[Bug 272010] Re: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
** Changed in: ubufox (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010 Title: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icedtea-gcjwebplugin/+bug/272010/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272010] Re: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/openjdk-6 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010 Title: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272010] Re: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
** Changed in: ubufox (Ubuntu) Assignee: Alexander Sack (asac) => Chris Coulson (chrisccoulson) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010 Title: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272010] Re: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/totem -- Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272010] Re: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
** Changed in: icedtea-gcjwebplugin (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Won't Fix -- Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272010] Re: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
sun-java6 still has no plugin description -- Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272010] Re: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
** Changed in: icedtea-gcjwebplugin (Ubuntu) Status: Won't Fix => Fix Released ** Changed in: sun-java5 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released ** Changed in: sun-java6 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272010] Re: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
Alexander, On upto date Jaunty as of today Icedtea (1st entry) installs correctly - only other entry now shown is Java SE - haven't tried that one yet. So yeh, that seems happier. (IcedTea is a bit flaky - found some 100% java processes left over afterwards - but that's separate I guess). Dave -- Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272010] Re: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
the ubufox task was opened by Matthias to get feedback from me I had some questions, so its not fixed. ** Changed in: ubufox (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => New -- Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272010] Re: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
ubufox bug has been fixed. However I see the following problems: 1. Adobe Flash Player installer does NOT work on 64 bit Ubuntu 9.04 (bug #361430). 2. (cosmetic) "Adobe Player" and "Gnash Player" using capital "P", while "Swfdec player" uses small "p". 3. (cosmetic) Adobe Flash Player URL (http://www.adobe.com) is missing a slash "/" at the end. ** Changed in: ubufox (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272010] Re: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
Dave, please test with an up-to-date jaunty install. I updaed the plugin DB so all entries displayed in the plugin finder should work. If not, please open a bug and subscribe me to it. -- Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272010] Re: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
> reopening the ubufox task, until it's clear how ubufox handles differently named plugins. I don't understand what differently named means here? Do you have more than one plugin .so in a single binary Package? How are those named? -- Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272010] Re: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
> sun-java5 does not provide the plugin package please don't touch reports if you don't understand how to validate them ** Changed in: sun-java5 (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Triaged -- Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272010] Re: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
sun-java5 does not provide the plugin package ** Changed in: sun-java5 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Invalid -- Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272010] Re: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
If I uninstall all java plugins I get three options: 1) 'The IcedTea Web Browser Plugin' Selecting this gives the error 'Could not find package 'cacao-oj6-plugin' 2) 'GCJ Web Browser Plugin' Selecting this gives 'Package 'gcjwebplugin' is virtual.' 3) 'The IcedTea Web Browser Plugin' This actually installs IcedTea. This is on a Jaunty (upto date as of today 11th April, upgraded from Intrepid, 64bit). Note also that both (1) and (2) trigger bug #319278 where it claims success, and (3) hits #344705 where openjdk-6 doesn't work. Dave -- Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272010] Re: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
reopening the ubufox task, until it's clear how ubufox handles differently named plugins. ** Changed in: ubufox (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272010] Re: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
icedtea-gcjwebplugin isn't built anymore ** Changed in: icedtea-gcjwebplugin (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Won't Fix -- Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272010] Re: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
This bug was fixed in the package openjdk-6 - 6b14-1.4.1-0ubuntu5 --- openjdk-6 (6b14-1.4.1-0ubuntu5) jaunty; urgency=low [Matthias Klose] * Update to the final CACAO 0.99.4 release. * Security Vulnerability Fixes for OpenJDK: - 6522586: Enforce limits on Font creation. - 6536193: flaw in UTF8XmlOutput. - 6610888: Potential use of cleared of incorrect acc in JMX Monitor. - 6610896: JMX Monitor handles thread groups incorrectly. - 6630639: lightweight HttpServer leaks file descriptors on no-data connections. - 6632886: Font.createFont can be persuaded to leak temporary files. - 6636360: compiler/6595044/Main.java test fails with 64bit java on solaris-sparcv9 with SIGSEGV. - 6652463: MediaSize constructors allow to redefine the mapping of standard MediaSizeName values. - 6652929: Font.createFont(int,File) trusts File.getPath. - 6656633: getNotificationInfo methods static mutable (findbugs). - 6658158: Mutable statics in SAAJ (findbugs). - 6658163: txw2.DatatypeWriter.BUILDIN is a mutable static (findbugs). - 6691246: Thread context class loader can be set using JMX remote ClientNotifForwarded. - 6717680: LdapCtx does not close the connection if initialization fails. - 6721651: Security problem with out-of-the-box management. - 6737315: LDAP serialized data vulnerability. - 6792554: Java JAR Pack200 header checks are insufficent. - 6804996: JWS PNG Decoding Integer Overflow [V-flrhat2ln8]. - 6804997: JWS GIF Decoding Heap Corruption [V-r687oxuocp]. - 6804998: JRE GIF Decoding Heap Corruption [V-y6g5jlm8e1]. * Add security patch for the lcms library. * Add accessibility patches java-access-bridge-security.patch and accessible-toolkit.patch. * Merge fixes for testsuite failures from the IcedTea6 branch. * Merge the proxy support for the plugin from the IcedTea6 branch. * Merge http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/release/icedtea6-1.4.1/rev/546ef0cdee06 (TJ). LP: #344705. * Add a Xb-Npp-Description for the IcedTea plugin. LP: #272010. [Edward Nevill] * Put VFP back in - selects VFP / novfp autmatically * More assembler optimisations -- Matthias KloseThu, 09 Apr 2009 14:14:12 +0200 ** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272010] Re: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
> To provide proper integration with ubufox, > > 1. plugins that use update-alternatives mechanism should also put a link for > their binary in > > /usr/share/ubufox/plugins/ > Xbb-Npp-File: libgnashplugin.so this doesn't work for the current java plugins, which are installed under a different name for each plugin. -- Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272010] Re: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
This bug was fixed in the package totem - 2.25.90-0ubuntu3
---
totem (2.25.90-0ubuntu3) jaunty; urgency=low
* debian/control{.in}: add XB-Npp-Description and XB-Npp-Filename
header to the totem-mozilla package to improve ubufox/ubuntu plugin db
integration (LP: #272010)
-- Alexander SackWed, 11 Feb 2009 13:03:08 +0100
** Changed in: totem (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection
dialog)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272010] Re: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
** Description changed: - To provide proper integration with ubufox, plugins should also put a - link for their binary in + To provide proper integration with ubufox, + + 1. plugins that use update-alternatives mechanism should also put a link + for their binary in /usr/share/ubufox/plugins/ and touch all /usr/lib/firefox-3.*/.autoreg that exist in .postinst. - Also please add the Description and Filename header to your binary - package, like gnash: + 2. All plugins should have a Description and Filename header added to + the binary package control, like gnash: Xb-Npp-Description: The GNU SWF Player (http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/) Xb-Npp-File: libgnashplugin.so When encountering a java plugin Firefox offers a confusing dialog: it gives two options: 1. "GCJ Web Browser Plugin" 2. "The GCJ Web Browser Plugin" the second options supposedly uses openjdk. No descriptions are given whatsoever. ** Attachment added: "totem fix" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22499081/totem.debdiff ** Changed in: totem (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
