[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
sponsors ACK for the sync. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Please sync libgdamm3.0 3.0.0-2 from Debian unstable. The 3.0.0 release
is considered a stable release and would be a good addition to hardy.
After the binary package name change that took place in
libgdamm3.0_2.9.82-0ubuntu1, the names of the ubuntu and debian packages
are the same.
The motu-release team has already approved the freeze exception for this
sync (see above).
Package changelog:
libgdamm3.0 (3.0.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Drop Conflicts/Replaces from shared library package. They should be
able to install in parallel.
* Add `DM-Upload-Allowed: yes' field. Thanks Loïc for advocacy.
-- Deng Xiyue [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 19 Mar 2008
20:47:11 +0800
libgdamm3.0 (3.0.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
+ Bump soversion to 10 to match upstream changes.
+ Add proper Conflicts/Replaces to prepare for sync from Ubuntu.
* Add Debian GNOME Team as uploader.
* Refine debian/rules to be consistent with other GNOME Packages:
+ Use gnome-pkg-tools, and set GNOME_MODULE := libgdamm
+ Set shlibs version to 3.0.0 due to new API.
+ Set proper exclude rules.
+ Use chrpath hack to get rid of rpath on 64bit system.
+ Bump compat level to 6, and b-dep on debhelper = 6, cdbs = 0.4.51.
* Refine debian/control*:
+ Add chrpath, gnome-pkg-tools to Build-depends.
+ Wrap fields for easier patch.
+ Add ${misc:Depends} and ${shlibs:Depends} to Depends.
* Add libgdamm-3.0-doc.doc-base.libgdamm3.0-reference.
* Add libgdamm-3.0-doc.examples to ship examples.
* Refine libgdamm-3.0-doc.docs install path to retain original directory
hierarchy.
* Refine watch file.
-- Deng Xiyue [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 17 Mar 2008
10:09:54 +0800
libgdamm3.0 (2.9.81-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Import Ubuntu package in Debian
* New upstream version.
* Change Maintainer address to point at me
* Update Standars-Version to 3.7.3. No changes needed.
* Change how binary packages are named, from libgdamm-3.0 to libgdamm3.0
* Change package descriptions to made them more similar to the ones included
in libgdamm1.3 package.
-- Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 10 Feb 2008
17:01:48 +0100
--
Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
The only rdepends for this package is glom and I plan on submitting a new glom package that includes a new upstream release and builds against the new libgdamm3.0 package (Bug 204039). -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Build log of libgdamm3.0 3.0.0-2 on hardy. ** Attachment added: libgdamm3.0_3.0.0-2.buildlog http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12767903/libgdamm3.0_3.0.0-2.buildlog -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
libgdamm3.0 3.0.0-1 has already be accepted into Debian repository pool. Don't know whether it's still possible to begin the sync with Ubuntu? -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
yes, and I guess we should do so. Since it's the stable release, I'll give ACK #1 on this w.o. needing to revisit diffstat etc. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Looks like it's another soname bump (among other changes). ** Attachment added: Debian changes http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12736783/debian.changes -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
I have a question regarding the debian package. In the control file,
there is the following entry for the libgdamm3.0-10 binary package:
--
Package: libgdamm3.0-10
Architecture: any
Conflicts: libgdamm3.0-8,
libgdamm-3.0-8,
libgdamm3.0-9
Replaces: libgdamm3.0-8,
libgdamm-3.0-8,
libgdamm3.0-9
Depends: ${misc:Depends},
${shlibs:Depends}
Description: C++ wrappers for libgda3
libgdamm is a set of C++ bindings for the libgda3 database API.
libgda is the GNU Data Access library.
.
This package contains the shared library.
-
Based on the discussion above (StefanPotyra et. al.), I was under the
impression that there should not be conflicts/replaces fields for a
library package with a soname bump since it might lead to breakage.
What am I missing?
libgdamm3.0_2.9.82-0ubuntu2 was uploaded yesterday. So the problems
with the conflicts/replaces fields for the -dev and -doc binary packages
has been corrected. However, having the stable release of the library
is probably a good idea.
--
Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Chris Brotherton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a question regarding the debian package. In the control file,
there is the following entry for the libgdamm3.0-10 binary package:
--
Package: libgdamm3.0-10
Architecture: any
Conflicts: libgdamm3.0-8,
libgdamm-3.0-8,
libgdamm3.0-9
Replaces: libgdamm3.0-8,
libgdamm-3.0-8,
libgdamm3.0-9
Depends: ${misc:Depends},
${shlibs:Depends}
Description: C++ wrappers for libgda3
libgdamm is a set of C++ bindings for the libgda3 database API.
libgda is the GNU Data Access library.
.
This package contains the shared library.
-
Based on the discussion above (StefanPotyra et. al.), I was under the
impression that there should not be conflicts/replaces fields for a
library package with a soname bump since it might lead to breakage.
What am I missing?
They should be Conflicts/Replacesed, because they have the same
contents. Installing them in parallel will fail. And 2.9.82-0ubuntu1
doesn't have the problem when installed in parallel with
2.9.81-0ubuntu1 is because the soname changed since 2.9.82: The
additional -.
libgdamm3.0_2.9.82-0ubuntu2 was uploaded yesterday. So the problems
with the conflicts/replaces fields for the -dev and -doc binary packages
has been corrected. However, having the stable release of the library
is probably a good idea.
--
Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744
You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
of the bug.
--
Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Oh, indeed, there should be only conflicts/replaces against the -dev/-doc package and not against the library package. Deng, can you fix this in unstable? Thanks! -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Hi, On Wednesday 19 March 2008 13:02:28 Deng Xiyue wrote: [..] They should be Conflicts/Replacesed, because they have the same contents. Erm, the *library* package mustn't have overlapping files for different SONAME's, and it looks like the unstable package correctly doesn't: dpkg -c libgdamm3.0-10_3.0.0-1_i386.deb drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-03-17 09:46 ./ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-03-17 09:46 ./usr/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-03-17 09:47 ./usr/lib/ -rw-r--r-- root/root769704 2008-03-17 09:47 ./usr/lib/libgdamm-3.0.so.10.0.0 drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-03-17 09:46 ./usr/share/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-03-17 09:46 ./usr/share/doc/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-03-17 09:47 ./usr/share/doc/libgdamm3.0-10/ -rw-r--r-- root/root 1348 2008-03-17 09:42 ./usr/share/doc/libgdamm3.0-10/changelog.Debian.gz -rw-r--r-- root/root 104 2008-02-23 17:56 ./usr/share/doc/libgdamm3.0-10/README -rw-r--r-- root/root 630 2008-02-23 17:56 ./usr/share/doc/libgdamm3.0-10/TODO -rw-r--r-- root/root 2211 2008-03-17 09:42 ./usr/share/doc/libgdamm3.0-10/copyright -rw-r--r-- root/root47 2008-02-23 17:56 ./usr/share/doc/libgdamm3.0-10/AUTHORS -rw-r--r-- root/root 2585 2008-03-16 14:35 ./usr/share/doc/libgdamm3.0-10/NEWS.gz -rw-r--r-- root/root 13828 2008-03-16 14:35 ./usr/share/doc/libgdamm3.0-10/changelog.gz lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2008-03-17 09:46 ./usr/lib/libgdamm-3.0.so.10 - libgdamm-3.0.so.10.0.0 Cheers, Stefan. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
StefanPotyra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, On Wednesday 19 March 2008 13:02:28 Deng Xiyue wrote: [..] They should be Conflicts/Replacesed, because they have the same contents. Erm, the *library* package mustn't have overlapping files for different SONAME's, and it looks like the unstable package correctly doesn't: Oops, I forgot the soversion bump between 2.9.82 and 3.0.0. Sorry. Fixing right away... -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Should I keep this bug open or submit a new one for a debian unstable sync request? Also, once we sync, I will make sure the glom package is updated to build against the new version of the library. So far, glom is the only package the reverse depends on libgdam3.0. Chris. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Axk #2 and approved. someone mark confirmed please. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Oops, I forgot the soversion bump between 2.9.82 and 3.0.0. Sorry. Fixing right away... Excellent, thanks! Cheers, Stefan. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
I'll leave this one open since it has already received two ACKs and been approved by the motu-release team. Thanks. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
The transitional packages are not necessary. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Thanks, Daniel. Here is an update package with conflicts/replaces fields for the -dev and -doc binary packages, but without the unnecessary transitional packages. ** Attachment added: libgdamm3.0_2.9.82-0ubuntu2.diff.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12719824/libgdamm3.0_2.9.82-0ubuntu2.diff.gz -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
** Attachment added: libgdamm3.0_2.9.82-0ubuntu2.buildlog http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12719870/libgdamm3.0_2.9.82-0ubuntu2.buildlog -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ LC_ALL=C sudo apt-get install -f Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: libgdamm-3.0-dev libgdamm-3.0-8 Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them. The following extra packages will be installed: libgdamm3.0-dev Suggested packages: libgdamm-3.0-doc The following NEW packages will be installed: libgdamm3.0-dev 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 4 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B/91.8kB of archives. After this operation, 1040kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? (Reading database ... 163824 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libgdamm3.0-dev (from .../libgdamm3.0-dev_2.9.82-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libgdamm3.0-dev_2.9.82-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/include/libgdamm-3.0/libgdamm/private/blob_p.h', which is also in package libgdamm-3.0-dev dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libgdamm3.0-dev_2.9.82-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ** Changed in: libgdamm3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Putting sponsoring of bug 202874 on hold until this is fixed. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Daniel Holbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ LC_ALL=C sudo apt-get install -f Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: libgdamm-3.0-dev libgdamm-3.0-8 Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them. The following extra packages will be installed: libgdamm3.0-dev Suggested packages: libgdamm-3.0-doc The following NEW packages will be installed: libgdamm3.0-dev 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 4 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B/91.8kB of archives. After this operation, 1040kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? (Reading database ... 163824 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libgdamm3.0-dev (from .../libgdamm3.0-dev_2.9.82-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libgdamm3.0-dev_2.9.82-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/include/libgdamm-3.0/libgdamm/private/blob_p.h', which is also in package libgdamm-3.0-dev This is caused by not having proper Conflicts/Replaces field for libgdamm3.0-dev in debian/control. I've done this in Debian. Should be fixed when my package is uploaded and Ubuntu syncs. dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libgdamm3.0-dev_2.9.82-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ** Changed in: libgdamm3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
We should merge the change ASAP. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Daniel Holbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We should merge the change ASAP. Now it's sitting on Debian NEW queue. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
I should be able to address this issue this evening after work. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
** Attachment added: libgdamm3.0_2.9.82-0ubuntu2.buildlog http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12712399/libgdamm3.0_2.9.82-0ubuntu2.buildlog -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
I suggest that we stick with our 2.9.82 version of libgdamm3.0 and then
sync after hardy is released to the 3.0.0 version in debian. The debian
version has a number of changes and includes a soname change.
To address the above problems, I included conflicts/replaces fields for
the libgdamm3.0-dev and libgdamm3.0-docs binary packages. I also
included transitional packages for the -dev and -doc binary packages.
Please let me know if this is appropriate, my control file is below.
For the conflicts/replace fields, I used the previous version of the
libgdamm3.0 package since it was the first version to include the name
change.
---
Control File
Source: libgdamm3.0
Section: devel
Priority: extra
Maintainer: Ubuntu Desktop Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (= 5), autotools-dev, libglibmm-2.4-dev (=
2.12.8), libgda3-dev (= 3.0.0)
Standards-Version: 3.7.3
Package: libgdamm3.0-9
Architecture: any
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
Description: C++ wrappers for libgda
libgdamm is a set of C++ bindings for the libgda database API.
.
This package contains the library.
Package: libgdamm3.0-dev
Provides: libgdamm-3.0-dev
Conflicts: libgdamm-3.0-dev ( 2.9.82-0ubuntu1)
Replaces: libgdamm-3.0-dev ( 2.9.82-0ubuntu1)
Architecture: any
Section: libdevel
Depends: ${misc:Depends}, libgdamm3.0-9 (= ${binary:Version}),
libglibmm-2.4-dev (= 2.12.8), libgda3-dev (= 3.0.0)
Suggests: libgdamm-3.0-doc
Description: C++ wrappers for libgda (library headers)
libgdamm is a set of C++ bindings for the libgda database API.
.
This package contains the library headers.
Package: libgdamm3.0-doc
Provides: libgdamm-3.0-doc
Conflicts: libgdamm-3.0-doc ( 2.9.82-0ubuntu1)
Replaces: libgdamm-3.0-doc ( 2.9.82-0ubuntu1)
Section: doc
Architecture: all
Description: C++ wrappers for libgda (documentation)
libgdamm is a set of C++ bindings for the libgda database API.
.
This package contains the documentation.
Package: libgdamm-3.0-dev
Architecture: all
Depends: libgdamm3.0-dev
Description: transitional package to new libgdamm naming scheme
This dummy package is provided to smooth the upgrade to the new libgdamm
naming scheme.
.
This package can be safely removed.
Package: libgdamm-3.0-doc
Architecture: all
Depends: libgdamm3.0-doc
Description: transitional package to new libgdamm naming scheme
This dummy package is provided to smooth the upgrade to the new libgdamm
naming scheme.
.
This package can be safely removed.
** Attachment added: libgdamm3.0_2.9.82-0ubuntu2.diff.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12712395/libgdamm3.0_2.9.82-0ubuntu2.diff.gz
--
Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Murray Cummings has just release libgdamm3.0 stable release 3.0.0, which bumps soversion to 10, and retain the '-' in shared library name. So I guess there'll be no needs to change package name for ubuntu. I'll try to refine the Debian package and upload in a few days (since I need sponsoring before I'm accepted as DM). -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
That is great to hear. I am the one who worked on the most recent package version in ubuntu. Let me know if there is anything I can help with. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Murray Cumming has just released libgdamm3.0 stable release 3.0.0, which bumps soversion to 10, and retains the '-' in shared library name. By the way. I have never heard of any problem with the shared library name, or understood why Debian/Ubuntu might want to rename their packages to add or remove a -. In general, if there is ever something that you would like me to fix upstream, please file a bug. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
IIRC, Debian changed the naming to match 2.9.81, while upstream changed to match Ubuntu naming in 2.9.82. I'd say the current naming (with '-') is reasonable. Ubuntu has a larger user base than Debian, as glom has entered Ubuntu for some time. It's reasonable to match the Ubuntu naming, and it's not quite a big deal to change the naming in Debian, as it's technically doable and very few people are already using it. So please don't worry, Murray :) -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Actually, you have it backwards. Initially, ubuntu used the libgdamm-3.0-* naming scheme, but we changed it to match debians (libgdamm3.0-*). So you should not have to change the binary package names in debian. Murray, You don't need to worry about the package names (other than the sonames). Ubuntu just changed the binary package names to match debian. So, in the future, ubuntu can just sync from debian. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Chris Brotherton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Actually, you have it backwards. Initially, ubuntu used the libgdamm-3.0-* naming scheme, but we changed it to match debians (libgdamm3.0-*). So you should not have to change the binary package names in debian. Has this already happened? By searching on http://packages.ubuntu.com/ I haven't found any package named libgdamm3.0-*, so I guess it's not released yet. Will it be possible for Ubuntu to remain its naming convention? I've already changed it in Debian GNOME SVN to add '-'. Please let me know what you plan to do, and which Conflicts/Replaces field should be added for Ubuntu. Murray, You don't need to worry about the package names (other than the sonames). Ubuntu just changed the binary package names to match debian. So, in the future, ubuntu can just sync from debian. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Take a look here: http://packages.ubuntu.com/source/hardy/libgdamm3.0 The new package names are in hardy (scheduled to be released on April 24th). -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Chris Brotherton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Take a look here: http://packages.ubuntu.com/source/hardy/libgdamm3.0 The new package names are in hardy (scheduled to be released on April 24th). Thanks for the info. I've changed accordingly in SVN. You can check it here: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg- gnome/packages/unstable/libgdamm3.0/debian/ -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Hi, I'm one of the Debian maintainers of libgdamm3.0, and I'd like to sync with ubuntu work. I guess I'll add the proper Conflicts/Replaces for ubuntu to make it easier. According to Murray the stable version of libgdamm3.0 will probably be released in several weeks, so I wish the full sync will happen by then. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
** Changed in: libgdamm3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
With all of the above changes, I assume that I need two more ACKs to be approved. If not, let me know and I will subscribe u-u-s. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Sure, I'm still ok with the FFe. ACK. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Ack #2 again just to avoid potential confusion. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
I think I'm with you. Let me try to write what I understand. On a user system there is foo (in package foo-1), which links to libfoo.so.1 (in package libfoo1-1). Now we have a new libfoo with a different soname, and so we have libfoo.so.2 in package libfoo2-1 and foo in package foo-2 which links against libfoo.so.2 If the user upgrade foo-1 to foo-2, obviously it will also upgrade to libfoo.so.2 since libfoo2-1 will be a depends of foo-2, so, everything is fine, no dummy is needed (well, libfoo1-1 will still be on that system but in a more complex case I can understand why you would want that). If the user installs libfoo2-1 then foo will still be ok since that will not remove libfoo1-1. Wish somebody could write this stuff on a wiki page somewhere -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Which, in practice for Chris, means there is no need to have a dummy package nor a replaces/conflicts dependency, only the package name change will do, glom will have to be built/depends against the new library and then we can ask archive to remove the old libgdamm, right? Thanks for the explanation Stefan. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Cesare, exactly :). And removing the old binary is a standard task of archive admins, which I assume it will be done once the new binary package gets processed in binary new, so we wouldn't even need to request this. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Updated package. Changelog: libgdamm3.0 (2.9.82-0ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low * New upstream release. (LP #190744) * Updated Standards-Version to 3.7.3 * Added get-orig-source target to debian/rules. * Updated soname * Renamed binary packages from libgdamm-3.0-* to libgdamm3.0-* -- Christopher Brotherton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:12:20 -0600 ** Attachment added: libgdamm3.0_2.9.82-0ubuntu1.diff.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12528678/libgdamm3.0_2.9.82-0ubuntu1.diff.gz -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
** Attachment added: libgdamm3.0_2.9.82-0ubuntu1.buildlog http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12528681/libgdamm3.0_2.9.82-0ubuntu1.buildlog -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
** Attachment added: libgdamm3.0_2.9.82-0ubuntu1.installog http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12529125/libgdamm3.0_2.9.82-0ubuntu1.installog -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Hi Chris,
Am Samstag 08 März 2008 04:27:50 schrieb Chris Brotherton:
Stefan,
Sorry. I wasn't clear in my comment above. I used the
conflicts/replaces fields for the binary package name change and not for
the soname change.
For example:
Package: libgdamm3.0-9
Provides: libgdamm-3.0-9
Conflicts: libgdamm-3.0-9 ( ${source:Version})
Replaces: libgdamm-3.0-9 ( ${source:Version})
New package name: libgdamm3.0-9
Old package name: libgdamm-3.0-9
Now I'm confused, as I don't see a libgdamm[-]3.0-9 package in either
debian/unstable or ubuntu.
Since debian currently ships the binary libgdamm3.0-8 (probably, to avoid ABI
breakage by using a different binary package name), and ubuntu has
libgdamm-3.0-8 and the new version has a different SONAME, no dummy package
or conflicts/replaces are necessary at all.
Cheers,
Stefan.
--
Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Since debian currently ships the binary libgdamm3.0-8 (probably, to avoid ABI breakage by using a different binary package name) No, they just changed the name to have it similar to the old 1.3 branch. They have not yet packaged the new version (where we have seen the ABI breakage). ubuntu has libgdamm-3.0-8 and the new version has a different SONAME, no dummy package or conflicts/replaces are necessary at all. OK, but you still want to remove 3.0-8 don't you, and so for the transition to 3.0-9 you need a dummy package (and yes, you don't need conflicts/replaces). If we want to keep 3.0-8 (but why!?) then yes, I agree. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Hi, Am Samstag 08 März 2008 23:09:40 schrieb Cesare Tirabassi: Since debian currently ships the binary libgdamm3.0-8 (probably, to avoid ABI breakage by using a different binary package name) No, they just changed the name to have it similar to the old 1.3 branch. They have not yet packaged the new version (where we have seen the ABI breakage). Ah, ok. ubuntu has libgdamm-3.0-8 and the new version has a different SONAME, no dummy package or conflicts/replaces are necessary at all. OK, but you still want to remove 3.0-8 don't you, Yes. and so for the transition to 3.0-9 you need a dummy package (and yes, you don't need conflicts/replaces). No. Let me try to explain it again: For the upgrade path, you must always consider what can happen at the *users* system. Hence a package removed from the archive, means, that it can still be present on a users system during upgrading. Now, a dummy package makes sense, if a binary package was renamed, and provided the same functionality as the old one, because then on the users system the new binary package will get installed, when upgrading to the dummy package. For a library, where the ABI breaks, however it would be fatal to add a package with conflicts/replaces or a dummy package: On the users system, an application linked against the old shared object (let's call it libfoo.so.1), would require to have libfoo.so.1 present, and would not run without it. A dummy package, to which libfoo1 could get upgraded prior to upgrading the application linked against it, would of course not contain this very shared object. Since the SONAME is different in the new libfoo library package, there would be a libfoo.so.2 (for example) in there, so it also wouldn't make the application work (rightfully so, because the ABI changed). I hope this explanation was better than my first try. Please ask, if s.th. is not yet clear. Cheers, Stefan. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
** Attachment added: libgdamm3.0_2.9.82-0ubuntu1.buildlog http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12510727/libgdamm3.0_2.9.82-0ubuntu1.buildlog -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Updated to include binary package rename and transitional packages. I have included the Conflicts and Replaces package fields for the sake of completeness. ** Attachment added: libgdamm3.0_2.9.82-0ubuntu1.diff.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12510726/libgdamm3.0_2.9.82-0ubuntu1.diff.gz -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Hi, I guess I need to clear up some things here. Let's consider the upgrade path between between ABI incompatible libraries: The user has A installed, which depends on libfoo1. libfoo gets changed in an incompatible way and produces the binary package libfoo2 (in correlation to the SONAME). Having libfoo provide a libfoo1 dummy package, which would conflict/replace on the old libfoo1 package would mean, that the old libfoo1 could get replaced by libfoo1 (dummy) and draw in libfoo2. However, since libfoo2 is not compatible to libfoo1, A would no longer work in this state. Hence it is essential, that two ABI incompatible library versions can be installed together on the system. (As a result of this, a library package should not have conffiles due to filename conflicts.) - Adding conflicts/replaces would not smooth, but rather break the upgrade path. An ABI incompatible library does *not* replace the functionality of the old incompatible version. Let's see again what would happen if there is no conflicts/replaces: libfoo1 can not get upgraded, as there is no newer package. a newer A would be upgraded (A will always need to be rebuilt to pick up libfoo2), depending on libfoo2, so this package gets drawn in - libfoo1 and libfoo2 are both installed. Once no package depends on libfoo1 any longer, libfoo1 is still installed, but no longer needed. A smart package manager will see that libfoo1 was never directly installed, but only drawn in by A and offer the option to remove it (that's what apt-get autoremove can do). Problem solved :). HTH, Stefan. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Stefan,
Sorry. I wasn't clear in my comment above. I used the
conflicts/replaces fields for the binary package name change and not for
the soname change.
For example:
Package: libgdamm3.0-9
Provides: libgdamm-3.0-9
Conflicts: libgdamm-3.0-9 ( ${source:Version})
Replaces: libgdamm-3.0-9 ( ${source:Version})
New package name: libgdamm3.0-9
Old package name: libgdamm-3.0-9
Please let me know if I should of done this differently.
Thanks,
Chris.
--
Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Unsubscribed Ubuntu Sponsors for universe from this bug until motu- release gave another ACK. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
My only concern is the name change they have made in Debian for the binary packages. Since we will eventually sync it could make sense to be prepared already for that, and we could make the transition now. If however you guys don't think we should bother now and postpone it to intrepid than I'm fine to ack this. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Getting a name change done now will make the next LTS-LTS upgrade easier. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Chris,
to make the transition it is needed to:
1) Change your source package so that it provides binaries named like those in
Debian. This is mainly in debian/control and some of the debhelper files
(install etc.). You can see this easily by diffing the ubuntu and debian
packages.
Note that the difference is just the removal of a dash (-) from the binary
names, eg:
Ubuntu: libgdamm-3.0-8
Debian: libgdamm3.0-8
2) Change all libgdamm dependencies of packages in hardy to point to the
new naming scheme. You can find these by using apt-cache with the
rdepends option:
apt-cache rdepends libgdamm-3.0-8 libgdamm-3.0-dev libgdamm-3.0-doc
libgdamm-3.0-dev
Reverse Depends:
libglom-dev
libgdamm-3.0-doc
Reverse Depends:
libgdamm-3.0-dev
libgdamm-3.0-8
Reverse Depends:
libglom0
libgdamm-3.0-dev
glom
So this is just the glom src package.
3) Add to your source package transitional packages to ease the
gutsy-hardy upgrade. These are dummy packages which just depends on the
right dependencies and eventually conflict/replace the old packages.
For example:
Package: libgdamm-3.0-9
Architecture: all
Depends: libgdamm3.0-9
Description: transitional package to new libgdamm naming scheme
This dummy package is provided to smooth the upgrade to the new libgdamm
naming scheme.
This package can be safely removed.
It is not the case here, but if there was a previous version of the same
package one should have added to the libgdamm3.0-9 stanza in
debian/control:
Conflicts: libgdamm-3.0-9 ( ${source:Version})
Replaces: libgdamm-3.0-9 ( ${source:Version})
4) Request the removal of the old ubuntu packages from the archive
--
Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Cesare, Thanks for this info. Chris. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
I don't recall and am not in a position to check if this package has any conffiles or not. If it does, they may need to be moved to a location or renamed based on the package names. There is a recipe on wiki.debian.org for how to manage this in preinst/postinst if it's needed. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
diff.gz for updated package. Thanks. ** Attachment added: libgdamm3.0_2.9.81-0ubuntu1.diff.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12126610/libgdamm3.0_2.9.81-0ubuntu1.diff.gz ** Changed in: libgdamm3.0 (Ubuntu) Assignee: Chris Brotherton (protonchris) = (unassigned) Status: In Progress = Confirmed -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Daniel, I am not sure if this need to be an exception. It can probably wait until Hardy+1. If you want to unsubscribe u-u-s, I can resubscribe them when hardy+1 is ready. Thanks, Chris. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
The upstream changelog certainly looks like it includes a bunch of fixes. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
I guess this needs to go through https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
If this new package is accepted, I'll submit a new bug for a glom rebuild. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
** Attachment added: changelog.diff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12351958/changelog.diff -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
** Attachment added: libgdamm3.0-2.9.82.installog http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12352098/libgdamm3.0-2.9.82.installog -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Please let me know if you guys would like to see anything else. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Updated package for version 2.9.82 with soname bump. ** Attachment added: libgdamm3.0_2.9.82-0ubuntu1.diff.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12351949/libgdamm3.0_2.9.82-0ubuntu1.diff.gz -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
** Attachment added: libgdamm3.0_2.9.82-0ubuntu1.buildlog http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12352046/libgdamm3.0_2.9.82-0ubuntu1.buildlog -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
** Attachment added: upstream soname bump against r1309 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12339989/from.r1309.bump.so.version.patch -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
@Murray, above is the promised patch against configure.in, that will bump the SONAME to the next version (it does not set a new upstream version number though). -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Thanks. I have applied that and released libgdamm 2.82. Note that the *mm libraries don't bother changing the .so version name usually. GTK+ doesn't change it either. This is because - It's really hard to get right, because the version string in configure.ac is so disconnected from the eventual version name of the .so file. - If we specify an ABI break of new API between, for instance, GTK+ 2.11.1 and 2.11.2 (unstable releases) we have no way then to show that there is no API/ABI break (just API additions) between GTK+ 2.10.x and GTK+ 2.12.0 (stable releases). So you shouldn't really expect us to do this in future. If you think we should (I'm often wrong) then please do try to provide some exact examples of what libraries such as GTK+ should do in particular cases. I've tried to do that for GNOME before and failed. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Thanks, Murray. I'll put an updated package up in the next couple of days. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Thanks for adding that output. Indeed I was surprised: seems like I recalled wrongly, and c++ encodes the namespace of the enum in the symbol (for method signatures). Hence there are removed symbols, and thus the ABI is broken as well. This means, we cannot sync the package as is. The best solution would be, if you'd make a new upstream release, just bumping the SONAME, and we'd get this one in. The second best solution is to append s.th. to the name of the binary package of the library. (Both of these will have the effect that glom must get rebuilt for the new library). -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Murray, What to you think? Are you up for a new release with a soname bump? Chris. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
well, I guess I don't insist on having a diff of the symbols in this specific case. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
** Attachment added: Output from check-symbols http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12282470/check-symbols.log -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Any impact on glom0 and libglom0? Note that there is now a package available from sid, so we could just sync. In this case, we would need to change all rdepends to be compatible with the naming change made by debian though. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Hm... if the changelog indicates that the ABI stays the same. However it's worth investigating this: * libgda/src/connectionevent.hg: Put the enums inside the Gnome::Gda namespace instead of inside Gnome::. Can you a) attach a diff of the symbols between the old and the new version (I doubt, there is an unexpected change though, since the changelog seems to be very exact and enums are iirc always mapped to ints). and b) check, if these enums are part of the public API or just used internally inside libgdamm3.0? Thanks, Stefan. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
b) check, if these enums are part of the public API or just used internally inside libgdamm3.0? These enums are part of the public API. (I am the upstream maintainer.) -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
ok, so the public API changed. However since only glom uses it as package so far, and libglom0 doesn't have any rdepends (beside glom), I guess this could be fixed easily, either by modifying the current package or by syncing (rather merging to ensure a sane upgrade) from debian, in case it shouldn't build after an update any longer (also a quick grepping didn't reveal any usage of an enum in the Gnome:: namespace of glom). Hence, in case a diff of the symbols underlines that the ABI stays the same I'm happy to give an ACK. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Ack #2 and approved. ** Changed in: libgdamm3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
glom and libglom0 build and run against the new version of libgdamm3.0 without issue. If there is still interest in a symbols diff, I can provide that tomorrow. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Please consider a feature freeze exception for this package. This new version of this software is mostly bugfixes (see changelog above) and does not have significant new features or remove existing features (soname stays the same). Only one package depends on this package, so an upgrade is low risk. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
** Attachment added: diffstat http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12218800/libgdamm3.0-diffstat.txt -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
** Attachment added: buildlog http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12218802/libgdamm3.0-2.9.81.buildlog -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
** Attachment added: Install Log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12218805/install.log -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
Firstly, please do not set to confirmed for feature freeze exception bugs. The bug gets set to confirmed when two acks are given to update the package. As to that, it does appear to be very much a bugfix release, so +1 from me. ** Changed in: libgdamm3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = New -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
