[Bug 375352] Re: Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions

2009-09-08 Thread panticz.de
The creation and boot of Ubuntu 9.10 LiveCD works fine unless you use the Koala 
version of 
squashfs-tools http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/squashfs-tools. On my Ubuntu 
Jaunty I have to upgrade (see my script: http://www.panticz.de/LiveCD) 
squashfs-tools to 1:4.0-1, this fix all the boot problems.

-- 
Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 375352] Re: Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions

2009-09-08 Thread Colin Watson
I think you mean works fine *if* you use the Karmic version of
squashfs-tools, not unless.

-- 
Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375352] Re: Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions

2009-09-08 Thread panticz.de
The creation and boot of Ubuntu 9.10 LiveCD works fine  IF  you use the 
Koala version of
squashfs-tools... (of course IF and not unless, sorry!)

-- 
Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375352] Re: Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions

2009-09-08 Thread razor7
Hello...Tested with different CD-RW and worked OK without any problems.

Best regards!

-- 
Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375352] Re: Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions

2009-09-05 Thread razor7
Hello...I have downloaded Karmic Desktop AMD64 ISO image from here
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/karmic/alpha-5/, burned it with
brasero to a RW CD and testes in another PC.

When tries to boot, there is a blank screen, after that screen of aobut
1/2 second, the system falls into normal windows bootloader.

Any idea to solve this?

Thanks a lot!

-- 
Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 375352] Re: Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions

2009-09-05 Thread Colin Watson
You have some other problem, and it would be best to ask it elsewhere;
you aren't suffering from the bug you're replying to.

-- 
Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375352] Re: Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions

2009-06-08 Thread Joachim Frieben
Today's karmic-desktop.iso image file boots just fine.

-- 
Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 375352] Re: Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions

2009-06-04 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 02:48:32AM -, Geir Ove Myhr wrote:
 I know we can't expect a working Live CD at the start of a release
 cycle, but it would be nice to have an open bug report in launchpad
 when it doesn't work. This way eager testers may subscribe to that
 report and know when the Live CD is expected to work and start filing
 bug reports for real bugs. Would you consider this for Karmic or LL?

Well, of course we will often file bugs for our own reference, but to be
honest I don't think testers would find such reports any easier to find
than the current situation. They would typically be filed on packages
currently believed to be actually causing a problem, rather than on some
general live CD package (we don't want to have such a general live
CD package because it would end up being a real nightmare to handle
since everyone would file bugs on it any time they had any problem at
all with the live CD), and I wouldn't want testers to have to trawl the
entire bug database before getting started.

I *am* sensitive to the amount of time that eager testers put in and I
don't want them to waste their valuable time, neither by testing things
that we already know don't work nor by having to trawl through the bug
database before they even get started. I think the best policy, really,
is for testers to assume that the entire world is broken at the start of
a release cycle (which it often is; it sometimes turns out to be more
efficient for us to just drop in all the new code from Debian and then
fix it up as necessary, rather than being slow and careful at each
step), and to only start testing once the release manager or somebody
coordinating testing activities says it's worthwhile doing so.

We're usually reasonably clear about this through such channels as
iso.qa.ubuntu.com and #ubuntu-testing, I think; once you see a CD up for
testing at an early alpha, you can fairly safely assume that by then
it's received very basic smoke-testing and is not a complete waste of
time.

If there's anywhere where we're being unclear about this right now, I'd
like to know about it so that we can fix it up.

-- 
Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375352] Re: Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions

2009-05-28 Thread Colin Watson
casper isn't responsible for this - the bug is simply in the squashfs
package. It should have been left there rather than bounced around all
over the place. :-)

Although this bug is fairly trivial in itself, the reason we hadn't
fixed this until now was that there was basically no point in doing so
until we had a reasonable solution for a union filesystem in Karmic,
given that aufs is apparently no longer particularly sanely supportable
on the 2.6.30 kernel. I've been on the road, which slowed things down,
but I got unionfs-fuse working earlier this week as a stopgap measure
until we get proper VFS-level union mounts in the kernel (which are
coming soon), so it's now worthwhile to deal with this.


** Changed in: casper (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375352] Re: Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions

2009-05-28 Thread Colin Watson
I'm syncing squashfs from Debian unstable, which should deal with this.
I'll be keeping an eye on things over the next couple of days.

[Updating] squashfs (1:3.3-7ubuntu2 [Ubuntu]  1:4.0-1 [Debian])
 * Trying to add squashfs...
  - squashfs_4.0-1.diff.gz: downloading from http://ftp.debian.org/debian/
  - squashfs_4.0.orig.tar.gz: downloading from http://ftp.debian.org/debian/
  - squashfs_4.0-1.dsc: downloading from http://ftp.debian.org/debian/
I: squashfs [main] - squashfs-tools_1:3.3-7ubuntu2 [main].


** Changed in: squashfs (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Released

** Changed in: squashfs (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Colin Watson (cjwatson)

-- 
Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375352] Re: Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions

2009-05-28 Thread Colin Watson
Geir: just for the record, the tool (livecd-rootfs) that builds our live
filesystems simply installs the squashfs-tools package from karmic to do
so ...

-- 
Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375352] Re: Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions

2009-05-28 Thread Geir Ove Myhr
Thank you for clearing this up, Colin. Where is the best place to file a
bug report when a LiveCD doesn't boot (next time, for some other
reason)? Is the process of how the LiveCD documented somewhere? I found
the logs at http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-archive/livefs-build-logs/
and http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ .

I have tried to find a bug report on the aufs support in the 2.6.30
kernel, but couldn't find one. The only thing I found was this thread:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2009-February/004509.html
.

-- 
Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375352] Re: Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions

2009-05-28 Thread Colin Watson
In this case, the Karmic live CD was completely screwed, we knew about
it and considered it just about top priority, but work on it was made
difficult due to us all travelling to our developer summit and other
related events. At the start of a release cycle you can usually expect
that total across-the-board breakage such as this is already being
handled.

In general, casper is a reasonable place to file live CD problems, and
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingCasper offers some advice on collecting
debugging information.

The live filesystem is built by livecd-rootfs, which is packaged; the
actual ISO is built by a somewhat shakier pile of scripts that isn't
packaged (http://people.ubuntu.com/~cjwatson/bzr/cdimage/mainline/ and
the stuff listed in configs/devel from there; you probably don't want to
attempt to set this up unless you really REALLY have to ...).

The lack of aufs support in the 2.6.30 kernel is not a bug; it's
deliberate, since aufs has been repeatedly refused for merge upstream
and current available patches don't apply to 2.6.30. We're going to get
'mount --union' pretty soon, which will be a proper solution available
in the upstream kernel and should be far preferable to any of the
previous options.

-- 
Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 375352] Re: Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions

2009-05-28 Thread Geir Ove Myhr
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
 In this case, the Karmic live CD was completely screwed, we knew about
 it and considered it just about top priority, but work on it was made
 difficult due to us all travelling to our developer summit and other
 related events. At the start of a release cycle you can usually expect
 that total across-the-board breakage such as this is already being
 handled.

I know we can't expect a working Live CD at the start of a release
cycle, but it would be nice to have an open bug report in launchpad
when it doesn't work. This way eager testers may subscribe to that
report and know when the Live CD is expected to work and start filing
bug reports for real bugs. Would you consider this for Karmic or LL?

Thank you for all the information about how the Live CD is built. Hope
you have good time in Barcelona!

-- 
Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375352] Re: Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions

2009-05-27 Thread Geir Ove Myhr
I tried unpacking the iso/casper/filesystem.squashfs, unpacking it
with unsquashfs, installing the 4.0 version from debian
(http://packages.debian.org/unstable/admin/squashfs-tools) and remaking
filesystem.squashfs with mksquashfs from that package. Booting got past
the point where it stops now, but it does not work properly. It seems
that the file system isn't in place. gdm complains about some directory
missing and when being dropped to a shell, /bin/bash is missing.

-- 
Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375352] Re: Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions

2009-05-24 Thread Geir Ove Myhr
** Also affects: casper (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375352] Re: Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions

2009-05-24 Thread Geir Ove Myhr
Making another guess: adding casper as a source package. There was an
update to that package today, so maybe there's a change in tomorrow's
daily-live. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+source/casper/1.175

PS: I've learned since my last comment that aufs is not a replacement
for squashfs, but that both are required for the LiveCD to work
properly.

-- 
Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375352] Re: Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions

2009-05-21 Thread Celso Providelo
Soyuz isn't yet in charge of building CD images. The problem is
elsewhere.

** Changed in: soyuz
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375352] Re: Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions

2009-05-20 Thread Joachim Frieben
RE: Goldy  wrote ..

Please stop spamming this bug report! Your ranting is complete nonsense given 
that Ubuntu 9.10  (which is -not- Ubuntu 9.05) is at an early alpha stage. Btw, 
it is still possible to install from the alternate install media which is what 
I have done successfully. If you want to upgrade a running system, then a 
dist-upgrade is also possible.
The squashfs issue will certainly be fixed for the next milestone release.

-- 
Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375352] Re: Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions

2009-05-20 Thread Goldy
You are so right! complaining about a bug that prevent boot is worng,
but complaining about bugs for poor graphic, mouse pointer, wirless
undetect etc. is very right... again: 9.05 was realese with bug that
prevent booting!

Don't worry; I won't bother your system developers anymore: have fun
explaining yourself how you benifit from loosing users.

-- 
Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375352] Re: Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions

2009-05-20 Thread Geir Ove Myhr
** Also affects: soyuz
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375352] Re: Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions

2009-05-20 Thread Geir Ove Myhr
Still present for daily-live 20090520. I don't think this really is a
bug in squashfs, though. Squashfs is the source package for the binary
package squashfs-tools that you receive with your ubuntu installation.
While it would be nice if this was upgraded to version 4.x for Karmic,
the real problem here is that the automatic building of the daily-live
images uses squashfs 3.x instead of 4.x. This is not a bug in ubuntu per
se, but in the part of Launchpad responsible for making the CD-images. I
think that part is Soyuz, so I have added that package to the bug report
(I also considered launchpad-buildd, but from the description on
https://launchpad.net/launchpad-buildd it seemed that Soyuz was the
right place to file).

-- 
Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375352] Re: Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions

2009-05-20 Thread Geir Ove Myhr
Actually, this seems to be a known issue. From the Known issues on
http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/karmic/alpha1 : There are no desktop CDs
with live systems available, since the current kernel still lacks
support for the aufs file system.

So apparently aufs instead of squashfs will be used for the LiveCD in
karmic.

-- 
Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375352] Re: Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions

2009-05-19 Thread Goldy
Valid for 2009-05-19 as well.

Please solve it! don't you want me to upgrade?
How is it possible that booting the system is not a no. 1 praiority? Don't 
you want users to AT-LEAST get a non-graphic interface? How do you expect the 
bug Microsoft has a majority market share (no. one!) to be solved, if the 
simplest user must be a programmer? (fix his own bugs)

8.04 was perfect. 8.10 can be solved with acpi=off or pci=nomsi. 9.04 was 
RELEASED WITH the .dep BUG,  now it seems you broke all previous records by 
giving me the clue: go back to windows.
I thought ubuntu is for the people, now I feel like paying for red-hat.

-- 
Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375352] Re: Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions

2009-05-15 Thread Goldy
This bug valid also in 2009-05-15 .
Please give it a high priority: I want to at least BOOT the system.

Before that, I get an error that the device ata1 isn't ready.

Thanks.

-- 
Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375352] Re: Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions

2009-05-15 Thread bonehead
I can confirm the Kubuntu 64 bit install does this too. Tries to boot
then drops to shell.

-- 
Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375352] Re: Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions

2009-05-15 Thread bonehead
I can confirm the Kubuntu 64 bit install does this too. Tries to boot
then drops to shell.

-- 
Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375352] Re: Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions

2009-05-15 Thread bonehead
I forgot to add to the above ^^^

I get the error 'Loading AppArmour module failed'

-- 
Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375352] Re: Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions

2009-05-12 Thread Jim10
Confirmed

Gr,
Jim

-- 
Karmic desktop CD fails to boot because of different squashfs versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs