[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2012-04-19 Thread Kaushik
Should I be seeing this issue now in oneric?
I have filed a bug here and want to check if this is a duplicate.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/985169

BR
Subbu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981

Title:
  [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/565981/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2012-04-19 Thread Kaushik
I had rebooted my desktop since the time that  I posted the last log:
The latest values are:

glxinfo | grep GLX version
GLX version: 1.4

cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_gem_objects
655 objects, 657907712 bytes
326 [306] objects, 96661504 [73461760] bytes in gtt
  15 [12] active objects, 17940480 [6397952] bytes
  8 [8] pinned objects, 5607424 [5607424] bytes
  303 [286] inactive objects, 73113600 [61456384] bytes
  0 [0] freed objects, 0 [0] bytes
9 pinned mappable objects, 11898880 bytes
176 fault mappable objects, 7675904 bytes
2147479552 [268435456] gtt total

BR
Subbu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981

Title:
  [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/565981/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2011-02-05 Thread FAJALOU
Any thoughts?  Help?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981

Title:
  [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2011-02-05 Thread Matt
As far as I can see, this happens only for certain kernel
configurations. I am currently running a custom 2.6.36, and everything
seems fine. But a while ago I when did some experiments with kernel
options, I found cases where the leak was there. I did not report this
because I could not find out what caused the problem.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981

Title:
  [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2011-02-05 Thread madbiologist
@Rakosi, Roberto, and FAJALOU - if you are using a laptop you may be
encountering bug #569273.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981

Title:
  [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-12-07 Thread FAJALOU
I second Matt...but with a few differences.
I am running Linux lrc-laptop 2.6.32-26-generic #48-Ubuntu SMP Wed Nov 24 
09:00:03 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux
Lenovo thinkpad sl410, with an intel graphics card.

After a few suspends, /usr/bin/X :0 vt7 -nr -nolisten tcp -auth
/var/run/xauth/A:0-26HBac  will begin to just eat up my memory, bringing
my computer to a standstill in the end and forcing a reboot.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981

Title:
  [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-09-17 Thread Matt
This still seems to be a problem in recent kernel versions (KMS
enabled)!

Oddly, with kernel 2.6.33, everything seems fine (lucid + ppa kde and
all xorg variants, including xorg-edgers on a Thinkpad T500, i915).

But with every version from 2.6.34 up to 2.6.36-rc4 I have tried, there
clearly is a bad memory leak making the machine unusable within several
hours (watching movies does is not helpful in particular).

This slabtop output shows what happens after less than two hours or so
of normal activity (switching desktops, moving windows etc.):

 OBJS ACTIVE  USE OBJ SIZE  SLABS OBJ/SLAB CACHE SIZE NAME  
211200 211200 100%0.02K825  256  3300K kmalloc-16

It'd be great if anyone who knows more about the state of this problem
could comment or post a solution if available...

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-07-12 Thread David Tombs
Rafael: As you can see above, this bug has been fixed. Please report a
new bug.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-07-11 Thread rafael.pino
Greetings to everyone. I still have the memory leak problem, but only
when compiz is on. I have a ATI Raden HD 3200 in a HP dv5-1022la. If
compiz is off then memory usage is around 300MB, but when compiz is on,
memory usage increments to 900MB.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-05-20 Thread LocutusOfBorg
please fill a new bug!

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-05-20 Thread Roberto Gordo Saez
It is already reported and marked as a duplicate of this bug

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-05-19 Thread Roberto Gordo Saez
The object bytes count does not drop for me, it keeps growing and
growing on fully updated Ubuntu 10.04. Closing applications never drops
the count. Maybe not exactly the same bug, but the symptomps looks
exactly like the original.

The 2GB of RAM and most swap gets full at around 5-7 days of uptime, swapping 
becomes extreme and must be rebooted. I have ATI radeon RV280, free driver, and 
KMS enabled (xorg crash when KMS is disabled, different bug). 
GLX version: 1.2

Can I do something to debug this?

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-05-03 Thread Chris Halse Rogers
This particular bug is *definitely* fixed.  It's entirely possible that
there are other, unrelated, memory issues in the server, or specific
drivers.  These should be filed as separate bugs - although memory
issues often end up being problems in the apps using X :).

 If I close vinagre, it immediately drops down to: 
...
If the “object bytes” count drops after closing applications then you
are not seeing this bug.

In fact, if you're using the Ubuntu 10.04 final release, you're not
seeing this bug.  We know the cause, and the code responsible is no
longer in our X server.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-05-02 Thread Haggai Eran
Hi,
I'm using the final version of Lucid on an Asus Eee PC 1005HA with intel 945 
graphics card. I don't usually use compiz, but I think I've encountered a 
similar situation to what this bug describes with vinagre. After using vinagre 
to access a vnc server for  a couple of hours, the system really slows down. I 
get the following from /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects:
867 objects
2117353472 object bytes
3 pinned
36143104 pin bytes
185061376 gtt bytes
260308992 gtt total

If I close vinagre, it immediately drops down to: 
572 objects
136286208 object bytes
3 pinned
36143104 pin bytes
87183360 gtt bytes
260308992 gtt total

$ glxinfo | grep GLX version
GLX version: 1.2

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-05-01 Thread Sami
I think not yet :S:S

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-05-01 Thread David Hardstone
Yes, this bug has been fixed.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-05-01 Thread Rakosi Alpar
I installed the final version of Lucid. I have 1gb of ram, the normal
memory usage is about 30%, but after 2 hours now is 60%. Everything is
closed, if I view the top applications, isn't anything that could be a
reason for this memory usage.

direct rendering: Yes
server glx vendor string: SGI
server glx version string: 1.2
GLX version: 1.2

cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects
1754 objects
572997632 object bytes
0 pinned
0 pin bytes
0 gtt bytes
0 gtt total

My graphics card is an ATI9250, and I use the open source ati driver.
Now then my problem is related to this bug? Is this bug fixed?

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-29 Thread eMcE
This bug is now officially fixed or not jet?

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-28 Thread Cat
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: Fix Released = Fix Committed

** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-27 Thread Alan Nordman
Sorry!  Newb misclick!

** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: Fix Released = In Progress

** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: In Progress = Fix Released

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-26 Thread madbiologist
Now that this bug has been tracked down and corrected, can we consider
reinstating the performance enhancement patches that were dropped in
xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.13.0-1ubuntu5 as an attempt to fix this bug?
Or do they depend on GLX 1.4?

See https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-ati and bug
#564181 and bug #563400 for details.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-25 Thread VasiaUVI
Hello,
I think I am also affected by this bug although I have GLX ver 1.2. Here are 
some outputs:

va...@vasia-laptop:~$ grep object bytes /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects
78479360 object bytes
va...@vasia-laptop:~$ glxinfo | grep GLX version
GLX version: 1.2
va...@vasia-laptop:~$ uname -a
Linux vasia-laptop 2.6.32-21-generic-pae #32-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 16 09:39:35 UTC 
2010 i686 GNU/Linux
va...@vasia-laptop:~$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects
984 objects
79396864 object bytes
0 pinned
0 pin bytes
0 gtt bytes
0 gtt total
va...@vasia-laptop:~$ lspci | grep VGA
01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RC410 [Radeon Xpress 
200M]

The think is that I don't have to wait 1 hour or so to have my system very 
heavy, after entering in Ubuntu Lucid the system is heavy!
1
What could be the problem? My Ubuntu system now is ...I can say, useless!
Thanks!

