[Bug 414298] Re: Please merge devscripts_2.10.53 from Debian unstable
2.10.53ubuntu2 is in karmic. ** Changed in: devscripts (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- Please merge devscripts_2.10.53 from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414298 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 414298] Re: Please merge devscripts_2.10.53 from Debian unstable
** Attachment added: "Debdiff against Debian's 2.10.55 package based on latest version in Ubuntu" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31892968/devscripts_2.10.55ubuntu1.debdiff -- Please merge devscripts_2.10.53 from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414298 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 414298] Re: Please merge devscripts_2.10.53 from Debian unstable
Ok, I've prepared the devscripts 2.10.55ubuntu1 package ** Attachment added: "Debdiff against Debian's 2.10.55 package" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31704686/devscripts_2.10.55ubuntu1.debdiff -- Please merge devscripts_2.10.53 from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414298 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 414298] Re: Please merge devscripts_2.10.53 from Debian unstable
I uploaded 2.10.55 to Debian earlier today with the (hopefully this time) correct security fix for uscan. -- Please merge devscripts_2.10.53 from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414298 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 414298] Re: Please merge devscripts_2.10.53 from Debian unstable
Adam Barrat commented: "Unfortunately the security fix is buggy; see Debian #544931. We're hoping to have 2.10.55 out with the problems resolved within the next few days." -- Please merge devscripts_2.10.53 from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414298 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 414298] Re: Please merge devscripts_2.10.53 from Debian unstable
2.10.54 is out and has a security fix: * uscan: Evaluate mangle rules without evaluating them directly as Perl code to avoid the possibility of remote code execution. This is CVE-2009-2946. As a side effect, (Closes: #515209) The old merge seems to mostly apply: dan...@bert:~/devscripts-2.10.54$ patch -p1 < ../devscripts*diff patching file debian/changelog Hunk #1 FAILED at 1. Hunk #2 succeeded at 289 (offset 71 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 713 (offset 71 lines). Hunk #4 succeeded at 1293 (offset 71 lines). Hunk #5 succeeded at 2195 (offset 71 lines). Hunk #6 succeeded at 2295 (offset 71 lines). Hunk #7 succeeded at 2368 (offset 71 lines). Hunk #8 succeeded at 2487 (offset 71 lines). Hunk #9 succeeded at 2603 (offset 71 lines). Hunk #10 succeeded at 2663 (offset 71 lines). Hunk #11 succeeded at 2756 (offset 71 lines). Hunk #12 succeeded at 2885 (offset 71 lines). Hunk #13 succeeded at 3044 (offset 71 lines). 1 out of 13 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file debian/changelog.rej patching file debian/control Hunk #1 FAILED at 1. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file debian/control.rej patching file debian/rules patching file scripts/debchange.1 Hunk #1 succeeded at 221 (offset 1 line). patching file scripts/debchange.pl Hunk #1 succeeded at 115 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 148 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 186 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #4 succeeded at 304 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #5 succeeded at 325 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #6 succeeded at 388 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #7 succeeded at 400 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #8 succeeded at 450 (offset 3 lines). Hunk #9 succeeded at 564 (offset 3 lines). Hunk #10 succeeded at 738 (offset 4 lines). Hunk #11 succeeded at 873 (offset 4 lines). Hunk #12 succeeded at 950 (offset 4 lines). Hunk #13 succeeded at 1024 (offset 4 lines). Hunk #14 FAILED at 1042. Hunk #15 succeeded at 1093 (offset 15 lines). Hunk #16 FAILED at 1142. Hunk #17 succeeded at 1418 (offset 15 lines). 2 out of 17 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file scripts/debchange.pl.rej patching file scripts/debsign.1 patching file scripts/debsign.sh patching file scripts/debuild.pl patching file scripts/dscverify.pl patching file scripts/rmadison.pl patching file scripts/uupdate.1 patching file scripts/uupdate.sh patching file test/debchange.pl patching file test/Makefile dan...@bert:~/devscripts-2.10.54$ Ahmed: can you take a look at it? ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2009-2946 -- Please merge devscripts_2.10.53 from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414298 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 414298] Re: Please merge devscripts_2.10.53 from Debian unstable
Release team ack. This isn't something that can cause breakage on the default installations or for users, and for developers it's nice to get the updates and fixes there. -- Please merge devscripts_2.10.53 from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414298 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 414298] Re: Please merge devscripts_2.10.53 from Debian unstable
Hi, I'm happy to upload this if the release team is happy to have this in karmic. Thanks, James -- Please merge devscripts_2.10.53 from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414298 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 414298] Re: Please merge devscripts_2.10.53 from Debian unstable
Yes, you're right, I forget to remove debian-keyring and debian- maintainers from Recommends. Also pot & po files didn't need to be changed (that resulted from applying the previous ubuntu patch) ** Attachment added: "Debdiff against Debian's package" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30846539/devscripts_2.10.53ubuntu1.debdiff -- Please merge devscripts_2.10.53 from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414298 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 414298] Re: Please merge devscripts_2.10.53 from Debian unstable
- The new Recommends: debian-keyring and debian-maintainers are in Universe. I suggest making them Suggests: instead. - How does "rmadison: Change default URL parameter to ubuntu." work with the new RMADISON_DEFAULT_URL option? - Why is po4a/po/devscripts.pot and po4a/po/fr.po changed in your diff? -- Please merge devscripts_2.10.53 from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414298 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 414298] Re: Please merge devscripts_2.10.53 from Debian unstable
devscripts (2.10.53ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low
* Resynchronise with Debian. Remaining changes: (LP: #511269)
- rmadison: Change default URL parameter to ubuntu.
- scripts/debchange.pl:
+ Adjust --security template for Ubuntu.
+ Add -U/--upstream flag that forces original "just increment
the end" behaviour; Ubuntu is upstream for some pieces of software.
+ Add --distributor= to override lsb_release output.
+ Default to "karmic" as distribution.
+ Add "ubuntu1" to version string for new versions, with tweaks for
special cases.
+ Add -R/--rebuild flag for Ubuntu's no-change rebuilds.
- Add test/debchange.pl, test/Makefile: debchange test suite; call it
during build in debian/rules. Also add lsb-release build dependency for
this, so that debchange uses Ubuntu mode.
- scripts/debuild.pl: Enforce Ubuntu merge policy.
- scripts/debsign.{sh,1}: Implement DEBSIGN_ALWAYS_RESIGN variable to skip
the "Would you like to use the current signature?" question. (Debian
#447955)
- scripts/uupdate.{sh,1}: Use -0ubuntu1 default revision on Ubuntu.
- scripts/dscverify.pl: Add Ubuntu keyrings.
- Drop universe packages from Recommends to Suggests:
+ libcrypt-ssleay-perl: only needed for a corner case (uscan on SSL
download sites), wasn't installed by default in previous releases
either, and seems quite dead upstream
+ libsoap-lite-perl: only needed for one less common command ("select")
for bts, which isn't useful for Ubuntu itself, and pulls in a lot of
other universe Perl libraries
+ debian-{keyring,maintainers}: not useful enough in Ubuntu
+ equivs: too much of a hack to install by default
+ libyaml-syck-perl: transition-check is fairly Debian-specific
** Attachment added: "Debdiff against Debian's package"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30393918/devscripts_2.10.53ubuntu1.debdiff
** Changed in: devscripts (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
Please merge devscripts_2.10.53 from Debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414298
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
