[Bug 316174] Re: All translations gone
** Also affects: langpack-o-matic Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: langpack-o-matic Importance: Undecided => High Assignee: (unassigned) => Martin Pitt (pitti) Status: New => In Progress ** Summary changed: - All translations gone + update langpacks need strict -base dependency -- update langpacks need strict -base dependency https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316174 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 316174] Re: All translations gone
Even though I downgraded the packages I had upgraded, a few apps are still appearing in English :/ I'll now try upgrading all (that is, including -base). -- All translations gone https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316174 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 316174] Re: All translations gone
I don't know what the package management problem you have here is, but my point is that if the versioned dependency were in place then this problem would not have arisen. Either both packages would have been upgraded, or neither. I'm not concerned about either of those outcomes. I *am* concerned about the case where -es is upgraded but -es-base isn't. -- All translations gone https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316174 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 316174] Re: All translations gone
@Colin: The problem is not just that I installed the language-pack-es and the -base package didn't automatically get marked for update. The -base package doesn't show as an upgrade at all, so I can't even manually mark it for upgrading. If I tell it to upgrade everything that is available for upgrade, language-pack-es is updated to the "empty" version but language-pack-es-base remains untouched. I have no idea why. What I *can* do is going to the list of package versions in aptitude, and marking the newest version number for installing (with +). But if I press + on the package itself (and not on a specific version number), it's not marked for upgrade. This did work for the non -base language- pack packages. Although I agree that the language packs should depend on the specific version of the -base package they need. -- All translations gone https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316174 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 316174] Re: All translations gone
You're supposed to upgrade -base too. The problem here appears to be that language-pack-es (and presumably other delta language packs) doesn't have a tight versioned dependency on language-pack-es-base. (I agree that this is critical due to the upgrade regression.) -- All translations gone https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316174 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 316174] Re: All translations gone
I still don't know why I got the 20090105 package if it's in -proposed. My /etc/apt/preferences is: Package: * Pin: release a=hardy-updates Pin-Priority: 900 Package: * Pin: release a=hardy-proposed Pin-Priority: 400 Package: * Pin: release a=hardy-backports Pin-Priority: 300 which supposedly shows stuff from -proposed only if I explicitly ask for it with "aptitude -t hardy-proposed". I didn't use -t when upgrading... Anyway, thanks for confirming. I have now downgraded the packages manually. Good thing the problem was found in -proposed before it was pushed to everybody :) -- All translations gone https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316174 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 316174] Re: All translations gone
Indeed. Looks like -de is gone as well. This is the hardy-proposed upload. Assigning to pitti. ** Changed in: language-pack-es (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical Assignee: (unassigned) => Martin Pitt (pitti) Status: New => Confirmed -- All translations gone https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316174 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 316174] Re: All translations gone
1:8.04+20090105 doesn't even show in packages.ubuntu.org; how did I manage to get it? :/ -- All translations gone https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316174 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 316174] Re: All translations gone
Changelog for language-pack-es 1:8.04+20090105 says just "Initial release". All previous changelog entries seem to have disappeared. -- All translations gone https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316174 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
