[Bug 540126] Re: Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 605204 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605204 This bug was fixed in the package bluefish - 2.0.1-1 --- bluefish (2.0.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release - the first release of the 2.0 series for Debian (closes: #570731; LP: #540126). This release fixes these reported issues: - Better settings handling (closes: #548272). - Improved filebrowser (LP: #45927). - Improved syntax highlighting engine (LP: #108628). - Improved file operations (LP: #181110). - Translated menu descriptions (LP: #371318, #371322). The chosen menu name is fine. - Improved browser commands and handling (LP: #158891, #348408). * Updated and adjusted packaging files. * debian/bluefish_icon.xpm: Renamed to debian/bluefish.xpm. * debian/bluefish.install: Adjusted. * debian/bluefish.menu (icon): Adjusted. * debian/bluefish-data.install, debian/bluefish-plugins.install: Added. * debian/control: Added bluefish-data, bluefish-dbg and bluefish-plugins. (Build-Depends): Dropped deprecated build-dependencies libaspell-dev, libgnomeui-dev, libgnomevfs2-dev, libpcre3-dev and dpatch. Added intltool, libtool, libenchant-dev and libgucharmap2-dev. (Standards-Version): Bumped to 3.8.4. (Depends, Suggests): Adjusted. Added gvfs-backends as dependency. * debian/copyright: Updated. * debian/rules: Rewritten. Dropped dpatch. (LDFLAGS): Dropped -Wl,-z,defs because of plugins. (config.status:): Adjusted configure switches. (install): Install to debian/tmp and list missing files. (binary-indep): Added for bluefish-data. (binary-arch): Adjusted. Put debugging symbols into bluefish-dbg. * debian/watch: Added support for RCs. * debian/README.Debian: Dropped (useless with 2.0). * debian/README.source: Dropped together with dpatch. * debian/patches/: Dropped (obsolete). * debian/reportbug/: Dropped. -- Lorenzo De LisoTue, 29 Jun 2010 21:40:10 +0200 ** Changed in: bluefish (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540126] Re: Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 605204 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605204 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 605204 Please merge bluefish 2.0.1-1 (universe) from debian unstable (main) -- Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540126] Re: Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version
Wouldn't you know, the 2.0.1 release announcement appeared a couple of days ago. -- Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540126] Re: Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version
** Changed in: bluefish (Debian) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540126] Re: Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version
** Branch linked: lp:debian/sid/bluefish -- Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540126] Re: Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version
** Changed in: bluefish (Debian) Status: New => Fix Committed -- Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540126] Re: Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version
** Changed in: bluefish (Debian) Status: Unknown => New -- Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540126] Re: Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version
The debian team is working on the new version, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=570731 or http://debian.wgdd.de/debian/#sid ** Changed in: bluefish (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #570731 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=570731 ** Also affects: bluefish (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=570731 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540126] Re: Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version
** Changed in: bluefish (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 540126] Re: Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version
I made a mistake in my second command. corrected: u...@machine:~$ sudo apt-key adv --recv-keys --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0xE394D996 Executing: gpg --ignore-time-conflict --no-options --no-default-keyring --secret-keyring /etc/apt/secring.gpg --trustdb-name /etc/apt/trustdb.gpg --keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --recv-keys --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0xE394D996 gpg: requesting key E394D996 from hkp server pgp.mit.edu gpg: key E394D996: "Automatic Archive Signing Key for wgdd.de (2009/2010) " not changed gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: unchanged: 1 and... it worked! but it took >50 sec. to process. I will wait a longer time next time, before to ctrl+c. -- Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 540126] Re: Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version
On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 12:25 +, Daniel Leidert wrote: > sudo preserves $HOME IIRC, which might be the problem here. But you > don't quote the error message ... u...@machine:~$ sudo gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.educ --recv-keys 0xE394D996 gpg: WARNING: unsafe ownership on configuration file `/home/user/.gnupg/gpg.conf' gpg: external program calls are disabled due to unsafe options file permissions gpg: keyserver communications error: general error gpg: keyserver receive failed: general error > Second issue: --recv-keys is a gpg command, whereas --keyserver is an > option. gpg expects options before commands. So the first --recv-keys > might be a problem in several cases. But that's JFTR. E: Command line option --recv-keys is not understood u...@machine:~$ sudo # gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0xE394D996 it makes sens now. > It works from the root user account without any issues. So become root > or try the -H switch of sudo or fix the sudoers file - I guess this will > help. Please ask such things on your favourite Ubuntu user > list/newsgroup/community. I will. Again thank you for the lead. I can now formulate my pgp related questions and ask on the newsgroup/forum. regards, nomnex -- Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540126] Re: Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version
sudo preserves $HOME IIRC, which might be the problem here. But you don't quote the error message ... Second issue: --recv-keys is a gpg command, whereas --keyserver is an option. gpg expects options before commands. So the first --recv-keys might be a problem in several cases. But that's JFTR. It works from the root user account without any issues. So become root or try the -H switch of sudo or fix the sudoers file - I guess this will help. Please ask such things on your favourite Ubuntu user list/newsgroup/community. -- Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540126] Re: Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version
Daniel, when a key is missing on Ubuntu, I usually pass the command: sudo apt-key adv --recv-keys --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com {N} >From your page http://debian.wgdd.de/debian/#gpgkey, I have tried the command: sudo apt-key adv --recv-keys --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0xE394D996 (but the command returned an error msg., would you be kind enough to give me the correct syntax, if I have to re-install a key located on an external server.) - I did not know the "--reinstall" switch, my comment #9 "[re]-installing" implied passing the command "sudo apt-get install wgdd-archive-keyring" over again. -- we all have been newbie once... - Again thank you for your kind answers and BlueFish 2.0 package. It is the first time I am using a Debian repository. -- Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540126] Re: Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version
A simple `apt-get install $package" has no effect on an installed package, which you should already know, when you use a Debian-based Linux. You have to tell apt-get, that you want to install the package again via the `--reinstall' switch. Comment #9 is probably wrong. I doubt you have really reinstalled the package. Besides possible (obvious) ways to restore the key: e.g. removing the package and installing it again or following the two alternative ways described on my pages (there are 3 ways of getting the key - via package, via key from my server and via public key servers), you can simply run: apt-get install --reinstall wgdd-archive-keyring Please read the information I provided. I'm not willing to give you personal assistance for things, which have already been described. -- Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540126] Re: Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version
edit #8, line 9: [re]-installing the key does not bring it back in my software sources > authentication (Trusted software providers) -- Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540126] Re: Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version
Daniel, I have removed your the key in my software source by mistake. what's the command to call it back? when I do an update: W: GPG error: http://debian.wgdd.de jaunty Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 0F719C35E394D996 installing the key has no effect: u...@pc:~$ sudo apt-get install wgdd-archive-keyring Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done wgdd-archive-keyring is already the newest version. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Thanks -- Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540126] Re: Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version
I did, yesterday after commenting on the thread. I will install using these packages, thanks. -- Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540126] Re: Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version
Did you read https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluefish/+bug/540126/comments/1? http://bfwiki.tellefsen.net/index.php/Installing_Bluefish#Installing_2.0.0_.28current_stable.29_on_Ubuntu_9.04_or_newer -- Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540126] Re: Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version
Daniel, how do I install version 2.0 on Karmic? will you provide a .deb link anytime soon? Thanks -- Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 540126] Re: Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version
2010/3/17 Daniel Leidert : > The package you mention from the PPA have several issues. These are > mostly based on the packaging of the bluefish 1.0 series (which I'm > responsible for). The packaging files have not been adjusted for the > changes in bluefish and list outdated build- and runtime-dependencies. > These packages won't be part of Bluefish repositories and I cannot > suggest to add it to Ubuntu. And again: There are packages of Bluefish > 2.0 built for Ubuntu versions 9.04 and 9.10 at debian.wgdd.de. These are > the packages, which will go into Debian and then synced to Ubuntu. If > anybody decides different, then live with the results. OK Thanks for the information. -- Úr Balázs Telefon: +36 (20) 336 1191 E-mail: urbalazs [kukac] gmail [pont] com Skype: urbalazs MSN: urbalazs [kukac] gmail [pont] com Weblap: http://www.urbalazs.hu/ iWiW: http://iwiw.hu/pages/user/userdata.jsp?userID=76603 -- Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540126] Re: Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version
The package you mention from the PPA have several issues. These are mostly based on the packaging of the bluefish 1.0 series (which I'm responsible for). The packaging files have not been adjusted for the changes in bluefish and list outdated build- and runtime-dependencies. These packages won't be part of Bluefish repositories and I cannot suggest to add it to Ubuntu. And again: There are packages of Bluefish 2.0 built for Ubuntu versions 9.04 and 9.10 at debian.wgdd.de. These are the packages, which will go into Debian and then synced to Ubuntu. If anybody decides different, then live with the results. -- Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 540126] Re: Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version
2010/3/17 Daniel Leidert : > This is a release with 2 zeros. My plans are to wait a few bug-fix > releases, before this is put into Debian and then it can by synced to > Ubuntu. There are packages for Ubuntu 9.04 and 9.10 at debian.wgdd.de, > which I build and provide. Hi! Thanks the fast answer! I found it is a PPA too (https://launchpad.net/~klaus-vormweg/+archive/ppa), but it would be great, if this package will be the part of the official repository. OK, I'm waiting for the bugfix and use the PPA version. Thanks -- Úr Balázs -- Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540126] Re: Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version
This is a release with 2 zeros. My plans are to wait a few bug-fix releases, before this is put into Debian and then it can by synced to Ubuntu. There are packages for Ubuntu 9.04 and 9.10 at debian.wgdd.de, which I build and provide. http://debian.wgdd.de/debian/#ubuntu -- Please upgrade bluefish to 2.0.0 version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs