[Bug 509061] Re: packaging of webkitimageqt

[Jeremy Bicha]

** Tags added: needs-packaging

** Summary changed:

- packaging of webkitimageqt 
+ [needs-packaging] webkitimageqt

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: Incomplete => Confirmed

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Importance: Undecided => Wishlist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509061

Title:
  [needs-packaging] webkitimageqt

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/josm/+bug/509061/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 509061] Re: packaging of webkitimageqt

[Bug Watch Updater]

** Changed in: debian
   Status: Unknown => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509061

Title:
  packaging of webkitimageqt 

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 509061] Re: packaging of webkitimageqt

[Leo Arias]

bastik, the Ubuntu bug was marked as incomplete because in order to
request a package you should follow the guidelines at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages

After reading it, and adding the missing information, you can change the
status to new.

thanks again.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509061

Title:
  packaging of webkitimageqt 

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 509061] Re: packaging of webkitimageqt

[bastik]

James Michael DuPont wrote:
> What about landsat.
> warper.geothings.net works  ?

Yes and yes.

>>> Whatever you do, please make sure that people who follow the osm
>> instructions know what to do to use custom wms layers.
>>
>> What do you mean by that? Where is the documentation lacking?
>>
> 
> Well at the time the osm docs talked about compiling things yourself etc, I
> have not looked in a long time.
> 

You still need to compile for Mac OS.

>>> Also for the balkans, the yahoo images are better than bing, bing is
>> useless
>> there.
>>
>> Can you point me to a location?
>>
> 
> prishtina kosovo.
> 42° 39′ 48″ N, 21° 9′
> 44

Thanks

> I guess I am totally out of date. Thanks for the info.
> If there is good alternatives, then fine. I dont care, it served its purpose
> at the time.

I take it as a compliment, because it means we are moving forward... :)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509061

Title:
  packaging of webkitimageqt 

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 509061] Re: packaging of webkitimageqt

[James Michael DuPont]

On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:28 PM, bastik <509...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:

> > I dont use bing. This is needed for custom WMS layers.
>
> Standard wms and tms work out of the box, this is only required for the
> "html:http://..."; kind of imagery source (e.g. yahoo).
>
that is new to me, maybe josm has improved.
What about landsat.
warper.geothings.net works  ?

>
> > If there is an alternative package, then update the osm docs.
>
> What's wrong with the docs at
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/WMSPlugin ?
>
have not looked in a while.

>
> > Why do we need kde when we have gnome?
>
> webkitimageqt and gnome-web-photo fulfil exactly the same task in this
> case: load a url, render the content and output it in image format. If
> there is any practical difference, you should point it out.
>
ok, well at the time the qt was easier to use. if the gnome is packaged and
works then fine.


>
> > That is not the question why does it take one more than one year for a
> package to be integrated?
>
> (not responsible for this)
>
> > Whatever you do, please make sure that people who follow the osm
> instructions know what to do to use custom wms layers.
>
> What do you mean by that? Where is the documentation lacking?
>

Well at the time the osm docs talked about compiling things yourself etc, I
have not looked in a long time.


>
> > Also for the balkans, the yahoo images are better than bing, bing is
> useless
> there.
>
> Can you point me to a location?
>

prishtina kosovo.
42° 39′ 48″ N, 21° 9′
44

I guess I am totally out of date. Thanks for the info.
If there is good alternatives, then fine. I dont care, it served its purpose
at the time.

>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509061
>
> Title:
>  packaging of webkitimageqt
>
> Status in Java OpenStreetMap editor:
>  Invalid
> Status in Ubuntu:
>  Incomplete
> Status in Debian GNU/Linux:
>  Unknown
>
> Bug description:
>  Binary package hint: josm
>
> java.io.IOException: Could not start browser. Please check that the
> executable path is correct.
> Cannot run program "webkit-image": java.io.IOException: error=2, No such
> file or directory
>at wmsplugin.HTMLGrabber.grab(HTMLGrabber.java:41)
>at wmsplugin.WMSGrabber.fetch(WMSGrabber.java:69)
>at wmsplugin.Grabber.attempt(Grabber.java:100)
>at wmsplugin.WMSGrabber.run(WMSGrabber.java:52)
>at
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
>at
> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)
>at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)
>at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
>at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
>at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:636)
>
> Debian package for webkitimageqt josm plugin
>
> here is the debian package
> http://osm.komzpa.net/~mdupont/osm/pool/main/w/webkitimageqt/
>
> you add to your /etc/apt/source.list
>
> deb 
> http://osm.komzpa.net/~mdupont/osm/gjergi-osm
>  main
> deb-src 
> http://osm.komzpa.net/~mdupont/osm/gjergi-osm
>  main
>
> apt-get install webkitimageqt
> should work.
>
> if you want the source
>
> apt-src install webkitimageqt
>
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/josm/+bug/509061/+subscribe
>


-- 
James Michael DuPont
Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova and Albania flossk.org
flossal.org

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509061

Title:
  packaging of webkitimageqt 

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 509061] Re: packaging of webkitimageqt

[bastik]

> I dont use bing. This is needed for custom WMS layers.

Standard wms and tms work out of the box, this is only required for the
"html:http://..."; kind of imagery source (e.g. yahoo).

> If there is an alternative package, then update the osm docs.

What's wrong with the docs at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/WMSPlugin ?

> Why do we need kde when we have gnome?

webkitimageqt and gnome-web-photo fulfil exactly the same task in this
case: load a url, render the content and output it in image format. If
there is any practical difference, you should point it out.

> That is not the question why does it take one more than one year for a
package to be integrated?

(not responsible for this)

> Whatever you do, please make sure that people who follow the osm
instructions know what to do to use custom wms layers.

What do you mean by that? Where is the documentation lacking?

> Also for the balkans, the yahoo images are better than bing, bing is useless
there.

Can you point me to a location?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509061

Title:
  packaging of webkitimageqt 

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 509061] Re: packaging of webkitimageqt

[James Michael DuPont]

I dont use bing. This is needed for custom WMS layers.
If there is an alternative package, then update the osm docs.
Why do we need kde when we have gnome?
That is not the question why does it take one more than one year for a
package to be integrated?
Whatever you do, please make sure that people who follow the osm
instructions know what to do to use custom wms layers.
Also for the balkans, the yahoo images are better than bing, bing is useless
there.
thanks,
mike

On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:58 PM, bastik <509...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:

> Why is this still needed?
>
> First of all, Yahoo Imagery is more or less obsolete since we can trace
> from Bing aerial imagery, which has better coverage and resolution at
> most places. Second you can install gnome-web-photo_0.3-0ubuntu2 instead
> and it works the same way. (Yes, you need to downgrade to the version
> from Intrepid, newer versions do not work with josm, see
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/WMSPlugin.)
>
> (Typo by OP: this is for wmsplugin/imagery (which is no longer a plugin)
> and not for validator (also not a plugin any more).)
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509061
>
> Title:
>  packaging of webkitimageqt
>
> Status in Java OpenStreetMap editor:
>  Invalid
> Status in Ubuntu:
>  Incomplete
> Status in Debian GNU/Linux:
>  Unknown
>
> Bug description:
>  Binary package hint: josm
>
> java.io.IOException: Could not start browser. Please check that the
> executable path is correct.
> Cannot run program "webkit-image": java.io.IOException: error=2, No such
> file or directory
>at wmsplugin.HTMLGrabber.grab(HTMLGrabber.java:41)
>at wmsplugin.WMSGrabber.fetch(WMSGrabber.java:69)
>at wmsplugin.Grabber.attempt(Grabber.java:100)
>at wmsplugin.WMSGrabber.run(WMSGrabber.java:52)
>at
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
>at
> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)
>at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)
>at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
>at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
>at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:636)
>
> Debian package for webkitimageqt josm plugin
>
> here is the debian package
> http://osm.komzpa.net/~mdupont/osm/pool/main/w/webkitimageqt/
>
> you add to your /etc/apt/source.list
>
> deb 
> http://osm.komzpa.net/~mdupont/osm/gjergi-osm
>  main
> deb-src 
> http://osm.komzpa.net/~mdupont/osm/gjergi-osm
>  main
>
> apt-get install webkitimageqt
> should work.
>
> if you want the source
>
> apt-src install webkitimageqt
>
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/josm/+bug/509061/+subscribe
>


-- 
James Michael DuPont
Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova and Albania flossk.org
flossal.org

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509061

Title:
  packaging of webkitimageqt 

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 509061] Re: packaging of webkitimageqt

[bastik]

Why is this still needed?

First of all, Yahoo Imagery is more or less obsolete since we can trace
from Bing aerial imagery, which has better coverage and resolution at
most places. Second you can install gnome-web-photo_0.3-0ubuntu2 instead
and it works the same way. (Yes, you need to downgrade to the version
from Intrepid, newer versions do not work with josm, see
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/WMSPlugin.)

(Typo by OP: this is for wmsplugin/imagery (which is no longer a plugin)
and not for validator (also not a plugin any more).)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509061

Title:
  packaging of webkitimageqt 

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 509061] Re: packaging of webkitimageqt

[James Michael DuPont]

Leo What is incomplete? the package is there, it works, I built it. what is the 
problem, be specific.
thanks,
mike

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509061

Title:
  packaging of webkitimageqt 

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 509061] Re: packaging of webkitimageqt

[Leo Arias]

Thank you for taking the time to request this package and helping to
make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately you have not provided enough
information for a developer to start packaging this application. Please
make sure this bug meets the guidelines at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages. An example of a
complete package request is available at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages/ExamplePackageRequest.

** Changed in: josm (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

** Package changed: josm (Ubuntu) => ubuntu

** Also affects: debian via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=569040
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509061

Title:
  packaging of webkitimageqt 

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 509061] Re: packaging of webkitimageqt

[James Michael DuPont]

see the debian packaging bugreport:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=569040


** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #569040
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=569040

-- 
packaging of webkitimageqt 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509061
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 509061] Re: packaging of webkitimageqt

[James Michael DuPont]

any reason why this is invalid?
The webkitinageqt is needed for the josm-plugin validator.
please advise on how to proceed.

-- 
packaging of webkitimageqt 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509061
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 509061] Re: packaging of webkitimageqt

[Bug Watch Updater]

** Changed in: josm
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
packaging of webkitimageqt 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509061
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 509061] Re: packaging of webkitimageqt

[James Michael DuPont]

here is the source repository :
http://github.com/h4ck3rm1k3/webkitimageqt

-- 
packaging of webkitimageqt 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509061
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 509061] Re: packaging of webkitimageqt

[Bug Watch Updater]

** Changed in: josm
   Status: Unknown => New

-- 
packaging of webkitimageqt 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509061
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs