[Bug 30734] Re: colorgcc should replace default gcc

2014-08-15 Thread Manuel López-Ibáñez
GCC 4.9 supports colors out of the box, thus the current colorgcc is not
needed anymore.

Ubuntu should just enable GCC colors by default. See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1324901 for a
possible way to do this.


** Changed in: colorgcc (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30734

Title:
  colorgcc should replace default gcc

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/colorgcc/+bug/30734/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 30734] Re: colorgcc should replace default gcc

2012-11-19 Thread Pander
** Tags added: development

** Tags added: color

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30734

Title:
  colorgcc should replace default gcc

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/colorgcc/+bug/30734/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 30734] Re: colorgcc should replace default gcc

2012-07-12 Thread Pander
** Tags added: 12.10

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30734

Title:
  colorgcc should replace default gcc

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/colorgcc/+bug/30734/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 30734] Re: colorgcc should replace default gcc

2012-04-27 Thread Amir Taaki
I agree. Please make colorgcc the default. Most of the development tools
like git, Python or whatever have colourised output nowadays. It's
ludicrous that gcc is stuck in the past - especially with such huge
output that often spans 2 pages worth of template errors.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30734

Title:
  colorgcc should replace default gcc

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/colorgcc/+bug/30734/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 30734] Re: colorgcc should replace default gcc

2012-01-30 Thread Pander
Addition to #12: I'm referring to gcc as it gets shipped by Ubuntu.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30734

Title:
  colorgcc should replace default gcc

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/colorgcc/+bug/30734/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 30734] Re: colorgcc should replace default gcc

2011-02-04 Thread Pander
As most of what is seen in the terminal is colored (ls, vim, etc.) by
default gcc's output may also be in color.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30734

Title:
  colorgcc should replace default gcc

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 30734] Re: colorgcc should replace default gcc

2011-02-04 Thread Manuel López-Ibáñez
#11

The current maintainers of GCC have already said that they do not want
to implement color output in GCC.

http://gcc.gnu.org/PR45850

http://gcc.gnu.org/PR36150

I have a preliminary patch, so if Ubuntu would be willing to carry the
patch, I would finish it. However, most distributions are very
conservative about patching GCC.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30734

Title:
  colorgcc should replace default gcc

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 30734] Re: colorgcc should replace default gcc

2010-02-28 Thread kit
I find the instructions at http://blog.emptycrate.com/node/429 work
fine. Specifically issuing the following commands manually once after
installation. The fact these sym-links aren't automatically created
during installation seems, to me, a defect in the installation package
which could easily be fixed.

sudo ln -s /usr/bin/colorgcc /usr/local/bin/gcc
sudo ln -s /usr/bin/colorgcc /usr/local/bin/g++
sudo ln -s /usr/bin/colorgcc /usr/local/bin/cc
sudo ln -s /usr/bin/colorgcc /usr/local/bin/c++

or when run with root privileges during installation, the following
single line would accomplish the same thing.

ln -s /usr/bin/colorgcc /usr/local/bin/gcc; ln -s /usr/bin/colorgcc
/usr/local/bin/g++; ln -s /usr/bin/colorgcc /usr/local/bin/cc; ln -s
/usr/bin/colorgcc /usr/local/bin/c++

-- 
colorgcc should replace default gcc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30734
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 30734] Re: colorgcc should replace default gcc

2010-02-28 Thread manu
Debian/Ubuntu have a system to handle alternatives for programs. In any
case, parsing the output of gcc is prone to errors. It would be better
if gcc implemented colors

-- 
colorgcc should replace default gcc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30734
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 30734] Re: colorgcc should replace default gcc

2010-02-28 Thread kit
To clarify, colorgcc is just a wrapper for the real gcc, etc. The above
symlinks in /usr/local/bin/* are found before the real gcc, etc. in
/usr/bin/* (owing to the default path variable -
PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games).
The title and description of this bug should be ammended.

If my previous suggestion can be integrated in to the repository
package, the sym-links should automatically get removed during
uninstallation so that when the path is traversed to execute gcc, etc.
the original ones are then found.

-- 
colorgcc should replace default gcc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30734
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 30734] Re: colorgcc should replace default gcc

2010-02-28 Thread kit
Ah ok, sorry. I didn't refresh the page before my last message and
missed what you said about the debian/ubuntu alternatives system. It
would be nice if the gcc system implemented colors and I don't know much
about the alternatives system. I'll read about the alternatives system
and see if the colour functionality can just be patched directly in to
gcc. Thanks for your quick reply.

-- 
colorgcc should replace default gcc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30734
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 30734] Re: colorgcc should replace default gcc

2009-09-28 Thread Dimitrios Symeonidis
this is wishlist, confirmed

** Changed in: colorgcc (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Low = Wishlist

** Changed in: colorgcc (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
colorgcc should replace default gcc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30734
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 30734] Re: colorgcc should replace default gcc

2009-09-28 Thread Dimitrios Symeonidis
related thread:
http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-434787.html

-- 
colorgcc should replace default gcc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30734
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 30734] Re: colorgcc should replace default gcc

2008-12-22 Thread Aleksander Morgado
I also agree with the proposed change here.

-- 
colorgcc should replace default gcc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30734
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 30734] Re: colorgcc should replace default gcc

2008-02-22 Thread manu
The right way is for colorgcc to use the alternatives system in the same
way that other packages do (for example gs, gs-eps, gs-gpl, etc, or the
very same gcc-4.1, gcc-3.4, etc).

This way, colorgcc gets installed as an alternative of gcc with higher
priority. Then, colorgcc itself needs to be configured to find the
actual gcc (which will probably be the second highest priority
alternative to gcc).

-- 
colorgcc should replace default gcc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30734
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 30734] Re: colorgcc should replace default gcc

2007-08-07 Thread ironstorm
I agree with this RFE, I installed colorgcc in the hopes it would
colourize my gcc output.

Just installing it doesn't appear to be enough

So far I'm trying:
alias gcc='colorgcc'
export CC=gcc

I'm not sure if this is the right way to go though...

-- 
colorgcc should replace default gcc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30734
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 30734] Re: colorgcc should replace default gcc

2007-06-28 Thread Guillaume Desmottes
I reopen this bug as I don't see the point to discuss about a RFE on
forums instead of on our bug tracker.

** Changed in: colorgcc (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid = New

-- 
colorgcc should replace default gcc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30734
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 30734] Re: colorgcc should replace default gcc

2007-03-07 Thread Barry deFreese
Thanks for your suggestion. The changes you are requesting require more
discussion, which should be done on an appropriate mailing list or
forum. http://www.ubuntu.com/community/forums/ might be a good start.

** Changed in: colorgcc (Ubuntu)
   Status: Unconfirmed = Rejected

-- 
colorgcc should replace default gcc
https://launchpad.net/bugs/30734

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs