[Bug 242043] Re: [needs-packaging] read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64
** Changed in: debian Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242043 Title: [needs-packaging] read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/read-edid/+bug/242043/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242043] Re: [needs-packaging] read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #502125 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=502125 -- [needs-packaging] read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242043] Re: [needs-packaging] read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/read-edid -- [needs-packaging] read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242043] Re: [needs-packaging] read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/karmic/read-edid -- [needs-packaging] read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242043] Re: [needs-packaging] read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64
This bug was fixed in the package read-edid - 2.0.0-1ubuntu1
---
read-edid (2.0.0-1ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low
* debian/{control,rules}, Makefile.am:: build amd64 and lpia with
libx86-dev (LP: #242043, debian bug 534742).
-- Kees Cook k...@ubuntu.com Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:31:52 -0700
** Changed in: read-edid (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
[needs-packaging] read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242043
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242043] Re: [needs-packaging] read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64
** Summary changed: - [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64 + [needs-packaging] read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64 -- [needs-packaging] read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242043] Re: [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64
TJ, did you decide not to go ahead with this? -- [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242043] Re: [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64
What I'm quite failing to understand is the original bug description. I might be wrong, but I doubt that dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg has anything to do with read-edid (as read-edid is universe... so it can't be automatically available for xserver). I am sure that dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg has something to do with read-edid simply because that's the error I got back when I invoked it! :-) I am not a ubuntu linux hacker, but I did do enough digging back at the time to assure myself that read-edid being missing was in fact the problem that stopped reconfiguration from taking place. If read-edid is in universe and the xserver is supposed to be (re)configurable without packages that are in universe, then read-edid may need reclassification (or alternately, the reconfiguration process may need changing to avoid the dependency). -- [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242043] Re: [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64
setting to confirmed based on my recent ACK #2 (and no opposition). Please go ahead. ** Changed in: read-edid (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242043] Re: [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64
Thanks for testing. No, the difference (address of vga Bios) is not a problem, that's quite expected actually (don't ask, and just don't dare to look at libx86 *how* it handles graphic bios calls, you might be frightened *g*...). What I'm quite failing to understand is the original bug description. I might be wrong, but I doubt that dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg has anything to do with read-edid (as read-edid is universe... so it can't be automatically available for xserver). However with jaunty's X, which can very well read the edid on its own and which to my knowledge uses autotedection in most cases, I see no risk in updating read-edid. ACK #2 from me (Scott, unless you oppose to it). -- [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242043] Re: [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64
** Tags added: edid -- [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242043] Re: [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64
I've tested the read-edid from the PPA (read- edid_2.0.0-0ubuntu1~tj~ppa1j_i386.deb) and it seems to work fine. I noticed a difference on STDERR from get-edid though: $ diff get-edid-1.4.err get-edid-2.0.err1c1 get-edid: get-edid version 1.4.1 --- get-edid: get-edid version 2.0.0 9c9 VBE string at 0x0 Intel(r)Crestline Graphics Chip Accelerated VGA BIOS --- VBE string at 0x2110 Intel(r)Crestline Graphics Chip Accelerated VGA BIOS I don't know if this is a problem or not. This is a Thinkpad X61 Tablet running Jaunty. The STDOUT of get-edid is identical in both versions, and the output of parse-edid given this EDID information is also identical. ** Attachment added: get-edid-2.0.err http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24133197/get-edid-2.0.err -- [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242043] Re: [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64
I also tested on another computer, a Dell Optiplex SX280 USFF. Basically the same results. Identical STDOUT from get-edid and parse-edid, but a similar difference in STDERR: $ diff get-edid-1.4.err get-edid-2.0.err 1c1 get-edid: get-edid version 1.4.1 --- get-edid: get-edid version 2.0.0 9c9 VBE string at 0x0 Intel(r)915G/915GV/910GL Graphics Chip Accelerated VGA BIOS --- VBE string at 0x2110 Intel(r)915G/915GV/910GL Graphics Chip Accelerated VGA BIOS -- [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242043] Re: [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64
Are these rdepends affected by this upgrade? Reverse Depends: xdebconfigurator lm-sensors It looks like xdebconfigurator is not using read-edid by default. It just suggests read-edid now. -- [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 242043] Re: [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 06:40 +, Iulian Udrea wrote: Are these rdepends affected by this upgrade? Reverse Depends: xdebconfigurator lm-sensors It looks like xdebconfigurator is not using read-edid by default. It just suggests read-edid now. That's correct, and it detects the presence of the read-edid tools using: xdebconfigurator:74:chomp($getedid = `which get-edid`); # read-edid exists? I couldn't find any usage of read-edid's executables (get-edid or parse-edid) in lm-sensors. The only occurrence of the string edid at all... pwd /home/all/SourceCode/lm-sensors-3-3.0.2 grep -rni edid * debian/control:14:Suggests: sensord, read-edid, i2c-tools debian/changelog:776: * Suggests: read-edid (closes: bug#265890). prog/detect/sensors-detect:1212: # for SPD and EDID EEPROMs because some hardware monitoring chips prog/detect/sensors-detect:1218: name = EDID EEPROM, ...is in the Debian changelog where it says: debian/changelog:776: * Suggests: read-edid (closes: bug#265890) Looking at that Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=265890 it seems as if the only reason for the Suggests was because: ...decode-edid.pl is not present in the package... The output of get-edid | parse-edid is the same as it ever was so packages relying on the output won't be affected. The only change is a gain in the availability of the tools on 64-bit installations. -- [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242043] Re: [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64
I'm fine with it. ACK #1 ** Changed in: read-edid (Ubuntu) Assignee: TJ (intuitivenipple) = (unassigned) Status: In Progress = New -- [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242043] Re: [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64
I'd like to see testing from more than one person. -- [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242043] Re: [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64
Feature Freeze Exception request * Upstream added support for amd64 architecture (using libx86) and has a new maintainer ** Attachment added: FFE ChangeLog http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24017626/ffe-ChangeLog.patch -- [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242043] Re: [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64
** Attachment added: pbuilder jaunty amd64 build log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24017675/read-edid-2.0.0-0ubuntu1%7Etj%7Eppa1j-jaunty-amd64-2009-03-13_21-00-50.log -- [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242043] Re: [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64
= Install log = sudo apt-get install read-edid Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following NEW packages will be installed read-edid 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 94 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/12.8kB of archives. After this operation, 77.8kB of additional disk space will be used. Selecting previously deselected package read-edid. (Reading database ... 205161 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking read-edid (from .../read-edid_2.0.0-0ubuntu1~tj~ppa1j_amd64.deb) ... Processing triggers for man-db ... Setting up read-edid (2.0.0-0ubuntu1~tj~ppa1j) ... = Tests = Tested on x86 and amd64 hardware. Reports expected results for monitors that support EDID. -- [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242043] Re: [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64
Please test the package in my PPA and report back. https://launchpad.net/~intuitivenipple/+archive/ppa/ -- [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242043] Re: [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64
Successfully build-tested for Hardy, Intrepid, Jaunty (i386 and amd64). Runs on Jaunty amd64 (no results since Nvidia GeForce 7600 + Sony FE41Z don't provide EDID output). Runs on Jaunty i386 (no results since Intel i815M + Sony SRX51 TFT don't provide EDID output). -- [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242043] Re: [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64
I'm working on the package. I'll have a test package in my PPA shortly. ** Changed in: read-edid (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = TJ (intuitivenipple) Status: Triaged = In Progress -- [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242043] Re: [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64
** Changed in: debian Status: Unknown = New -- [needs-packaging} read-edid-2.0.0 for amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