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-25 Thread Philip Muškovac
VasiaUVI: if you have glx 1.2 then you are NOT affected by this bug,
please file a new bug with 'ubuntu-bug xorg'

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-25 Thread yoda2031
ch...@chris-desktop:~$ glxinfo | grep glx version
server glx version string: 1.4
client glx version string: 1.4
ch...@chris-desktop:~$ X -version

X.Org X Server 1.7.6
Release Date: 2010-03-17
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.24-25-server i686 Ubuntu
Current Operating System: Linux chris-desktop 2.6.32-21-generic #32-Ubuntu SMP 
Fri Apr 16 08:10:02 UTC 2010 i686
Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-21-generic 
root=UUID=31bc6c69-2094-4837-89bd-fc9c6210c794 ro quiet splash
Build Date: 23 April 2010  05:11:50PM
xorg-server 2:1.7.6-2ubuntu7 (Bryce Harrington br...@ubuntu.com) 
Current version of pixman: 0.16.4
Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
to make sure that you have the latest version.
ch...@chris-desktop:~$ free
 total   used   free sharedbuffers cached
Mem:   18013401759156  42184  0   88481337520
-/+ buffers/cache: 4127881388552
Swap:  4883720   42684879452

Is it just me, or does something not add up there? (using the 'fixed'
package, yet still using GLX 1.4, and RAM usage is still unearthly high)

Using nvidia non-free driver version 195

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-25 Thread Diego F . Rodríguez
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: Fix Released = Fix Committed

** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-25 Thread James King
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: Fix Released = Fix Committed

** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-23 Thread gapon
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: Fix Released = Fix Committed

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-23 Thread Berend De Schouwer
Works for me(tm)

00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GME
Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)

Also fixes netbook-launcher startup

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-23 Thread Petar Velkovski
Conn O Griofa, I never said that the patch works at your computer.

Read what you've written: Although the initial feedback from most
people seems to indicate that the proposed update fixes the issue, I
haven't seen anybody post output that would positively confirm the leak
as being fixed

I just posted what you demanded.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-23 Thread fgh
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: Fix Released = Fix Committed

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-23 Thread alex
I've updated a couple of hours ago. This bug has gone, but now xorg
sometimes crashes and gets me back to the kdm login screen.It hasn't
been so before.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-23 Thread Petar Velkovski
alex you should open a new bug report (even if you believe that it is the patch 
mentioned here that caused your problem).
Open a console and type this:
ubuntu-bug xserver-xorg

There are certain attachments you should send when reporting problems
like this (this list is taken form
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Xorg/Debugging):

* All of the X server log file(s): /var/log/Xorg.*.log
* If you use a xorg.conf, please include it in the bug report, otherwise, 
please specify in the bug report that it does not exist. Usually this would be 
located at /etc/X11/xorg.conf, but see the xorg.conf manpage - man xorg.conf - 
for other standard locations.
* /var/log/Xorg.0.log from a trial run where you move your xorg.conf aside 
and let Xorg autodetect your hardware (if you have such a file).
* /var/log/dmesg (please add drm.debug=15 as boot parameter and reboot) 
especially in case of crashes and using KMS.
* content of /var/log/gdm/ only in cases there is nothing interesting in 
/var/log/Xorg.*.log and dmesg output

but I believe that the command above will do that for you automatically.

You can also give some additional information like if you noticed that
the crashes happen when you use certain applications. I hope this
information will be of any use to you.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-23 Thread Petar Velkovski
alex I forgot to mention this in my previous post, but you should
probably mention this bug report in your newly created bug report and
also come back here and tell us the bug number of the report, in case
someone else following this bug has the same problems as you do.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-23 Thread Ken Weill P. Lumacad
I have dual core processor. CPU1 and CPU2. I always get 100% CPU usage
in either of the CPU usage but not at the same time. When CPU1 goes to
100%, CPU2 lowers to about 44%. then when CPU2 rises to 100%, CPU1
lowers down to about 47%.

Is this related also to this Xorg bug?

NVIDIA non-free is enabled in this PC. Visual effects is set to NONE but
it still consumes 100% cpu usage in either of the 2 cpu cores.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-23 Thread Conn O Griofa
Petar,

You clearly implied that I was misinterpreting my results in the first
sentence of comment #37. In comment #59, I acknowledged that your system
appears not to have the same memory leak issue; as I said, your
allocation increases /and/ decreases, unlike my own. I asked for
evidence simply because I was concerned that some people may have
prematurely reported the bug as fixed (thankfully however, it seems that
my issue is a corner-case). I am not interested in an argument, so don't
try to create a mountain out of a molehill.

Regardless, in light of the 1.8 server being uploaded to xorg-edgers
(version
2:1.8.0+git20100422+server-1.8-branch.5455df65-0ubuntu0sarvatt2), I gave
the newest packages another try.

Unfortunately, compiz stilI freezes on my system with the 1.8 server.
Although I'm not sure if it matters, considering that the leak in this
report is related to GLX/OpenGL, I did enable metacity compositing
(which uses XRender), and after 5 hours uptime I can see the object
bytes allocation remaining stable at ~43MB. The system is very
responsive, and closing applications has the expected effect of
decreasing the GEM allocation.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-23 Thread Petar Velkovski
Is there any reason for xserver-xorg not being updated in the official
repository, or is it that the mirror server I'm getting updates from
hasn't been updated yet?

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-23 Thread Linuxexperte
hi people,
I wanted to give you an update on my terminal-Output some minutes ago.

Hier is the Output: 
and...@andrea-desktop:~$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects | grep 'object 
bytes'
458080256 object bytes
and...@andrea-desktop:~$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects
2037 objects
458878976 object bytes
3 pinned
13705216 pin bytes
165658624 gtt bytes
260308992 gtt total
and...@andrea-desktop:~$ 

this shows, that figures are still rising somehow. I have already updated my 
system to the latest stands.
But what wonders me is, that my system is not going to freez even after about 
three or four hours of uptime. Systemspeed only goes down noticable, whan I use 
for example Opera, Gimp and a Gaming-Application at the same time. 
RAM on my System is 1015MB and the System uses at the moment 5844MB
CPU is 2x Genuine Intel(R) c...@1.6ghz
Greetings
Linuxexperte

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-23 Thread Petar Velkovski
Linuxexperte is this with xserver-xorg packages from the official Lucid
repository or with xserver-xorg packages from
https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/x-updates?

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-23 Thread Alexander Bürger
While reading this bug report I ran looked at
/sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects on my own computer. I got:

7681 objects
-1325842432 object bytes
6 pinned
12771328 pin bytes
108036096 gtt bytes
201326592 gtt total

I do not believe that the negative number is correct, but I am unable to
tell if this is only a display problem.

Some info about my computer:
uname -a
Linux xenon 2.6.32-21-generic #32-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 16 08:09:38 UTC 2010 
x86_64 GNU/Linux

dpkg -l xserver-xorg* | grep ^.[ih]
ii  xserver-xorg  1:7.5+5ubuntu1
  the X.Org X server
ii  xserver-xorg-core 2:1.7.6-2ubuntu5  
  Xorg X server - core server
ii  xserver-xorg-input-evdev  1:2.3.2-5ubuntu1  
  X.Org X server -- evdev input driver
ii  xserver-xorg-input-mouse  1:1.5.0-1 
  X.Org X server -- mouse input driver
ii  xserver-xorg-input-synaptics  1.2.2-1ubuntu4
  Synaptics TouchPad driver for X.Org server
ii  xserver-xorg-video-intel  2:2.9.1-3ubuntu4  
  X.Org X server -- Intel i8xx, i9xx display d
ii  xserver-xorg-video-vesa   1:2.3.0-1ubuntu1  
  X.Org X server -- VESA display driver

lspci | grep Graph
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset 
Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 07)
00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset 
Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 07)

uptime (includes 3-4 times hibernating)
23:16:58 up 1 day, 13:55,  4 users,  load average: 0.36, 0.44, 0.36

system was installed from the beta2 iso and updated afterwards

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-23 Thread Petar Velkovski
Alexander Bürger you are hit by the bug. The number is negative because
object bytes uses signed integer to store its value (I came to this
conclusion on my own, so sorry if that is not correct). And because
there is a leak, and the number never decreases, it reaches a point when
the number overflows (the maximum signed 32 integer value is
+2,147,483,647). It seams that the patch proposed here is not present in
the official Ubuntu repositories yet. You should add the PPA form
https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/x-updates and test if
it works for you.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-23 Thread Robert Hooker
The fix is released now, thanks for all of the testing everyone and if
you still have problems please file a new bug about it with ubuntu-bug
xorg so your logs can be examined deeper.

xorg-server (2:1.7.6-2ubuntu7) lucid; urgency=low

  * Drop 117_fix_crash_with_createglyphset.patch
- Dupe of patch 110
  * Drop 03_fedora_glx_versioning.diff, 04_fedora_glx14-swrast.diff
- These patches were brought in by Debian to provide glx 1.4 support
  which Fedora backported from xserver 1.8, however testing in
  Ubuntu showed they caused a crash when closing Clutter apps (#550218),
  and graphics corruption when opening windows.  Dropping these patches
  returns us to GLX 1.2, which has been found to be stable; Debian has
  also dropped these two patches.
  (Fixes #565903).
  * Drop 114_dri2_make_sure_x_drawable_exists.patch
- This was an early attempt by upstream which fixed the aforementioned
  Clutter crash, but which introduced a memory leak.
  (Fixes #565981)

Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:24:38 -0700


** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-23 Thread fgh
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: Fix Released = Fix Committed

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-23 Thread Robert Hooker
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-22 Thread Linuxexperte
hello people,
I just heard of this today. So I just want to know if I am also affected or not.
I put this command into the Terminal: cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects

The output is this:
cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects
1688 objects 
241090560 object bytes
3 pinned
13705216 pin bytes
118263808 gtt bytes
260308992 gtt total
and...@andrea-desktop:~$ 

So my question would be: am I affected too or not??
My graphic-chip is: Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics 
Controller (rev 02)

Can anybody give me an answer and if it would ben ecessary for me to
install these new packages??

Greetings
Karmicbastler

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-22 Thread Martin Pitt
Linuxexperte [2010-04-22 15:38 -]:
 241090560 object bytes

This is quite much, but in the end it's really noticeable if you are
affected -- after a few hours your system becomes totally sluggish and
feels like a tar pit. On my system, shutdown took about a minute, too.

 Can anybody give me an answer and if it would ben ecessary for me to
 install these new packages??

If for nothing else, it's interesting to know that they do not cause
regressions.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-22 Thread Conn O Griofa
Martin,

Although the initial feedback from most people seems to indicate that
the proposed update fixes the issue, I haven't seen anybody post output
that would positively confirm the leak as being fixed (in other words,
that the GEM object byte allocation is actually reducing when
applications are closed).

Is it possible that the leak is still present with the patched server?
The reason why I'm asking is that my system has just 768MB of RAM, and
depending on my usage pattern it can take several hours for me to
recognize the sluggishness (typically when the GEM allocation reaches
~300MB or so). Users with larger amounts of RAM may not notice any
problems until much later, perhaps.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-22 Thread Robert Hooker
Linuxexperte [2010-04-22 15:38 -]:
 241090560 object bytes

229MB is a perfectly reasonable amount to expect there and not
indicative of a leak, if on the other hand you see it at 1GB+ after a
few more hours uptime then you know you have problems.

As a side note, the x-updates packages are fixing another major issue
where clutter apps are failing to load under swrast [1] which is
affecting a large amount of people and to me reinforces the assertion
that dropping the GLX 1.4 backports is the correct thing to do at this
point. Note that all KMS drivers are already able to have a client GLX
version 1.4 regardless of this, this is just lowering the server's
reported GLX version back to 1.2. Proprietary drivers are unaffected
because they don't use the server's glx anyway.


[1] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-games/+bug/561734

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-22 Thread Petar Velkovski
Conn O Griofa,

pe...@aurora:~$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects | grep 'object bytes'
160043008 object bytes
pe...@aurora:~$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects | grep 'object bytes'
160456704 object bytes
pe...@aurora:~$ oowriter 
[1] 21973
pe...@aurora:~$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects | grep 'object bytes'
144465920 object bytes
pe...@aurora:~$ oo
oobase  oocalc  oodraw  ooffice oofromtemplate  
ooimpress   oomath  ooweb   oowriter
pe...@aurora:~$ oocalc 
[1] 22013
pe...@aurora:~$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects | grep 'object bytes'
179482624 object bytes
[1]+  Doneoocalc
pe...@aurora:~$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects | grep 'object bytes'
144240640 object bytes

Does this positively confirm the leak as being fixed?

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-22 Thread Petar Velkovski
Here is anothe one that might be more clear:

pe...@aurora:~$ date ; cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects | grep 'object 
bytes'
Thu Apr 22 20:08:31 CEST 2010
164847616 object bytes
pe...@aurora:~$ oowriter 
[1] 2189
pe...@aurora:~$ date ; cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects | grep 'object 
bytes'
Thu Apr 22 20:08:44 CEST 2010
165933056 object bytes
pe...@aurora:~$ oocalc 
[2] 2216
[1]   Doneoowriter
pe...@aurora:~$ date ; cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects | grep 'object 
bytes'
Thu Apr 22 20:09:06 CEST 2010
[2]+  Doneoocalc
201986048 object bytes
pe...@aurora:~$ date ; cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects | grep 'object 
bytes'
Thu Apr 22 20:09:17 CEST 2010
187908096 object bytes
pe...@aurora:~$ date ; cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects | grep 'object 
bytes'
Thu Apr 22 20:09:30 CEST 2010
192741376 object bytes
pe...@aurora:~$ date ; cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects | grep 'object 
bytes'
Thu Apr 22 20:09:36 CEST 2010
174059520 object bytes

So the values are:
164847616 
165933056 (encrease)
201986048 (encrease)
187908096 (decrease)
192741376 (encrease)
174059520 (decrease)

Good enough?

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-22 Thread Bryce Harrington
Bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565903 likewise suggests a downgrade
to glx 1.2 would resolve some corruption issues.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-22 Thread amano
Well, downgrading to glx 1.2 seems to be the best idea then. Only very
few apps seem to be affected and people that use binary blobs are not
affected at all. On the other hand the downgrade fixes some corruption
issues.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-22 Thread Fabio Albieri
I see the same behaviour in Kubuntu with KWIN effects enables.

Question:ù
in an eventual downgrade to glx 1.2 and such, how much performance loss shall 
we expect on lower end intel GMA netbooks ?

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-22 Thread Robert Hooker
Question:ù
in an eventual downgrade to glx 1.2 and such, how much performance loss shall 
we expect on lower end intel GMA netbooks ?

None

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-22 Thread Michał Gołębiowski
I observe the same behaviour in Karmic:

$ for t in `seq 1 10`; do eog /usr/share/backgrounds ; echo `grep object 
bytes /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects` `ps --noheaders ocomm,vsz,rss 
$(pidof X)`; done
374431744 object bytes Xorg 250080 96968 Xorg 163408 15644
393375744 object bytes Xorg 250192 97144 Xorg 163408 15644
398163968 object bytes Xorg 250208 97160 Xorg 163408 15644
402931712 object bytes Xorg 250228 97180 Xorg 163408 15644
407707648 object bytes Xorg 250264 97288 Xorg 163408 15644
412442624 object bytes Xorg 250264 97288 Xorg 163408 15644
417333248 object bytes Xorg 250280 97296 Xorg 163408 15644
421969920 object bytes Xorg 250308 97364 Xorg 163408 15644
426786816 object bytes Xorg 250720 97576 Xorg 163408 15644
431591424 object bytes Xorg 250720 97576 Xorg 163408 15644

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-22 Thread Michał Gołębiowski
I forgot to mention: I have Compiz enabled.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-22 Thread Tormod Volden
** Description changed:

  [Problem]
  Memory leak.  Fix to glx 1.4 backport did not deallocate gem objects properly.
  
  [Background]
  Red Hat backported glx 1.3 and 1.4 support from xserver 1.8.  These patches 
were taken by Debian as patches 03_fedora_glx_versioning.diff and 
04_fedora_glx14-swrast.diff, and so Ubuntu took them in order to remain in sync 
with Debian.  Other distros using xserver 1.7 have likewise adopted these 
backports.
  
  Subsequent testing by Ubuntu identified an xserver crash that occurs
  with these patches enabled when closing Clutter apps.  A partial fix was
  implemented in Ubuntu based on upstream work, and the issue believed
  solved, but further testing has shown that a slow memory leak is
  present, causing issues such as described below, which can result in
  system instability after a day or two of uptime (depending on memory
  quantity and usage).  Distros that don't include support for Clutter
  obviously won't see the bugs.
  
  Following these findings, Debian has dropped the glx patches.  Ubuntu is
  evaluating fixing the patches vs. following Debian's approach, being
  mindful of any userspace apps that may have come to depend on glx
  1.3/1.4 functionality.
  
  [Original Report]
  There has been some buzz the last days about excessive swapping and OOM 
conditions. It can seem like the kernel memory use is increasing since the user 
processes seem not to grow unusually.
  
  /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects shows that the GEM object bytes
  number is increasing. One way to reproduce, is this:
  
- $ for t in `seq 1 10`; do eog /usr/share/backgrounds ; echo `grep object 
bytes /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects` `ps --noheaders ocomm,vsz,rss 
($pidof X)`; done
+ $ for t in `seq 1 10`; do eog /usr/share/backgrounds ; echo `grep object 
bytes /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects` `ps --noheaders ocomm,vsz,rss 
$(pidof X)`; done
  142376960 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  145907712 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  150458368 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  154816512 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  159244288 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  163721216 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  168148992 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  172699648 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  177152000 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  181530624 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  
  It shows that the Xorg process is not growing, but gem objects are. Similarly 
counting and summing objects show there are gem objects adding up (with 
refcount 2) but not disappearing again when the application closes:
   awk '/name/{ i++; s+= $4 } END{print i   s}' 
/sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_names
  
  These issues have been seen on intel and ati, with the lucid kernel as
  well as the mainline 2.6.34 snapshot.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.5+5ubuntu1
  Uname: Linux 2.6.34-999-generic i686
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Sun Apr 18 15:59:21 2010
  ProcEnviron:
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: xorg
  system:
   distro: Ubuntu
   codename:   lucid
   architecture:   i686
   kernel: 2.6.34-999-generic

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-22 Thread Petar Velkovski
Michał Gołębiowski the test you've done by itself shows nothing. Please
read my previous posts!

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-22 Thread Conn O Griofa
Petar Volkovski,

What you did in comment #51 is just another variation of the testcase in
the bug description that others have been performing (and that you
insist does not represent a memory leak).

Your output differs from mine in that the GEM allocation increases *and*
decreases. I have never seen the GEM object bytes allocation decrease on
my system (as I said, even when I close every application and leave
nothing but an empty GNOME desktop and panel running); only
stopping/restarting the server will reduce the allocation.

I can understand that the object bytes may level out at a certain size,
but on my system it grows out of control. Once it hits ~300MB (of a
system with the integrated graphics set to 128MB, and with just 768MB
ram in total), the system becomes unusable due to I/O and swapping. It
is clearly a memory leak.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-22 Thread Robert Hooker
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-22 Thread Bilal Akhtar
Is this bug fixed? I am waiting for this package to come in the repos.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-22 Thread Timo Jyrinki
I think there is a slight possibility of mixing multiple slowdown bugs
here. If you experience slowdown and suspect it might not all be because
of GEM objects, please glance at bug #95 which was reported before
xorg-server ubuntu2 with the 114 patch went in, and claims that
2.6.32-19 kernel introduced a slowdown that was not there in 2.6.32-18,
on intel graphics. And I seem to have even something else which feels
like sluggish X.org, namely that ondemand on my computer seems to set
the CPU speed to 800MHz on lucid. So if you experience slowdowns of X,
you may be interested in not only checking this bug report but checking
your CPU clock speed when CPU load is there, and maybe pondering about
that other bug which relates to a potential kernel regression with
intel.

Please report these kernel regression possibilities and possible CPU
speed setting failures to the bug #95 instead of here. The CPU thing
probably needs another place as well, but better in that bug report
where I've already messed about than this GLX / GEM bug report.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-22 Thread Loïc Minier
So I have 2:1.7.6-2ubuntu7~xup2 packages from
ppa:ubuntu-x-swat/x-updates and it worked fine in the beginning and
seemed to help with the problem, but now I'm seeing 60%+ CPU (of one of
the two cores) being used in the Xorg process; laptop gets hot.

Nothing in xorg.log, nothing in .xsession-errors.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-22 Thread Loïc Minier
I stupidly tried stracing Xorg from a xterm on top of Xorg  tsss  :)

What's the proper way to look into the CPU consumption issue next time I
hit it?  (just froze my laptop and had to reboot because of the strace,
so CPU is back to normal ATM)

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-22 Thread Loïc Minier
BTW otherwise things seemed to be stable WRT memory consumption, but
only ran it for some hours, might not be enough.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-22 Thread Thorsten Reinbold
Just as Feedback: with the xup2 packages I have no memory leak. Compiz
Performance is OK, before using the Packages from the PPA I had a choppy
Performance while watching Videos in Fullscreen. This has gone with the
updated Packages and runs smooth now.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-22 Thread Jcink
For whatever it's worth, even if nothing at all, I've had the test setup
in VMware Workstation with 3D acceleration turned on, host card is an
ATI Radeon HD 4850. It seems okay, I let it go for around the past 15
hours and memory usage is fine. I realize VMs do their own things
sometimes though. I'll keep testing it anyway to see if I can make
anything happen.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-22 Thread Sebastian Martinez
I test this package now

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread MagicMyth
Just confirming that Robert's xorg packages (2ubuntu7~xup2) have fixed
the issue I mentioned in #564636. So far no stability issues. I will
report back on whether it fixes the ATI GPU issue when I get the chance
to test that.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread Petar Velkovski
Preliminary testing shows that Robert's xorg packages from
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/x-updates fix this bug for
me too. (Intel graphic)

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread Martin Pitt
Robert, from the current discussion it seems that it's quite safe to
roll back the two glx 1.4 and the 114 patch. Personally I would rather
like to see this fixed in final, since it's such a notable regression
and the 114 patch was just introduced a few days ago.

I heard that the rdepends were tested how they behave wrt. rolling back
GLX from 1.4 to 1.2. From a more theoretical standpoint, what does that
change entail? Does it drop a few GLX features which would help
performance improvements in some cases? What do client apps do if those
functions are suddenly not available any more?

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread Martin Pitt
I started a testing wiki page at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Testing/GEMLeak

I'll send a call for testing to ubuntu-de...@.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread Alessandro Ghersi
I added the ppa, I did the upgrade and reboot but glxinfo | grep GLX version 
still says 1.4
Is it right? I ask because the wiki says Please verify that glxinfo | grep 
GLX version says 1.2, not 1.4.
I've xserver-common and xserver-xorg-core 2:1.7.6-2ubuntu7~xup2 installed.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread Timo Jyrinki
As a small note, applications requiring GLX 1.4 generally do not start
if the 1.4-specific extensions are not available. I never got to
studying which are such applications, even though it crossed my mind.
Probably games, some professional proprietary applications etc. Quite a
few applications depend on those, since GLX 1.4 is ca. 10 years old,
even though the free software 3D stack hasn't supported it.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread Erick Brunzell
I caught wind of this at the forums:

http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=9154355posted=1#post9154355

And as I said there, Please excuse me for being a pain but being
visually impaired I can sometimes overlook the obvious, but my blind old
self can't see is how to add myself and my machine to testing here:

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Testing/GEMLeak

So I'll just be using this bug report in the interim.

I can tell you that I'm using Intel 82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics and glxinfo 
| grep GLX version produces
GLX version: 1.4 in an UNAFFECTED fresh install from 04/01/2010, but it DOES 
affect an upgrade from Karmic to Lucid that was performed less than 48 hours 
ago!

I'll leave this well working install alone and start testing the other.

Uptime on the non-effected install previously mentioned:

la...@lance-desktop:~$ uptime
 13:02:16 up  4:34,  2 users,  load average: 0.34, 0.60, 0.49

13+ hours UP and np problem with GLX version: 1.4!

The other had been UP not nearly as long!

I'll stay available!

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread Erick Brunzell
Something possibly helpful, or not, since I'm visually impaired one of
the first things I do is right click the desktop, adjust fonts, etc, and
particularly DISABLE the 3D stuff. That is, even if enabled by default,
if Visual Effects shows Normal, I change it to None.

That's how the unaffected Lucid desktop was prior to booting into the
affected one. I tried to change it back to Normal and it wouldn't!

I booted into the affected one and checked. It is also set to None and
I think I'll leave it alone and boot into one of the installs I did
during iso testing to try the patch/revert. That way I'll still be
able to gather info from the one that slowed to a crawl and the one that
seems unaffected.

Someone much smarter than I am would have to tell me what info gather,
and how to gather it.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread Vish
Using 2ubuntu7~xup2 , I'm not having any memory problems i had reported earlier 
Bug #563400 (thanks Sarvatt!)
This is on an ATI X1400 Mobility radeon [RV515]

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread Luka
i'd like to report that I do not notice this regressions. My packages
are update. I do not use proposed ppa to downgrade glx to 1.2.

My video adapter:
VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile GME965/GLE960 Integrated 
Graphics Controller (rev 0c)

os:  lucid lynx 10.04 32bit Desktop which was upgraded from karmic.

important parts of glxinfo report:
direct rendering: Yes
server glx version string: 1.4
client glx version string: 1.4
GLX version: 1.4

Running compiz, my uptime is about 4 days and I use suspend that works
great. There are no speed regressions to report. In fact this is the
first time that I am able to play opengl games like nexuiz and penumba
rather smoothly. But I do experience occasional xorg restart, but only
when playing penumbra and that is probably not related to this bug.

I am sure that doesn't help much those affected, but I hope someone will
have some use from a good report as well.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread Erick Brunzell
OK, while installing packages on my third Lucid so I can just use it,
I browsed the apt history files of the others to see if that might shed
some light. It did to me, but it may not be helpful to you.

On my main Lucid (the one NOT affected) I'd let update mangler remove
compiz and compiz-gnome  on 04/09/2010 (obviously because I don't
use them anyway) so that's why it was NOT affected.

Of course we don't want everyone to remove compiz so I'll keep running
Lucid #3 with the reversion/patch + desktop effects enabled and report
back tomorrow.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread Andy
I am running Lucid in Virtualbox with Compiz enabled.  Host Machine is Nvidia.  
I just ran all the updates
then rebooted and checked my version  

ubu...@lucid-test:~$ glxinfo|grep version
server glx version string: 1.2 Chromium
client glx version string: 1.2 Chromium
GLX version: 1.3
OpenGL version string: 2.0 Chromium 1.9

I ran the update manager again and it said the system is up to date.  I am not 
noticing any problems
But shouldn't it be showing 1.4 instead of 1.3 ?

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread W00ster
Running Lenovo ThinkPad T400, model 6475ZN2 with the Xserver from
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/x-updates.

After rebooting and starting the new Xserver, running some 1080p video in full 
screen and some other applications normally taxing the Xerver, GLX and memory 
quite hard, the number of bytes used by GEM objects have dropped to a more 
normal level:
1198 objects
126042112 object bytes
6 pinned
16838656 pin bytes
79060992 gtt bytes
234881024 gtt total

The number of object bytes used to be larger by a factor of 10.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Description changed:

- Binary package hint: xorg
+ [Problem]
+ Memory leak.  Fix to glx 1.4 backport did not deallocate gem objects 
properly.  
  
- There has been some buzz the last days about excessive swapping and OOM
- conditions. It can seem like the kernel memory use is increasing since
- the user processes seem not to grow unusually.
+ [Background]
+ Red Hat backported glx 1.3 and 1.4 support from xserver 1.8.  These patches 
were taken by Debian as patches 03_fedora_glx_versioning.diff and 
04_fedora_glx14-swrast.diff.  Other distros using xserver 1.7 have likewise 
adopted these backports.
+ 
+ Subsequent testing by Ubuntu identified an xserver crash that occurs
+ with these patches enabled when closing Clutter apps.  A partial fix was
+ implemented, and the issue believed fixed, but as further testing and
+ analysis has been done it's come to light that a slow memory leak is
+ present, causing issues such as described below, which can result in
+ system instability after a day or two of uptime (depending on memory
+ quantity and usage).
+ 
+ Following these findings, Debian has dropped the glx patches.  Ubuntu is
+ evaluating fixing the patches vs. following Debian's approach, being
+ mindful of any userspace apps that may have come to depend on glx
+ 1.3/1.4 functionality.
+ 
+ [Original Report]
+ There has been some buzz the last days about excessive swapping and OOM 
conditions. It can seem like the kernel memory use is increasing since the user 
processes seem not to grow unusually.
  
  /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects shows that the GEM object bytes
  number is increasing. One way to reproduce, is this:
  
  $ for t in `seq 1 10`; do eog /usr/share/backgrounds ; echo `grep object 
bytes /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects` `ps ocomm,vsz,rss 1020|grep X`; done
  142376960 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  145907712 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  150458368 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  154816512 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  159244288 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  163721216 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  168148992 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  172699648 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  177152000 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  181530624 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  
  It shows that the Xorg process is not growing, but gem objects are. Similarly 
counting and summing objects show there are gem objects adding up (with 
refcount 2) but not disappearing again when the application closes:
-  awk '/name/{ i++; s+= $4 } END{print i   s}' 
/sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_names
+  awk '/name/{ i++; s+= $4 } END{print i   s}' 
/sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_names
  
  These issues have been seen on intel and ati, with the lucid kernel as
  well as the mainline 2.6.34 snapshot.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.5+5ubuntu1
  Uname: Linux 2.6.34-999-generic i686
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Sun Apr 18 15:59:21 2010
  ProcEnviron:
-  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: xorg
  system:
-  distro: Ubuntu
-  codename:   lucid
-  architecture:   i686
-  kernel: 2.6.34-999-generic
+  distro: Ubuntu
+  codename:   lucid
+  architecture:   i686
+  kernel: 2.6.34-999-generic

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Description changed:

  [Problem]
- Memory leak.  Fix to glx 1.4 backport did not deallocate gem objects 
properly.  
+ Memory leak.  Fix to glx 1.4 backport did not deallocate gem objects properly.
  
  [Background]
  Red Hat backported glx 1.3 and 1.4 support from xserver 1.8.  These patches 
were taken by Debian as patches 03_fedora_glx_versioning.diff and 
04_fedora_glx14-swrast.diff.  Other distros using xserver 1.7 have likewise 
adopted these backports.
  
  Subsequent testing by Ubuntu identified an xserver crash that occurs
  with these patches enabled when closing Clutter apps.  A partial fix was
- implemented, and the issue believed fixed, but as further testing and
- analysis has been done it's come to light that a slow memory leak is
+ implemented in Ubuntu based on upstream work, and the issue believed
+ solved, but further testing has shown that a slow memory leak is
  present, causing issues such as described below, which can result in
  system instability after a day or two of uptime (depending on memory
  quantity and usage).
  
  Following these findings, Debian has dropped the glx patches.  Ubuntu is
  evaluating fixing the patches vs. following Debian's approach, being
  mindful of any userspace apps that may have come to depend on glx
  1.3/1.4 functionality.
  
  [Original Report]
  There has been some buzz the last days about excessive swapping and OOM 
conditions. It can seem like the kernel memory use is increasing since the user 
processes seem not to grow unusually.
  
  /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects shows that the GEM object bytes
  number is increasing. One way to reproduce, is this:
  
  $ for t in `seq 1 10`; do eog /usr/share/backgrounds ; echo `grep object 
bytes /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects` `ps ocomm,vsz,rss 1020|grep X`; done
  142376960 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  145907712 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  150458368 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  154816512 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  159244288 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  163721216 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  168148992 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  172699648 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  177152000 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  181530624 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  
  It shows that the Xorg process is not growing, but gem objects are. Similarly 
counting and summing objects show there are gem objects adding up (with 
refcount 2) but not disappearing again when the application closes:
   awk '/name/{ i++; s+= $4 } END{print i   s}' 
/sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_names
  
  These issues have been seen on intel and ati, with the lucid kernel as
  well as the mainline 2.6.34 snapshot.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.5+5ubuntu1
  Uname: Linux 2.6.34-999-generic i686
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Sun Apr 18 15:59:21 2010
  ProcEnviron:
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: xorg
  system:
   distro: Ubuntu
   codename:   lucid
   architecture:   i686
   kernel: 2.6.34-999-generic

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Description changed:

  [Problem]
  Memory leak.  Fix to glx 1.4 backport did not deallocate gem objects properly.
  
  [Background]
- Red Hat backported glx 1.3 and 1.4 support from xserver 1.8.  These patches 
were taken by Debian as patches 03_fedora_glx_versioning.diff and 
04_fedora_glx14-swrast.diff.  Other distros using xserver 1.7 have likewise 
adopted these backports.
+ Red Hat backported glx 1.3 and 1.4 support from xserver 1.8.  These patches 
were taken by Debian as patches 03_fedora_glx_versioning.diff and 
04_fedora_glx14-swrast.diff, and so Ubuntu took them in order to remain in sync 
with Debian.  Other distros using xserver 1.7 have likewise adopted these 
backports.
  
  Subsequent testing by Ubuntu identified an xserver crash that occurs
  with these patches enabled when closing Clutter apps.  A partial fix was
  implemented in Ubuntu based on upstream work, and the issue believed
  solved, but further testing has shown that a slow memory leak is
  present, causing issues such as described below, which can result in
  system instability after a day or two of uptime (depending on memory
- quantity and usage).
+ quantity and usage).  Distros that don't include support for Clutter
+ obviously won't see the bugs.
  
  Following these findings, Debian has dropped the glx patches.  Ubuntu is
  evaluating fixing the patches vs. following Debian's approach, being
  mindful of any userspace apps that may have come to depend on glx
  1.3/1.4 functionality.
  
  [Original Report]
  There has been some buzz the last days about excessive swapping and OOM 
conditions. It can seem like the kernel memory use is increasing since the user 
processes seem not to grow unusually.
  
  /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects shows that the GEM object bytes
  number is increasing. One way to reproduce, is this:
  
  $ for t in `seq 1 10`; do eog /usr/share/backgrounds ; echo `grep object 
bytes /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects` `ps ocomm,vsz,rss 1020|grep X`; done
  142376960 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  145907712 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  150458368 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  154816512 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  159244288 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  163721216 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  168148992 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  172699648 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  177152000 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  181530624 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  
  It shows that the Xorg process is not growing, but gem objects are. Similarly 
counting and summing objects show there are gem objects adding up (with 
refcount 2) but not disappearing again when the application closes:
   awk '/name/{ i++; s+= $4 } END{print i   s}' 
/sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_names
  
  These issues have been seen on intel and ati, with the lucid kernel as
  well as the mainline 2.6.34 snapshot.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.5+5ubuntu1
  Uname: Linux 2.6.34-999-generic i686
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Sun Apr 18 15:59:21 2010
  ProcEnviron:
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: xorg
  system:
   distro: Ubuntu
   codename:   lucid
   architecture:   i686
   kernel: 2.6.34-999-generic

** Description changed:

  [Problem]
  Memory leak.  Fix to glx 1.4 backport did not deallocate gem objects properly.
  
  [Background]
- Red Hat backported glx 1.3 and 1.4 support from xserver 1.8.  These patches 
were taken by Debian as patches 03_fedora_glx_versioning.diff and 
04_fedora_glx14-swrast.diff, and so Ubuntu took them in order to remain in sync 
with Debian.  Other distros using xserver 1.7 have likewise adopted these 
backports.
+ Red Hat backported glx 1.3 and 1.4 support from xserver 1.8.  These patches 
were taken by Debian as patches 03_fedora_glx_versioning.diff and 
04_fedora_glx14-swrast.diff.  Other distros using xserver 1.7 have likewise 
adopted these backports.
  
  Subsequent testing by Ubuntu identified an xserver crash that occurs
  with these patches enabled when closing Clutter apps.  A partial fix was
  implemented in Ubuntu based on upstream work, and the issue believed
  solved, but further testing has shown that a slow memory leak is
  present, causing issues such as described below, which can result in
  system instability after a day or two of uptime (depending on memory
- quantity and usage).  Distros that don't include support for Clutter
- obviously won't see the bugs.
+ quantity and usage).
  
  Following these findings, Debian has dropped the glx patches.  Ubuntu is
  evaluating fixing the patches vs. following Debian's approach, being
  mindful of any userspace apps that may have come to depend on glx
  1.3/1.4 functionality.
  
  [Original Report]
  There has been some buzz the last days about excessive swapping and OOM 
conditions. It can seem like the kernel memory use is increasing since the user 
processes seem not to grow unusually.
  
  /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects shows that 

[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread Kees Cook
** Description changed:

  [Problem]
  Memory leak.  Fix to glx 1.4 backport did not deallocate gem objects properly.
  
  [Background]
- Red Hat backported glx 1.3 and 1.4 support from xserver 1.8.  These patches 
were taken by Debian as patches 03_fedora_glx_versioning.diff and 
04_fedora_glx14-swrast.diff.  Other distros using xserver 1.7 have likewise 
adopted these backports.
+ Red Hat backported glx 1.3 and 1.4 support from xserver 1.8.  These patches 
were taken by Debian as patches 03_fedora_glx_versioning.diff and 
04_fedora_glx14-swrast.diff, and so Ubuntu took them in order to remain in sync 
with Debian.  Other distros using xserver 1.7 have likewise adopted these 
backports.
  
  Subsequent testing by Ubuntu identified an xserver crash that occurs
  with these patches enabled when closing Clutter apps.  A partial fix was
  implemented in Ubuntu based on upstream work, and the issue believed
  solved, but further testing has shown that a slow memory leak is
  present, causing issues such as described below, which can result in
  system instability after a day or two of uptime (depending on memory
- quantity and usage).
+ quantity and usage).  Distros that don't include support for Clutter
+ obviously won't see the bugs.
  
  Following these findings, Debian has dropped the glx patches.  Ubuntu is
  evaluating fixing the patches vs. following Debian's approach, being
  mindful of any userspace apps that may have come to depend on glx
  1.3/1.4 functionality.
  
  [Original Report]
  There has been some buzz the last days about excessive swapping and OOM 
conditions. It can seem like the kernel memory use is increasing since the user 
processes seem not to grow unusually.
  
  /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects shows that the GEM object bytes
  number is increasing. One way to reproduce, is this:
  
- $ for t in `seq 1 10`; do eog /usr/share/backgrounds ; echo `grep object 
bytes /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects` `ps ocomm,vsz,rss $(pidof X)|grep 
X`; done
+ $ for t in `seq 1 10`; do eog /usr/share/backgrounds ; echo `grep object 
bytes /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects` `ps --noheaders ocomm,vsz,rss 
($pidof X)`; done
  142376960 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  145907712 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  150458368 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  154816512 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  159244288 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  163721216 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  168148992 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  172699648 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  177152000 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  181530624 object bytes Xorg 25812 15372
  
  It shows that the Xorg process is not growing, but gem objects are. Similarly 
counting and summing objects show there are gem objects adding up (with 
refcount 2) but not disappearing again when the application closes:
   awk '/name/{ i++; s+= $4 } END{print i   s}' 
/sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_names
  
  These issues have been seen on intel and ati, with the lucid kernel as
  well as the mainline 2.6.34 snapshot.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.5+5ubuntu1
  Uname: Linux 2.6.34-999-generic i686
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Sun Apr 18 15:59:21 2010
  ProcEnviron:
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: xorg
  system:
   distro: Ubuntu
   codename:   lucid
   architecture:   i686
   kernel: 2.6.34-999-generic

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 09:19:49PM -, Andy wrote:
 I am running Lucid in Virtualbox with Compiz enabled.  Host Machine is 
 Nvidia.  I just ran all the updates
 then rebooted and checked my version  

The -nvidia binary driver includes its own GLX library, so this bug is
completely irrelevant in that case.  Virtualbox also includes its own
video driver, although dunno what it does for glx.  In any case, your
configuration does not sound like one that requires being tested, but
thanks for the feedback.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread discord
I've  been running the beta for a couple of months,

00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS,
943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)

and I haven't been affected either. I tried the script above to test,
but the script didn't work. Seems there's no bug on the 945 and 965
chipsets.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread discord
whoops, thought I wasn't affected, but after running a clip through vlc
for half an hour, my memory usage started to increase sharply. I'm not
sure this has always been a problem since I've been running testing for
quite awhile and watched dvds without issue a couple of times..

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread Conn O Griofa
Unfortunately, this proposed X server update has not resolved the
problem on my system. I'm using a stock Ubuntu Lucid installation,
compiz enabled, and with the proposed X server update.

c...@nx9010:~$ lspci | grep VGA
01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon IGP 
330M/340M/350M

c...@nx9010:~$ glxinfo | grep GLX version
GLX version: 1.2

After approximately one hour uptime (watching a Flash video [1]), I
noticed the system becoming sluggish, especially scrolling pages in
Firefox. This is the output which I captured shortly after noticing the
sluggishness had begun:

c...@nx9010:~$ pid=`pidof X` ; for t in `seq 1 10`; do eog 
/usr/share/backgrounds ; echo `grep object bytes 
/sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects` `ps ocomm,vsz,rss $pid |grep X`; done
290811904 object bytes Xorg 32120 24264
292790272 object bytes Xorg 32120 24264
294481920 object bytes Xorg 32120 24264
295972864 object bytes Xorg 32120 24264
297984000 object bytes Xorg 32120 24264
302874624 object bytes Xorg 32120 24264
304979968 object bytes Xorg 32888 24840
306962432 object bytes Xorg 32120 24264
308514816 object bytes Xorg 32120 24264
310161408 object bytes Xorg 32120 24264

There also seems to be something strange with the GEM pinned/gtt counts:

c...@nx9010:~$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects
1212 objects
308838400 object bytes
0 pinned
0 pin bytes
0 gtt bytes
0 gtt total

I was aware of the memory leak in KMS for some time, but only discovered
this bug report today. Aside from disabling KMS, the only way in which I
was able to stop this memory leak was to use a combination of the xorg-
edgers packages and the mainline kernel 2.6.34-rc5.

I am unsure which specific component eliminated the problem, but the
problem disappeared only after installing kernel 2.6.34-rc5 [2] (which
may or may not be coincidence, as an update in one of the xorg-edgers
packages may have really solved the issue). I will now test the xorg-
edgers packages against the official 2.6.32-21-generic kernel to try to
isolate the problem.

If you require any more information or a separate bug report filed,
please let me know.

[1] http://www.southparkstudios.com/episodes/103922/
[2] http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v2.6.34-rc5-lucid/

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread Conn O Griofa
Update on comment #33:

I managed to have a quick word with David Airlie, and he told me that
the radeon driver does not report the pinned/pin/gtt values, so that's
not an issue.

Here are some results from kernel 2.6.34-rc5 with the latest xorg-edgers
packages [1]:

c...@nx9010:~$ glxinfo | grep GLX version
GLX version: 1.4

c...@nx9010:~$ pid=`pidof X` ; for t in `seq 1 10`; do eog 
/usr/share/backgrounds ; echo `grep object bytes 
/sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects` `ps ocomm,vsz,rss $pid |grep X`; done
317861888 object bytes Xorg 23524 15108
319795200 object bytes Xorg 23524 15120
321794048 object bytes Xorg 23524 15120
323530752 object bytes Xorg 24292 15696
328589312 object bytes Xorg 24292 15696
329527296 object bytes Xorg 24292 15696
329826304 object bytes Xorg 23524 15120
331714560 object bytes Xorg 23524 15128
333737984 object bytes Xorg 23524 15168
335695872 object bytes Xorg 23524 15168

The results are almost identical to comment #33 - however, I am
experiencing absolutely no slowdown or sluggishness despite the same
high object count. Perhaps the bug is still present, but the driver or X
server is more resistant to the GEM leak, somehow.

[1] current xorg-edgers X server version:
2:1.7.6.901+git20100413+server-1.7-nominations.e7ab6537-0ubuntu0sarvatt3.
Upon inspecting the source, this build uses the same patches as
mentioned in this bug's description, which probably means that the
memory leak is to be expected. Why the slowdown does not occur is still
a mystery, though.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread Conn O Griofa
Using kernel 2.6.32-21-generic and xorg-edgers packages:

After just 10 minutes uptime the slowdown has occurred, with a lower
object bytes count than before. Here is the output at the point in which
the slowdown became noticeable:

c...@nx9010:~$ pid=`pidof X` ; for t in `seq 1 10`; do eog 
/usr/share/backgrounds ; echo `grep object bytes 
/sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects` `ps ocomm,vsz,rss $pid |grep X`; done
156647424 object bytes Xorg 26912 18948
158511104 object bytes Xorg 26912 18948
163356672 object bytes Xorg 27680 19524
162840576 object bytes Xorg 27680 19524
164474880 object bytes Xorg 26912 18948
166895616 object bytes Xorg 21808 13844
168878080 object bytes Xorg 21808 13844
170754048 object bytes Xorg 21808 13844
172756992 object bytes Xorg 21808 13844
174747648 object bytes Xorg 21808 13844

Conclusion: in the case of my particular system, the memory leak is
occurring in all cases (with or without the X server update or xorg-
edgers packages), but the slowdown can be avoided by using the
2.6.34-rc5 kernel.

I have just one more combination to test: kernel 2.6.34-rc5 + stock
drivers (i.e., no xorg-edgers packages) + the proposed X server update.
After that, I promise to stop spamming this bug ;).

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread Conn O Griofa
Final test: kernel 2.6.34-rc5 + stock drivers + proposed X server
update.

X server uptime: approximately 1 hour.

c...@nx9010:~$ glxinfo | grep GLX version
GLX version: 1.2

c...@nx9010:~$ pid=`pidof X` ; for t in `seq 1 10`; do eog 
/usr/share/backgrounds ; echo `grep object bytes 
/sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects` `ps ocomm,vsz,rss $pid |grep X`; done
372658176 object bytes Xorg 32400 19844
374898688 object bytes Xorg 32400 19900
376623104 object bytes Xorg 32400 19840
378945536 object bytes Xorg 32400 19800
380846080 object bytes Xorg 32400 19712
382578688 object bytes Xorg 32400 19712
384847872 object bytes Xorg 32400 19712
386646016 object bytes Xorg 32400 19712
32432 object bytes Xorg 32400 19712
390582272 object bytes Xorg 32400 18480

As you can see, the leak is still occurring. After reaching ~300MB in
object bytes, the computer began to slow down due to excessive I/O and
disk swapping, so applications were slower to load and respond; however,
in periods of calm I/O activity, graphics performance is absolutely
fine. I see no graphical slowdown whatsoever!

To summarise:
Kernel 2.6.32-21-generic + proposed X server from this bug report = memory 
leak, graphical slowdown
Kernel 2.6.32-21-generic + xorg-edgers packages = memory leak, graphical 
slowdown
Kernel 2.6.34-rc5 + proposed X server from this bug report = memory leak, no 
discernible graphical slowdown
Kernel 2.6.34-rc5 + xorg-edgers package = memory leak, no discernible graphical 
slowdown

In other words: 
a) I get a memory leak in all cases, with or without the patched X server;
b) the newer kernel eliminates any graphical performance impact from the memory 
leak.

I'm not sure in what direction to proceed; since it seems that most
people are seeing the bug fixed, perhaps this is a separate leak that's
not related to 03_fedora_glx_versioning.diff and
04_fedora_glx14-swrast.diff. Shall I file a new bug, and if so, against
what component?

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread Petar Velkovski
Conn O Griofa  I believe you are misinterpreting the results (or the
test is not reliable indication of the memory leak). This is how I know
that the patch works. I have a System Monitor active in my top panel.
Right click the System Monitor and select Memory in Monitored Resources
(if not already selected).Below for the Colors option choose Memory
and set 5 different colours for User, Shared, Buffers, Cached, Free.
What interests you is the colour for Cached memory. Start using your
computer. Open Firefox, Office, play a movie and you'll notice that the
Cached memory increases. Once your Cached memory takes significant
amount of RAM, try executing this commands:

sync
sudo sh -c echo 3  /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches

This should clear the cached memory (not entirely, but I suppose this is
a normal behaviour). For instance after executing this command on my
system the System Monitors says that 27% of my computers memory is used
by programs and 18% is used as cache (it was 31% used by programs, 63%
used as cache before the execution). And my system uses the xorg package
from https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/x-updates, which
solves the memory leak problem for me. If there is a memory leak, the
previous command will be able the release only small portion of the
cached memory. So even if it manages to release half of the cached
memory on the first try, this is still an indication that there is a
memory leak.

Also keep in mind that the system is automatically droping the cache memory 
from time to time. So try this:
1.Open an application(s) using a lot of memory (OpenOffice Write, Firefox, Gimp 
etc.)
2. execute:
cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects | grep 'object bytes'
3. wait for a few seconds (5, 10, 15 sec)
4. repeat procedures 2 and 3 a few times
5. Close the application(s) using a lot of memory
6. Do procedure 2 and 3 (one or two times)

If during following the procedure above the object bytes number NEVER
decreases then you do have a memory leak. If the number oscillates (for
exsample goes up, down, up, up, down) then you are fine and there should
be no memory leak.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread Conn O Griofa
Peter Velkovski,

Thanks for the suggestion, but on my system - even if I close all
applications on the running X server - the GEM object bytes value
*never* decreases. Freeing the pagecache, dentries and inodes (as you
suggest) makes no difference at any point.

The only way to reduce the ever-increasing GEM allocation is to restart
the running X server. At the conclusion of all my tests (comments
#33-36), I always stopped GDM, switched to a VT, and checked the values
in /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects. With no X server running, the
object bytes allocation is usually reduced to ~30MB.

Let me also clarify something: In comments #33-36, I neglected to
mention that by patched X server, I was referring to version
2:1.7.6-2ubuntu7~xup2 from the X-Updates PPA.

I have subsequently tried to test version 2:1.7.6-2ubuntu7.5 from
https://edge.launchpad.net/~sarvatt/+archive/bugs and noted the
following:

GDM starts up and I can enter my login credentials, but I get stuck at
the purple wallpaper with no other graphical elements loading. The
pointer is responsive and I can switch to a VT (which I do). At this
point I check the kernel and Xorg.0.log, but see no errors or useful
output from the tail sections. When I try to switch from the VT back to
the running server, my system freezes and I am forced to power cycle the
system.

It seems to me that the 2ubuntu7.5 packaged with the backported fixes
has the bigger potential for regressions. As for my particular system, I
guess that my last recourse it to test a vanilla 1.8 server to see if
that fixes the memory leak.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-20 Thread Tormod Volden
In that case I think the discussion here is relevant:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26394 and the Track DRI2
drawables as resources, not privates thread on xorg-devel ML, with four
glx commits on xserver master 2010-04-16.


** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #26394
   http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26394

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-20 Thread Tormod Volden
A link to the ML thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg.devel/6829/focus=7229

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-20 Thread William Grant
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) = xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-20 Thread Vish
Downgrading to xorg-server -2ubuntu1 does prevent the memory problems .

** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-20 Thread Sebastian Martinez
perhaps is my problem too

cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects
3640 objects
1269358592 object bytes
4 pinned
13766656 pin bytes
111054848 gtt bytes
234881024 gtt total

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-20 Thread Tournier Mathieu
I think this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-
server/+bug/564636 is a duplicate of this bug

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-20 Thread Tormod Volden
Running xorg-edgers xserver 1.8 now with
114_dri2_make_sure_x_drawable_exists.patch dropped (thanks Sarvatt!) and
the problem can not be reproduced.

-- 
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


  1   2   >