[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
This bug was fixed in the package bacula - 2.2.8-5ubuntu7.2 --- bacula (2.2.8-5ubuntu7.2) hardy-proposed; urgency=low * Applied upstream's 2.2.8-strippath.patch, modified to compile cleanly on hardy. (http://bacula.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bacula?view=revrevision=6867) - Fix strippath bug that created a buffer overrun and crash the FD. (LP: #227613) [Ante Karamatic] * Export $HOME in /etc/bacula/scripts/make_catalog_backup_awk. - Thanks to Hanno Stock. (LP: #227410) * debian/bacula-director-pgsql.postinst - Really compare versions. (LP: #228693) * debian/bacula-directory-pgsql.postinst: - grant all privileges to new user on the new new database. * patches/ubuntu_grant_privileges.patch - test if $USER and $db_name are set in grant_postgresql_privileges. -- Chuck Short zul...@ubuntu.com Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:15:06 -0500 ** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
This bug was fixed in the package bacula - 2.2.8-5ubuntu7.2 --- bacula (2.2.8-5ubuntu7.2) hardy-proposed; urgency=low * Applied upstream's 2.2.8-strippath.patch, modified to compile cleanly on hardy. (http://bacula.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bacula?view=revrevision=6867) - Fix strippath bug that created a buffer overrun and crash the FD. (LP: #227613) [Ante Karamatic] * Export $HOME in /etc/bacula/scripts/make_catalog_backup_awk. - Thanks to Hanno Stock. (LP: #227410) * debian/bacula-director-pgsql.postinst - Really compare versions. (LP: #228693) * debian/bacula-directory-pgsql.postinst: - grant all privileges to new user on the new new database. * patches/ubuntu_grant_privileges.patch - test if $USER and $db_name are set in grant_postgresql_privileges. -- Chuck Short zul...@ubuntu.com Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:15:06 -0500 ** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
I have test the hardy proposed package and I cannot reproduce it. The default hardy package, bacula-fd crash 1/2 of times that I tested. With the proposed package, I've test 10 times and it not crash. ii bacula-fd 2.2.8-5ubuntu7.2 -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
I have test the hardy proposed package and I cannot reproduce it. The default hardy package, bacula-fd crash 1/2 of times that I tested. With the proposed package, I've test 10 times and it not crash. ii bacula-fd 2.2.8-5ubuntu7.2 -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
Accepted into hardy-proposed, please test and give feedback here. Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance! ** Tags removed: verification-failed ** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
Accepted into hardy-proposed, please test and give feedback here. Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance! ** Tags removed: verification-failed ** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu Intrepid) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu Intrepid) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
This has already been fixed for intrepid. ** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu Intrepid) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
Hi, with the latest package in PPA I cannot reproduce the bug. package version: bacula 2.2.8-5ubuntu7.1~ivoks3 sorry by the time to reply. -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
Hi, with the latest package in PPA I cannot reproduce the bug. package version: bacula 2.2.8-5ubuntu7.1~ivoks3 sorry by the time to reply. -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
On Saturday 27 September 2008 09:45:11 Ante Karamatić wrote: On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 20:36:41 - Kern Sibbald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 24 September 2008 20:04:18 Ante Karamatić wrote: The upstream bug has not been fixed in 2.2.8!! I haven't said that :) OK, no problem. I didn't take offense, hope you didn't, but just wanted to clarify. The bug *was* fixed in the 2.2.8 version with two patches. Did you apply them? We have 2.2.8 version in Ubuntu 8.04, and this bug is filed for 2.2.8. I think it was fixed later in bacula, not in 2.2.8... The bug in the main Bacula 2.2.8 Branch HEAD is fixed because the code is identical to the current 2.4.2 code. That is if 2.2.8 is fully and correctly patched with the released patches, it should have this bug and others fixed. It is possible that there were confusions with the patches in getting from the first 2.2.8 to the version that is in the SVN. In any case, what is clear to me is that we have no problems in the 2.4.x base with this bug and that the 2.4.0 was pulled from the last 2.2.8 and that no additional strippath changes were made in the 2.4.x versions. If not an easy way to fix it is to take src/dird/backup.c from either the last commit to Branch-2.2 or from the current released code (Branch-2.4) rather than trying to apply the patches. I guess you are referring to src/filed/backup.c? If yes, that file is exactly the same in my PPA version and in 2.4.2. Yes, sorry. I should have said src/filed/backup.c src/dird/backup.c has more differences, but I don't think those are relevant for this bug. Yes, you are correct. We'll wait for Sergio to test my PPA version. OK, if you have a 2.2.8 src/filed/backup.c that is the same as on 2.4.2, then the bug *should* be fixed. If not, I will be worried ... By the way, what does PPA mean and where does one find those versions? Thanks ... -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 20:36:41 - Kern Sibbald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 24 September 2008 20:04:18 Ante Karamatić wrote: The upstream bug has not been fixed in 2.2.8!! I haven't said that :) The bug *was* fixed in the 2.2.8 version with two patches. Did you apply them? We have 2.2.8 version in Ubuntu 8.04, and this bug is filed for 2.2.8. I think it was fixed later in bacula, not in 2.2.8... If not an easy way to fix it is to take src/dird/backup.c from either the last commit to Branch-2.2 or from the current released code (Branch-2.4) rather than trying to apply the patches. I guess you are referring to src/filed/backup.c? If yes, that file is exactly the same in my PPA version and in 2.4.2. src/dird/backup.c has more differences, but I don't think those are relevant for this bug. We'll wait for Sergio to test my PPA version. Thank you! -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
On Saturday 27 September 2008 09:45:11 Ante Karamatić wrote: On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 20:36:41 - Kern Sibbald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 24 September 2008 20:04:18 Ante Karamatić wrote: The upstream bug has not been fixed in 2.2.8!! I haven't said that :) OK, no problem. I didn't take offense, hope you didn't, but just wanted to clarify. The bug *was* fixed in the 2.2.8 version with two patches. Did you apply them? We have 2.2.8 version in Ubuntu 8.04, and this bug is filed for 2.2.8. I think it was fixed later in bacula, not in 2.2.8... The bug in the main Bacula 2.2.8 Branch HEAD is fixed because the code is identical to the current 2.4.2 code. That is if 2.2.8 is fully and correctly patched with the released patches, it should have this bug and others fixed. It is possible that there were confusions with the patches in getting from the first 2.2.8 to the version that is in the SVN. In any case, what is clear to me is that we have no problems in the 2.4.x base with this bug and that the 2.4.0 was pulled from the last 2.2.8 and that no additional strippath changes were made in the 2.4.x versions. If not an easy way to fix it is to take src/dird/backup.c from either the last commit to Branch-2.2 or from the current released code (Branch-2.4) rather than trying to apply the patches. I guess you are referring to src/filed/backup.c? If yes, that file is exactly the same in my PPA version and in 2.4.2. Yes, sorry. I should have said src/filed/backup.c src/dird/backup.c has more differences, but I don't think those are relevant for this bug. Yes, you are correct. We'll wait for Sergio to test my PPA version. OK, if you have a 2.2.8 src/filed/backup.c that is the same as on 2.4.2, then the bug *should* be fixed. If not, I will be worried ... By the way, what does PPA mean and where does one find those versions? Thanks ... -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 09:25:55 - Kern Sibbald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, no problem. I didn't take offense, hope you didn't, but just wanted to clarify. Of course not. The bug in the main Bacula 2.2.8 Branch HEAD is fixed because the code is identical to the current 2.4.2 code. That is if 2.2.8 is fully and correctly patched with the released patches, it should have this bug and others fixed. It is possible that there were confusions with the patches in getting from the first 2.2.8 to the version that is in the SVN. Oh! Mea culpa... I didn't know 2.2.8 is still getting patches. I'm checking out source as I write this... OK, if you have a 2.2.8 src/filed/backup.c that is the same as on 2.4.2, then the bug *should* be fixed. If not, I will be worried ... I've seen your comments on bug in bacula buglist, but we really need Sergio to confirm this. Thank you for the info! -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
On Saturday 27 September 2008 12:06:24 Ante Karamatić wrote: On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 09:25:55 - Kern Sibbald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, no problem. I didn't take offense, hope you didn't, but just wanted to clarify. Of course not. The bug in the main Bacula 2.2.8 Branch HEAD is fixed because the code is identical to the current 2.4.2 code. That is if 2.2.8 is fully and correctly patched with the released patches, it should have this bug and others fixed. It is possible that there were confusions with the patches in getting from the first 2.2.8 to the version that is in the SVN. Oh! Mea culpa... I didn't know 2.2.8 is still getting patches. I'm checking out source as I write this... OK. Just to be clear, you can get it from the branches Branch-2.2 svn checkout https://bacula.svn.sf.net/svnroot/bacula/branches/Branch-2.2 ... You might want to subscribe to the Source Forge Bacula bacula-patches notification. That way, you will see when I post any new patch. In general, once I post a patch, it means it has been reasonably well tested and usually verified by the bug submittor (or myself if I found the bug). Occassionally, and very unusual, as was the case in the original strippath bug report, I cannot reproduce the problem and the reporter does not respond to requests to confirm the patch, and the patch may not be totally correct, which is why we had at least two patches for that bug. In any case, if you get a bug report, it always best to check if any patches on it have been released ... OK, if you have a 2.2.8 src/filed/backup.c that is the same as on 2.4.2, then the bug *should* be fixed. If not, I will be worried ... I've seen your comments on bug in bacula buglist, but we really need Sergio to confirm this. Thank you for the info! Thanks for the description of PPA, pretty cool. -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
On Wednesday 24 September 2008 20:04:18 Ante Karamatić wrote: The upstream bug has not been fixed in 2.2.8!! The bug *was* fixed in the 2.2.8 version with two patches. Did you apply them? If not an easy way to fix it is to take src/dird/backup.c from either the last commit to Branch-2.2 or from the current released code (Branch-2.4) rather than trying to apply the patches. If you diff src/dird/backup.c from what you are currently shipping in 2.2.8 to the current 2.4 release and there are differences, it is pretty sure they are the fixes to the strippath problem as I don't remember making any other fix there. -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
Could you test my PPA? deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/ivoks/ubuntu hardy main -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
Could you test my PPA? deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/ivoks/ubuntu hardy main -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
Can you try the new version in my ppa (bacula_2.2.8-5ubuntu7.2~ppa1). Thanks chuck -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
sorry but it's not working. when I run a job copying one file it works. Then i modified the file and rerun the job. The second, third time it crash again. if I if you need some file or log I'll happy to add it, but I cannot install -dbgsym for add a backtrace. -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
Can you try the new version in my ppa (bacula_2.2.8-5ubuntu7.2~ppa1). Thanks chuck -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
sorry but it's not working. when I run a job copying one file it works. Then i modified the file and rerun the job. The second, third time it crash again. if I if you need some file or log I'll happy to add it, but I cannot install -dbgsym for add a backtrace. -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
** Tags added: verification-failed ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
Hi, Can you try the package from my archive, before I upload this thing to hady-proposed again: http://launchpad.net/~zulcss/+archive. thanks chuck -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
still doesn't work. I attach backtrace but I don't have debug symbols for bacula packages. ** Attachment added: bacula-bt.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15590552/bacula-bt.log -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
** Attachment added: bacula-dir.conf http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15608463/bacula-dir.conf -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
attached the bacula-fd.conf and bacula-dir.conf (don't worry about passwords) ** Attachment added: bacula-fd.conf http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15608460/bacula-fd.conf -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
Hi, Can you try the package from my archive, before I upload this thing to hady-proposed again: http://launchpad.net/~zulcss/+archive. thanks chuck -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
still doesn't work. I attach backtrace but I don't have debug symbols for bacula packages. ** Attachment added: bacula-bt.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15590552/bacula-bt.log -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
Can you attach your bacula-fd.conf please? Thanks chuck -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
** Attachment added: bacula-dir.conf http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15608463/bacula-dir.conf -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
attached the bacula-fd.conf and bacula-dir.conf (don't worry about passwords) ** Attachment added: bacula-fd.conf http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15608460/bacula-fd.conf -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
** Tags added: verification-failed ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
I've tested proposed package after upgrade, and I get same error too. package: ii bacula-fd 2.2.8-5ubuntu7.1 -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
I've tested proposed package after upgrade, and I get same error too. package: ii bacula-fd 2.2.8-5ubuntu7.1 -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
Chuck or anyone else, can you improve the test case by giving a sample configuration for testing this bug fix? This is one of the bugfixes we'd like people to try to verify in the special SRU BugHug day tomorrow: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20080624 Thanks! -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
** Description changed: Binary package hint: bacula bacula-fd has a know bug/crash when the strippath option is used. more information here: http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1047 The upstream bug has not been fixed in 2.2.8!! + + TEST CASE: + 1. apt-get install bacula-server bacula-client. + 2. Configure and enable the strippath option. -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
Chuck or anyone else, can you improve the test case by giving a sample configuration for testing this bug fix? This is one of the bugfixes we'd like people to try to verify in the special SRU BugHug day tomorrow: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20080624 Thanks! -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
** Description changed: Binary package hint: bacula bacula-fd has a know bug/crash when the strippath option is used. more information here: http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1047 The upstream bug has not been fixed in 2.2.8!! + + TEST CASE: + 1. apt-get install bacula-server bacula-client. + 2. Configure and enable the strippath option. -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
tested the -proposed, no change the backtrace that bacula-fd generates itself is attached ** Attachment added: bacula-fd.trace http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14982912/bacula-fd.trace -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu Intrepid) Assignee: (unassigned) = Chuck Short (zulcss) ** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: Fix Committed = In Progress -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
Accepted into -proposed, please test and give feedback here ** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: New = Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
Debian currently ships a patch that we inherited that does not fix this issue. I have backported the patch (attached) to resolve this issue. TEST CASE: 1. apt-get install bacula-server bacula-client. 2. Configure and ebaled the strippath option. Note: This should be done with someone who has experience with bacula. There should be no regressions from this patch. If you have any questions please let me know. -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
Debian currently ships a patch that we inherited that does not fix this issue. I have backported the patch (attached) to resolve this issue. TEST CASE: 1. apt-get install bacula-server bacula-client. 2. Configure and ebaled the strippath option. Note: This should be done with someone who has experience with bacula. There should be no regressions from this patch. If you have any questions please let me know. -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
** Attachment added: Fix for strippath option. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14659797/fix-segv-strippath.patch -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227613] Re: [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd
** Summary changed: - SIGSEGV in bacula-fd + [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd -- [SRU] SIGSEGV in bacula-fd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
