[Bug 497796] Re: Without an apt cache, packages are not considered "genuine Ubuntu packages"

2020-05-05 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for apport (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]

** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497796

Title:
  Without an apt cache, packages are not considered  "genuine Ubuntu
  packages"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apport/+bug/497796/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 497796] Re: Without an apt cache, packages are not considered "genuine Ubuntu packages"

2020-03-05 Thread Marcus Tomlinson
This release of Ubuntu is no longer receiving maintenance updates. If
this is still an issue on a maintained version of Ubuntu please let us
know.

** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497796

Title:
  Without an apt cache, packages are not considered  "genuine Ubuntu
  packages"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apport/+bug/497796/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 497796] Re: Without an apt cache, packages are not considered "genuine Ubuntu packages"

2012-04-28 Thread Kangarooo
THis exist in 10.04 UNR latest updates
cant bug about packages witch installed from ubuntu souces
Gimp
Meld
VLC

BTW i found i have some strange packages see picture
How i was able to obtain them?
Dropbox link i understand came with installation of dropbox
Firefox link i added maybe couse wanted latest FF
but what is lucid bleed and why would i need it?

in lucid bleed i found thouse what i cant report are in its list.

** Attachment added: "cant genuine package.png"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apport/+bug/497796/+attachment/3112749/+files/cant%20genuine%20package.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497796

Title:
  Without an apt cache, packages are not considered  "genuine Ubuntu
  packages"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apport/+bug/497796/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 497796] Re: Without an apt cache, packages are not considered "genuine Ubuntu packages"

2011-10-05 Thread Martin Pitt
Closing upstream task, this is a distro-level bug, and we already have a
distro task.

** Changed in: apport
   Status: Triaged => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497796

Title:
  Without an apt cache, packages are not considered  "genuine Ubuntu
  packages"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apport/+bug/497796/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 497796] Re: Without an apt cache, packages are not considered "genuine Ubuntu packages"

2010-08-12 Thread Greg Auger
This bug is quite troublesome. I am looking to report a bug on a new
Maverick installation where the wireless internet connection is not
working. I can't do so because of this bug!

-- 
Without an apt cache, packages are not considered  "genuine Ubuntu packages"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497796
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 497796] Re: Without an apt cache, packages are not considered "genuine Ubuntu packages"

2010-07-27 Thread Kangarooo
Instead after changing sources there should be made that ubuntu-bug still 
works.. otherwise after changing sources why something is lost so ubuntu-bug 
doenst think package isnt genuine?
look my Bug #610458:
"used ubuntu-bug packagename (to be exact apt and apt-utils) and got messege 
This package isnt original ubuntu package.
after apt-get update ubuntu-bug again worked."
and is there reason for such behaviour?

-- 
Without an apt cache, packages are not considered  "genuine Ubuntu packages"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497796
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 497796] Re: Without an apt cache, packages are not considered "genuine Ubuntu packages"

2010-06-09 Thread Scott Moser
The explicit point of the message is tell the user that PPA packages or
other 3rd party software packages cannot be reported by apport.  I do
not think that that is a bug at all, but only in identifying something
that *is* a genuine package as *not* a genuine package.

-- 
Without an apt cache, packages are not considered  "genuine Ubuntu packages"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497796
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 497796] Re: Without an apt cache, packages are not considered "genuine Ubuntu packages"

2010-06-09 Thread Scott Moser
The bug is about the official package being reported as "not genuine".
If a user has installed off of official media, removed the cache files
(or changed their mirror) they are then told that the bug they found is
in a package that is "not a genuine Ubuntu package". Its at very least
confusing, worse, it could be scary as the un-knowledgeable user may
believe something is wrong with their system.

-- 
Without an apt cache, packages are not considered  "genuine Ubuntu packages"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497796
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 497796] Re: Without an apt cache, packages are not considered "genuine Ubuntu packages"

2010-06-09 Thread John Vivirito
I guess this bug is strictly an official package being reported an not
genuine, or is it about being able to report a bug on PPA package

-- 
Without an apt cache, packages are not considered  "genuine Ubuntu packages"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497796
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 497796] Re: Without an apt cache, packages are not considered "genuine Ubuntu packages"

2010-03-12 Thread svaens
I noticed a plymouth crash, and as I went to report it (via the gui) It
came back at me with the message "the problem cannot be reported: This
is not a genuine Ubuntu package". Not nice.

-- 
Without an apt cache, packages are not considered  "genuine Ubuntu packages"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497796
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 497796] Re: Without an apt cache, packages are not considered "genuine Ubuntu packages"

2010-03-10 Thread dino99
the latest Lucid's updates have resolved this problem. Now working fine.

-- 
Without an apt cache, packages are not considered  "genuine Ubuntu packages"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497796
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 497796] Re: Without an apt cache, packages are not considered "genuine Ubuntu packages"

2010-03-08 Thread dino99
hi Martin,

please change the "importance" of this bug: actualy it is difficult to
report, as :

- ubuntu-bug ALWAYS complaint that "genuine packages" are not genuine.
- apport-collect refuse to report if we are not the owner of that number's bug.
- there is a lot "silent problem" not detected by apport.

So it is neither "Low" or "whishlist" but "severe show stopper"

All these comments are about Lucid A3 updated and are regression (A2 was
working without these problems)

-- 
Without an apt cache, packages are not considered  "genuine Ubuntu packages"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497796
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 497796] Re: Without an apt cache, packages are not considered "genuine Ubuntu packages"

2010-03-07 Thread dino99
few minutes ago i've tried to report against gnome-panel (which is a
genuine package, not from ppa or else: lucid package), and apport
complaint about a non genuine: what is the mechanism based on ? packages
database not updated ?

-- 
Without an apt cache, packages are not considered  "genuine Ubuntu packages"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497796
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 497796] Re: Without an apt cache, packages are not considered "genuine Ubuntu packages"

2010-02-24 Thread Ubuntu QA Website
** Tags added: iso-testing

-- 
Without an apt cache, packages are not considered  "genuine Ubuntu packages"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497796
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 497796] Re: Without an apt cache, packages are not considered "genuine Ubuntu packages"

2010-02-24 Thread Martin Pitt
** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

-- 
Without an apt cache, packages are not considered  "genuine Ubuntu packages"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497796
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs