[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-05-02 Thread Aaron
Is it fixed now? There are two fixes that had been released, but my
laptop still doesn't wake up.

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-26 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi,

vlowther [2008-03-25 23:15 -]:
 Yes.  The default in pm-utils is to not touch the video card across a
 hibernate/resume cycle, but you can tell pm-utils to use the quirks
 passed from HAL. We may as well not break expected behaviour for those
 who do need to use quirks when hibernating.

I applied the same patch to suspend-hybrid and hibernate in bzr head.
I'll upload it in the next days, when some other fixes piled up.

Thanks, Martin

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-25 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi vlowther,

vlowther [2008-03-24 18:35 -]:
 The patch applied to the HAL suspend script should also be applied to
 the HAL hibernate and HAL suspend-hybrid scripts.

OK for suspend-hybrid, but for hibernate as well? are you sure?

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-25 Thread vlowther
Yes.  The default in pm-utils is to not touch the video card across a
hibernate/resume cycle, but you can tell pm-utils to use the quirks
passed from HAL. We may as well not break expected behaviour for those
who do need to use quirks when hibernating.

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-24 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package pm-utils - 0.99.2-3ubuntu3

---
pm-utils (0.99.2-3ubuntu3) hardy; urgency=low

  * Drop 96-video-quirk-ignoring.patch again. It is incomplete (since we need
to do the same on the suspend side) and does not really fit here (if
pm-utils gets quirks passed on the command line, they should actually be
used). We'll solve this in the hal suspend script instead. (LP: #198808)

 -- Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:32:06
+0100

** Changed in: pm-utils (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress = Fix Released

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-24 Thread vlowther
The patch applied to the HAL suspend script should also be applied to
the HAL hibernate and HAL suspend-hybrid scripts.

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-22 Thread Bernhard Gehl
Hi Johne,
I am not really sure since your problem seems to have come up much earlier, 
while my wireless has been working since feisty and just broke on the hal 
update - and could be unbroken by reinstalling an earlier version of hal...

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-22 Thread Bernhard Gehl
... never mind, the second (0.5.11...ubuntu2) update fixed this somehow.

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-21 Thread Bernhard Gehl
Is it absolutely necessary to implement the sensible defaults in the
code of hal/pm-utils or wouldn't it be possible to use fdi files for
that?

Why not put something in like 25-kernel-quirk-pm-checkdefaults.fdi which
1) matches for the pm-quirks and exits if any (including the .none) quirks 
are set
2) matches for the ati/nvidia/intel drivers and exits if one of these is used 
(fglrx manifests as info.linux.driver = fglrx_pci - I don't know about nvidia 
and intel but wouldn't it be easy to implement setting suitable keys that in a 
startup-script?)
3) matches system.kernel.version and sets the corresponding sensible defaults

In this way, the pm-quirk-behaviour would be completely guided by config
files and changing it wouldn't require modifying code?

Oh - and picking up an idea I got from awen on Bug #202814: I think it
would help diagnosing the suspend/resume process a lot, if the pm-
suspend-script contained a line like echo $*  ~/pm-suspend.log to
log the quirks it was called with.

P.S.: Sorry if I made a stupid suggestion, I'm quite new to all this
hal-fdi-stuff...

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-21 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package pm-utils - 0.99.2-3ubuntu2

---
pm-utils (0.99.2-3ubuntu2) hardy; urgency=low

  * Add debian/patches/96-video-quirk-ignoring.patch: Ignore resume video
quirks when using the proprietary nvidia or fglrx drivers, or Intel =
915G, since they are not needed on them and actively break resuming. Since
this cannot be expressed as FDI rules with current hal, this hack needs to
suffice for Hardy. See patch tags for links to further information.
(LP: #198808)
  * Modify Maintainer value to match the DebianMaintainerField
specification.

 -- Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:09:45
+0100

** Changed in: pm-utils (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress = Fix Released

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-21 Thread vlowther
(re comment # 19)

If it's crazy debugging features you want, and you are comfortable
running bleeding-edge code, I maintain a .deb of the pm-utils
development series @ http://fnordovax.org/~victor/PmUtils/

But yes, in an ideal world HAL would handle finding the right quirks and
inform pm-utils to use just the ones it determines are needed.

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-21 Thread Martin Pitt
Fixed in hal bzr head, will upload soon.

** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress = Fix Committed

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-21 Thread Martin Pitt
Bernhard Gehl [2008-03-21 12:12 -]:
 Why not put something in like 25-kernel-quirk-pm-checkdefaults.fdi which
 1) matches for the pm-quirks and exits if any (including the .none) quirks 
 are set
 2) matches for the ati/nvidia/intel drivers and exits if one of these is used 

That's the entire problem. Of course we would like to do that, but
FDIs don't allow that with the current hal version. So these hacks
have to do for Hardy.

 Oh - and picking up an idea I got from awen on Bug #202814: I think it
 would help diagnosing the suspend/resume process a lot, if the pm-
 suspend-script contained a line like echo $*  ~/pm-suspend.log to
 log the quirks it was called with.

When I debug them, I usually add somethign like this to the script in
question:

  exec 2/tmp/99video.trace
  set -x

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-21 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package hal - 0.5.11~rc2-1ubuntu1

---
hal (0.5.11~rc2-1ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low

  * Update our git snapshot from March 01 to current 0.5.11-RC2, which brings
a few bug fixes.
- Adds properties for tablet PCs (LP: #90451)
- Fixes operation on MacBookPro third generation. (LP: #129869)
  * Remove patches applied upstream:
- 02_allow_ufs_ufstype.patch
- 05_fix_dell_brightness.patch
  * Adapt patches to new upstream version:
- 96_uinput_device_support.patch
- 96_uinput_device_support.patch
  * Merge with Debian unstable; see 0.5.10+git20080301-1ubuntu1 for remaining
Ubuntu changes.
  * Replace 88_change_pm_quirk_policy.patch with
01_default_suspend_quirks.patch: Only set the default suspend quirks for
kernel problem workarounds if hal-info does not define any quirks at all
for the hardware. (LP: #198808)

hal (0.5.11~rc2-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream release candidate
  * debian/libhal-storage1.{symbols,shlibs}, debian/libhal1.{symbols,shlibs}:
- Updated symbols and shlibs

 -- Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:39:03
+0100

** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-21 Thread vlowther
The fix applied in pm-utils is incomplete.  You should also ignore quirks while 
suspending the system if you are going to ignore them when resuming. 
The following code block also needs to be applied to the 20video file at the 
beginning of the suspend_video function:

++if [ -d /sys/module/nvidia ] || [ -d /sys/module/fglrx ] || \
++[ -d /sys/module/i915 ]; then
++return
++fi
++

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-21 Thread vlowther
The fix as published is incomplete.  If you are ignoring quirks while
resuming, you should ignore them while suspending.

** Changed in: pm-utils (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Released = In Progress

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-21 Thread Bernhard Gehl
For some reason the fix to hal seems to have broken my wireless lan connection 
(Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network Connection (rev 02) on 
iwl3945). I could restore it to working condition by reinstalling a (cached) 
version of 0.5.10 (hal and libhal)
a) does this make sense?
b) do I have to open a new bug?

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-21 Thread vlowther
(re comment #27)
That sounds like it should be a new bug.

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-21 Thread Johne
Hey Bernhard,

I've opened up a bug that I am relatively sure is related

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/200064

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-20 Thread Martin Pitt
We just discussed this in the desktop team meeting. It is a damned if
you do, damned if you don't situation, but we decided to drop this
patch for the following reasons:

 * Upstream FDI rules should be quite good nowadays, other distributions aren't 
reportedly much worse wrt. suspend/resume than our's.
 * We have a lot of reports that the patch breaks current hardware (like Dell 
Latitudes)
 * upstream FDIs will get better over time, while the old acpi-support 
behaviour gets more and more obsolete
 * Maintaining the patch (or rather the consequences) is fighting against 
upstream and thus producing pointless maintenance overhead and bugs
 * We can always update FDIs for specific models, even post-release (OTOH we 
cannot revert this patch after Hardy is released, since that will cause 
undefined regressions).

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-20 Thread Martin Pitt
Step (3) needs to be done in pm-utils., since this dynamic driver check
cannot be expressed in FDI rules.

** Changed in: pm-utils (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: gnome-power-manager = pm-utils
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Martin Pitt (pitti)
   Status: Invalid = In Progress

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-20 Thread vlowther
To do (#3) with the current ubuntu pm-utils, you should arrange for the
appropriate driver package to drop a file in /etc/pm/config.d.  Bug#
180378 has the solution I used to use for my system.

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-20 Thread Martin Pitt
After a more in-depth discussion we clarified the situation now. The
problem is that many of the machines which do not have any FDI rules at
all need some of the quirks to circumvent some kernel problems (the
quirks mentioned in the affected patch).

So, this is what should happen:

 (1) laptop model has no matching FDI rule - use the default quirks in the 
current patch
 (2) laptop model has matching FDI rule - use them as they are, and do not add 
quirks

So the current patch provides (1), but breaks (2). To fix this, I
propose that the script checks if any of
$HAL_PROP_POWER_MANAGEMENT_QUIRK_* is set, it uses the upstream
behaviour, otherwise it enables the kernel related ones mentioned in the
patch.

In addition, we need another case:

 (3) the proprietary nvidia and fglrx drivers, and intel = i915 [1]
know how to reset the video hardware on resume and must not use any
video quirk in /usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/99video. resume_video() should
immediately return in those cases.

This is particularly important since FDI rules only match hardware
models, not device drivers. E. g. the quirks are necessary if you are
using the nv driver, but detrimental if you use nvidia.

This could be checked with:

 * nvidia: lsmod | grep -qw nvidia
 * fglrx: lsmod | grep -qw fglrx
 * intel: use lspci -n | grep -w 0300: to find the graphics card, and then 
either
* cut out the same line from lspci, search for ([0-9]+)G and compare $1 
for = 915, or
* cut out the product ID from lspci -n and compare it against = 2592 (the 
product ID of the 915GM), since they seem to be ordered chronologically

The intel one is quite a hack, though, I'd appreciate other suggestions.
But it's certainly better than what we have now.


[1] 
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-hardy.git;a=commitdiff;h=37bf83ea3a1841ec63d2d9b54b485bb90386ce5b

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-20 Thread Mark Baas
I don't know for sure whether i am also a victim of this bug. However, I always 
used to be able to do suspend untill now hardy alpha 6. I have a packard bell 
laptop MZ057. In other word a strange model.
pm-suspend --quirk-vbestate-restore this command also didn't work. 
I tried to suspend with just s2ram (0.8), no luck. I just can't resume. Nothing 
in the logs either. 
I do use fglrx, but even without it loaded i cannot suspend and on gutsy i had 
no problems.

What exactly could be going wrong? I think my problem belong in this bug right? 
I suppose i have laptop model without fdi rule.
What can i try/provide?

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-20 Thread vlowther
The output of lshal |grep quirk will tell you if hal knows of any quirks
that should be applied to your system.

Also, the outputs of lsmod and a copy of /var/log/pm-suspend.log (if it
exists) would come in handy.

You can also try the workaround I used in bug# 180378 (download the 99
-non-free-nvidia file, save it /etc/pm/config.d, and change the first
line to grep for fglrx instead of nvidia)

Then, once you find a combination of quirks that work (probably the
default of no quirks should be used), you can save them in that file.

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-20 Thread Matthew Garrett
What packages? xserver-xorg-video-intel shouldn't be providing a
config.d file, since the functionality is in the kernel and not in the
driver. The kernel can't provide it, because you can install multiple
kernel versions simultaneously and they can't all provide the file. The
logical place to put the video driver handling right now is in pm-utils.

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-20 Thread Martin Pitt
For the record, lsmod | grep -qw nvidia - test -d /sys/module/nvidia

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-20 Thread Martin Pitt
Another discussion result with Matthew: instead of doing complicated
vendor/process ID matching for Intel, it should be sufficient to just
test for /sys/module/i915. It it is not yet 100% clear whether this will
also do the right thing on i830 and i855 (which also use that module
now), waiting for confirmation from Intel.

For now we'll upload that to hardy and collect test results. If
necessary, we can finetune afterwards for i830 and i855.

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-20 Thread Mark Baas
I tried the nvidia thing (with fglrx). No luck either, the lshal | grep quirk 
returns nothing. 
The pm-suspend.log only tells about suspending, it doesnt even say anything 
about starting resuming. It must be maybe a kernel issue. Maybe i should try 
installing the kernel 2.6.22 from gutsy and see what happens. 
In the end you suggest that i try every single combination of the nvidia hook? 
That is like 25 combinations, isnt there anything more specific i can do.

** Attachment added: lsmod output
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12766368/lsmod_markbaas.txt

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-20 Thread vlowther
(re: comment no. 14)

For the short term, having these quirk workarounds as part of pm-utils
is doable.

Longer term, though, there are two goals to work towards:

1) Make HAL fdi rules flexible enough to deal with things besides system
mfgr/make/model when deciding what quirks to apply.  At a minimum it
should also be able to consider the current video device(s) and the
driver(s), as they are arguable more important than the system model
(especially if we start caring about desktops with their easily-replaced
video cards).  This will probably involve replacing the current key
matching scheme with something a but more complex.

2) If piece of software requires special handling to operate correctly
across a suspend/resume cycle, it should be responsible for providing
the hook, not pm-utils.

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-19 Thread Martin Pitt
I'm currently discussing this with Matthew Garret via email. I'm
currently trying to understand what's necessary to drop that patch and
maintain behaviour compatibility to previous releases.

It's quite clear to me that we can't and shouldn't break upstream
behaviour eternally. We should rather add the necessary quirks to hal-
info (the ones which acpi-support did in earlier releases), since this
is a fixed and diminishing target.

** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = High
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Martin Pitt (pitti)
   Status: Confirmed = In Progress
   Target: None = ubuntu-8.04

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-18 Thread Nikolaus Filus
It's still invalid for g-p-m. The bug is in the hal package.

** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Invalid

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198808] Re: [Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming

2008-03-17 Thread vlowther
Confirmed while doing development on pm-utils:

On my system:

lshal |grep quirk -  power_management.quirk.vbestate_restore = true
(bool)

However, pm-suspend is  called with the following parameters:
 --quirk-dpms-on --quirk-vbestate-restore --quirk-vbemode-restore 
--quirk-vga-mode3 --quirk-vbe-post --quirk-reset-brightness

It should only called with --quirk-vbestate-restore.

** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid = Confirmed

** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
[Hardy] HAL breaks pm-utils quirks and resuming
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs