[Bug 184216] Re: FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test

2010-11-24 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: linux (Debian)
   Status: New = Fix Released

-- 
FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 184216] Re: FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test

2009-07-02 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/karmic/palo

-- 
FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 184216] Re: FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test

2009-06-10 Thread Bryan Wu
This bug report is being closed because we received no response to the
previous inquiry for information. Please reopen if this is still an
issue in the current Ubuntu release, Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 -
http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download.  If the issue remains in
Jaunty, please test the latest upstream kernel build -
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds .  To reopen the bug, click
on the current status under the Status column and change the status back
to New.  Thanks.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged = Won't Fix

-- 
FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 184216] Re: FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test

2009-06-10 Thread Steve Langasek
I've checked linux/elf.h on karmic, and it appears that it no longer
includes any references to loff_t; so marking this bug as fixed.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged = Fix Released

-- 
FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 184216] Re: FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test

2009-06-10 Thread Steve Langasek
That's inappropriate.  All the information required to fix this bug is
already here in the report.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Won't Fix = Triaged

-- 
FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 184216] Re: FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test

2008-10-08 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: palo (Debian)
   Status: New = Fix Released

-- 
FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 184216] Re: FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test

2008-08-28 Thread Leann Ogasawara
The Ubuntu Kernel Team is planning to move to the 2.6.27 kernel for the
upcoming Intrepid Ibex 8.10 release.  As a result, the kernel team would
appreciate it if you could please test this newer 2.6.27 Ubuntu kernel.
There are one of two ways you should be able to test:

1)  If you are comfortable installing packages on your own, the linux-
image-2.6.27-* package is currently available for you to install and
test.

--or--

2)  The upcoming Alpha5 for Intrepid Ibex 8.10 will contain this newer
2.6.27 Ubuntu kernel.  Alpha5 is set to be released Thursday Sept 4.
Please watch http://www.ubuntu.com/testing for Alpha5 to be announced.
You should then be able to test via a LiveCD.

Please let us know immediately if this newer 2.6.27 kernel resolves the
bug reported here or if the issue remains.  More importantly, please
open a new bug report for each new bug/regression introduced by the
2.6.27 kernel and tag the bug report with 'linux-2.6.27'.  Also, please
specifically note if the issue does or does not appear in the 2.6.26
kernel.  Thanks again, we really appreicate your help and feedback.

** Tags added: cft-2.6.27

-- 
FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 184216] Re: FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test

2008-04-29 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: linux (Debian)
   Status: Unknown = New

-- 
FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 184216] Re: FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test

2008-04-02 Thread Colin Watson
Steve, since you have a workaround, could you upload that?

** Changed in: palo (Ubuntu Hardy)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Steve Langasek (vorlon)

-- 
FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 184216] Re: FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test

2008-04-02 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package palo - 1.16ubuntu1

---
palo (1.16ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low

  * Include sys/types.h before linux/elf.h, to work around type
issues in linux-libc-dev.  LP: #184216.
  * Modify Maintainer value to match the DebianMaintainerField
specification.

 -- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Wed, 02 Apr 2008
08:24:17 +

** Changed in: palo (Ubuntu Hardy)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 184216] Re: FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test

2008-04-02 Thread Steve Langasek
Preparing an upload of palo with the workaround.  BTW, elf.h is not a
usable substitute for linux/elf.h, because:

gcc -g -O -I../include -I../lib   -c -o elf64.o ../lib/elf64.c
../lib/elf64.c: In function 'prepare_ELF64_loadable':
../lib/elf64.c:51: error: storage size of 'eh' isn't known
../lib/elf64.c:81: error: storage size of 'ep' isn't known
make[2]: *** [elf64.o] Error 1

It's still not correct for linux/elf.h to use loff_t. Well, for all I
imagine any consumers of the published header are concerned,
elf_coredump_extra_notes_*() may not need to be defined at all, so
/that/ may be the real bug - but in any case there's no reason that all
of a sudden users of linux/elf.h should have to pre-include sys/types.h,
linux-libc-dev headers really oughtn't depend on type definitions from
glibc...

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #467226
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=467226

** Also affects: linux (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=467226
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 184216] Re: FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test

2008-03-11 Thread Ben Collins
Actually, the bug here may just be that elf64.c needs to include elf.h
and not linux/elf.h

-- 
FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 184216] Re: FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test

2008-03-11 Thread Stefan Bader
Since this has a work around for palo and whether and which change could
be made for the kernel is rather open, I mark this won't fix for Hardy.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Hardy)
   Status: Triaged = Won't Fix

-- 
FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 184216] Re: FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test

2008-03-10 Thread Ben Collins
I think this needs to be checked further. It may be perfectly acceptable
for linux/elf.h to use loff_t. It is also strictly correct that
sys/types.h is needed when loff_t is needed to be defined. So the bug
may just be that linux/elf.h needs to include sys/types.h when
__KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES is defined. I believe this define is set when
-ansi is used.

-- 
FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 184216] Re: FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test

2008-03-07 Thread Steve Langasek
I think this is a bug in linux-libc-dev, not in palo.  The linux-libc-
dev -provided /usr/include/linux/elf.h declares functions that take an
loff_t * as an argument, and loff_t is defined in
/usr/include/linux/types.h *only* when __KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES is
undefined.  But __KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES must be defined for palo to avoid
conflicts with other userspace type definitions.  linux/elf.h should be
usable even when __KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES is set; loff_t should be replaced
with __kernel_loff_t in this header.

As a workaround for palo though, palo can include the userspace
sys/types.h before linux/elf.h.

** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Hardy)
   Importance: Undecided = High
   Status: New = Confirmed

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #464262
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464262

** Also affects: palo (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464262
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 184216] Re: FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test

2008-03-04 Thread Leann Ogasawara
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Hardy)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Kernel Team (ubuntu-kernel-team)
   Status: Confirmed = Triaged

-- 
FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 184216] Re: FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test

2008-02-24 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: palo (Debian)
   Status: Unknown = New

-- 
FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 184216] Re: FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test

2008-01-18 Thread Marco Rodrigues
** Tags added: ftbfs

-- 
FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 184216] Re: FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test

2008-01-18 Thread Caroline Ford
new -confirmed

** Changed in: palo (Ubuntu Hardy)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 184216] Re: FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test

2008-01-18 Thread Caroline Ford
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-autotest/2007-December/34.html
Automatic build of palo_1.16build1 on terranova by sbuild/i386 1.170.5

cd palo  make
make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/palo-1.16build1/palo'
gcc -g -O -I../include -I../lib   -c -o diskpart.o ../lib/diskpart.c
gcc -g -O -I../include -I../lib   -c -o elf64.o ../lib/elf64.c
In file included from ../lib/elf64.c:20:
/usr/include/linux/elf.h:396: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' 
before 'loff_t'
make[2]: *** [elf64.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/palo-1.16build1/palo'
make[1]: *** [makepalo] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/palo-1.16build1'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2

-- 
FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 184216] Re: FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test

2008-01-18 Thread Caroline Ford
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-autotest/2007-December/30.html
Automatic build of palo_1.16build1 on king by sbuild/amd64 1.170.5

cd palo  make
make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/palo-1.16build1/palo'
gcc -g -O -I../include -I../lib   -c -o diskpart.o ../lib/diskpart.c
gcc -g -O -I../include -I../lib   -c -o elf64.o ../lib/elf64.c
In file included from ../lib/elf64.c:20:
/usr/include/linux/elf.h:396: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' 
before 'loff_t'
make[2]: *** [elf64.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/palo-1.16build1/palo'
make[1]: *** [makepalo] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/palo-1.16build1'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2

-- 
FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs