[Bug 196396] Re: Live installer needs ETA display
[Expired for ubiquity (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196396 Title: Live installer needs ETA display To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/196396/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 196396] Re: Live installer needs ETA display
This release of Ubuntu is no longer receiving maintenance updates. If this is still an issue on a maintained version of Ubuntu please let us know. ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196396 Title: Live installer needs ETA display To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/196396/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 196396] Re: Live installer needs ETA display
I think the real problem with a two-progress-bars solution is that the outer progress bar would be no more accurate than the current one, and would really just have to be equally divided. Perhaps a series of explicitly named steps would be better. However, a further problem is that we don't have good progress information for many of the inner steps; for example, the installer has no idea how far update-initramfs has got, which is a particularly slow step. That presents a problem for any scheme involving an inner progress bar and outer progress information reporting; the inner bar would have to be a throbber for some steps and not for others, which I think would be pretty ugly. That's one of the reasons we decided to go for a single progress bar. -- Live installer needs ETA display https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196396 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 196396] Re: Live installer needs ETA display
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = ubiquity -- Live installer needs ETA display https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196396 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 196396] Re: Live installer needs ETA display
See bug 61514 for the history of this problem. It's not trivial to do better at the moment ... ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist Status: New = Triaged -- Live installer needs ETA display https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196396 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 196396] Re: Live installer needs ETA display
Could you comment on the two-progress-bars solution? Note that this really isn't anything that's killing me, I just thought I should report it since it was an annoyance during the install :-). -- Live installer needs ETA display https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196396 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
