[Bug 318818] Re: Intrepid fails LSB 3.2 tests on foomatic-filters
** Changed in: foomatic-filters (Ubuntu Intrepid) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- Intrepid fails LSB 3.2 tests on foomatic-filters https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318818 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318818] Re: Intrepid fails LSB 3.2 tests on foomatic-filters
There is an updated version which fixes a regression: foomatic-filters (4.0.0-0ubuntu0.2) intrepid-proposed; urgency=low . * debian/patches/foomatic-rip-segfault-on-jcl-merging.patch: Fixed segfault of the JCL merging process on long JCL command lists (LP: #321164). This was also reported on the Intrepid SRU 4.0.0-0ubuntu0.1 in LP: #318614. Can you please test this version instead/again, and report back here? Thank you! -- Intrepid fails LSB 3.2 tests on foomatic-filters https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318818 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318818] Re: Intrepid fails LSB 3.2 tests on foomatic-filters
Accepted foomatic-filters into intrepid-proposed, please test and give feedback here. Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance! ** Changed in: foomatic-filters (Ubuntu Intrepid) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed -- Intrepid fails LSB 3.2 tests on foomatic-filters https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318818 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 318818] Re: Intrepid fails LSB 3.2 tests on foomatic-filters
Steve Langasek [2009-01-20 6:50 -]: This does not fit the SRU process as described at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates. Micro-release exceptions for SRUs must be approved by the TB, based on the presence of an upstream QA process that provides a reasonable guarantee that the new release will be regression-free relative to what we released with. Please note that this is not a general request to put in new microreleases. The complete diff was provided, and we do not plan to put in further upstream updates. This is just a bunch (some 10) individual commits, and I don't particularly care whether they are called '4.0 final' or 'merge fixes from upstream'. Which of these changes do you believe meet the SRU process's requirement to only fix high-impact bugs? I will say that I don't think LSB test failures are themselves an SRU justification. That was my concern as well. The other fixes are regressions from hardy, and thus acceptable in an SRU. How much of the diff is related solely to LSB compatibility, and would disappear if that was taken out? -- Intrepid fails LSB 3.2 tests on foomatic-filters https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318818 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318818] Re: Intrepid fails LSB 3.2 tests on foomatic-filters
The fixes which I did to make it LSB-compliant are also regressions against hardy, most prominently the security bug 318816. They also include that things like wrong treatment of supplying string or numerical option settings which are out of range and that PJL option settings do not get correctly inserted into the output data stream (which cuses also bug 303691). All problems described in http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2423 are also failures of the basic functionality and regressions against Hardy (Hardy shipped foomatic-filters 3.0.x). -- Intrepid fails LSB 3.2 tests on foomatic-filters https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318818 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318818] Re: Intrepid fails LSB 3.2 tests on foomatic-filters
** Tags removed: pet-bug -- Intrepid fails LSB 3.2 tests on foomatic-filters https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318818 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318818] Re: Intrepid fails LSB 3.2 tests on foomatic-filters
Due to the many regression bugs which the foomatic-filters package in Intrepid has (see changelog below) I propose to replace Intrepid's foomatic-filters by the final 4.0.0 release (which is currently in Jaunty). An SRU request is uploaded to -proposed. Here is the debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21399871/foomatic- filters_4.0.0%7Ebzr177-0ubuntu1_4.0.0-0ubuntu0.1.debdiff Note that its is long, as due to the final release also the documentation is updated and the machine-generated files of the build system got regenerated. The following diff contains only the changes in active code (which actually modify the /usr/bin/foomatic-rip executable): http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21399918/foomatic-4-intrepid-foomatic-4 -final-changes-in-active-code.diff The following debian/changelog contains all fixes on active code, the upstream ChangeLog I do not show here as it is much longer due to the documentation changes and the 4.0.0 final release. foomatic-filters (4.0.0-0ubuntu0.1) intrepid-proposed; urgency=low * New upstream release (4.0.0 final release, BZR rev 195, all the changes against rev 177 as shipped by Intrepid are regressions against Hardy) - Let custom JCL options get correctly inserted. - Treat None as empty string in string and password options. - String and password option settings got inserted with the Custom. prefix. - Fixed segfault which occured when using string options (LP: #318614). - Make foomatic-rip working correctly with PostScript of StarOffice 8. - The PostScript code of PostScript options did not get inserted when the spooler is CUPS and foomatic-rip had to convert incoming PDF to PostScript (LP: #299918). - Made merging of PJL options of the PPD and of the driver correctly working (LP: #318818). - Corrected the insertion of the %%PageSetup sections (LP: #318818). - Inserted PostScript option settings from pstops were not corrected with custom option settings done on the command line (numerical, string, password). - If there was only one PJL option in the PPD no PJL got added at all (LP: #303691). - Made foomatic-rip conforming with the LSB compliance tests (LSB bug #2423, LP: #318818). - Fixed infinite loop when page-specific option settings are used (LP: #318816). - Made foomatic-rip correctly working with custom JCL options. - Option setting insertions got corrupted when there is a composite option in the PPD file (Upstream bug #173, comment #23). -- Till Kamppeter till.kamppe...@gmail.com Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:42:49 +0100 -- Intrepid fails LSB 3.2 tests on foomatic-filters https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318818 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318818] Re: Intrepid fails LSB 3.2 tests on foomatic-filters
** Changed in: foomatic-filters (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- Intrepid fails LSB 3.2 tests on foomatic-filters https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318818 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318818] Re: Intrepid fails LSB 3.2 tests on foomatic-filters
** Tags added: pet-bug ** Changed in: foomatic-filters (Ubuntu Intrepid) Importance: Undecided = Medium Status: New = Fix Committed -- Intrepid fails LSB 3.2 tests on foomatic-filters https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318818 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 318818] Re: Intrepid fails LSB 3.2 tests on foomatic-filters
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 04:12:02PM -, Till Kamppeter wrote: Due to the many regression bugs which the foomatic-filters package in Intrepid has (see changelog below) I propose to replace Intrepid's foomatic-filters by the final 4.0.0 release (which is currently in Jaunty). This does not fit the SRU process as described at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates. Micro-release exceptions for SRUs must be approved by the TB, based on the presence of an upstream QA process that provides a reasonable guarantee that the new release will be regression-free relative to what we released with. Unless a micro-release exception is first established, we should only be accepting targeted changes that each qualify under the SRU policy. Which of these changes do you believe meet the SRU process's requirement to only fix high-impact bugs? I will say that I don't think LSB test failures are themselves an SRU justification. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org -- Intrepid fails LSB 3.2 tests on foomatic-filters https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318818 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318818] Re: Intrepid fails LSB 3.2 tests on foomatic-filters
** Changed in: foomatic-filters (Ubuntu Intrepid) Status: Fix Committed = In Progress -- Intrepid fails LSB 3.2 tests on foomatic-filters https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318818 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
