[Bug 548994] Re: Disabling of features is inconsistent

2010-04-25 Thread Conscious User
I changed the description. It is now clear the Gwibber is following the
specification (except for Bug #549000), while Empathy is not.

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: indicator-me
+ 
+ According to the specification, the status options should only appear if
+ Empathy has at least one account set up. This is not currently the case.
+ They always appear.
+ 
+ Original description below (was originally about inconsistency between
+ Gwibber and Empathy, but now it is clear the Gwibber is right and
+ Empathy is wrong):
  
  When Gwibber has not been started, the text field in the Me Menu is
  disabled by not appearing.
  
  When Empathy has not been started, status changing in the Me Menu is
  disabled by graying out.
  
  *Both* should not appear or *both* should be grayed out when disabled.
  The current behavior is inconsistent.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Fri Mar 26 18:30:20 2010
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Alpha i386 (20100325)
  Package: indicator-me 0.2.6-0ubuntu1
  ProcEnviron:
-  LANG=en_US.utf8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  LANG=en_US.utf8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-17.26-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1
  SourcePackage: indicator-me
  Uname: Linux 2.6.32-17-generic i686

** Summary changed:

- Disabling of features is inconsistent
+ Status options should not appear if no IM accounts are set up

-- 
Status options should not appear if no IM accounts are set up
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548994
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 548994] Re: Disabling of features is inconsistent

2010-03-29 Thread Ivanka Majic
** Tags added: gloam

-- 
Disabling of features is inconsistent
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548994
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 548994] Re: Disabling of features is inconsistent

2010-03-29 Thread Matthew Paul Thomas
This is now consistent in the specification.

For the text field: The broadcast field should be present if you have
at least one broadcast account set up. There is no specification that
it should be disabled (though I guess it would be nice to disable it
whenever you have no Internet connection). It is irrelevant whether
Gwibber happens to be running.

For the IM status items: Each item should be sensitive only if at least
one of the accounts you have set up in Empathy supports that status,
regardless of whether Empathy is currently running.

-- 
Disabling of features is inconsistent
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548994
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 548994] Re: Disabling of features is inconsistent

2010-03-29 Thread Conscious User
Okay, but in the case of no accounts set up, what is the rationale for
graying out one and removing entirely the other?

-- 
Disabling of features is inconsistent
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548994
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 548994] Re: Disabling of features is inconsistent

2010-03-29 Thread Conscious User
Oops, disregard last comment. I saw the rewritten specification now and
it says that removal is the case for both.

It is not the case of the current implementation, though. Will this land
for Lucid?

-- 
Disabling of features is inconsistent
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548994
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 548994] Re: Disabling of features is inconsistent

2010-03-26 Thread Conscious User

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42074948/Dependencies.txt

-- 
Disabling of features is inconsistent
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548994
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs