[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
This bug report is being closed due to your last comment. For future reference you can manage the status of your own bugs by clicking on the current status in the yellow line and then choosing a new status in the revealed drop down box. You can learn more about bug statuses at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status . Thank you again for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Feel free to submit any future bugs you may find. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
Yes. Please close this bug report. I don't want to help any more people troubleshoot their messed up partition tables. :P -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
zosx, from the comments it seems your problem has been resolved. can we close this bug report? ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Incomplete -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
Oops, zosX is correct. My problem is a much simpler one. I didn't have the directory created for the mount point. Don't know how that was forgotten. My bad. Sorry. And thanks. -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
I hate to say it but your problem has nothing to do with the partition table problems people were having. It seems like your table is fine. Have you tried manually adding the partition to fstab? I mean why is it failing? Does a mount -t ntfs /dev/sdb2 /mount/Windows work for instance? Just saying something doesn't work really doesn't give any insight into the problem. I think like a help forum would be a better place to go or perhaps finding someone with a similar problem in the bugtraq as yours. On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 6:11 AM, John O'Neall wrote: > I also cannot access my Windows partition. It is reported correctly by > fdisk > > $ sudo fdisk -l > > Disk /dev/sda: 320.0 GB, 320072933376 bytes > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 38913 cylinders > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes > Disk identifier: 0xc435 > > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System > /dev/sda1 * 1 65 522081 83 Linux > /dev/sda2 66137010482412+ 83 Linux > /dev/sda313711892 4192965 82 Linux swap / Solaris > /dev/sda41893 33744 2558511905 Extended > /dev/sda51893841952428096 83 Linux > /dev/sda684208680 2096451 83 Linux > /dev/sda78681 1703567111506 83 Linux > /dev/sda8 17036 33744 134215011 83 Linux > > Disk /dev/sdb: 120.0 GB, 1200 bytes > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 14589 cylinders > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes > Disk identifier: 0x9dc96e9e > > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System > /dev/sdb1 1 7 561966 FAT16 > /dev/sdb2 * 8816665537167+ 7 HPFS/NTFS > /dev/sdb38167 1458951592747+ 5 Extended > /dev/sdb58167 1135325599546 83 Linux > /dev/sdb6 11354 1288312289693+ 83 Linux > /dev/sdb7 12884 1441312289693+ 83 Linux > /dev/sdb8 14414 14589 1413688+ 83 Linux > > > as /dev/sdb2, and parted sees it ok, with no obvious problems with > primary partitions: > > (parted) print all > Model: ATA WDC WD1200JD-75G (scsi) > Disk /dev/sdb: 120GB > Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B > Partition Table: msdos > > Number Start End SizeType File system Flags > 1 32.3kB 57.6MB 57.5MB primary fat16 > 2 57.6MB 67.2GB 67.1GB primary ntfs boot > 3 67.2GB 120GB 52.8GB extended > 5 67.2GB 93.4GB 26.2GB logical ext3 > 6 93.4GB 106GB 12.6GB logical ext3 > 7 106GB 119GB 12.6GB logical ext3 > 8 119GB 120GB 1448MB logical ext3 > > > Model: ATA ST3320620A (scsi) > Disk /dev/sda: 320GB > Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B > Partition Table: msdos > > Number Start End SizeType File system Flags > 1 32.3kB 535MB 535MB primary ext3 boot > 2 535MB 11.3GB 10.7GB primary ext3 > 3 11.3GB 15.6GB 4294MB primary linux-swap > 4 15.6GB 278GB 262GB extended > 5 15.6GB 69.2GB 53.7GB logical ext3 > 6 69.2GB 71.4GB 2147MB logical ext3 > 7 71.4GB 140GB 68.7GB logical ext3 > 8 140GB 278GB 137GB logical ext3 > > I am using the current (31 Jan 2009) release > > $ lsb_release -a > No LSB modules are available. > Distributor ID: Ubuntu > Description:Ubuntu 8.10 > Release:8.10 > Codename: intrepid > > So is there a solution for this or not? I am a recent immigrant from > Kubuntu. During the installation, I did not change anything or tell it > to use sdb partitions, as this is the way it is done for Kubutnu > installation. Hope this was not an error. > > Thanks for any help. > > -- > Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in Ubuntu: New > > Bug description: > When I install the new beta and get to the manual partition editor it shoes > my SATA drive as having no partition table. When I open the same partition in > fdisk from the installer CD it shows the partition map. The chipset is the > sis180 raid SATA controller (though I suspect the hardware driver is not at > issue). It looks like there is just something in my partition table that the > installer does not like. I tried rewriting the table from fdisk to no avail. > It still refuses to show me the existing partitions in the installer. My > drive is mapped like this: > > Primary Partition --> Windows XP > Extended partition - > > 1. Ubuntu 8.04 > 2. Swap > > Pretty basic. > > I didn't see that anyone else was having this probem with Ibex and I > specifically remember 8.04 seeing my windows partition when I installed last > on this
[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
I also cannot access my Windows partition. It is reported correctly by fdisk $ sudo fdisk -l Disk /dev/sda: 320.0 GB, 320072933376 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 38913 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Disk identifier: 0xc435 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 1 65 522081 83 Linux /dev/sda2 66137010482412+ 83 Linux /dev/sda313711892 4192965 82 Linux swap / Solaris /dev/sda41893 33744 2558511905 Extended /dev/sda51893841952428096 83 Linux /dev/sda684208680 2096451 83 Linux /dev/sda78681 1703567111506 83 Linux /dev/sda8 17036 33744 134215011 83 Linux Disk /dev/sdb: 120.0 GB, 1200 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 14589 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Disk identifier: 0x9dc96e9e Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sdb1 1 7 561966 FAT16 /dev/sdb2 * 8816665537167+ 7 HPFS/NTFS /dev/sdb38167 1458951592747+ 5 Extended /dev/sdb58167 1135325599546 83 Linux /dev/sdb6 11354 1288312289693+ 83 Linux /dev/sdb7 12884 1441312289693+ 83 Linux /dev/sdb8 14414 14589 1413688+ 83 Linux as /dev/sdb2, and parted sees it ok, with no obvious problems with primary partitions: (parted) print all Model: ATA WDC WD1200JD-75G (scsi) Disk /dev/sdb: 120GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: msdos Number Start End SizeType File system Flags 1 32.3kB 57.6MB 57.5MB primary fat16 2 57.6MB 67.2GB 67.1GB primary ntfs boot 3 67.2GB 120GB 52.8GB extended 5 67.2GB 93.4GB 26.2GB logical ext3 6 93.4GB 106GB 12.6GB logical ext3 7 106GB 119GB 12.6GB logical ext3 8 119GB 120GB 1448MB logical ext3 Model: ATA ST3320620A (scsi) Disk /dev/sda: 320GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: msdos Number Start End SizeType File system Flags 1 32.3kB 535MB 535MB primary ext3 boot 2 535MB 11.3GB 10.7GB primary ext3 3 11.3GB 15.6GB 4294MB primary linux-swap 4 15.6GB 278GB 262GB extended 5 15.6GB 69.2GB 53.7GB logical ext3 6 69.2GB 71.4GB 2147MB logical ext3 7 71.4GB 140GB 68.7GB logical ext3 8 140GB 278GB 137GB logical ext3 I am using the current (31 Jan 2009) release $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 8.10 Release:8.10 Codename: intrepid So is there a solution for this or not? I am a recent immigrant from Kubuntu. During the installation, I did not change anything or tell it to use sdb partitions, as this is the way it is done for Kubutnu installation. Hope this was not an error. Thanks for any help. -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
also, fdisk shows this. Disk /dev/sda: 200.0 GB, 200049647616 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 24321 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Disk identifier: 0x6000 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 12131710485760 de Dell Utility /dev/sda2 *1317 12875928388807 HPFS/NTFS /dev/sda3 16475 2432263032308+ f W95 Ext'd (LBA) /dev/sda4 * 23995 24322 2620416c W95 FAT32 (LBA) Disk /dev/sdb: 4043 MB, 4043309056 bytes 125 heads, 62 sectors/track, 1018 cylinders Units = cylinders of 7750 * 512 = 3968000 bytes Disk identifier: 0xb0bcd68e This doesn't look like a partition table Probably you selected the wrong device. Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sdb1 ? 415919 447748 123339962 78 Unknown Partition 1 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?): phys=(518, 102, 15) logical=(415918, 36, 50) Partition 1 has different physical/logical endings: phys=(743, 0, 62) logical=(447747, 120, 15) Partition 1 does not end on cylinder boundary. /dev/sdb2 ? 55855 155943 387841909+ 10 OPUS Partition 2 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?): phys=(205, 7, 0) logical=(55854, 42, 14) Partition 2 has different physical/logical endings: phys=(920, 235, 50) logical=(155942, 71, 34) Partition 2 does not end on cylinder boundary. /dev/sdb3 ? 241234 488877 959615034 8b Unknown Partition 3 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?): phys=(260, 125, 54) logical=(241233, 109, 56) Partition 3 has different physical/logical endings: phys=(893, 46, 60) logical=(488876, 58, 35) Partition 3 does not end on cylinder boundary. /dev/sdb4 ?43984406 32768a OS/2 Boot Manager Partition 4 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?): phys=(269, 111, 50) logical=(4397, 31, 49) Partition 4 has different physical/logical endings: phys=(0, 0, 0) logical=(4405, 88, 50) Partition 4 does not end on cylinder boundary. Partition table entries are not in disk order -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
I tried partition magic, but it does not work with vista unfortunately. Then I realized you need to use sudo in front of cfdisk. using that, I getFATAL ERROR: Bad primary partition 2: Partition ends in the final partial cylinder -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
Ohpartition magic may be able to straighten that out too. Don't know if the DOS version will see your drive but the windows install should be able too On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Mark Bassett wrote: > Yeah I meant Wubi. Try deleting them in windows since it sees all the > partitions and can probably manipulate them without issue. I'm guessing that > it was a windows install on that disk anyways to begin with. I've never seen > a partition table that cfdisk couldn't mangle back together so all I can > wish you really is luck. Hope you have a big external you can make images to > just in case. =) > > > On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 11:23 PM, BrianS wrote: > >> If you could tell me how to delete it, I would be more than willing to. >> The only thing on the hard drive that I do not want to lose is the >> recovery partition. As for the others, I have nothing on them that I >> want to keep that badly, and the recovery makes it easy for reinstalling >> windows. If you are talking about wubi, I would rather just not deal >> with windows except for when I need it for using visual studio for >> school assignments. >> >> -- >> Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 >> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber >> of the bug. >> >> Status in Ubuntu: New >> >> Bug description: >> When I install the new beta and get to the manual partition editor it >> shoes my SATA drive as having no partition table. When I open the same >> partition in fdisk from the installer CD it shows the partition map. The >> chipset is the sis180 raid SATA controller (though I suspect the hardware >> driver is not at issue). It looks like there is just something in my >> partition table that the installer does not like. I tried rewriting the >> table from fdisk to no avail. It still refuses to show me the existing >> partitions in the installer. My drive is mapped like this: >> >> Primary Partition --> Windows XP >> Extended partition - >> >> 1. Ubuntu 8.04 >> 2. Swap >> >> Pretty basic. >> >> I didn't see that anyone else was having this probem with Ibex and I >> specifically remember 8.04 seeing my windows partition when I installed last >> on this drive. Any help would be appreciated. Sorry for the lack of logs or >> screen shots as I don't have many good ways to capture from the installer >> CD. >> >> -zosX >> > > -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
Yeah I meant Wubi. Try deleting them in windows since it sees all the partitions and can probably manipulate them without issue. I'm guessing that it was a windows install on that disk anyways to begin with. I've never seen a partition table that cfdisk couldn't mangle back together so all I can wish you really is luck. Hope you have a big external you can make images to just in case. =) On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 11:23 PM, BrianS wrote: > If you could tell me how to delete it, I would be more than willing to. > The only thing on the hard drive that I do not want to lose is the > recovery partition. As for the others, I have nothing on them that I > want to keep that badly, and the recovery makes it easy for reinstalling > windows. If you are talking about wubi, I would rather just not deal > with windows except for when I need it for using visual studio for > school assignments. > > -- > Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in Ubuntu: New > > Bug description: > When I install the new beta and get to the manual partition editor it shoes > my SATA drive as having no partition table. When I open the same partition > in fdisk from the installer CD it shows the partition map. The chipset is > the sis180 raid SATA controller (though I suspect the hardware driver is not > at issue). It looks like there is just something in my partition table that > the installer does not like. I tried rewriting the table from fdisk to no > avail. It still refuses to show me the existing partitions in the installer. > My drive is mapped like this: > > Primary Partition --> Windows XP > Extended partition - > > 1. Ubuntu 8.04 > 2. Swap > > Pretty basic. > > I didn't see that anyone else was having this probem with Ibex and I > specifically remember 8.04 seeing my windows partition when I installed last > on this drive. Any help would be appreciated. Sorry for the lack of logs or > screen shots as I don't have many good ways to capture from the installer > CD. > > -zosX > -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
If you could tell me how to delete it, I would be more than willing to. The only thing on the hard drive that I do not want to lose is the recovery partition. As for the others, I have nothing on them that I want to keep that badly, and the recovery makes it easy for reinstalling windows. If you are talking about wubi, I would rather just not deal with windows except for when I need it for using visual studio for school assignments. -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
I'd still try to delete that extended partition and recreate it. Sounds like your partition table is pretty screwed to me. Rewriting it with windows or something might help. I don't think anything will work for you without changes to the table somehow. Unallocated space doesn't just suddenly appear or your table became suddenly corrupt. :P You can always recreate the FAT32 partition at the end for the media you might need to make the volume label the same, but I doubt the size matters as long as it is FAT32..have you thought about installing ubuntu on your windows partiton and boot selected with windows? :) -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
when i type cfdisk into the terminal, it gives FATAL ERROR: Cannot open disk drive. Press any key to exit cfdisk. That first 87MB partition appeared a few days ago, I am not sure why. The media direct has to be on a seperate partition as it allows you to play music and videos without having to load an entire operating system. Parted tells me "Error: Can't have overlapping partitions. " again, cfdisk just tells me FATAL ERROR -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
Sure. Make sure that your file table is correct and in proper order. That was my initial problem. I believe that I used cfdisk to show the partitions. Make sure that any extended partitions only contain logical drives. I had a logical drive somehow marked as a primary partition. Changing the bit allowed gparted to read the table correctly. It should throw a warning on such problems versus the silent approach, but I guess that doesn't really make it a bug. I'm looking at your partition table now and the first partition seems to just be unused (that 87megs), you can leave that. It is pretty normal to have slack or unallocated space at the beginning or ending of a drive, though 87 megs is kind of a large chunk. I'm guessing that grub at least works off the boot partition. First of all the windows logical volume manager is showing you all of your partitions and unallocated space. The fdisk from linux is only showing you partitions that are actually formatted and allocated. Thus the FAT partition at the end shows up. That 2.5 gig partition surely could be backed up to another partition can it not? I would suggest just trying to reduce the partitions at the end to 0 and simply deleting the whole extended partition, leaving just your dell recovery partition and the vista install intact. It will at least reduce the number of partitions that may be causing you problems. What does parted from the command line say? Overlapping partitions? Try opening the drive in cfdisk and doing a print (key P). It will tell you what the type of partition is and everything. Having that blank space with an extended partition following with more blank space and then a logical partition just might be compounding your issues. Why not make an extended partition to encompass everything after Vista and then break it into logical partitions? Three logical partitions, linux, swap, media. You can boot linux from any partition with grub or lilo. Cfdisk is probably going to really become your good friend here. -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
Sorry for the many posts. This is what vista displays all my drives as, if it helps with what I stated before. I would like to put ubuntu back on the free space + unallocated, but keep vista,media direct, and recovery. Thank you very much ** Attachment added: "C:\Users\Brian\Pictures\disk management.jpg" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20821830/C%3A%5CUsers%5CBrian%5CPictures%5Cdisk%20management.jpg -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
Looking at what zosX has said about the overlapping, I am wondering which one of these do I delete and how do I do that? Thank you very much. I have a dell XPS m1530 with one partition being 10gb of recovery. one partition being 2.5gb for media direct and the other is vista. I would like to keep these 3, but am not sure how to determine which one i don't need. The rest of my harddrive is either free space or unallocated. ** Attachment added: "fdisk.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20821641/fdisk.png -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
Has anybody figured out a way around this? I royally screwed up my sound driver and decided I would just install Intrepid. I had been using hardy. I just formatted the partition that that hardy was on and now I have it as free space. Yet when I go to install, the only option is to format the entire drive. Is there a way to keep the existing partitions and install to the free space? My computer seems so empty without ubuntu :( -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
I have the same problem with the final release of Intrepid Ibex. -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
still affects 8.10 final release. this is a very unlikely bug -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
Problem does not exist for me in kubuntu 8.10 final. -- Cheers, Doctor Rimzi -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
Actuall I fail altogether. You cannot have a primary partition existing in a extended partition. Don't know why I didn't see that right away. I also have no clue as to how that happened. Partition table corruption? Strange. Deleting the partition in cfdisk makes it readable in gparted. Issue solved. Perhaps the devs at gparted should give an error in the gui if the table somehow seems to overlap. Sorry to be a bother at such a busy time for ubuntu devs. I'm really looking foward to intrepid ibex though! -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
Partition Table for /dev/sdb First Last # Type Sector Sector OffsetLength Filesystem Type (ID) Flag -- --- --- --- -- --- 1 Primary 0 139588784 63 139588785 HPFS/NTFS (07) Boot 2 Primary 139588785 160071659 020482875 Extended (05)None 5 Logical 139588785 156874724126# 17285940 Linux (83) None 3 Primary 156874725 160071659 0 3196935 Linux swap / So (82) None I fail to see overlap here. -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
Sorry for all the comments (squeaky wheel, hehe). Also you might want to notice that the drive sizes are listed differently between cfdisk/fdisk and gparted. I think therein lies a clue. The ONLY software that refuses to correctly report the drive capacity and the partition table so far is gparted and the ubuntu installer. This is with the 32-bit installer. Haven't tried the 64-bit, nor would I really care to be honest. Athlon64-3000,sis raid180 serial ata, with the not so hot, not so bad sis (740?) AMD64 chipset. Any input would be appreciated as I really don't know where to begin to look when the core utilities and the kernel are giving me the results I would expet Ok, so I just open parted from the command line, and here is what I get: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo parted /dev/sdb GNU Parted 1.8.9 Using /dev/sdb Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands. (parted) print Error: Can't have overlapping partitions. well I created the table with the 8.04 installer...why the hell would I have overlapping partitions now? Any way I could fix this? I could grow the NTFS partition the encompass the whole disk and then just shrink it..IF gparted worked Don't tell me I'm going to have whip out the trusty partition magic. what is this the year 2000 again? -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
Same problem on the release candidate. cfdisk is now on the iso, and that also seems to report the correct table information. I think I can safely rule out that there is something wrong with my partition table. Isn't the installer partitioning utility based on gparted? Both show nothing just an empty drive of unallocated space. ** Attachment added: "Screenshot.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18975039/Screenshot.png -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
This works for me now that I downloaded the latest version. Yay. -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
Confirmed on Kubuntu Intrepid RC, and this time, it shows only white blank space (as if there are no hdd's). This is on a HP Pavilion dv6018ea laptop, the HDD is SATA, and is partitioned into two partitions: one for WinXP, one for WinVista. Haven't had this problem on this laptop in any previous version of Ubuntu/Kubuntu. -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
Stupid windowshere is the file :) ** Attachment added: "gpartedfail.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18461980/gpartedfail.png -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
Scratch that. I just didn't see the file. Here you go: ** Attachment added: "gpartedfail" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18461947/gpartedfail -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
The latest snapshot still does not show my partitions. Ubuntu's console fdisk shows them fine while the installer and gparted do not. Seeing as how I made the partitions with gparted in the first place, there should not be a conflict here. Writing the table from the console fdisk does nothing to alleviate the problem. I went to attach a screenshot, but apparently it was never saved to my NTFS partition. (Probably mounted read only) Though the file manager showed it as being saved on the partition. (another bug? ;) Oh yeah, the NTFS partition I mounted was on the drive that does not show the partition table under gparted. So I guess it shows up in /proc/partitions, which means that there is a bug in gparted and by extension ubuntu's installer. If I remember correctly I tried the text installer to no avail as well. Kind of a bummer for sure. If someone needs a screenshot to confirm, I'd be happy to go back and produce one. -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
I didn't get a chance to try 20081008, but it the 20081009.1 snapshot worked fine. -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
Did the 10/08 snapshot fix it yet? Seems like they had this bug before in 7.04 from reading through the bug reports. Perhaps it is the same bug rearing its ugly head again. -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
I'm having a similar/related problem. I used yesterday's (10/7) snapshot install CD, amd64 server (text installer), and the install process fails at the partitioning step. I was able to use a shell on another tty to partition my hd (/dev/sda), but even once partitioned, the installer doesn't see them, won't do anything with them. They are visible in /proc/partitions. I have the 10/8 snapshot and will try again tonight. This is to be a fresh installation. -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
I'm having this problem too. Both of the partitions on my disk show up in the places menu and when I do mount -a; however, the partition editor in ubiquity, gparted, and partman all report it as being unpartitioned space. -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
