[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-11-19 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
Henning Moll wrote:
> Is my understanding correct that even this fix
> does not solve the problem for all applications?

Of course, it does not solve the problem for applications calling the
resolver explicitly with AF_INET6. That's bound to fail. These
applications would fail worse if libc behavior were changed on that one.

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-11-19 Thread Henning Moll
Thomsas Butter wrote:
> Thanks for the good fix!

Is my understanding correct that even this fix does not solve the
problem for all applications?

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-10-24 Thread Colin Watson
David: I've re-raised this as bug 156720 and a fix is in progress.
Thanks.

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-09-27 Thread David Gerber
This bug is back in gutsy. The patch should be applied again.

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-04-04 Thread Thomas Butter
Thanks for the good fix!

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-04-03 Thread Trent Lloyd
Rock, I really do feel this is the right solution

I guess at the end of the day your blacklisting kicked enough upraw to
fix the problem, so I guess it was the right move :)

Cheers!
Trent

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-04-03 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Yes the blacklist has been removed already.

Fabio

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-04-03 Thread Trent Lloyd
As I understand it, a patch has now been applied to glibc

"A fixed glibc with the following patch has been uploaded today:

14:30 < Mithrandir> Uploading to ubuntu (via ftp to upload.ubuntu.com):
glibc_2.5-0ubuntu13.dsc: done. glibc_2.5-0ubuntu13.diff.gz: done.
glibc_2.5-0ubuntu13_source.changes: done.

This glibc has the following patch in it:
http://err.no/patches/glibc-only-lookup-ipv6-if-it-makes-sense.diff

Mithrandir is Tollef Fog Heen, Ubuntu Release Manager.

"

Which should fix this issue in a much better way - will this hack now be
reverted?

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-04-03 Thread Jeff Bailey
Ouch, another comment here to say that blacklisting this broke a
perfectly working ipv6 system.  I can see doing this for new installs,
but I don't think it's a good idea to break existing ones.

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-04-03 Thread didier
>First my apologies for the initial remark. I did not realize that
>getaddrinfo() actually stopped doing  if ipv6 was not loaded even
>if AI_ADDRCONFIG was not set.

Is it true?

Here feisty with libc-2.5.0ubuntu12 
no ip6
but wget, for example, still request  records

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-04-03 Thread Thomas Butter
The Vista DNS Query Behaviour is described here:

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/network/ipv6/vista_dns.mspx

"- If the host has only link-local or Teredo IPv6 addresses assigned, the DNS 
Client service sends a single query for A records.
- If the host has at least one IPv6 address assigned that is not a link-local 
or Teredo address, the DNS Client service sends a DNS query for A records and 
then a separate DNS query to the same DNS server for  records. If an A 
record query times out or has an error (other than name not found), the 
corresponding  record query is not sent."


I don't know why they don't do any  query if you have a teredo address 
(which is globally routable), but the rest sounds reasonable.

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-04-03 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
First my apologies for the initial remark. I did not realize that 
getaddrinfo() actually stopped doing  if ipv6 was not loaded even 
if AI_ADDRCONFIG was not set.

Answers inline.

Le lundi 2 avril 2007 06:53, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto a écrit :
> Remi, restoring IPv6 is a matter of adding/uncommenting a line in
> interfaces or removing the blacklist. I don't believe that it can be
> such big source of headackes.

So, how do I deploy Ubuntu with IPv6 to a large number of PCs with 
non-techies users?

Even if I could modify the configuration manually, how do I cope with 
configuration files updates from Ubuntu? dpkg will not deploy new 
versions because the configuration files changed.

At the very least, the ipv6 blacklist should be in a file of its own so 
that it does not prevent upgrading the rest of the file for people 
still using IPv6.

That's not only immensely impractical for "human beings", the current 
solution provides no sane exit strategy and upgrade path, which is the 
most basic question to answer when deploying this kind of kludge.

Also the statement that this is "not an issue" because it's handled by 
ifupdown is misleading. It misses the fact that most IPv6 systems are 
using stateless autoconf (but I'm repeating comments already made by 
other people).

On my system, the upgrade also had the very unkind effect of breaking 
ip6tables completely, since IPv6 autoloading got disabled, and any sane 
person will do firewall configuration before configuration the network 
interfaces.

> What MacOS does is also not completely proper.

The MacOS X solution is far from perfect, but it is surely much less 
worse than permanently killing IPv6 because of a few broken DNS caches.

> I can have only
> link-local address and use them to connect from one machine to
> another with proper entries in the DNS. 

Any applications, with the possible exception of ping6, will 
return "Invalid argument" error because the DNS resolver cannot 
guess/set the scope ID in the IPv6 socket address structure. Futhermore 
many applications cannot deal with link-local anyway because they do 
not preserve the scope ID even if it's set.

On top of that, putting link-local in the DNS is against documented 
standard practices.

> ow your solution would address this case if  query will not be
> available?

The current solution does not handle this case either, in any practical 
circumstance.

Regards;

-- 
Rémi Denis-Courmont
http://www.remlab.net/

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-04-03 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 05:50:13 -, Thomas Butter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The relevant changes in glibc 2.5 are address sorting related. I don't
> think it allows disabling  queries in gai.conf

Yes. These changes will NOT AT ALL fix the  timeout problem. But some
people reported there were "other" (unspecified?) issues than  timeout.

glibc 2.5 (and kernel 2.6.17.2) will fix a bunch of other potential
IPv6-related inconviences:
It will not cause connection timeouts when trying to connect to a
dual-stack server from a dual-stack private-IPv6(ULAs) and IPv4 network,
as IPv4 will be attempted first.
Similarly, if you have sone clueless XP/Vista box advertising a 6to4 prefix
on the network: glibc 2.5 will prioritize IPv4 (unless the final destination
has a 6to4 address), whereas glibc 2.3 would prioritize IPv6.

--
Rémi Denis-Courmont
http://www.remlab.net/

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-04-02 Thread Trent Lloyd
Thomas Butter wrote:
>> Link local addresses aren't limited to just "link diagnostics", also
>> when using avahi/zeroconf, you may well have dns for just the local link.
>> 
>
> I am no avahi expert so I could be wrong. I think avahi/zeroconf only
> uses the dns protocol, but won't use the glibc name resolution functions
> with link local addresses. So this use case won't affect the Vista/OS X
> like name resolution.
>   
Well, I am ;)

I was talking about situations where you could be using a link local IP, 
that is in DNS, where you may not have a default route.

Case in point was Avahi which can make use of link local IPs which you 
can then get at with DNS using the libnss-mdns, having said that given 
the interface specification stuff, they are relatively useless unless 
your using the Avahi API directly which allows you to get the interface 
along with the name.

Cheers,
Trent



-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-04-02 Thread Thomas Butter
> Link local addresses aren't limited to just "link diagnostics", also
> when using avahi/zeroconf, you may well have dns for just the local link.

I am no avahi expert so I could be wrong. I think avahi/zeroconf only
uses the dns protocol, but won't use the glibc name resolution functions
with link local addresses. So this use case won't affect the Vista/OS X
like name resolution.

The relevant changes in glibc 2.5 are address sorting related. I don't think
it allows disabling  queries in gai.conf

>From glibc NEWS:

* For Linux, the sorting of addresses returned by getaddrinfo now also
  handles rules 3, 4, and 7 from RFC 3484.  I.e., all rules are handled.
  Implemented by Ulrich Drepper.

* Allow system admin to configure getaddrinfo with the /etc/gai.conf file.
  Implemented by Ulrich Drepper.

gai.conf man page:

http://www.die.net/doc/linux/man/man5/gai.conf.5.html

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-04-02 Thread Trent Lloyd
Has anyone affected by this tried this in feisty? Apparently there may
be some changes in glibc 2.5 which affect this?

Trent

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-04-02 Thread Trent Lloyd
Howdy,


>>> breaking ip6tables completely, since IPv6 autoloading got disabled,
>>> and any sane person will do firewall configuration before
>>> configuration the network interfaces.
> On my system, the upgrade also had the very unkind effect ofI usually 
> load a firewall on given protocol once lo is up on that protocol for 2 
> reasons
> I don't. Is it a reason to break my working system?
>
> Besides, it does not work either, since there were no need to set inet6 
> explicitly on lo so far.
>   
I have to say I am somewhat in agreeance that this should potentially be 
made to apply "only to new installs", because it can break existing 
machines that are only available via IPv6, etc.


>> 2) it is always executed before any real interface is up.
>> 
>
> That's a side effect. In practice, lo is created by the kernel, and the 
> lo interface in /etc/network/interfaces is really a cosmetic entry.
>   
That is not correct, the kernel creates 'lo' just like it creates eth0, 
eth1, etc, but it does not configure an IP.
This is what that stanza does.
>   
>> Another way to hook up a firewall script to a specific protocol is to
>> use the /etc/modprobe.d/ to run a script as soon as a certain module
>> is loaded.
>> 
>
> If ipv6 gets loaded after some real interface is brought up, we get an 
> unfirewalled time window, which was the precise reason for not doing it 
> that way.
>   
Put lo before any other interfaces in 'auto' and that should not happen 
AFAIK.


>> It appears somebody is using it this way and it was brought up as use
>> case. I will check this up again.
>> 
>
> It appears many more people are using IPv6 and expect it to work out of 
> the box on their Ubuntu Feisty, as it did in Dapper and Edgy. From 
> reading the bug thread and the rants on freenode/#ipv6, I have a 
> feeling I am not the only one.
>
> 18:44 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% host basile.link
> basile.link has IPv6 address fe80::211:11ff:fe25:e6b4
> 18:44 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% ssh basile.link
> ssh: connect to host basile.link port 22: Invalid argument
> 18:44 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% ssh basile.link%eth0
> ssh: basile.link%eth0: Name or service not known
> 18:44 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% ping6 basile.link
> connect: Invalid argument
> 18:44 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% ping6 basile.link -I eth0 -c 1
> PING basile.link(basile.link) from fe80::20d:60ff:fe38:6d16 eth0: 56 
> data bytes
> 64 bytes from basile.link: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.167 ms
>
> --- basile.link ping statistics ---
> 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.167/0.167/0.167/0.000 ms
>
> ping6 is the only application that can handle this, which is of pretty 
> limited use. Also, when you're down to doing link diagnostics, you 
> probably cannot reach the DNS server, so you'd better use numerical 
> addresses anyway.
>   
Link local addresses aren't limited to just "link diagnostics", also 
when using avahi/zeroconf, you may well have dns for just the local link.

It is true, and somewhat annoying, that using link local IPs require 
interfaces to be specifically set, some applications will do this, some 
won't, this is an ongoing issue in relation to Avahi right now.



Cheers,
Trent

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-04-02 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
Le lundi 2 avril 2007 18:39, vous avez écrit :
> /etc/network/interfaces is not considered a configuration file and no
> packages owns it. So you can modify it at will.

I was referring to the backlist file, not interfaces.

(...)
> I think the overall price is worth the benefit.

You won't think that way when Ubuntu gets dropped in favor of 
your-favorite-IPv6-capable-proprietary-OS-here at some big government 
agency, in some university campus, or by DVB-H users..., because for 
some reason IPv6 ended up on the overhyped requirements list (even if 
it won't be used in practice). But I'm getting off-topic

> > On my system, the upgrade also had the very unkind effect of
> > breaking ip6tables completely, since IPv6 autoloading got disabled,
> > and any sane person will do firewall configuration before
> > configuration the network interfaces.

> I usually load a firewall on given protocol once lo is up on that
> protocol for 2 reasons:

I don't. Is it a reason to break my working system?

Besides, it does not work either, since there were no need to set inet6 
explicitly on lo so far.

> 1) i can make sure the protocol is loaded

ip6tables normally autoloads IPv6, which is the only sensical thing it 
could do.

> 2) it is always executed before any real interface is up.

That's a side effect. In practice, lo is created by the kernel, and the 
lo interface in /etc/network/interfaces is really a cosmetic entry.

> Another way to hook up a firewall script to a specific protocol is to
> use the /etc/modprobe.d/ to run a script as soon as a certain module
> is loaded.

If ipv6 gets loaded after some real interface is brought up, we get an 
unfirewalled time window, which was the precise reason for not doing it 
that way.

> >> What MacOS does is also not completely proper.
> >
> > The MacOS X solution is far from perfect, but it is surely much
> > less worse than permanently killing IPv6 because of a few broken
> > DNS caches.
>
> s/caches/implementations and it's not just DNS here. As I said there
> is also broken hardware around.

It *is* only DNS, or pre-2.6.9 kernels with the default onlink 
assumption. Feisty has 2.6.20 plus glibc 2.5 with proper RFC3484 
support.

> It appears somebody is using it this way and it was brought up as use
> case. I will check this up again.

It appears many more people are using IPv6 and expect it to work out of 
the box on their Ubuntu Feisty, as it did in Dapper and Edgy. From 
reading the bug thread and the rants on freenode/#ipv6, I have a 
feeling I am not the only one.

18:44 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% host basile.link
basile.link has IPv6 address fe80::211:11ff:fe25:e6b4
18:44 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% ssh basile.link
ssh: connect to host basile.link port 22: Invalid argument
18:44 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% ssh basile.link%eth0
ssh: basile.link%eth0: Name or service not known
18:44 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% ping6 basile.link
connect: Invalid argument
18:44 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% ping6 basile.link -I eth0 -c 1
PING basile.link(basile.link) from fe80::20d:60ff:fe38:6d16 eth0: 56 
data bytes
64 bytes from basile.link: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.167 ms

--- basile.link ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.167/0.167/0.167/0.000 ms

ping6 is the only application that can handle this, which is of pretty 
limited use. Also, when you're down to doing link diagnostics, you 
probably cannot reach the DNS server, so you'd better use numerical 
addresses anyway.

Also if both Apple and Microsoft does it that way on their 
IPv6-by-default general purpose OSes, it might not be such a stupid 
notion.

> PS I don't exclude that the use case was based on personally
> developed application that we cannot exclude to exist.

So you would consider that an hypotetical personally-developed 
application, that breaks standard practices, and will only work on 
Linux, is more important than non-hypotetical people using IPv6 that 
are screwed by the last change?

Wasn't it a "balance" thing?

Regards,

-- 
Rémi Denis-Courmont
http://www.remlab.net/

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-04-02 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> First my apologies for the initial remark. I did not realize that 
> getaddrinfo() actually stopped doing  if ipv6 was not loaded even 
> if AI_ADDRCONFIG was not set.

no problem :)

> 
> Answers inline.
> 
> Le lundi 2 avril 2007 06:53, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto a écrit :
>> Remi, restoring IPv6 is a matter of adding/uncommenting a line in
>> interfaces or removing the blacklist. I don't believe that it can be
>> such big source of headackes.
> 
> So, how do I deploy Ubuntu with IPv6 to a large number of PCs with 
> non-techies users?
> 
> Even if I could modify the configuration manually, how do I cope with 
> configuration files updates from Ubuntu? dpkg will not deploy new 
> versions because the configuration files changed.

/etc/network/interfaces is not considered a configuration file and no packages
owns it. So you can modify it at will.

> 
> At the very least, the ipv6 blacklist should be in a file of its own so 
> that it does not prevent upgrading the rest of the file for people 
> still using IPv6.

It is on its own blacklist file alone.

> 
> That's not only immensely impractical for "human beings", the current 
> solution provides no sane exit strategy and upgrade path, which is the 
> most basic question to answer when deploying this kind of kludge.

Well here we need to balance what are the pros and cons. Pros are a lot given
how many people are unfortunately hitted by broken hw and broken DNS
implementations. Cons is only one.. to re-enable autoconf you need to either
unblacklist ipv6 or add one line to /etc/network/interfaces.

I think the overall price is worth the benefit.

> On my system, the upgrade also had the very unkind effect of breaking 
> ip6tables completely, since IPv6 autoloading got disabled, and any sane 
> person will do firewall configuration before configuration the network 
> interfaces.

I usually load a firewall on given protocol once lo is up on that protocol for 2
reasons:

1) i can make sure the protocol is loaded
2) it is always executed before any real interface is up.

Another way to hook up a firewall script to a specific protocol is to use the
/etc/modprobe.d/ to run a script as soon as a certain module is loaded.

> 
>> What MacOS does is also not completely proper.
> 
> The MacOS X solution is far from perfect, but it is surely much less 
> worse than permanently killing IPv6 because of a few broken DNS caches.

s/caches/implementations and it's not just DNS here. As I said there is also
broken hardware around.

> 
>> I can have only
>> link-local address and use them to connect from one machine to
>> another with proper entries in the DNS. 
> 
> Any applications, with the possible exception of ping6, will 
> return "Invalid argument" error because the DNS resolver cannot 
> guess/set the scope ID in the IPv6 socket address structure. Futhermore 
> many applications cannot deal with link-local anyway because they do 
> not preserve the scope ID even if it's set.
> 
> On top of that, putting link-local in the DNS is against documented 
> standard practices.

It appears somebody is using it this way and it was brought up as use case.
I will check this up again.

Fabio

PS I don't exclude that the use case was based on personally developed
application that we cannot exclude to exist.

-- 
I'm going to make him an offer he can't refuse.

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-04-02 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Remi, restoring IPv6 is a matter of adding/uncommenting a line in
interfaces or removing the blacklist. I don't believe that it can be
such big source of headackes.

What MacOS does is also not completely proper. I can have only link-local 
address and use them to connect from one machine to another with proper entries 
in the DNS. How your solution would address this case if  query will not be 
available?

Fabio

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-04-01 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
I have serious doubts that blacklisting IPv6 really solves the problem.
glibc's getaddrinfo() will still query  regardless, unless
AI_ADDRCONFIG flag is set. And it is very often *not* set, if only
because it is a "proprietary" GNU extension.

In other words, the problem is now fixed merely for some applications,
but surely not all of them, and particularly probably a bunch of apps in
Ubuntu universe.

IMHO, the proper solution would rather go along the lines of what MacOS
X does, i.e. only try  if there is any non-loopback non-link-local
IPv6 address (and only try A is there is any non-loopback IPv4 address).
That means hacking glibc, and has nothing to do with the *kernel* IPv6
plugin. Also, I think it is much less likely that an application will
want to resolve  in absence of IPv6 connectivity, than it is likely
that some Ubuntu users will want IPv6 connectivity, even though both are
uncommon situation in any case.

Finally, adding such a blacklist looks like an incoming source of
headaches if IPv6 is to ever be restored, and a nice source of Ubuntu
bashing from advanced users once Feisty is released.

To sum up, the real problems are that glibc only checks IPv6
connectivity if AI_ADDRCONFIG is set (this is a trivial hack to
sysdeps/posix/getaddrinfo.c), and then glibc's check_pf considers IPv6
is available even if there is only ::1 or fe80::something which is
clearly wrong (this is a not-so-trivial to make_request from
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/check_pf.c).

My 0,02€. Regards.

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-03-31 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Scott: the problems are 2. hardware that people are forced to use and
broken ISP DNS.

once you load ipv6, the glibc resolver will query  first and A later
as specified by Internet RFC's.

so when your application (clearly FF is the first one to really show it) 
attempts to connect to www.foo.bar, the first query will be
 and that one will take ages to fail because of the broken hw/DNS that's 
not under ubuntu s control. As soon as the timeout
occurs, the resolver will try IPv4 and bang... it works.

the FF "solution" is just to force FF to do a specific A query.

The really worst part here is that these devices and software implementation 
are not even IPV4 compliant since if you have never configured IPv6, the DNS 
query will happen
in ipv4.

Fabio

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-03-31 Thread Scott Robinson
Maybe I'm missing the documentation, but with the exception of the
Firefox resolution thing, has anyone worked out why when v6 is enabled
DNS resolution is taking so much longer in these cases?

I have installed Ubuntu on many machines, none accessing a v6 network..
and yet none seem to have this problem?

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-03-30 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Sami: done thanks. the comment should be there from the monday install
CD's or tomorrow network installations.

Fabio

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-03-30 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Sami: good suggestion. I will see if i can get it done asap.

Fabio

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-03-30 Thread Sami Haahtinen
Should there be a change in the default interfaces file so that it
includes a commented IPv6 line to allow easier enabling of IPv6 support?

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-03-30 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Thomas, that's exactly what i told you.. just add a line like:

iface lo inet6 manual

to interfaces and you are done. no other changes.. everything will just
work from there on.. loading ipv6, autoconf and etc.

Fabio

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-03-30 Thread Thomas Butter
> this change comes in combo with ifupdown that will do the
> right thing once you have at least one instance that
> requires ipv6.

ifupdown won't be able to know if I need ipv6 since ipv6 uses auto-
configuration when a router advertisement arrives and some applications
use link-local addresses which are never configured.

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs



[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-03-30 Thread Martin Tasker
Most of the beneficiaries of this change won't notice it.  So let me say
"thank you" here.

Thanks to the developers for taking this action.

Thanks to those established users who know that IPv6 is an issue, for
making a small sacrifice to help out new users - like me - who don't
know that.

It's much appreciated.

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-03-30 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
as explained on IRC, repeating here again i can add docs to the
ReleaseNotes...

this change comes in combo with ifupdown that will do the right thing
once you have at least one instance that requires ipv6.

it's the easiest solution that makes everybody happy.

Fabio

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-03-30 Thread LuisM
This is the most BS solution that I have seen in a while. I understand
that the technology is in its infancy, but disabling it is not the right
solution either.

In any case, I see your point.

Now for those of you who DO use ipv6 and care, perhaps you have enough
knowledge to simply enable the thing again:

#> cat /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-ipv6 
# never load ipv6 automatically. ifupdown will do it for on request.
#blacklist ipv6

ifdown/ifup your interface and you are back in business.

Now let's move on to other bugs that need to be fixed.

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-03-30 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Yes.. hence we need the ReleaseNote.. there is no other way around that
without a lot of magic that can behave really badly.

Fabio

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-03-30 Thread Trent Lloyd
It is worth noting while the ifupdown changes will cause any static
setups to continue working, it will break setups relying on
autoconfiguration, which are quite common for those using IPv6.

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-03-30 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
2 things:

1) a change to ifupdown has been done so that current setups will not
break (or shouldn't)

2) information to the Release note will be added as soon as somebody
from the doc team can tell me where they did move the page.

Fabio

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-03-30 Thread Thomas Butter
Ubuntu had IPv6 enabled for a long time. Now all other major OS (Vista,
OSX) have enabled it by default and Ubuntu will disable it without
warning for existing users?

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-03-30 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Fixed in feisty by blacklisting ipv6


** Changed in: netcfg (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-03-29 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
** Changed in: netcfg (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
   Status: Confirmed => In Progress

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-03-24 Thread Milan
Here in France, Tecom AH4222 is distributed by one of the major FAIs,
and it suffers from this bug too.

Your reaction to the report is strange. I think we need to allow
disabling IPv6 easily, eg via a checkbox in System -> Administration
->Network, along with Avahi enabling option. We could add a tooltip
explaining that IPv6 is generating delays and connection errors with
buggy routers.This is IMHO compulsory, because a normal user (even
advanced users are confused) won't know where to search for a solution.
Feisty will suffer from comparison with Windows XP on the *numerous*
routers that handle IPv6 badly.

I'm in favor of disabling IPv6 by default since it's still the
exception, and that people who use it most often know they use it, and
will still be able to use Internet with IPv4. I agree it's good we help
passing to IPv6, but Ubuntu's worldwide influence in this domain is
little, and people who own buggy routers will still have them. We should
always focus on usability: we don't have to force the user to use new
technologies if they can bring issues. They should at least be proposed
to disable it easily.

Why even no workaround was found in more than a year ?! Now Feisty is to
be released, and for at least 6 month people coming from Windows as well
as old Linux users will have to bear a slow connection.

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-03-18 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
Thomas, perhaps I don't understand very well the features of ipv6 that
you mention. If it was just a matter of additional features, then the
solution would be the same as with providing compiz or beryl by default:
even if the scale (OSX exposé alike) plugin is really an usability aid,
since it shows you all the windows at once, and moreover desktop effects
are a good publicity for a linux distribution now that both OSX and
Vista have them, ubuntu will not ship compiz by default since it might
break things for people having broken opengl support in their video
card. I have a card supported by open source drivers and have no such
problems, but will not demand compiz by default on ubuntu because I want
all newbies to be able to use ubuntu, and don't want them to see a
"broken" thing at installation.

The examples you mentioned are university and business, and in both
cases you will have a sysadmin or at least basic networking instructions
telling you that ipv6 is useful and advising you to enable it. It seems
like home users won't really need ipv6 and won't have anyone telling
them to check whether ipv6 is breaking things or not - in general. If
every case was like that, there would be no reason to enable ipv6 by
default. The example brought by Fabio is really interesting: he has a
home provider that needs ipv6 enabled. The question is: did they warn
you, in their initial instructions, that you needed to enable ipv6? In
general, it still seems to me that a provider requiring ipv6 is
something rare w.r.t. a provider breaking with ipv6.

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-03-17 Thread Dfincher
I would be ok with leaving it enabled if there were an easy process to
disable it if needed.  After doing a little research I did find this to
be a prevelent problem with Linux reguardless of distribution.  Seems
that whatever solution is provided would benefit to any distro which has
IPv6 enabled.

Possibly a small troubleshooting app which checks for the IPv6 issue and
offers to turn it off if found and recommends that the user look at
updating their firmware.  Place the with the network managment software.
This solution leaves IPv6 enable and provides the user a simple check
and disable if desired.

Hardware: Actiontec GT701-wg (sold by Qwest Communications)
Firmware: Version QW05.05 works with IPv6 (Lower versions do not)

Thanks,
DFincher

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-03-17 Thread Thomas Butter
> Disable IPv6 now and work towards getting a compatibility check in
place with clear and simple procedures for the users.

IPv6 is used in many university, some company networks. New routers
(e.g. the new Apple Airport Extreme) give you an 6to4 address
automatically. Disabling would remove an often used feature.

Automatically detecting the router problem at installation is also not
possible since many computers move between networks.

I don't think that there is a solution which works without educating the
user: manually disabling IPv6 in a GUI when the problem occurs or update
the firmware of the user. While the former is easier I think the latter
is the better long-term solution.

In any case it would be good if a list of affected routers and firmware
versions exists. It would help understanding better how many people are
really affected and would be a needed to educate users.

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-03-17 Thread Dfincher
On 17/3/07 Trent Lloyd wrote:
> Please remember this has *nothing* to do with whether your modem/router 
> *supports* IPv6, but whether its inherrently broken and doesn't handle DNS 
> queries properly.

I agree with you 100% on this. I hate to have to find workarounds for
poorly developed software and hardware (do it right the first time).  I
went searching for and found a firmware upgrade to my Actiontec GT701-wg
DSL modem and re-enabled IPv6.  No more issues with connectivity and
speed.

However, I am a technically inclined person who wouldn't think twice
about diving head first into a new piece of hardware or software.  I
have 20+ years of IT experience which I can draw on to resolve issues.
A typical user (my wife) would not even know where to start.  If Linux
(pick your flavor) doesn't work right the first time and isn't easy to
troubleshoot the novice user will drop it and run screaming back to 98,
XP or Vista (hopefully not WinME).

I really believe the best solution is to limit the possible problems up
front.  Give the user time to get comfortable with an OS which actually
works better and is more stable than anything they have used in the past
and then give them options to make it better.  Do a check on boot-up for
a Live CD and during the installation process for IPv6 timeout.  If it
exists then place the blacklist-ipv6 file in the modprobe.d directory
and let the user enjoy the OS.  Secondly place a configuration option in
network tools to remove/add the blacklist file at their option.  If IPv6
is disabled when the network manager is opened then place a help button
which will lead the user to a good descriptive page of how IPv6 can help
or limit their Internet experience.

On 17/3/07 Trent Lloyd wrote:
> I'm not saying this makes it any less of a problem but you must understand 
> its 
> a bug in the devices, they should just pass the DNS requests on properly, I 
> highly expect you'll have exactly the same problem with Vista.

Again, I agree with you 100% on this.  You must ask yourself if the
normal user would even know how to go look for firmware updates for
their hardware.  I just about guarantee that if I called my ISP for
assistance they would have said something along the lines of "We don't
support Linux and can't help you with your problem" and would have never
even gotten to the point of identifying a firmware issue as the problem.

Every patch listed for my modem had a disclaimer beside it stating not
to use it for Vista.  Then after looking a a compatibility chart it
appeared that IPv6 would probably be the least of my worries if I wanted
to run this modem with Vista.

Ubuntu and Linux have an opportunity and it would be a shame if a small
issue such as this limited that opportunity.

Disable IPv6 now and work towards getting a compatibility check in place
with clear and simple procedures for the users.

Thanks,
Dfincher

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-03-17 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
I see a "solution" to this bug. In my opinion, if you need ipv6, your
ISP will warn you, and you will know. So, the solution could be
blacklisting ipv6 by default, and putting a checkbox in
system/administration/network/general to enable it (the module can be
loaded on the fly I suppose, so there would even be no need to reboot).
I could be happy with enabling it by default, too, but with the same
checkbox ready there. Current situation is just  a mess where many users
will try ubuntu from XP and notice that "internet is slow", and if we
are lucky, they will look on the web and find an "evil command line"
solution.

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-03-16 Thread Trent Lloyd
Please remember this has *nothing* to do with whether your modem/router
*supports* IPv6, but whether its inherrently broken and doesn't handle
DNS queries properly.

I'm not saying this makes it any less of a problem but you must
understand its a bug in the devices, they should just pass the DNS
requests on properly, I highly expect you'll have exactly the same
problem with Vista.

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-03-16 Thread Dfincher
I believe that enabling or disabling ipv6 on install or in the network
management application should be an option.  With appropriate warnings
about future compatibility and current performance issues.

In trying out Ubuntu 6.10 Edgy-Eft I found Internet access with Firefox
extremely slow to non-existent and I was ready to dump Ubuntu.  However
being the curious human I am, I decided to not give up.  Thanks to the
forum list and multiple references to turning off ipv6 through the
blacklist I was able to resolve the problem.

My DSL modem only supports basic DHCP and DNS options and has NO support
for IPV6 configurations.  I found ipv6 to be a problem under Fedora
also, so it is not just Ubuntu that is having issues with this problem.

Ubuntu and Linux almost lost a Techie to this problem.  Have not doubt
that an inexperienced user will dump Linux in a heartbeat if this isn't
resolved in the distributions.

DFincher
Info. Sys. Admin

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-02-02 Thread Thomas Butter
The problem is caused by buggy caching dns servers in the routers. The
IPv4 (!) dns query for a  is simply ignored and not answered so the
resolver waits until it timeouts.

You can see this when you do a "host -t  www.kame.net" on a machine
behind that router and on any other machine with IPv6 disabled. It
should find the  record even with IPv4 only.

In my opinion a better work around than disabling IPv6 would be to
manually set a nameserver which is not your router.

Since the problem can be detected automatically (A lookup of a known host with 
A and  records works, but  gives a timeout) there could be a solution 
which does one of the following in that case:
a) stop  queries in glibc
b) start a dummy dns server which forwards everything to the real DNS, but 
answers  queries with a SERVFAIL

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2007-01-08 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
Disabling and enabling ipv6 is simple, so, given the current transition
situation, we should provide a menu entry and a simple dialog to do
this.

Regarding choosing the default behavior, I still am inclined towards
ipv4, since if you need ipv6, then your ISP will warn you and you will
know this, but if you need ipv4 chances are that you never heard about
that. If vista will have a great diffusion, I suppose that ISPs will
finally switch to ipv6 so that this will be a suitable default. However,
given that vista, suse 10.2 already enable it by default, and who knows
about fedora and next OSX release, your mileage may vary on the subject.

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2006-12-23 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
A very simple explanation on why I did set this to wishlist is because
there are other users like you that have the exact opposite problems.
There is no straight solution to this issue if not complaining to your
hw manifacturer or ISP to install some decent compliant software.

The same way I did set to wishlist, I also own the same opposite bug for
IPv6 to be initialized even earlier because my ISP does indeed prefer
IPv6 over Ipv4.

If any of you can think of a way/solution to make both the setups
friendly for both the situation I will be fairly happy to take patches
and push them into Ubuntu.

As it stands now I have only see workarounds that don't satisfy both
user classes.

Fabio

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2006-12-23 Thread Trent Lloyd
I personally *suspect* from what I've seen vista would see the same
problems, however I don't know, haven't tested, and would be interested
to hear from anyone that has tried it.

Also this isn't about IPv6 at all, this is about disabling a potentially
usefull feature, to work around broken hardware. (And it is broken,
because even if a device doesn't support IPv6, there is no reason to
break in this way, it's just lazy coding)

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2006-12-23 Thread Martin Tasker
Well, interesting debate.  Glad I've made a difference by resurrecting
the defect - though getting it put onto the wishlist was not actually
what I hoped for!

Perhaps Vicenzo you are right that this needs to go onto a developer
discussion, and not just because the defect has been iced.  There are
real puzzles around.  I've done some research, and found that IPv6 is
getting another push in the industry - not what I had expected to find.
Kristian's question, how does Vista do it, deserves a good answer, and
might yield better solutions than merely disabling IPv6 wholesale.  I
can't personally shed light there - my whole purpose in trying Linux was
to avoid Vista!

But I would emphasize that what's at stake here is nothing to do with
IPv6.  Rather, it's the adoption of consumer Linux, which has an
unparalleled opportunity given the disruption which Microsoft is causing
with Vista.  Ubuntu's reputation makes it a key player in this whole
business of Linux adoption.

So the Ubuntu devs in considering this issue are _really_ choosing
between being protocol-friendly and being newbie-friendly.  I had
expected that would be a straightforward call ... but in any case, it's
not my call, it's theirs.

That's all from me in this forum until the New Year.  Happy Christmas
all around (or whatever you're celebrating!).

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2006-12-23 Thread Kristian Hermansen
On 12/23/06, Vincenzo Ciancia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kristian: we all fixed that ourselves, I personally am worried for
> newbies who will just not understand why e.g. google earth is unusable
> on their system, and will trash ubuntu. Many of them will trash
> GNU/linux "in toto", because ubuntu is nowadays advertised as the "best
> and easiest to use" linux distribution by many people. Being the latter
> a good thing, why shouldn't it be really so? Ubuntu is really easy to
> set up and to use, and apt to newbies, the problem in my opinion is
> mainly to fix bugs.

You make some good points, and I agree.  Let me ask you one final
question.  How does Microsoft Windows Vista enable IPv6 without making
problems for the end users?  Presumably, the Ubuntu users who are
experiencing IPv6 issues would see the same on Vista...
-- 
Kristian Hermansen

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2006-12-23 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
Kristian: we all fixed that ourselves, I personally am worried for
newbies who will just not understand why e.g. google earth is unusable
on their system, and will trash ubuntu. Many of them will trash
GNU/linux "in toto", because ubuntu is nowadays advertised as the "best
and easiest to use" linux distribution by many people. Being the latter
a good thing, why shouldn't it be really so? Ubuntu is really easy to
set up and to use, and apt to newbies, the problem in my opinion is
mainly to fix bugs.

If to use ubuntu as they want, newbies must learn how to look for a
solution on the web, understand what ipv6 is and how to blacklist kernel
modules, you can't surely claim ubuntu is for newbies. Marking this bug
as a "wishlist" does not help. It is a serious breakage, not for
everybody but for many people.

In any case, discussing it here seems not to be that fruitful, if and
when I will have time, I will try to discuss it on the development
mailing list.

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2006-12-22 Thread Asraniel
 Trent Lloyd : most of the people here use "Analog: Netopia" 3346 or "ISDN: 
Netopia 3356".
This information can be found on the homepage of the biggest swiss ISP:
http://de.bluewin.ch/internetzugang/index.php/endgeraete_adsl

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2006-12-21 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
** Changed in: netcfg (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Medium => Wishlist

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2006-12-21 Thread Martin Tasker
> By that same token of advice, why not just disable IPv6 yourself?

I have done!

It took me eight hours of my own time, spread over several days, and the
involvement of five members of the Ubuntu community on the newbie forum,
to work out that I needed to do that.

I would have been seriously more impressed by Ubuntu if I hadn't had to
go through all that.

So at this point, I know that every time I do a new install of Linux
(Ubuntu or otherwise), the first thing a sensible person does is disable
IPv6, then get to work on customizing the desktop to taste etc etc.

What are my options now?  (a) disappear safe with my knowledge but let
others keep suffering, (b) monitor the newbie forums and help everyone,
(c) get the devs to do something to fix the problem, (d) contribute a
fix the problem myself or (e) wait for the whole universe to get sorted
on IPv6?

I've chosen (c) because it's best for the community, best for me, and
the most I can actually do

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2006-12-20 Thread Kristian Hermansen
On 12/20/06, Martin Tasker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I respect Kristian Hermansen's conciliatory suggestion, but I am not
> keen on it.  It's bad to offer users a choice between options they don't
> understand.  If you offer them such choice, you must of course tell
> people to select IPv4 unless they really really know what they're doing.
> My preference would be not to bother, just to disable IPv6 by default,
> and to offer a FAQ aimed at enabling IPv6 post-install for such users as
> may wish to.

By that same token of advice, why not just disable IPv6 yourself?
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=6841
-- 
Kristian Hermansen

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2006-12-20 Thread Martin Tasker
Vicenzo Ciancia wrote: "I think it would be better to disable it until a
better solution is found. I have seen bugs wait for months an important
decision leaving users machines broken, when a quick fix was known ..."

I agree 100%.  And with Vicenzo's other comments.

Trent Lloyd wrote: "Windows Vista is also shipping with IPv6 enabled by
default, perhaps this will help weed out the devices which don't do what
they are supposed to do and violate the DNS specifications."

This is interesting.  Have any Vista users experienced similar problems?

Trent, on your other points, I just can't accept your perspective.

1. IPv6 is far from being imminent.  It's been upcoming technology for
five years now and it's been realised that IPv4-based NAT etc have
solved the IPv6 problems adequately.  Ubuntu has no control over the
ISPs and routers which don't handle IPv6 properly.  What you're
effectively asking _me_ is to be committed to driving IPv6 adoption.
I'm not!  I'm committed to a bunch of other things which is why I've
tried Ubuntu, but I did not simultaneously sign up to the IPv6 crusade.

2. in fact, IPv6 was not even something I had thought about (in my
personal life - professionally I have had reason to) before installing
Ubuntu.  I bought a cheap router because I'm not into wasting money, and
if I had spent more it would not have been because of IPv6.  I didn't
use IPv6 as a procurement criterion when selecting my ISP.  Surely most
users would say the same thing.

3. I am fully aware of the theoretical benefits to the world, of
everyone adopting IPv6;  But there are currently in practice no user-
perceived benefits from using IPv6, and yet many user-perceived
disbenefits.  Search for IPv6 in Linux Format's forums (at
www.linuxformat.co.uk).  Every single reference I looked at was negative
("why doesn't this stupid thing work?!"): not one was positive ("I just
love Linux because I can use IPv6 at last!!").

Ubuntu is the first thing that's made IPv6 an issue for me.  Everything
I have read about Ubuntu makes me think that Ubuntu should take this
seriously as an inhibitor to adoption.  The current default penalizes
people who've done nothing stupid.

If you really want to promote IPv6 in the ecosystem, consider making
_handling_ IPv6 the default for server configurations of Ubuntu, but
_issuing_ IPv4 requests the default for client configurations of Ubuntu.
Actually this idea has drawbacks too (essentially because no machine is
a pure server, and because people might set up such in their homes) but
the point is that it's infrastructure-side where IPv6 adoption has to be
driven, not client-side - and especially not home-client-side.

I respect Kristian Hermansen's conciliatory suggestion, but I am not
keen on it.  It's bad to offer users a choice between options they don't
understand.  If you offer them such choice, you must of course tell
people to select IPv4 unless they really really know what they're doing.
My preference would be not to bother, just to disable IPv6 by default,
and to offer a FAQ aimed at enabling IPv6 post-install for such users as
may wish to.

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2006-12-20 Thread Trent Lloyd
Asraniel - and as I requested, what make/model are the routers that "98%
of switzerland" use?

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2006-12-20 Thread Kristian Hermansen
Why not just change the Ubuntu installer to query the user for IPv6
support?  Jzzz!
-- 
Kristian Hermansen

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2006-12-20 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
Il giorno mer, 20/12/2006 alle 07.36 +, Trent Lloyd ha scritto:
So the way to fix the problems with an upcoming technology is to supress
> it? Thats silly.. Disabling it by default out of the box also does not
> aid adoption.
> 
Well, I never liked to be pushed to early adoption of a technology for my 
everyday work. This is just lying about its stability or well-tested-ness. I 
don't expect free software to adopt strategies of early-adoption, I can accept 
that mobile phone companies or processor manufacturers do this, but not a 
distribution which should be designed for stability, to work well *and* to be 
customizable, so that i can turn on ipv6 if I find it's better. You can even 
put a checkbox in the network configuration tool, but I expect the default 
settings to be maximum safety, not maximum features.


> As far as I can see, this is a limited issue to those with "broken"
> routers, probably 98% of devices on the market have no problems with
> this.
> 
> 

The observation that one user in my situation can make about ubuntu
these days is that "internet is slow". This is the observation that I
made on windows 98, seven years ago, and it was embarassing for
microsoft. Perhaps also on vista we will see an "internet is slow"
problem. The machines on which you are installing ipv6 are home users
machines, and you say it's a good idea to make them early adopters? Why?
I would rather prefer to see providers adopting ipv6 first, and then
home users. Perhaps I don't understand enough of networking to know the
advantages of using ipv6, but by now it looks like I can do everything I
want without using it. What are the advantages of using ipv6 at home at
the moment?


It seems in italy too, we have this problem, but I have a cheap home router so 
I don't know.

> It is unfortunate that this is the case, the only solution that I would
> personally like to see is some kind of attempt at detecting a "broken"
> router, this could perhaps be achieved by doing a lookup on ubuntu.com
> for IPv4 only, if that succeeds, try an any lookup and if that is met by
> serious delays offer the ability to disable it, but I'd love to know
> exactly how many users are affected by this issue and how much worth
> there is in spending developer time on this (of course, I'm sure the
> Ubuntu developers would *consider and discuss* accepting a proper well
> formed and tested patch that did this) -- perhaps a simple FAQ entry
> would suffice.
> 
> 
I think it would be better to disable it until a better solution is found. I 
have seen bugs wait for months an important decision leaving users machines 
broken, when a quick fix was know, this is not a good idea in my opinion since 
you already have the update system, and can remove the quick fix and install 
the true patch anytime you want. You can't know how many people are affected by 
the problem because  normally people do not even know anything about ipv6. 
Moreover, a FAQ entry does not help newbies that at most can insert a cd and 
click on "install", and I bet ubuntu wants to cover also this target - at least 
I hope so. If vista will bring world wide ipv6 adoption, we can wait for this 
and then turn on by default ipv6 in ubuntu, even with a stable release update 
if necessary (and I don't expect it will be so urgent).

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2006-12-20 Thread Asraniel
98% dont have a problem?thats not true. in switzerland 98% of the
routers have this problem, just that you know it.

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2006-12-19 Thread Trent Lloyd
So the way to fix the problems with an upcoming technology is to supress
it? Thats silly.. Disabling it by default out of the box also does not
aid adoption.

As far as I can see, this is a limited issue to those with "broken"
routers, probably 98% of devices on the market have no problems with
this.

Windows Vista is also shipping with IPv6 enabled by default, perhaps
this will help weed out the devices which don't do what they are
supposed to do and violate the DNS specifications.

It is unfortunate that this is the case, the only solution that I would
personally like to see is some kind of attempt at detecting a "broken"
router, this could perhaps be achieved by doing a lookup on ubuntu.com
for IPv4 only, if that succeeds, try an any lookup and if that is met by
serious delays offer the ability to disable it, but I'd love to know
exactly how many users are affected by this issue and how much worth
there is in spending developer time on this (of course, I'm sure the
Ubuntu developers would *consider and discuss* accepting a proper well
formed and tested patch that did this) -- perhaps a simple FAQ entry
would suffice.

Could those with this problem please tell me what modem
manufacturer/model devices you have (and what your dns servers are set
to) so I can investigate this further and determine 100% if it is the
modem dns servers, or the ISPs servers, etc, if I can login to a box
with this problem it would be great...

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2006-12-19 Thread Martin Tasker
Please raise this to critical and schedule into Feisty.

It's critical because it's part of the post-installation user experience
and damages Ubuntu's credibility exactly in the eyes of those whom its
trying to reach.  This bug's been open for 14 months now, and is trivial
to fix, so obviously any status below critical isn't going to get
attention.

My own experience, I have now found, is typical of many.  I'm a hardened
Windows user but dislike the prospect of going to Vista.  So on a new PC
I install Ubuntu.  I find Firefox is at best slow, at worst times out on
my favourite web pages.  It took me _eight hours_ of my own time and
involved five members of the Ubuntu community, to get a solution.  Of
course I did _not_ immediately do a search on IPv6, it simply didn't
cross my mind that that could be anything to do with the problem.
Instead I just felt stupid, and submitted a stupid newbie report saying
my system was slow ... then I sat back waiting for people to ask me
whether I'd switched on my monitor etc etc.  It shouldn't have to be
that way.

I guess the reason why not _everyone_ is afflicted by this problem is
that their router kindly suppresses IPv6 before it gets out of their
home.

As it happens I work for a company that has IPv6 networking as one of
its product features, so I know what IPv6 is.  I also know that it's
useless for any practical purpose - due to lack of deployment, to lack
of consistent implementation, and to feasible alternatives.  Yesterday I
consulted a senior system architect to confirm that view - it's valid,
and nothing is really changing.

I haven't seen a single positive reference to IPv6 in user discussions
of Linux (check out the hits in Linux Format forums, for instance).

There are those who think IPv6 will happen some day, and would like a
coordinated plan to implement it across the board in Ubuntu (see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IPv6Integration, for example).  I have no
problem with this.  But it makes sense to disable IPv6 by default, so
that conscious experimenters can turn it on if they wish, until such a
plan has been worked out in Ubuntu (and rest of world) to enable IPv6 in
a way that doesn't create disappointment for any stakeholder.

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2006-11-28 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
I had strange behavior on NFS mounts via wifi at home, it had high
bandwidth in the beginning but then it dropped down, and with delays
large enough to forbid watching videos over NFS. Other laptops on the
same network have no problems (running dapper), and using other
distributions (suse 10.0) on the same laptop I had no such problems too.

Disabling ipv6 seems to have fixed the problem and also to have made
google earth work fast. Is this possible or is it a coincidence? My
router does not support ipv6. If NFS slowdown are possible this is
definitely not only a DNS problem.

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2006-10-29 Thread Timo Aaltonen
** Changed in: Ubuntu
Sourcepackagename: None => netcfg

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2006-10-03 Thread Jordan
Just my $0.002: I had horrible DNS resolution times ( > 10 seconds ) for
a long time and I assumed that it was because my router / ISP didn't
support ipv6, so I went through the hassle of turning off ipv6 and the
problems that come from that.

This week I decided to switch to openDNS
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDNS and to my surprise I had no more
DNS resolution problems! So unless you know for sure that your hardware
or ISP does not support ipv6, try using another DNS service ( I
recommend openDNS as it also has other benefits over traditional DNS
services ).

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2006-09-16 Thread towsonu2003
> It is worse than that. In the time it takes for the IPv6 DNS request to
> fail the application times out on making its connection.

seems ipv6 causes connection issues as in:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=258686 though I'm not sure if
that's a problem with the user's router or with the timeout issue as
Martin Hosken puts it.

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2006-09-15 Thread Laurent Bigonville
** Tags added: ipv6

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: [Bug 24828] Re: [Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2006-07-27 Thread Trent Lloyd
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 04:23:11AM -, Martin Hosken wrote:
> Dear Trent,
> > Disabling IPv6 increaseing the throughput of your internet connection
> > makes no sense and I think thats just circumstantial, sorry :)
> >
> > The place where it *does* make a difference is the speed of new
> > connections, it seems that in some cases certain dns servers ignore
> > requests for IPv6 records and so everytime you try to resolve an IPv6
> > address it waits for them to timeout.
> >   
> 
> It is worse than that. In the time it takes for the IPv6 DNS request to
> fail the application times out on making its connection.
> > These broken DNS servers should really be fixed, but the last point
> > could work, not to bother looking up, guess it would fix some of these
> > cases.
> >   
> 
> It's not a question of the DNS server being dumb it's usually some cheap
> ADSL router/modem that is sitting between the computer and a good DNS
> server. Often configuring the router to pass a real DNS server address
> to the dhcp client is enough to solve the problem. But not all routers
> allow you to configure the dhcp server in them sufficiently.
> 
> So perhaps the real fix is to provide a way to turn off IPv6 DNS
> requests. But I guess that is impossible without turning off IPv6 in
> general. How much IPv6 takes off depends to a large extent on what MS do
> with Vista, I would suspect.
> > Could someone who experiences and is willing to let me login to their
> > machine please contact me? I'd love to try this as its never really
> > affected me.
> >   
> I'll send you directly, offline, a couple of tcpdump traces to compare.
> One is dns request to the D-Link 504T ADSL modem/router and the other is
> directly to a DNS server with packets merely routed by the modem.
> 
> -- 
> IPv6 should be disabled by default
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

-- 
Trent Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bur.st Networking Inc.

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: [Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2006-07-27 Thread Martin Hosken
Dear Trent,
> Disabling IPv6 increaseing the throughput of your internet connection
> makes no sense and I think thats just circumstantial, sorry :)
>
> The place where it *does* make a difference is the speed of new
> connections, it seems that in some cases certain dns servers ignore
> requests for IPv6 records and so everytime you try to resolve an IPv6
> address it waits for them to timeout.
>   

It is worse than that. In the time it takes for the IPv6 DNS request to
fail the application times out on making its connection.
> These broken DNS servers should really be fixed, but the last point
> could work, not to bother looking up, guess it would fix some of these
> cases.
>   

It's not a question of the DNS server being dumb it's usually some cheap
ADSL router/modem that is sitting between the computer and a good DNS
server. Often configuring the router to pass a real DNS server address
to the dhcp client is enough to solve the problem. But not all routers
allow you to configure the dhcp server in them sufficiently.

So perhaps the real fix is to provide a way to turn off IPv6 DNS
requests. But I guess that is impossible without turning off IPv6 in
general. How much IPv6 takes off depends to a large extent on what MS do
with Vista, I would suspect.
> Could someone who experiences and is willing to let me login to their
> machine please contact me? I'd love to try this as its never really
> affected me.
>   
I'll send you directly, offline, a couple of tcpdump traces to compare.
One is dns request to the D-Link 504T ADSL modem/router and the other is
directly to a DNS server with packets merely routed by the modem.

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2006-07-27 Thread Trent Lloyd
Disabling IPv6 increaseing the throughput of your internet connection
makes no sense and I think thats just circumstantial, sorry :)

The place where it *does* make a difference is the speed of new
connections, it seems that in some cases certain dns servers ignore
requests for IPv6 records and so everytime you try to resolve an IPv6
address it waits for them to timeout.

These broken DNS servers should really be fixed, but the last point
could work, not to bother looking up, guess it would fix some of these
cases.

Could someone who experiences and is willing to let me login to their
machine please contact me? I'd love to try this as its never really
affected me.

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default

2006-07-26 Thread Jérémie Corbier
** Bug 54156 has been marked a duplicate of this bug

-- 
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828

--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs