[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2010-08-13 Thread Michael Nagel
** Description changed:

- Ubuntu 9.10 Alpha3
+ First reported on Ubuntu 9.10 Alpha3
+ It affects Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx Final Release, too.
  
  rsyslogd: [origin software="rsyslogd" swVersion="4.2.0" x-pid="2296"
  x-info="http://www.rsyslog.com";] rsyslogd was HUPed, type 'lightweight'.
  
  After the above message in syslog no more messages are sent to any
  system logs. Plugging and unplugging an usb device produce no messages,
  although the device is mounted an works fine. Also, nothing is produced
  by the logger command.
  
  The problem occurs in a desktop and in a VirtualBox virtual machine. It
  occurred soon after karmic alpha 3 installation and persisted after
  installing all available updates in both environments.
  
  I'm attaching a typical syslog.

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2010-05-26 Thread Aleksander
rsyslogd -v :
rsyslogd 4.2.0, compiled with:
FEATURE_REGEXP: Yes
FEATURE_LARGEFILE:  Yes
FEATURE_NETZIP (message compression):   Yes
GSSAPI Kerberos 5 support:  Yes
FEATURE_DEBUG (debug build, slow code): No
Atomic operations supported:Yes
Runtime Instrumentation (slow code):No

See http://www.rsyslog.com for more information.

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2010-05-26 Thread Aleksander
I have last message in /var/log/syslog: 
May 26 07:35:16 kutoid rsyslogd: [origin software="rsyslogd" swVersion="4.2.0" 
x-pid="953" x-info="http://www.rsyslog.com";] rsyslogd was HUPed, type 
'lightweight'.
uname -a:
Linux kutoid 2.6.32-22-generic #33-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 28 13:27:30 UTC 2010 i686 
GNU/Linux
Kubuntu Linux Lucid Lynx

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2010-05-13 Thread Jonathan Michalon
Running 10.04 64bits, the same message show up BUT it seems normal. I've seen 
the following behavior:
The message show in /var/log/messages; afterward it's the first one of 
/var/log/syslog. Log seems to have been rotated.
If I execute something like that:
$ logger -t test "This is a test message"
test message shows up in both syslog and messages.
This is all absolutely normal, isn't?

I'm available if further test is needed…

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2010-04-12 Thread Ahmed Osama
Having the same problem here. Running 10.04 32bit.

Apr 11 12:26:46 home rsyslogd: [origin software="rsyslogd"
swVersion="4.2.0" x-pid="902" x-info="http://www.rsyslog.com";] rsyslogd
was HUPed, type 'lightweight'.

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2010-04-08 Thread Adam Heath
Additionally the permissions on syslog:


-rw-r- 1 syslog adm 4670 2010-04-08 11:03 /var/log/syslog

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2010-04-08 Thread Adam Heath
Having the same problem here. Running 9.10 64bit on EC2, this is from
very early this morning:


Apr  8 05:32:05 ubuntu rsyslogd: [origin software="rsyslogd" swVersion="4.2.0" 
x-pid="544" x-info="http://www.rsyslog.com";] rsyslogd was HUPed, type 
'lightweight'.

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2010-02-22 Thread Nikolaus Rath
I'm still having the same problem too. Here's a strace of the rsyslog
process when it receives the HUP:

[0] spitzer:/var/log# strace -p 7830
Process 7830 attached - interrupt to quit
select(1, NULL, NULL, NULL, {17, 289248}) = ? ERESTARTNOHAND (To be restarted)
--- SIGHUP (Hangup) @ 0 (0) ---
rt_sigaction(SIGHUP, {0x40c630, [], SA_RESTORER, 0x7f0cd0500190}, NULL, 8) = 0
rt_sigreturn(0x1)   = -1 EINTR (Interrupted system call)
futex(0x800594, FUTEX_WAKE_OP_PRIVATE, 1, 1, 0x800590, {FUTEX_OP_SET, 0, 
FUTEX_OP_CMP_GT, 1}) = 1
sched_yield()   = 0
select(1, NULL, NULL, NULL, {30, 0})= 0 (Timeout)
access("/var/log/syslog", F_OK) = 0
open("/var/log/syslog", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_NOCTTY|O_APPEND|O_CLOEXEC, 0640) = 
-1 EACCES (Permission denied)
select(1, NULL, NULL, NULL, {30, 0})= 0 (Timeout)
select(1, NULL, NULL, NULL, {30, 0})= 0 (Timeout)
access("/var/log/syslog", F_OK) = 0
open("/var/log/syslog", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_NOCTTY|O_APPEND|O_CLOEXEC, 0640) = 
-1 EACCES (Permission denied)
select(1, NULL, NULL, NULL, {30, 0})= 0 (Timeout)
select(1, NULL, NULL, NULL, {30, 0})= 0 (Timeout)

/var/log/syslog is owned by root:adm with permissions 0664 and created
by logrotate after the rotation.


** Changed in: rsyslog (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Released => Confirmed

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2010-02-11 Thread BMB
I found this page while searching for a fix for the same problem ("rsyslogd was 
huped..." and no more logging after that (I think cron might have stopped 
running my scripts then too. can that be?)
anyway, after reading all the technical stuff here, most of which I don't 
understand (what is a HUP anyway?), I still haven't figured out what 'm 
supposed to do. Has this bug been fixed, and me getting it is a different bug? 
is it only fixed in rsyslogd 4.7? will uninstalling rsyslogd and installing 
sysklogd solve it?
Thanx

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-12-14 Thread Luís Louro
Opening gnome-system-log shows it searches for, and does not find:

/var/log/auth.log.0: Erro ao verificar o ficheiro '/var/log/auth.log.0': 
Ficheiro ou directoria inexistente
/var/log/daemon.log.0: Erro ao verificar o ficheiro '/var/log/daemon.log.0': 
Ficheiro ou directoria inexistente
/var/log/debug.0: Erro ao verificar o ficheiro '/var/log/debug.0': Ficheiro ou 
directoria inexistente
/var/log/kern.log.0: Erro ao verificar o ficheiro '/var/log/kern.log.0': 
Ficheiro ou directoria inexistente
/var/log/messages.0: Erro ao verificar o ficheiro '/var/log/messages.0': 
Ficheiro ou directoria inexistente
/var/log/syslog.0: Erro ao verificar o ficheiro '/var/log/syslog.0': Ficheiro 
ou directoria inexistente
/var/log/user.log.0: Erro ao verificar o ficheiro '/var/log/user.log.0': 
Ficheiro ou directoria inexistente

Does the count start on zero?

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-12-09 Thread George Klein
@Gigglesworth, I'm still suffering the same problem as stated above at
#42.  For now I've just set all group configs to syslog.  I did hit
another problem which was all my own work though which might be relevant
to you.  As you'll see from the dynamic file template above, rsyslog
should create a new directory /var/log/ as the month changes.  This
didn't work for me but that was simply because rsyslog was running as
syslog:syslog but /var/log was root:root 0755.  That at least was clear
once I thought to look.

To save anyone else doing this other test (with apologies to Michael for
not simply accepting your statement) I also tested if it made any
difference putting user syslog in supplementary group syslog.  I
couldn't see any difference for rsyslog although as an interactive user
I couldn't chgrp a file to a group I wasn't a member of.

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-12-08 Thread Gigglesworth
I also have this same issue.

I noticed that my new files were all being created with the ownership of
"syslog:syslog". I was able to workaround this problem with a 'chgrp -Rv
adm /var/log/foobar', where 'foobar' was the directory containing the
new files. This should work, but I'm unsure if it will work when files
are recreated during the next log rotation.

I haven't had more time to investigate, but it does appear that there is
a mismatch with the file ownership.

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-11-16 Thread George Klein
Thanks for the quick answers Michael, I'm afraid they've thrown up what
looks like a bug to me.  It's similar to this bug but I'm happy to open
a new one if that's more appropriate.

Following your answers I set the following in rsyslog.conf (plus all the other 
parts obviously):
$FileOwner syslog
$FileGroup adm
$FileCreateMode 0640
$DirOwner syslog
$DirGroup adm
$DirCreateMode 0755
$Umask 0022
$PrivDropToUser syslog
$PrivDropToGroup syslog

I want dynamic files based on severity (among other things but this is what I 
tested) using the following template:
$template tLevel, "/var/log/%$MONTH%/%$DAY%/%HOSTNAME%.%SYSLOGSEVERITY-TEXT%"

I sent a log entry with:
logger -p local0.debug 'debug test'

and this resulted in the following syslog entry:
Nov 16 15:37:27 robbie rsyslogd: Could not open dynamic file 
'/var/log/11/16/robbie.debug' - discarding message

although ls -l /var/log/11/16 showed:
-rw-r- 1 syslog syslog  0 2009-11-16 15:37 robbie.debug
-rw-r- 1 syslog adm156681 2009-11-16 15:35 robbie.info
-rw-r- 1 syslog adm   622 2009-11-16 15:37 robbie.syslog

Yesterday when the only difference was:
$FileGroup syslog
$DirGroup syslog

robbie.debug was created and written to as I expected.  Just in case it's 
relevant I restarted rsyslog after editing the config with:
service rsyslog restart

robbie.info and robbie.syslog were created overnight owned by
syslog:syslog but I did a chown before the test I've described here.

The 2 things that look like bugs to me are:
- creating robbie.debug with the wrong group
- rsyslog being unable to write to it even with the wrong group.

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-11-15 Thread Michael Terry
1) PrivDropTo doesn't need to match $File.  Certainly not for the group.  But 
PrivDropToUser should be able to read files created by FileOwner.  Else, 
rsyslog can't read the files it creates.
2) syslog:adm is fine.  The group doesn't matter so much.  adm is the 
recommended group for system log files.
3) Yes, adm is for read-only access to system files.
4) No, syslog doesn't need to be in adm.

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-11-15 Thread George Klein
First - apologies for the vagueness that follows.  I'm only an amateur
and while I do record configurations I end up with, I don't record much
if anything on the way.  Second, I got here via installing rsyslog
myself on Jaunty and then upgrading to Karmic which may also have
confused things.  I currently have rsyslog 4.2.0-2ubuntu5.

Anyway, while trying to get to a setup I like, I've been having all
sorts of trouble with file/dir permissions.  I think I'm ok now and I
can get on with the other stuff I want to do but I have a couple of
observations/questions which may arise from either the package or my
fingers.

When I started looking at rsyslog after the upgrade, I found that
rsyslog.conf did not set $DirOwner or $DirGroup at all.  Having set
those the same as $FileOwner and $FileGroup rsyslog managed to create
the directories I want but I still had problems with dynafiles being
created and eventually found this bug report.

Following Rainer's link [1] in comment #28 I read in Michael's
description that $PrivDropToUser and $PrivDropToGroup should be set the
same as $FileOwner and $FileGroup.  I had $PrivDropTo as syslog:syslog
but $File as syslog:adm.  I don't believe I set any of those myself.
I've now set all the groups to syslog and things seem to be working now.

This last issue leaves me questions though:
- _must_ $PrivDropTo match $File?  I haven't spotted that as a requirement 
anywhere else or even mentioned in the docs I've read.
- should I have used syslog:syslog or syslog:adm?
- is the intention behind group adm to give read-only access to various admin 
files for appropriate users?
- if I use syslog:adm, should/must the syslog user be in group adm?

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-09-16 Thread Michael Terry
> I still have one concern, and that is probably easy to verify: what happens
> if logrotate runs? Does it create the files with the proper owner and
> permissions? And if so, how does it know?

The default logrotate script does not create the files.  It will move
the existing file out of the way and let rsyslog recreate.  It will also
HUP (but this becomes a restart with new upstartification changes)
rsyslog.

One interesting thing about logrotate is that it also doesn't know about
user changes to the list of output files.  The config just assumes.  So
it requires some skill as an admin to add/remove files correctly.

/var/log/syslog
{
rotate 7
daily
missingok
notifempty
delaycompress
compress
postrotate
restart rsyslog >/dev/null 2>&1 || true
endscript
}

/var/log/mail.info
/var/log/mail.warn
/var/log/mail.err
/var/log/mail.log
/var/log/daemon.log
/var/log/kern.log
/var/log/auth.log
/var/log/user.log
/var/log/lpr.log
/var/log/cron.log
/var/log/debug
/var/log/messages
{
rotate 4
weekly
missingok
notifempty
compress
delaycompress
sharedscripts
postrotate
restart rsyslog >/dev/null 2>&1 || true
endscript
}

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


RE: [Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-09-16 Thread Rainer Gerhards
> I agree it's probably (b), with the addendum that certainly part of the
> problem was previous rsyslog versions, which created the files as root.
> If that were the only problem, I suppose the packaging scripts could
> change permissions at install time, but that would require special
> logic
> to handle the case where the user set their own user/group.
> 
> I don't have any evidence yet that another program is creating/changing
> permissions on those files (all the current reports are explainable by
> rsyslog creating them as root before the user/group config change --
> there was a period of time where rsyslog was running unprivileged, but
> the config told it to create files as root, my bad), but I haven't done
> an audit to make sure it's the case.  I agree that such a review would
> be helpful.

OK, if it is only this transient problem, I think the current fix is a good
one to solve the situation. Nevertheless, you correctly point out that some
issue may occur if the user changes the file owner. Of course, one can argue
that then this is a user error, but I agree it would be useful to have some
utility to aid the user in that process. At least some doc should explain the
situation and what to watch for.
 
> So on the theory that the only real issue is previous rsyslog versions
> (until such an above review finds anything), the current 'force owner
> on
> open' behavior could conceivably be replaced by some install-time
> chowning, but to do that right (respect any user modification of either
> user/group or output files), it would involve parsing rsyslog.conf &
> rsyslog.conf.d/*.
> 
> Maybe for this usecase (distro changing default user/group), when
> rsyslog becomes fully-unprivileged, it could include a utility program
> called, say, rsyslog-fix-permissions that would run as root and chown
> all its output files?

This sounds very reasonable. I will keep this on my mind when working on the
new privilege drop code (whenever this may be). I tend to think that this
must be done by an interactive instance of rsyslogd, because only it has the
full knowledge of the configuration. But it may be really tricky for
dynafiles, where rsyslogd only knows at runtime, "as it happens" which files
need to be opened. Anyway, I think we can postpone that discussion until I
finally begin to implement that functionality.

> I suppose a second alternative is to force a logrotate that doesn't
> create the files and let rsyslog recreate its files.  But that relies
> on
> the logrotate config and seems a little forceful.  I don't think it
> would be wise to logrotate when an administrator isn't expecting it.

full ack

I still have one concern, and that is probably easy to verify: what happens
if logrotate runs? Does it create the files with the proper owner and
permissions? And if so, how does it know?

I understand that in Ubuntu terms, the "rsyslog logrotate script" is
considered part of the rsyslog package, but from the rsyslog project's POV
(mine ;)), this is something totally external, so I neither know exactly what
happens nor do I have any control over it. Actually, logrotate is my primary
concern in regard to overall system stability.

Rainer

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-09-16 Thread Michael Terry
I agree it's probably (b), with the addendum that certainly part of the
problem was previous rsyslog versions, which created the files as root.
If that were the only problem, I suppose the packaging scripts could
change permissions at install time, but that would require special logic
to handle the case where the user set their own user/group.

I don't have any evidence yet that another program is creating/changing
permissions on those files (all the current reports are explainable by
rsyslog creating them as root before the user/group config change --
there was a period of time where rsyslog was running unprivileged, but
the config told it to create files as root, my bad), but I haven't done
an audit to make sure it's the case.  I agree that such a review would
be helpful.

So on the theory that the only real issue is previous rsyslog versions
(until such an above review finds anything), the current 'force owner on
open' behavior could conceivably be replaced by some install-time
chowning, but to do that right (respect any user modification of either
user/group or output files), it would involve parsing rsyslog.conf &
rsyslog.conf.d/*.

Maybe for this usecase (distro changing default user/group), when
rsyslog becomes fully-unprivileged, it could include a utility program
called, say, rsyslog-fix-permissions that would run as root and chown
all its output files?

I suppose a second alternative is to force a logrotate that doesn't
create the files and let rsyslog recreate its files.  But that relies on
the logrotate config and seems a little forceful.  I don't think it
would be wise to logrotate when an administrator isn't expecting it.

Thanks very much for your Ubuntu concern.  I appreciate it!

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


RE: [Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-09-16 Thread Rainer Gerhards
> > I agree. The logrotate.d file that rsyslog uses in Debian/Ubuntu
> should use the 'create' directive which says
> > which user/group to create files as.
> 
> Hmm, I guess that's actually not needed.  Without the create directive,
> it leaves the creating up to rsyslog, which is fine for our purposes.

... but in that case, I wonder why there is an issue in the first place.
rsyslogd, correctly configured, creates files with the correct user. If the
files have the correct user, and the right permissions, there is no issue in
re-opening files after a HUP.

The original bug report claimed that the files were root-owned. So I conclude
the problem is either of this:

a) rsyslog.conf is incorrect and does not specify the correct file owner at
the correct location
OR
b) some other process creates the files with the wrong user

In theory, there is a possibility c) that there is a bug in rsyslogd that
prevents creation with the proper owner.

So far, I outrule c) because my testing indicates this is not the case.

So it is either a) or b).

Now comes the important point: if it is a), the problem will persist, because
the provided fix will also fail because of the configuration.

So it looks like it is b). That, however, means that the current solution
works to some degree, but fails under some circumstances. This, I think, is
pretty dangerous and very hard to solve when a bug report comes in. Please
see my failure case described in the links I posted in one of my earlier
messages. 

So while I have implemented a work-around in rsyslog, I still think this is
the wrong cure and careful consideration and review of all system components
is needed. Also keep in mind that the work-around will most likely always
fail with future rsyslg versions that have proper privilege drop code. Thus
the current work-around buys some time to find the component the incorrectly
creates the files - but it does not more.

Of course, distro-specific questions are not really of my concern. But I am
being somewhat persistent on this issue as I believe Ubuntu is a very
important distribution, does great work and as such deserves good
contributions.

Rainer

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-09-15 Thread Michael Terry
> I agree. The logrotate.d file that rsyslog uses in Debian/Ubuntu should use 
> the 'create' directive which says
> which user/group to create files as.

Hmm, I guess that's actually not needed.  Without the create directive,
it leaves the creating up to rsyslog, which is fine for our purposes.

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-09-15 Thread Michael Terry
> Why do you create these files as root-owned in the first place? Why not
> create them with the right user?  That is my primary point.

I agree.  The logrotate.d file that rsyslog uses in Debian/Ubuntu should
use the 'create' directive which says which user/group to create files
as.

> Michael Biebl, the Debian Maintainer, suggested using capabilities to reduce
> this need. I will look into this, but other than that I agree.

I looked into this a bit.  You'd need to use the CAP_SYS_ADMIN
capability.  Which is sort of a catch-all.  It allows the program to do
many, many root-y things [1].  Honestly, I'd prefer to have a root dd
process (which is contained and pretty safe) feeding an unprivileged
rsyslog than have an rsyslog with CAP_SYS_ADMIN.

[1] http://www.lids.org/lids-howto/node57.html

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-09-14 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: rsyslog
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


RE: [Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-09-11 Thread Rainer Gerhards
I think I missed to express me clearly enough in my previous reply:

> - firstly we either create root owned files, or open root owned files
> and ...

Why do you create these files as root-owned in the first place? Why not
create them with the right user?That is my primary point.

Rainer

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


RE: [Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-09-11 Thread Rainer Gerhards
> -Original Message-
> From: boun...@canonical.com [mailto:boun...@canonical.com] On Behalf Of
> Neil Wilson
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 2:05 PM
> To: Rainer Gerhards
> Subject: Re: [Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to
> system logs
> 
> Rsyslogd can't run initially as non-root if it is going to listen on
> port 512 or directly access the kernel logs. It needs to open that
> first as root and then keep them open while dropping privileges. So
> we're still going to have to root drop problem regrettably. (I'm sure
> you already know that. I'm just pointing it out for the rest of the
> audience here).

Michael Biebl, the Debian Maintainer, suggested using capabilities to reduce
this need. I will look into this, but other than that I agree.


> Once you sort the code so that it goes to non-root early, then it will
> fail to open any file for which it doesn't have permissions and will
> create files with the correct ownership. I believe that is the right
> approach: rsyslog shouldn't be changing permissions on files.

full ack

> 
> The issue we have at the moment is two fold:
> 
> - firstly we either create root owned files, or open root owned files
> and then write to them for a bit until the privileges drop and the
> files are closed
> - secondly we don't get any decent error out of rsyslog reporting the
> 'Permission denied' issue on opening/reopening of the files.

I have seen some issue when I worked on the patch this morning. But this
issue was so far unreported. It looks like a regression, and I am not sure if
4.2.0 already has this problem.

> 
> As you probably already know the file access code could do with a bit
> of TLC. It doesn't report errors as well as it should.

large parts of the code have been rewritten in the current beta/devel
versions.

> If you drop root privileges early enough before any files are opened
> or created and report errors properly in the File code then everything
> else will follow.

Ah, OK, I see where you are coming from. So the files were initially created
by rsyslogd? I thought they were created by some other process. Mhhh... could
be. But in any case, the very simple cure with the current code base is to
specify the correct file owner right at the top of rsyslog.conf, so the files
will be created with the correct owner right from the beginning. Note that my
patch (and the patch posted here), assumes that the file owner was properly
configured. If there is no proper owner config, neither of the patches will
work. Thus I assumed this were no issue... 

> Note that we don't kick off root processes to write files; we kick
> them off to read privileged files for which there is no other
> alternative - the kernel dmesg output doesn't appear to have a
> permission entry that works properly for example, and of course
> network ports under 1024 need root permission. It might be possible to
> engineer rsyslogd so that it runs as two processes that talk to each
> other. One as root to read the network ports and the kernel with the
> other running as a normal user to do the normal syslog processing.

you can already do that, and it is my default suggested config for
security-sensitive environments. I think internally TCP connections are used
to combine the two, but other modes are also possible. 

But my reference was not to processes to read files, but to the process to
write files.

Rainer
> 
> 
> 2009/9/11 Rainer Gerhards :
> > I couldn't agree more, and that is why I say that this work-around
> will
> > be broken once rsyslog's privilege drop code has been rewritten. As
> > stated in the wiki, the current solution is a quick and dirty one,
> > provided only because there seems to be some value in providing it
> over
> > not providing it.
> >
> > However, as far as this problem is concerned, this is not over root
> > access or non-root access. The issue is that rsyslogd should run as
> non-
> > root. Let's assume it finally has decent code to do that. Then it
> will
> > run, from the start on, as non-root. But then rsyslog.conf specifies
> > that rsyslogd shall write to files where it has no permissions. My
> point
> > is that either rsyslog.conf is invalid OR the files have been created
> > with wrong permissions. In any case, it is not something that rsyslog
> > can/should fix, because it is outside the scope of its configuration
> and
> > capabilities. I would consider it the wrong approach to create a root
> > child process just to write to some files, which apparently are set
> not
> > to be accessible for the daemon users. IMHO this is an inconsistent
> > system setup, and *that* root cause needs to be fixed.
&

Re: [Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-09-11 Thread Neil Wilson
Rsyslogd can't run initially as non-root if it is going to listen on
port 512 or directly access the kernel logs. It needs to open that
first as root and then keep them open while dropping privileges. So
we're still going to have to root drop problem regrettably. (I'm sure
you already know that. I'm just pointing it out for the rest of the
audience here).

Once you sort the code so that it goes to non-root early, then it will
fail to open any file for which it doesn't have permissions and will
create files with the correct ownership. I believe that is the right
approach: rsyslog shouldn't be changing permissions on files.

The issue we have at the moment is two fold:

- firstly we either create root owned files, or open root owned files
and then write to them for a bit until the privileges drop and the
files are closed
- secondly we don't get any decent error out of rsyslog reporting the
'Permission denied' issue on opening/reopening of the files.

As you probably already know the file access code could do with a bit
of TLC. It doesn't report errors as well as it should.

If you drop root privileges early enough before any files are opened
or created and report errors properly in the File code then everything
else will follow.

Note that we don't kick off root processes to write files; we kick
them off to read privileged files for which there is no other
alternative - the kernel dmesg output doesn't appear to have a
permission entry that works properly for example, and of course
network ports under 1024 need root permission. It might be possible to
engineer rsyslogd so that it runs as two processes that talk to each
other. One as root to read the network ports and the kernel with the
other running as a normal user to do the normal syslog processing.


2009/9/11 Rainer Gerhards :
> I couldn't agree more, and that is why I say that this work-around will
> be broken once rsyslog's privilege drop code has been rewritten. As
> stated in the wiki, the current solution is a quick and dirty one,
> provided only because there seems to be some value in providing it over
> not providing it.
>
> However, as far as this problem is concerned, this is not over root
> access or non-root access. The issue is that rsyslogd should run as non-
> root. Let's assume it finally has decent code to do that. Then it will
> run, from the start on, as non-root. But then rsyslog.conf specifies
> that rsyslogd shall write to files where it has no permissions. My point
> is that either rsyslog.conf is invalid OR the files have been created
> with wrong permissions. In any case, it is not something that rsyslog
> can/should fix, because it is outside the scope of its configuration and
> capabilities. I would consider it the wrong approach to create a root
> child process just to write to some files, which apparently are set not
> to be accessible for the daemon users. IMHO this is an inconsistent
> system setup, and *that* root cause needs to be fixed.
>
> Rainer
>
> --
> [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>


-- 
Neil Wilson

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-09-11 Thread Rainer Gerhards
I couldn't agree more, and that is why I say that this work-around will
be broken once rsyslog's privilege drop code has been rewritten. As
stated in the wiki, the current solution is a quick and dirty one,
provided only because there seems to be some value in providing it over
not providing it.

However, as far as this problem is concerned, this is not over root
access or non-root access. The issue is that rsyslogd should run as non-
root. Let's assume it finally has decent code to do that. Then it will
run, from the start on, as non-root. But then rsyslog.conf specifies
that rsyslogd shall write to files where it has no permissions. My point
is that either rsyslog.conf is invalid OR the files have been created
with wrong permissions. In any case, it is not something that rsyslog
can/should fix, because it is outside the scope of its configuration and
capabilities. I would consider it the wrong approach to create a root
child process just to write to some files, which apparently are set not
to be accessible for the daemon users. IMHO this is an inconsistent
system setup, and *that* root cause needs to be fixed.

Rainer

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-09-11 Thread Neil Wilson
I think we get into the realms of Unix philosophy at this point.

What actually needs to be fixed is the ability to set permissions on
network ports and other 'root only' system facilities. Then rsyslog
could be started as a non-privileged user and still get the facilities
it requires.

This 'obtain what you require and then drop privileges' is a nasty
workaround.

To be honest I prefer the Debian workaround where a root only process
grabs the relevant data and resurfaces it via a named pipe - with the
appropriate access permissions. Perhaps rsyslog should look at
adopting that approach for access to 'root-only' facilities. It
certainly prevents security holes.

2009/9/11 Rainer Gerhards :
> I have integrated the patch (actually the idea as the code has evolved
> in the mean time). Thanks for the suggestions. Please note that I think
> this patch tries to fix something outside of the scope of rsyslogd. I
> have posted full details in the rsyslog's bug tracker [1] as well as in
> the doc for the new directive [2]. Consequently, this has been changed
> to a "feature request" from rsyslog's POV. As such, the "patch" goes
> into the recent devel (4.7.0). It is rsyslog policy never to add new
> features to stable or beta versions.
>
> I would appreciate discussion on my view that the root cause is outside
> of rsyslog. Discussion is especially important as I expect that the
> work-around we now created will no longer work once rsyslog has new,
> better privilege drop code (probably in the v5 or v6 timeframe).
>
> Thanks,
> Rainer
>
> [1] http://bugzilla.adiscon.com/show_bug.cgi?id=150
> [2] http://www.rsyslog.com/doc-rsconf1_omfileforcechown.html
>
> --
> [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>


-- 
Neil Wilson

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-09-11 Thread Rainer Gerhards
I have integrated the patch (actually the idea as the code has evolved
in the mean time). Thanks for the suggestions. Please note that I think
this patch tries to fix something outside of the scope of rsyslogd. I
have posted full details in the rsyslog's bug tracker [1] as well as in
the doc for the new directive [2]. Consequently, this has been changed
to a "feature request" from rsyslog's POV. As such, the "patch" goes
into the recent devel (4.7.0). It is rsyslog policy never to add new
features to stable or beta versions.

I would appreciate discussion on my view that the root cause is outside
of rsyslog. Discussion is especially important as I expect that the
work-around we now created will no longer work once rsyslog has new,
better privilege drop code (probably in the v5 or v6 timeframe).

Thanks,
Rainer

[1] http://bugzilla.adiscon.com/show_bug.cgi?id=150
[2] http://www.rsyslog.com/doc-rsconf1_omfileforcechown.html

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-09-01 Thread Colin Watson
Looks fine, thanks - sponsoring.

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-09-01 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package rsyslog - 4.2.0-2ubuntu2

---
rsyslog (4.2.0-2ubuntu2) karmic; urgency=low

  * Fix log file ownership issues when HUPing an unprivileged rsyslog
LP: #407862
- debian/rsyslog.conf: Set $FileOwner to syslog
- debian/patches/deroot.patch: Always chown output files, since we may
  not be able to read them on a HUP otherwise.

 -- Michael TerryMon, 31 Aug 2009
14:58:50 -0400

** Changed in: rsyslog (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-31 Thread Michael Terry
** Changed in: rsyslog (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Confirmed

** Changed in: rsyslog (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Michael Terry (mterry) => (unassigned)

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-31 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: rsyslog
   Status: Unknown => Confirmed

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-31 Thread Michael Terry
Here's a debdiff that both sets the correct $FileOwner value of syslog
and makes sure that we chown all output files as we open them.

** Attachment added: "rsyslog-fileowner.debdiff"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31084941/rsyslog-fileowner.debdiff

** Bug watch added: bugzilla.adiscon.com/ #150
   http://bugzilla.adiscon.com/show_bug.cgi?id=150

** Also affects: rsyslog via
   http://bugzilla.adiscon.com/show_bug.cgi?id=150
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-31 Thread Michael Terry
Looks like we want to set $FileOwner in /etc/rsyslog.conf to syslog
(duh, my fault for not noticing that was still set to root) and add code
to chown files if they aren't $FileOwner and $FileGroup.  That should
let rsyslog do its thing.

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-31 Thread Neil Wilson
My machine is a fresh install of Karmic Alpha 3 on the bare metal - no
upgrades. So the permissions are created by the current package system
and/or logrotate.


2009/8/31 Michael Terry :
> OK, I see the difference.  My /var/log is the same as yours, but my
> /var/log/syslog is syslog:adm.  If I chown it to root:adm, I get the
> same behavior as you...  Now to see why/when it is root:adm (and if it
> should be).  I suspect my syslog:adm is because rsyslog created it for
> me at some point.  But yours may have been from sysklogd days?
>
> --
> [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>


-- 
Neil Wilson

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-31 Thread Michael Terry
I'll note that sysklogd did a rather forceful resetting of log ownership
as a result of bug 120085.  Before each kickoff in its init.d script, it
would reset permissions of log files.  Maybe we need something similar?
Still digging.

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-31 Thread Michael Terry
OK, I see the difference.  My /var/log is the same as yours, but my
/var/log/syslog is syslog:adm.  If I chown it to root:adm, I get the
same behavior as you...  Now to see why/when it is root:adm (and if it
should be).  I suspect my syslog:adm is because rsyslog created it for
me at some point.  But yours may have been from sysklogd days?

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-31 Thread Neil Wilson
For me it is busted as soon as I start up the machine unless I change
the ownership on the /var/log/* files to syslog:syslog and then it
will work fine.

I've just done the same as you after a fresh install of rsyslog to
make sure I'm on the latest repository version.

 * tail /var/log/syslog
 * sudo /etc/init.d/rsyslog restart
 * plug in usb stick
 * sudo /etc/init.d/rsyslog reload
 * pull usb stick out

I get the kernel messages after the restart but not the reload.

Is your /var/log the same permissions as default? Mine is owned
root:root mode 755 and the /var/log/syslog is owned root:adm with mode
640.

Rsyslog is supposed to close all the files on reload, so if a
syslog:syslog owned process can reopen a 640 mode file with root:adm
ownership then the kernel probably has a security hole :-)

This may be a thread sync problem. I'm on AMD 64 with 2 cores.  Is
your architecture similar?

2009/8/31 Michael Terry :
> OK, so I finally got time to sit down and look at this, and I can't
> reproduce the problem (files that rsyslog can log stop being logged
> after reload).

-- 
Neil Wilson

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-31 Thread Michael Terry
OK, so I finally got time to sit down and look at this, and I can't
reproduce the problem (files that rsyslog can log stop being logged
after reload).

I tested normal logs by:
 * tail -f /var/log/syslog
 * sudo chown root:root /var/log/lpr.log # (-rw-r- 1 root root 776 
2009-08-31 10:40 /var/log/lpr.log)
 * sudo /etc/init.d/rsyslog restart
 * sudo /etc/init.d/cups restart
 * sudo /etc/init.d/rsyslog reload
 * sudo /etc/init.d/cups reload

And in the tail output, I saw (cupsd.conf problem is something
unrelated, just good output to test rsyslog with):

Aug 31 10:40:11 bongo rsyslogd: [origin software="rsyslogd" swVersion="4.2.0" 
x-pid="9805" x-info="http://www.rsyslog.com";] (re)start
Aug 31 10:40:11 bongo rsyslogd: rsyslogd's groupid changed to 103
Aug 31 10:40:11 bongo rsyslogd: rsyslogd's userid changed to 102
Aug 31 10:41:32 bongo cupsd: Unable to read configuration file 
'/etc/cups/cupsd.conf' - exiting!
Aug 31 10:41:37 bongo rsyslogd: [origin software="rsyslogd" swVersion="4.2.0" 
x-pid="9805" x-info="http://www.rsyslog.com";] rsyslogd was HUPed, type 
'lightweight'.
Aug 31 10:41:39 bongo cupsd: Unable to read configuration file 
'/etc/cups/cupsd.conf' - exiting!

So that appears to be working!  It could read it from the start, and it
could still read it after a HUP.

Then I tested kern.log:
 * tail -f /var/log/syslog
 * sudo /etc/init.d/rsyslog restart
 * plug in a usb stick
 * sudo /etc/init.d/rsyslog reload
 * pull usb stick out

And I saw:
Aug 31 10:50:32 bongo rsyslogd: [origin software="rsyslogd" swVersion="4.2.0" 
x-pid="10300" x-info="http://www.rsyslog.com";] (re)start
Aug 31 10:50:32 bongo rsyslogd: rsyslogd's groupid changed to 103
Aug 31 10:50:32 bongo rsyslogd: rsyslogd's userid changed to 102
Aug 31 10:50:36 bongo kernel: [249915.148097] usb 2-2: new high speed USB 
device using ehci_hcd and address 40
...
Aug 31 10:50:49 bongo rsyslogd: [origin software="rsyslogd" swVersion="4.2.0" 
x-pid="10300" x-info="http://www.rsyslog.com";] rsyslogd was HUPed, type 
'lightweight'.
Aug 31 10:50:53 bongo kernel: [249932.212258] usb 2-2: USB disconnect, address 
40

So it was also able to continue reading from kern.log after a reload.

Can you give easy reproduction steps?

** Changed in: rsyslog (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Incomplete

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-17 Thread Neil Wilson
Yes. I think the reload needs to stay as a hard restart until upstream
refactors the code to separate the privileged and non-privileged code
base slightly more effectively.

How would the third party app know that the syslog server that is
running is rsyslog rather than syslog-ng or sysklogd? Don't they all
use different pidfile, init script names and process identifiers? Is
anything tied that closely to rsyslog?

Anything that does depend upon HUPing rsyslog should depend upon it or
its virtual package shouldn't it? Or at the very least
suggest/recommend it.


2009/8/17 Michael Terry :
> I meant 'wont fix' in the sense of after we fix bs=1 and we set the init
> script to always use hard restarts.  Then, we just say 'wont fix' to
> users of manual HUPs.  Is there a use case for manual HUPs vs init
> script restarts?  (serious question, are there 3rd party apps that
> depend on being able to HUP rsyslog for example?)
>
> As for disabling lightweight restarts via HUPs, I guess that's the same
> question -- if we just ignore HUPs, will we break anything?
>
> --
> [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>


-- 
Neil Wilson

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-17 Thread Michael Terry
I meant 'wont fix' in the sense of after we fix bs=1 and we set the init
script to always use hard restarts.  Then, we just say 'wont fix' to
users of manual HUPs.  Is there a use case for manual HUPs vs init
script restarts?  (serious question, are there 3rd party apps that
depend on being able to HUP rsyslog for example?)

As for disabling lightweight restarts via HUPs, I guess that's the same
question -- if we just ignore HUPs, will we break anything?

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-17 Thread Neil Wilson
The 'bs=1' kernel message fix helps, since otherwise kernel messages
don't get through at all. With bs=1 you get kernel messages when you
restart the daemon, but it stops again when you issue a 'HUP'.

I put some debug into the code over the weekend and lightweight
restart appears to close all the log files. They are then reopened 'on
demand' - but fail with 'permission denied.'

The lightweight restart option needs to be disabled somehow -
internally and via HUP. Either that or stop closing files in
lightweight mode. The file access code is a bit messy and it looks
hard to stop the file closes on HUP without breaking somehting else.
Perhaps upstream has a better suggestion?

I don't think the report is a 'wont fix' - we kinda need system log
messages to get through. :)


2009/8/17 Michael Terry :
> Guh, I thought it was safe to revert to how debian did it (sending a
> HUP) in the latest upload because I noticed that rsyslog forces a
> lightweight HUP restart when privileges are dropped.  It seemed to work
> for me, but I didn't do extensive testing.
>
> OK, so if the realization is that lightweight restarting is just broken
> with privilege dropping, then that's good to know.  We just go back to
> the previous init reloading and your original report would just be 'WONT
> FIX' since we don't support manual HUPing?
>
> However, it surprises me that lightweight restart would be broken.  As I
> said, the code specifically chooses lightweight restarts when privileges
> are dropped.  I would think that means it would be safe.
>
> So Neil, with your original patch for 4.2.0-1ubuntu2, things weren't
> working?  I had tested them, but I think I only tested kernel messages,
> which wouldn't be affected by the 'open as root, drop priv' issue since
> the kernel messages are readable by the rsyslog user.
>
> --
> [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>


-- 
Neil Wilson

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-17 Thread Michael Terry
Guh, I thought it was safe to revert to how debian did it (sending a
HUP) in the latest upload because I noticed that rsyslog forces a
lightweight HUP restart when privileges are dropped.  It seemed to work
for me, but I didn't do extensive testing.

OK, so if the realization is that lightweight restarting is just broken
with privilege dropping, then that's good to know.  We just go back to
the previous init reloading and your original report would just be 'WONT
FIX' since we don't support manual HUPing?

However, it surprises me that lightweight restart would be broken.  As I
said, the code specifically chooses lightweight restarts when privileges
are dropped.  I would think that means it would be safe.

So Neil, with your original patch for 4.2.0-1ubuntu2, things weren't
working?  I had tested them, but I think I only tested kernel messages,
which wouldn't be affected by the 'open as root, drop priv' issue since
the kernel messages are readable by the rsyslog user.

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-16 Thread Neil Wilson
Of course if the design is that files are opened and then permissions
are dropped (as seems to be the case on further reading:
http://wiki.rsyslog.com/index.php/Security#Dropping_Privileges), then
HUP needs to be ignored completely somehow and the reload command in the
init scripts needs reverting back to a simple alias for restart.

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-16 Thread Neil Wilson
Doh, this is so obvious it's embarrassing.

rsyslog is dropping privileges to 'rsyslog:rsyslog'

/var/log is set as follows:

drwxr-xr-x 14 root root 4096 2009-08-16 07:20 /var/log

The files appear to be created before the privileges are dropped - hence
why it seems to work for a bit and then stops.

-rw-r-  1 root adm   88 2009-08-16 08:39 kern.log
-rw-r-  1 root adm  354 2009-08-16 08:39 syslog
-rw-r-  1 root adm  354 2009-08-16 08:39 messages

Plus the console has the wrong permissions.

prw-r- 1 root adm  0 2009-08-16 08:47 /dev/xconsole

And of course when you HUP the syslog daemon it reopens the files and
gets permission denied.

So we need to get the permissions sorted out - and figure out why
rsyslog is able to open the log files are root.

Which package does the initial create on /var/log?

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-15 Thread Neil Wilson
** Changed in: rsyslog (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Released => In Progress

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-14 Thread Neil Wilson
Same here, but at least the kern log works now and you can get the
logging working via a restart.

Now to find out what is causing that HUP and why the files aren't
opening properly.

2009/8/14 Jose Bernardo :
> Sorry, but it still isn't fixed for me.


-- 
Neil Wilson

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-14 Thread Jose Bernardo
Sorry, but it still isn't fixed for me.

$ apt-cache policy rsyslog
rsyslog:
  Instalado: 4.2.0-2ubuntu1
  Candidato: 4.2.0-2ubuntu1
  Tabela de Versão:
 *** 4.2.0-2ubuntu1 0
500 http://ports.ubuntu.com karmic/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu karmic (development branch)
Release:9.10

Aug 14 14:17:38 jbs-lpia kernel: [   15.636268]groups: 0-1 (__cpu_power = 
2048)
Aug 14 14:17:38 jbs-lpia rsyslogd: [origin software="rsyslogd" 
swVersion="4.2.0" x-pid="2362" x-info="http://www.rsyslog.com";] rsyslogd was 
HUPed, type 'lightweight'.

I have to restart rsyslogd before messages start showing up in system
logs again.

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-14 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package rsyslog - 4.2.0-2ubuntu1

---
rsyslog (4.2.0-2ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low

  [ Michael Terry ]
  * Merge from debian unstable (LP: #413023), remaining changes:
- Run as rsyslog:rsyslog
- Allow reading /proc/kmsg when non-root
- Cleanly upgrade from sysklogd
  * debian/patches/deroot.patch: Don't allow using the klogctl function to
read klog messages.  Rather, allow /proc/kmsg or nothing, since we have
special support for reading /proc/kmsg while unprivileged.

  [ Neil Wilson ]
  * debian/rsyslog.init: Set blocksize for dd (LP: #407862) and restore
reload init argument to original lightweight reload

 -- Michael TerryThu, 13 Aug 2009
15:43:29 -0400

** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/karmic/rsyslog

** Changed in: rsyslog (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-13 Thread Michael Terry
** Changed in: rsyslog (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => In Progress

** Changed in: rsyslog (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Michael Terry (mterry)

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-11 Thread Neil Wilson
Ok problem#1 sorted. The new rsyslog system is starting up dd without
the correct blocksize indicator and that is causing everything to hang
up.

The new rsyslog init.d file uses

  # shovel /proc/kmsg to pipe readable by syslog user
  start-stop-daemon --start --pidfile $KMSG_PIDFILE --exec /bin/dd -b -m -- 
if=/proc/kmsg of=$KMSG_PIPE

The old klogd init.d file uses

  # shovel /proc/kmsg to pipe readable by klogd user
  start-stop-daemon --start --pidfile $kmsgpidfile --exec /bin/dd -b -m -- bs=1 
if=/proc/kmsg of=$kmsgpipe

Adding 'bs=1' to the rsyslog init.d file cures the lack of kernel
logging. Patch attached which also implements HUP based reload for this
daemon.


** Attachment added: "Fix blocksize and implement reload patch"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30189297/set_blocksize_and_do_reload.patch

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-11 Thread Neil Wilson
I did a check this morning and the pkill -HUP does stop the logging -
if it is actually still working at that point in time.

I also noticed that the logging will just stop *without* seeing the
HUP message. dmesg continues merrily, but nothing appears in
/var/log/syslog or /var/log/messages.

All very strange.

2009/8/10 Neil Wilson :
> No idea what's causing it. Mostly I see the restart message on boot
> but sometimes I don't.
>
> I feel this is going to be one of those irritating bugs that's
> difficult to track down...
>
> 2009/8/10 Michael Terry :
>> I tried to reproduce this with a 'sudo pkill -1 rsyslog'.  I got the
>> message in /var/log/syslog about a lightweight restart, but it kept
>> logging messages.  So I couldn't reproduce.
>>
>> Does a pkill -1 break rsyslog for you, Neil or Vajra?  Do either of you
>> know what triggered the HUP?
>>
>> --
>> [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
>> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
>> of the bug.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Neil Wilson
>


-- 
Neil Wilson

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-10 Thread Vajra Vrtti
I tried the command 'sudo pkill -1 rsyslog' in my VirtualBox
installation but couldn't see any effect. I have no idea about what
triggered the HUP. It just happens to be the last syslog message most of
the time, but not always. Sometimes the syslog stops before that
message.

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-10 Thread Neil Wilson
No idea what's causing it. Mostly I see the restart message on boot
but sometimes I don't.

I feel this is going to be one of those irritating bugs that's
difficult to track down...

2009/8/10 Michael Terry :
> I tried to reproduce this with a 'sudo pkill -1 rsyslog'.  I got the
> message in /var/log/syslog about a lightweight restart, but it kept
> logging messages.  So I couldn't reproduce.
>
> Does a pkill -1 break rsyslog for you, Neil or Vajra?  Do either of you
> know what triggered the HUP?
>
> --
> [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>


-- 
Neil Wilson

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-10 Thread Michael Terry
I tried to reproduce this with a 'sudo pkill -1 rsyslog'.  I got the
message in /var/log/syslog about a lightweight restart, but it kept
logging messages.  So I couldn't reproduce.

Does a pkill -1 break rsyslog for you, Neil or Vajra?  Do either of you
know what triggered the HUP?

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-07 Thread Neil Wilson
** Tags added: karmic

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-07 Thread Neil Wilson
I'm seeing this as well. When the rsyslog is getting the new
'lightweight' restart command the log files are not being reopened
properly and nothing gets logged from the kernel.

It makes debugging a right pain.


** Changed in: rsyslog (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-02 Thread Vajra Vrtti
The previous syslog was from a desktop.
I'm attaching another one from a VirtualBox VM.

** Attachment added: "Syslog from a VirtualBox VM"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29800584/syslog

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-01 Thread Adil Arif
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Judging from your description, I am going to assign this
bug to the rsyslog package in hopes that it will have a faster response.
If you believe that I have chosen the wrong package, please change your
bug to the correct one. Good luck on getting it fixed!

** Package changed: ubuntu => rsyslog (Ubuntu)

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: [karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs

2009-08-01 Thread Vajra Vrtti

** Attachment added: "syslog"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29786798/syslog

-- 
[karmic] Messages not being sent to system logs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs