[Bug 1976198] Re: [SRU] Possible missing dependencies of libsdl2-dev in Jammy
Here's a counterargument. Anyone upgrading from say middle of June on will get the same amount of packages to update regardless of whether this bug is fixed or not. If this bug is fixed before Ubuntu 22.04.1, then anyone installing from the new release images wouldn't have anything extra to download either. The vast majority of people that will use Ubuntu 22.04 LTS have not installed it yet. My opinion is that this is a FTBFS kind of bug. Reverse dependencies of libsdl2-dev might not build until this bug is fixed. Is it the position of the Ubuntu SRU team that FTBFS bugs only need to get fixed in jammy- proposed and not jammy-updates? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976198 Title: [SRU] Possible missing dependencies of libsdl2-dev in Jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsdl2/+bug/1976198/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1976198] Re: [SRU] Possible missing dependencies of libsdl2-dev in Jammy
This bug was fixed in the package libsdl2 - 2.0.22+dfsg-4 --- libsdl2 (2.0.22+dfsg-4) unstable; urgency=medium [ Gianfranco Costamagna ] * Ignore tests if the system is Ubuntu and architecture arm64, requiring some real new hw to complete successfully (workaround for LP: #1976288) [ Simon McVittie ] * d/control: Remove Sam Hocevar from Uploaders, with thanks for past contributions (Closes: #1011583) * d/tests/installed-tests: Assert that at least one test was run * d/control: Add missing dependencies for static linking (Closes: #1012088, LP: #1976198) * d/tests/cmake: Exercise static linking to SDL * Standards-Version: 4.6.1 (no changes required) * Only skip testatomic on Ubuntu, not the rest of the test suite. This lets us get at least some confidence that the package is working. -- Simon McVittie Mon, 30 May 2022 16:43:30 +0100 ** Changed in: libsdl2 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976198 Title: [SRU] Possible missing dependencies of libsdl2-dev in Jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsdl2/+bug/1976198/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1976198] Re: [SRU] Possible missing dependencies of libsdl2-dev in Jammy
@Robie, I would say that missing depends on a -dev impact users since it gives you a non working environment unless you figure out you need to install extra binaries the deb isn't pulling for you -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976198 Title: [SRU] Possible missing dependencies of libsdl2-dev in Jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsdl2/+bug/1976198/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1976198] Re: [SRU] Possible missing dependencies of libsdl2-dev in Jammy
upgrade log from clean jammy chroot (libsdl2-dev installed): root@Unimatrix08-Focal:/# apt update ; apt dist-upgrade Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-security InRelease [110 kB] Get:2 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates InRelease [109 kB] Get:3 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-proposed InRelease [270 kB] Hit:4 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy InRelease Get:5 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates/main amd64 Packages [221 kB] Get:6 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates/universe amd64 Packages [102 kB] Get:7 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-proposed/universe amd64 Packages [23.8 kB] Get:8 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-proposed/main amd64 Packages [119 kB] Fetched 957 kB in 2s (588 kB/s) Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done 2 packages can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see them. Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: libdecor-0-dev libdrm-dev libdrm-intel1 libgbm-dev libpciaccess-dev libpciaccess0 The following packages will be upgraded: libsdl2-2.0-0 libsdl2-dev 2 upgraded, 6 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 2363 kB/2609 kB of archives. After this operation, 1175 kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 libdecor-0-dev amd64 0.1.0-3build1 [5544 B] Get:2 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-proposed/main amd64 libgbm-dev amd64 22.0.1-1ubuntu2.1 [9282 B] Get:3 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-proposed/universe amd64 libsdl2-dev amd64 2.0.20+dfsg-2ubuntu1.22.04.1 [1767 kB] Get:4 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-proposed/main amd64 libsdl2-2.0-0 amd64 2.0.20+dfsg-2ubuntu1.22.04.1 [582 kB] Fetched 2363 kB in 0s (6058 kB/s) debconf: delaying package configuration, since apt-utils is not installed Selecting previously unselected package libdecor-0-dev:amd64. (Reading database ... 14837 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../0-libdecor-0-dev_0.1.0-3build1_amd64.deb ... Unpacking libdecor-0-dev:amd64 (0.1.0-3build1) ... Selecting previously unselected package libpciaccess0:amd64. Preparing to unpack .../1-libpciaccess0_0.16-3_amd64.deb ... Unpacking libpciaccess0:amd64 (0.16-3) ... Selecting previously unselected package libdrm-intel1:amd64. Preparing to unpack .../2-libdrm-intel1_2.4.110-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb ... Unpacking libdrm-intel1:amd64 (2.4.110-1ubuntu1) ... Selecting previously unselected package libpciaccess-dev:amd64. Preparing to unpack .../3-libpciaccess-dev_0.16-3_amd64.deb ... Unpacking libpciaccess-dev:amd64 (0.16-3) ... Selecting previously unselected package libdrm-dev:amd64. Preparing to unpack .../4-libdrm-dev_2.4.110-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb ... Unpacking libdrm-dev:amd64 (2.4.110-1ubuntu1) ... Selecting previously unselected package libgbm-dev:amd64. Preparing to unpack .../5-libgbm-dev_22.0.1-1ubuntu2.1_amd64.deb ... Unpacking libgbm-dev:amd64 (22.0.1-1ubuntu2.1) ... Preparing to unpack .../6-libsdl2-dev_2.0.20+dfsg-2ubuntu1.22.04.1_amd64.deb ... Unpacking libsdl2-dev:amd64 (2.0.20+dfsg-2ubuntu1.22.04.1) over (2.0.20+dfsg-2build1) ... Preparing to unpack .../7-libsdl2-2.0-0_2.0.20+dfsg-2ubuntu1.22.04.1_amd64.deb ... Unpacking libsdl2-2.0-0:amd64 (2.0.20+dfsg-2ubuntu1.22.04.1) over (2.0.20+dfsg-2build1) ... Setting up libpciaccess0:amd64 (0.16-3) ... Setting up libpciaccess-dev:amd64 (0.16-3) ... Setting up libdrm-intel1:amd64 (2.4.110-1ubuntu1) ... Setting up libgbm-dev:amd64 (22.0.1-1ubuntu2.1) ... Setting up libdecor-0-dev:amd64 (0.1.0-3build1) ... Setting up libsdl2-2.0-0:amd64 (2.0.20+dfsg-2ubuntu1.22.04.1) ... Setting up libdrm-dev:amd64 (2.4.110-1ubuntu1) ... Setting up libsdl2-dev:amd64 (2.0.20+dfsg-2ubuntu1.22.04.1) ... Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.35-0ubuntu3) ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976198 Title: [SRU] Possible missing dependencies of libsdl2-dev in Jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsdl2/+bug/1976198/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1976198] Re: [SRU] Possible missing dependencies of libsdl2-dev in Jammy
Depends: libasound2-dev, libdbus-1-dev, libdecor-0-dev, libdrm-dev, libegl1-mesa-dev, libgbm-dev, libgl-dev, libgles-dev, libglu1-mesa-dev, libibus-1.0-dev, libpulse-dev, libsdl2-2.0-0 (= 2.0.20+dfsg-2ubuntu1.22.04.1), libsndio-dev, libudev-dev, libwayland- dev, libx11-dev, libxcursor-dev, libxext-dev, libxfixes-dev, libxi-dev, libxinerama-dev, libxkbcommon-dev, libxrandr-dev, libxss-dev, libxt-dev, libxv-dev, libxxf86vm-dev, libc6 (>= 2.34), libopengl0, libx11-6 its ok now! ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976198 Title: [SRU] Possible missing dependencies of libsdl2-dev in Jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsdl2/+bug/1976198/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1976198] Re: [SRU] Possible missing dependencies of libsdl2-dev in Jammy
In the meantime a straightforward workaround is available to users affected by this bug, which is to install the required dependencies manually. ** Changed in: libsdl2 (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976198 Title: [SRU] Possible missing dependencies of libsdl2-dev in Jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsdl2/+bug/1976198/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1976198] Re: [SRU] Possible missing dependencies of libsdl2-dev in Jammy
This looks fine and I'm accepting. I wonder though if we can stage it to bundle it with an update that directly impacts users? Otherwise every qemu user will have to download this update for no benefit to them. I don't feel too strongly about this. I'll set the tag, but if time has passed and nothing has appeared to bundle it with, or if another SRU team member thinks it needs releasing earlier, please go ahead and drop the tag. ** Tags added: block-proposed-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976198 Title: [SRU] Possible missing dependencies of libsdl2-dev in Jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsdl2/+bug/1976198/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1976198] Re: [SRU] Possible missing dependencies of libsdl2-dev in Jammy
** Changed in: libsdl2 (Debian) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976198 Title: [SRU] Possible missing dependencies of libsdl2-dev in Jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsdl2/+bug/1976198/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1976198] Re: [SRU] Possible missing dependencies of libsdl2-dev in Jammy
** Summary changed: - Possible missing dependencies of libsdl2-dev in Jammy + [SRU] Possible missing dependencies of libsdl2-dev in Jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976198 Title: [SRU] Possible missing dependencies of libsdl2-dev in Jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsdl2/+bug/1976198/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
