affected, Accepted snapd into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/2.16ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance! ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634236 Title: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1634236/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1634236] Re: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak
Hello Michael, or anyone else affected, Accepted snapd into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/2.16+16.10ubuntu1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance! ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu Yakkety) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634236 Title: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1634236/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1634236] Re: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634236 Title: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1634236/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1634236] Re: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634236 Title: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1634236/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1634236] Re: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak
can you provide an ETA for when this will be pushed as a proposed SRU? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634236 Title: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1634236/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1634236] Re: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak
** Description changed: Trivial SRU of snapd that adds a missing versioned dependency for snap- confine to snapd. + + It turns out there is a regression because of this if: + - you use an armhf architecture + - snapd 2.16 + - snap-confine < 1.0.43 + + The reason is that with snapd 2.16 we use the "snap run" to start applications. This is a command written in go. On armhf the auxv vector content is critical for successfully running go commands. + But apparmor cleans that by default because it might be dangerous. + On snap-confine 1.0.43 we added an apparmor rule to relax this. ** Description changed: Trivial SRU of snapd that adds a missing versioned dependency for snap- confine to snapd. It turns out there is a regression because of this if: - you use an armhf architecture - snapd 2.16 - snap-confine < 1.0.43 The reason is that with snapd 2.16 we use the "snap run" to start applications. This is a command written in go. On armhf the auxv vector content is critical for successfully running go commands. But apparmor cleans that by default because it might be dangerous. On snap-confine 1.0.43 we added an apparmor rule to relax this. + + TEST CASE: + - install snapd 2.16 on an armhf/classic system (e.g. pi2) + - make sure you have snap-confine from xenial (not from xenial-updates): 1.0.38 + - snap install hello + - run "hello" and verify it does not run + - install snap-confine from xenial-updates (1.0.43) + - verify that "hello" does run now -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634236 Title: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1634236/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1634236] Re: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak
** Summary changed: - [SRU] 2.16.1 + [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634236 Title: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1634236/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs