[Bug 367160] Re: Modeline scanning behavior does not match documentation (off-by-one error?)

2010-09-15 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gedit
   Importance: Unknown = Medium

-- 
Modeline scanning behavior does not match documentation (off-by-one error?)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367160
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 367160] Re: Modeline scanning behavior does not match documentation (off-by-one error?)

2009-05-28 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package gedit - 2.27.1-0ubuntu1

---
gedit (2.27.1-0ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low

  * New upstream release: (LP: #380924)
- Remove the mmap document loader (Paolo Borelli)
- Remove open location dialog and sample plugin (Paolo Borelli)
- Added public API for document saving (Jesse van den Kieboom)
- Put external tools in a submenu (Jesse van den Kieboom)
- Added language support for external tools (Jesse van den Kieboom)
- Implemented asynchronous reading and writing on external tools (Jesse van 
den Kieboom)
- Add Quick Open plugin (Jesse van den Kieboom)
- Misc bugfixes
- New and updated translations
  * debian/patches/90_autoconf.patch
- updated for new version
  * Launchpad bugs fixed:
- various crasher bugs (LP: #348536, LP: #368262, LP: #368495)
- fix modeline scanning (LP: #367160)

 -- Andreas Moog am...@ubuntu.com   Wed, 27 May 2009 14:00:44 +0200

** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

-- 
Modeline scanning behavior does not match documentation (off-by-one error?)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367160
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 367160] Re: Modeline scanning behavior does not match documentation (off-by-one error?)

2009-05-13 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gedit
   Status: New = Fix Released

-- 
Modeline scanning behavior does not match documentation (off-by-one error?)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367160
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 367160] Re: Modeline scanning behavior does not match documentation (off-by-one error?)

2009-05-04 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
this has been fixed upstream, thanks for reporting.

** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged = Fix Committed

-- 
Modeline scanning behavior does not match documentation (off-by-one error?)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367160
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 367160] Re: Modeline scanning behavior does not match documentation (off-by-one error?)

2009-04-27 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
Thanks for your bug report. This bug has been reported to the developers
of the software. You can track it and make comments here:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=580494

** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Low

** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #580494
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=580494

** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Triaged

** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs)

** Also affects: gedit via
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=580494
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
Modeline scanning behavior does not match documentation (off-by-one error?)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367160
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 367160] Re: Modeline scanning behavior does not match documentation (off-by-one error?)

2009-04-27 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gedit
   Status: Unknown = New

-- 
Modeline scanning behavior does not match documentation (off-by-one error?)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367160
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 367160] Re: Modeline scanning behavior does not match documentation (off-by-one error?)

2009-04-26 Thread Jonathan Rascher

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25988762/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25988763/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25988764/ProcStatus.txt

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: gedit
  
  The modelines plugin doesn't quite work as documented in the gedit
  manual. Modelines are not recognized on some lines where there should
- be, and they are recognized on some lines where they shouldn't.
+ be, and they are recognized on some lines where they should not be.
  
  Expected results (according to the documentation):
  * Emacs modelines are recognized on the first two lines of a file.
  * Vim modeslines are recognized on the first and last three lines of a file.
  * Kate modelines are recognized on the first and last ten lines of a file.
  
  Actual results:
  * Emacs modelines are recognized on the first line of a file.
  * Vim modeslines are recognized on the first two and last four lines of a 
file.
  * Kate modelines are recognized on the first nine and last ten lines of a 
file.
  
  Perhaps the most annoying effect of this bug is that only the first line
  of a file is scanned for an Emacs modeline. This makes it impossible to
  use Emacs modelines in files that must begin with shebang lines.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  Architecture: amd64
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gedit
  Package: gedit 2.26.1-0ubuntu1
  ProcEnviron:
   PATH=(custom, user)
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: gedit
  Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic x86_64

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: gedit
  
  The modelines plugin doesn't quite work as documented in the gedit
  manual. Modelines are not recognized on some lines where there should
  be, and they are recognized on some lines where they should not be.
  
  Expected results (according to the documentation):
  * Emacs modelines are recognized on the first two lines of a file.
- * Vim modeslines are recognized on the first and last three lines of a file.
+ * Vim modelines are recognized on the first and last three lines of a file.
  * Kate modelines are recognized on the first and last ten lines of a file.
  
  Actual results:
  * Emacs modelines are recognized on the first line of a file.
- * Vim modeslines are recognized on the first two and last four lines of a 
file.
+ * Vim modelines are recognized on the first two and last four lines of a file.
  * Kate modelines are recognized on the first nine and last ten lines of a 
file.
  
  Perhaps the most annoying effect of this bug is that only the first line
  of a file is scanned for an Emacs modeline. This makes it impossible to
  use Emacs modelines in files that must begin with shebang lines.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  Architecture: amd64
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gedit
  Package: gedit 2.26.1-0ubuntu1
  ProcEnviron:
   PATH=(custom, user)
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: gedit
  Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic x86_64

-- 
Modeline scanning behavior does not match documentation (off-by-one error?)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367160
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs