[Bug 337875] Re: Docky trash does not reflect number of items in trash

2009-03-06 Thread Alex Launi
** Changed in: gnome-do (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
Docky trash does not reflect number of items in trash
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337875
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 337875] Re: Docky trash does not reflect number of items in trash

2009-03-06 Thread rax_m
I'll look into it.. thanks for taking the time to look at this anyway.

Cheers
Rax



From: David Siegel 
To: ra...@yahoo.co.uk
Sent: Thursday, 5 March, 2009 23:35:29
Subject: Re: [Bug 337875] Re: Docky trash does not reflect number of items in 
trash

"MB" is not a meaningful abbreviation to most of our users, and don't
you agree that it should be some other program's job to inform the
user that their trash has grown "too large"? I understand why this
information is useful to you, and probably to many other people, but I
remain unconvinced that it is sufficiently useful to merit inclusion
in Do. Perhaps you could write a patch, are provide further reasons
for this feature?

-- 
Docky trash does not reflect number of items in trash
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337875
You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
of the bug.

-- 
Docky trash does not reflect number of items in trash
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337875
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 337875] Re: Docky trash does not reflect number of items in trash

2009-03-05 Thread David Siegel
"MB" is not a meaningful abbreviation to most of our users, and don't
you agree that it should be some other program's job to inform the
user that their trash has grown "too large"? I understand why this
information is useful to you, and probably to many other people, but I
remain unconvinced that it is sufficiently useful to merit inclusion
in Do. Perhaps you could write a patch, are provide further reasons
for this feature?

-- 
Docky trash does not reflect number of items in trash
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337875
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 337875] Re: Docky trash does not reflect number of items in trash

2009-03-05 Thread rax_m
Good question! It's a hard one to justify, I guess it's something I like to 
know. 
Perhaps a better tooltip would be "15MB currently in trash" .. that way you 
know whether you're letting the trash grow too large?

-- 
Docky trash does not reflect number of items in trash
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337875
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 337875] Re: Docky trash does not reflect number of items in trash

2009-03-04 Thread Alex Launi
Can you provide an argument for why this is a useful feature? I
personally cannot think of a single reason why a user would need this
bit of information. Empty/Full is the only trash info I can think of
that it is remotely useful. By nature of being "trash", what's in it
should be irrelevant.

-- 
Docky trash does not reflect number of items in trash
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337875
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs