[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 Title: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: Andy Whitcroft (apw) = (unassigned) -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
This bug seems to be a bit confusing likely because people are reporting status/issues of (at least) 2 completely different USB-modems. 0af0:6971 Option (aka GlobalTrotter Icon 255 Model: GI0255) Works out of the box with Jaunty. 0af0:6911 Option (aka GlobalTrotter Icon 7.2 Model: GI0201 with updated flash) This one is a big hassel to get working as it is identified as a storage device. Still requires rezero and jumping through hoops to get working in Jaunty. Since the title of this bug is USB ID :6911 could people please post issues with OTHER USB modems in another bug and leave this bug for fixing of the still currently broken :6911? Thanks :) For the coders, is there any output you still need for fixing this thing? I'll be happy to attach it. :) -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
jaunty beta does not fix the issue. When the key is plugged in it is recognized as usb-storage. I installed rezero from http://ppa.launchpad.net/martijn/ppa/ubuntu/pool/main/r/rezero/rezero_0.1-3_i386.deb And after that install the key is recognized as modem and I get to setup the connection in network manager. Why isn't rezero installed on jaunty? -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
I've installed jaunty on a machine that comes with a Option 0af0:7011 device. It uses option by default, but forcing hso doesn't seem to work. -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
sorry, mine didn't load option, it just defaulted to mass-storage -mode, and I'm trying to come up with a patch to fix it. -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
Hi. I have unknown modem from polish GSM operator Era BlueConnect identified by lsusb as 0af0:6971 Option. I use program HSOconnect v. 1.1.82 2008-05-23. I can start using modem, but some time after initialization and using it, it completely hang system. I'm using Ubuntu 8.10 with 2.6.27-14-generic kernel. -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 11:21:28AM -, Alexander Sack wrote: please try to patch the kernel with the patches from below thread (3 patches) and maybe add your device to the unusual devices (as the 3/3 patch does) https://lists.one-eyed-alien.net/pipermail/usb-storage/2009-January/004499.html https://lists.one-eyed-alien.net/pipermail/usb-storage/2009-January/004556.html Any luck with this? - Alexander -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
Alexander, could you provide a pre-built kernel with those patches? -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:18:20AM -, Ban wrote: Well, the modem is not detected. its just that the scsi device has Modem in its name. Have you tried to use hso vs. option driver? In jaunty hso driver supposely will prevent the usb storage mount. i don't agree. it's true that the scsi driver gets loaded, and that the usbstorage device name includes modem in its name, but if you look closely at the first initialisation you'll see: [ 433.542594] hso: /build/buildd/linux-2.6.28/drivers/net/usb/hso.c: 1.2 Option Wireless [ 433.542653] usbcore: registered new interface driver hso that is actually the hso driver getting loaded. it remains in lsmod as it should, but no /dev entries are created for the modem i'm assuming that is because the device is already hijacked by the usbstorage driver. positive is that the hso driver is loaded for my device as it should (not the option driver) but the prevention of the usb storage driver is not working, or at least not for my usbid. the usb storage gets mounted. no hso dev entries anywhere. please try to patch the kernel with the patches from below thread (3 patches) and maybe add your device to the unusual devices (as the 3/3 patch does) https://lists.one-eyed-alien.net/pipermail/usb-storage/2009-January/004499.html https://lists.one-eyed-alien.net/pipermail/usb-storage/2009-January/004556.html - Alexander -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
Well, the modem is not detected. its just that the scsi device has Modem in its name. Have you tried to use hso vs. option driver? In jaunty hso driver supposely will prevent the usb storage mount. i don't agree. it's true that the scsi driver gets loaded, and that the usbstorage device name includes modem in its name, but if you look closely at the first initialisation you'll see: [ 433.542594] hso: /build/buildd/linux-2.6.28/drivers/net/usb/hso.c: 1.2 Option Wireless [ 433.542653] usbcore: registered new interface driver hso that is actually the hso driver getting loaded. it remains in lsmod as it should, but no /dev entries are created for the modem i'm assuming that is because the device is already hijacked by the usbstorage driver. positive is that the hso driver is loaded for my device as it should (not the option driver) but the prevention of the usb storage driver is not working, or at least not for my usbid. the usb storage gets mounted. no hso dev entries anywhere. Ban -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 09:40:17PM -, Ban wrote: i had a try with the latest Jaunty alpha livecd with what seems like interesting results: it seems like the device gets recognised as usb storage first, only the usb storage scan takes a while and meanwhile the modem gets detected, then the storage gets mounted and the modem seems not usable, or at least i cant find device nodes Well, the modem is not detected. its just that the scsi device has Modem in its name. Have you tried to use hso vs. option driver? In jaunty hso driver supposely will prevent the usb storage mount. - Alexander -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
i had a try with the latest Jaunty alpha livecd with what seems like interesting results: it seems like the device gets recognised as usb storage first, only the usb storage scan takes a while and meanwhile the modem gets detected, then the storage gets mounted and the modem seems not usable, or at least i cant find device nodes and network manager does not allow me to make a connection as it does in 8.10 with the hso driver/userspace blob a subsequent pull-out/stick-in of the stick seems to trigger only the storage driver this is dmesg covering initial stick-in/pull-out/stick-in: [ 429.316100] usb 3-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2 [ 429.481624] usb 3-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice [ 433.413371] Initializing USB Mass Storage driver... [ 433.416464] scsi2 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices [ 433.416999] usbcore: registered new interface driver usb-storage [ 433.417007] USB Mass Storage support registered. [ 433.418311] usb-storage: device found at 2 [ 433.418316] usb-storage: waiting for device to settle before scanning [ 433.542594] hso: /build/buildd/linux-2.6.28/drivers/net/usb/hso.c: 1.2 Option Wireless [ 433.542653] usbcore: registered new interface driver hso [ 438.417519] usb-storage: device scan complete [ 438.420501] scsi 2:0:0:0: CD-ROMZCOPTION HSDPA Modem 3.00 PQ: 0 ANSI: 2 [ 438.459439] sr1: scsi-1 drive [ 438.459607] sr 2:0:0:0: Attached scsi CD-ROM sr1 [ 438.459717] sr 2:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg2 type 5 [ 441.694558] ISO 9660 Extensions: Microsoft Joliet Level 1 [ 441.700592] ISOFS: changing to secondary root [ 1178.416150] usb 3-1: USB disconnect, address 2 [ 1203.708066] usb 3-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 3 [ 1203.873607] usb 3-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice [ 1203.875440] scsi3 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices [ 1203.876914] usb-storage: device found at 3 [ 1203.876919] usb-storage: waiting for device to settle before scanning [ 1208.877393] usb-storage: device scan complete [ 1208.880509] scsi 3:0:0:0: CD-ROMZCOPTION HSDPA Modem 3.00 PQ: 0 ANSI: 2 [ 1208.916297] sr1: scsi-1 drive [ 1208.916468] sr 3:0:0:0: Attached scsi CD-ROM sr1 [ 1208.916582] sr 3:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg2 type 5 [ 1211.681415] ISO 9660 Extensions: Microsoft Joliet Level 1 [ 1211.690418] ISOFS: changing to secondary root the device concerned has the following usbid: Bus 003 Device 003: ID 0af0:6971 Option the hso driver remains loaded until stick is pulled no device nodes to be found: no /dev/*hs* or /dev/*HS* -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 01:49:20PM -, Ban wrote: i'm still having the 'hanging' problem on an updated 8.10 with a Option Icon 225 (GIO225) I used the udev rule in combination with rezero to load the hso driver for this device, that works great. i can use the connection in networkmanager, but as soon as the connection stops (for example because of signal loss), the systems hangs completely and has to be forcibly powered off Could you check whether the jaunty kernel works for your without rezero? - Alexander -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
Without rezero, I get the ZeroCD CD drive, which doesn't switch into modem mode. -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
Hm, but that might be an old kernel. Will retry later. -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
I tried with both 2.6.27-9 and 2.6.27-7 (the only ones my updated 8.10 has) these came with zerocd udev rule (i'm guessing from a package ?) do you want me to try the one from -proposed or the jaunty one (or is that the same one ?) i can re-try tonight but i'm on umts right now. -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 01:12:57PM -, Ban wrote: I tried with both 2.6.27-9 and 2.6.27-7 (the only ones my updated 8.10 has) these came with zerocd udev rule (i'm guessing from a package ?) do you want me to try the one from -proposed or the jaunty one (or is that the same one ?) i can re-try tonight but i'm on umts right now. The idea is that userspace stuff isnt needed to not open the storage device; kernel fixes have flowed into 2.6.28 (jaunty) and now into 2.6.29; just wanted to check whether your device is already fixed or if we need to look around for cherry-picks from 2.6.29 development tree. So please check whether it works with 2.6.28 kernel out-of-box. - Alexander -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
Jaunty doesn't seem to have option_ms.[ch]yet: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu- jaunty.git;a=tree;f=drivers/usb/storage;h=eb55e5f0a0a86d3b67610b6da7ee02c48626aa7a;hb=7c88cff7e3a5e14d83287e3111a8131358b0091d Also, the one in kernel HEAD (http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;f=drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h;h=a7f9513fa19d984eda4a627124c448ee5f67cad7;hb=HEAD) doesn't list my device (0af0:6911, Option Icon 7.2) as one of the unusual_devs to switch to modem mode. -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
i'm still having the 'hanging' problem on an updated 8.10 with a Option Icon 225 (GIO225) I used the udev rule in combination with rezero to load the hso driver for this device, that works great. i can use the connection in networkmanager, but as soon as the connection stops (for example because of signal loss), the systems hangs completely and has to be forcibly powered off uname reports 2.6.27-9-generic (32bit) modinfo reports hso version is 1.2 deviceid is 0af0:6971 i'm getting no logging at all when the crash occurs, so i'm at a loss on how to provide more info. -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
update: if i manually stop the 3g connection, but the kernel module is still loaded, the hang does not occur. i hope it's ok to log this here, please let me know if i need to open another bug report. -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
This looks to have been resolved during the stable updates. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Committed -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
Could you make sure this also is the case for the 6711 device id? The option driver does not work with this device; only the hso driver (albeit with its watchdog timeouts and crashes, by the looks of things -- see my bug report elsewhere). Bus 005 Device 002: ID 0af0:6711 Option AKA Option Globetrotter MAX 7.2 Ready AKA Option GX0201 Thanks! -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: Pete Graner (pgraner) = Andy Whitcroft (apw) Status: Triaged = In Progress -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
@Martijn van de Streek, thoughtbox -- the current intrepid kernels have both the option and hso drivers, looking at the PCI ids you are reporting here they appear to only be supported by the hso driver. I would therefore expect only that driver to be loaded when they are detected. So could you confirm that you still see this issue with the kernel in -proposed (the -11 kernel). Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. If the problem is still present with this release then could you attach the output of the following commands to this bug (all with the device inserted): dmesg lsusb -v lsmod Either way report back here with the results of your testing. Thanks. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Incomplete -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
Works for me in -11. -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
Hi Alexander, I'll make sure we track this and try to get this resolved for Jaunty's release. Thanks. -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 01:46:58AM -, Leann Ogasawara wrote: ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium Leann, this sounds like rather a simple fix. Can you ensure that this gets done during this cycle so users with that hardware dont get a wrong driver? - Alexander -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
Pete, assigning to you to get kernel team attention. Dispatch to someone appropriate please. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Pete Graner (pgraner) -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
