Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: vim

The Ubuntu patch to the vim packaging contains a few diversions from Debian 
that are unneeded.
1) "set textwidth=0" in debian/runtime/debian.vim.in since that is Vim's default
2) "set nobackup" in debian/runtime/debian.vim.in since that is Vim's default
3) Adding NoDisplay=true to debian/gvim.desktop is no longer required (as 
stated 3 years ago at 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vim/+bug/13409/comments/4), and would 
address a couple of long-standing bugs -- #3222, #50576.
4) "set viminfo='20,\"50" in debian/runtime/debian.vim.in.  This one is more 
questionable but I feel that the difference between this value and Vim's 
default is not worth the divergence between Ubuntu and Debian.  Vim's default 
is "'20,<50,s10,h".  The first two settings of the option are exactly what is 
already declared in Ubuntu ('\"50' is the equivalent to '<50', just using old 
syntax).

The 'h' setting disables effect of the 'hlsearch' option when Vim starts
-- i.e., it won't cause the stored search term from a previous Vim
session to be highlighted upon starting a new Vim session.  The user
will have to perform a new search first.  Keeping 'h' seems to fall
under the principle of least surprise.

The 's10' setting limits individual items stored in the viminfo file to
10 Kbyte.  When the 's' setting isn't given, then Vim saves the entire
register instead of the given number of Kbytes.  Which behavior is
preferred is debatable, but creating a diversion for it seems like more
work than it's worth.

N.B., I decided to open a bug about this since I wasn't able to find any
useful details about communicating with my Ubuntu counterpart(s) aside
from just emailing the most recent uploader.

** Affects: vim (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

-- 
Unnecessary divergence from Debian
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to