[Bug 432360] Re: sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc.
ureadahead doesnt work with mainline unpatched kernels. Use an Ubuntu kernel and it works. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432360 Title: sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432360] Re: sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc.
lucid 10.04 After installing kernel 2.6.36 from http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v2.6.36-maverick/ I get sudo ureadahead --force-trace --verbose Counted 4 CPUs ureadahead: Errore durante il tracciamento: Nessun file o directory (Error while tracing: No such file or directory) and pack flie is not being created... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432360 Title: sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432360] Re: sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc.
#14 exactly describes my problem and configuration. packs are never created, so ureadahead is useless for me, it just consume time at boot for no good. $ sudo ureadahead -v /var/lib/ureadahead/pack: No existe el archivo o directorio (file or directory not found) ureadahead: Error al tracear: No existe el archivo o directorio (error while tracing: file or directory not found) $ cat /etc/fstab UUID=62c1d60f-f1aa-4e1e-bf84-8f1954bf2c04 / ext4 defaults 0 1 UUID=0bd4843f-e10b-477e-9247-00258a680b71 /home ext4 defaults 0 1 -- sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432360] Re: sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc.
** Changed in: ureadahead (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Fix Committed -- sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432360] Re: sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc.
Sorry for status changes, I'm new to launchpad and clicked the wrong link. Also, I have to agree with bl8n8r, it is annoying that an upgrade of Ubuntu results in so many error/warning messages during boot. Since some are saying that this here really is a bug of upstart, is there already a bug report filed? ** Changed in: ureadahead (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432360] Re: sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc.
I have to concur with bl8n8r, including a package that disallows separate /var, especially on a server, is simply not acceptable. Every time a new Ubuntu comes out, the server version seems to get more and more fragile. I too have this problem and it's cost me many hours of my time the last week, time I could spend doing more productive things than driving 45 minutes to the hosting center because of a package that doesn't like /var being in another mount point. -- sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432360] Re: sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc.
Why would you include a package (in a server system nonetheless) which doesn't allow you to put /var on a separate partition? Separating /var is a basic sysadmin task, otherwise you can have services fill up /var (logs) and DoS the box. # sudo aptitude purge ureadahead sreadahead bug fixed -- sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432360] Re: sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc.
Scott, I'm having a problem in #524135 which may or may not be related to this. Could you perhaps suggest some additional things I could do to narrow down the source of that bug? -- sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432360] Re: sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc.
ureadahead supports, as far as it can, separated filesystems - but it cannot support a separate /var Well that's unfortunate because there are very good reasons for having a separate /var and /home, namely that you might want to mount your root filesystem ro, because it should change only occasionally (i.e. updates), whereas /var can be mounted rw. It's a security feature. -- sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 432360] Re: sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc.
ureadahead supports, as far as it can, separated filesystems - but it cannot support a separate /var That is unlikely to ever change Scott -- Scott James Remnant sc...@ubuntu.com -- sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432360] Re: sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc.
So, is this bad, or not? My /var is on a separate partition and I'm receiving this errors, but apart from that, everything seems to work. -- sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432360] Re: sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc.
What is going on? Many people are providing so-called fixes for what? Is this a bug, yes or not? Or is this a problem of configuration (which I doubt)? I have never seen ureadahead errors like these before (I've been using Linux since 2000). So I assume it is a bug introduced in Karmic. Is Ubuntu Karmic going to provide a bug fix release? That is the question. Please, stop puting up your possible solutions, how do you know is not going to screw up someone's system for good? People have different settings and configurations. Let the bug fixers work on this issue that is (as far as I know) new in Karmic. I would like to see an update in the near future that helps solve all conflicts related to ureadahead readahead sreadahead and all the different terminated status (mine is status 4 for example). Is this bug officially solved? I see the mark in the top of this page. I would like that some admin put a message or something to explain where and what to do/ Thanks/ -- sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432360] Re: sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc.
I assume this is why ureadahead isn't: # ureadahead -v /var/lib/ureadahead/pack: No such file or directory ureadahead: Error while tracing: No such file or directory And I assume the error while tracing is because the -updates kernel isn't installed on my system since the kernel version is pinned. I've never tried to update the kernel to -updates, and I can't seem to find a really clear set of instructions on doing that (like, what about modules?) so I'll probably skip it. -- sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432360] Re: sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc.
With respect, I think there is a problem because the message never goes away (for me) nomatter how many I reboot and no pack files (or any files at all excepting the debugfs dir) ever get generated in /var/lib/ureadahead/. I have / mounted on /dev/sda1 and /home mounted on /dev/sda3. The above recommended change to /etc/init/ureadahead.conf does nothing but change the order of the error messages at boot time. I didn't try the attached patch. For my karmic system at least ureadhead never works. So yes, maybe the MESSAGE is not an error message but there surely seems to be an error or bug here. -- sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432360] Re: sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc.
Scott, can be explicit about where the Upstart bug is open, so we can take a look at it. Thanks, Kevin. -- sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432360] Re: sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc.
Fix Released but still the same error message... -- sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 432360] Re: sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc.
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 15:27 +, Arnold_Layne wrote: Fix Released but still the same error message... It's not an error message, just a warning. As I said in another bug, Upstart shouldn't actually bitch on the console, but it does - and there's a bug open about that. Scott -- Scott James Remnant sc...@ubuntu.com -- sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432360] Re: sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc.
ureadahead has now replaced sreadahead in both karmic (via -updates) and lucid ** Changed in: ureadahead (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released ** Changed in: sreadahead (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Won't Fix -- sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432360] Re: sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc.
ureadahead has better support for separate filesystems, when tracing it will generate additional pack files for each of the separate mounts (each one individually optimised) - and uses the mountall-generated mount event to run over those. There's nothing I can do about separate /var though - that's where the pack files have to go, and there's nowhere else sensible (or legal) for them. Frankly, there are bigger problems with /var and boot performance, so it's simply not a concern - if you have separate filesystems, you're not going to get a fast boot. ** Also affects: ureadahead (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ureadahead (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: ureadahead (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Committed ** Changed in: ureadahead (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432360] Re: sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc.
you are right. it will create /var/lib/sreadahead/pack, but on the next boot it will not find it. Unfortunately, I can't find a better place to put it :-( stop! what about putting it into initramfs? overkill? no - this would require a block based approch and is less flexible. anyway - is there a block tracer? -- sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432360] Re: sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc.
I had the same issue (/var as a separate filesystem). The suggested solution works for me: start on starting mountall to start on local-filesystems Regarding the patch: Does the change to /sys/kernel/debug will fix it? There will be still /var/lib/sreadahead/pack file missing every time when /var is on separate filesystem at the time of sreadahead start. -- sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432360] Re: sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc.
a better fix would be to change the debugfs mount point from /var/lib/sreadahead/debugfs to /sys/kernel/debug where it belongs. attached patch works for me. ** Attachment added: patch for sreadahead http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34330395/q.patch -- sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432360] Re: sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc.
Similarly, the same as camper365 /etc/init/sreadahead.conf: #start on starting mountall start on filesystem -- sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432360] Re: sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc.
yeah i modified /etc/init/sreadahead.conf file: start on local-filesystems but now system still show that message: init: sreadahead main process (1051) terminated with status 1 my hardware isn't x86,is Arm s3c6410 armV6 arch.i know karmic supported armV7 but is it support ARMV6 ARCH? -- sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432360] Re: sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc.
yeah i got problem like you ,the error message is: init: sreadahead main process (910) terminated with status 1 what's wrong ? -- sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432360] Re: sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc.
I have dedicated partitions for /var, /usr, /boot, /home, and /usr/local When I boot up, I get the message: init: sreadahead main process (395) terminated with status 1 so I am assuming this is my problem -- sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432360] Re: sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc.
** Summary changed: - sreadahead started to early when ex. /var is on separate filesystem + sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc. -- sreadahead should support separate /usr, /var etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
