[Bug 399241] Re: mnemosyne locking is not atomic
I agree it's not a full lock, but a second copy will notice that the lockfile is present and warn the user. In the 2.x codebase, we now use sqlite database level locks. ** Changed in: mnemosyne (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- mnemosyne locking is not atomic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399241 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 399241] Re: mnemosyne locking is not atomic
I agree it's not a full lock, but a second copy will notice that the lockfile is present and warn the user. In the 2.x codebase, we now use sqlite database level locks. ** Changed in: mnemosyne (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- mnemosyne locking is not atomic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399241 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 399241] Re: mnemosyne locking is not atomic
I agree it's not a full lock, but a second copy will notice that the lockfile is present and warn the user. In the 2.x codebase, we now use sqlite database level locks. ** Changed in: mnemosyne (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- mnemosyne locking is not atomic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399241 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 399241] Re: mnemosyne locking is not atomic
I agree it's not a full lock, but a second copy will notice that the lockfile is present and warn the user. In the 2.x codebase, we now use sqlite database level locks. ** Changed in: mnemosyne (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- mnemosyne locking is not atomic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399241 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 399241] Re: mnemosyne locking is not atomic
I agree it's not a full lock, but a second copy will notice that the lockfile is present and warn the user. In the 2.x codebase, we now use sqlite database level locks. ** Changed in: mnemosyne (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- mnemosyne locking is not atomic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399241 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 399241] Re: mnemosyne locking is not atomic
I agree it's not a full lock, but a second copy will notice that the lockfile is present and warn the user. In the 2.x codebase, we now use sqlite database level locks. ** Changed in: mnemosyne (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- mnemosyne locking is not atomic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399241 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs