[Bug 575293] Re: mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0

2015-06-17 Thread Rolf Leggewie
lucid has seen the end of its life and is no longer receiving any
updates. Marking the lucid task for this ticket as Won't Fix.

** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575293

Title:
  mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/575293/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 575293] Re: mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0

2013-09-13 Thread Steve Langasek
Based on the bug comment history, I don't believe there are any further
changes to be made to mountall here.  If I've overlooked something,
please reopen.

** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575293

Title:
  mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/575293/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 575293] Re: mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0

2012-05-23 Thread Paul Crawford
OK, that makes sense. I had assumed this was a check-only pass through
fstab

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575293

Title:
  mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/575293/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 575293] Re: mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0

2012-05-20 Thread Paul Crawford
The original problem, though sadly I did not post the exact messages,
was saying it could not run fsck.cifs (which of course is non-existent).
The bug in this case was that with pass=0 it should not even have tried
to run a check on boot-up.

The bug now is the same underlying problem, that during the initial pass
though fstab to do any file system checks during booting it is trying to
mount the CIFS systems which (a) won't work as networking, etc, is not
up yet, and (B) the log-in credentials are missing as they are on my
/home partition, also not mounted yet.

Basically the problem is at this stage it should only be considering
locally mounted file systems, as anything else cannot be mounted until
the system has booted further and has networking, samba, nfsd, etc, are
up.

Maybe even stronger, it should not bother at this stage with anything if
pass=0 since you are basically telling it not to check things.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575293

Title:
  mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/575293/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 575293] Re: mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0

2012-05-20 Thread Paul Crawford
The current (64-bit 10.04) boot.log file has messages such as these
appearing:

error -1 (Unknown error 18446744073709551615) opening credential file 
/home/paul/.smbcredentials
mountall: mount /media/swdev [1087] terminated with status 1
mount error: could not resolve address for smb: Temporary failure in name 
resolution
No ip address specified and hostname not found

Again, not a surprise given this is before partitions such as /home are
mounted, and before networking, NIS, samba, etc, are up.


** Attachment added: boot.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/575293/+attachment/3154947/+files/boot.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575293

Title:
  mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/575293/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 575293] Re: mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0

2012-05-20 Thread Steve Langasek
Ok;  the error message for fsck.cifs has been resolved now via bug
#838091.  I don't know if mountall is still trying to find fsck for
filesystems with pass=0 set - it's not meant to, and the code is written
to specifically avoid fscking them.

 The bug now is the same underlying problem, that during the initial pass
 though fstab to do any file system checks during booting it is trying to
 mount the CIFS systems which (a) won't work as networking, etc, is not
 up yet, and (B) the log-in credentials are missing as they are on my
 /home partition, also not mounted yet.

So I don't agree that a) is a problem.  networking *may or may not* be
up at the time mountall first tries to mount the filesystems; and
networking may be *partially* up, but the route to the required server
may not be up yet.  mountall cannot sanely determine the right time to
try to mount the network filesystems, so it does the only reasonable
thing and tries to mount them at startup, and if that fails, tries to
mount them again each time a network device comes up (and signals
mountall with SIGUSR1).

b) however means that you have a dependency between your mounts, and
that's not something that mountall is designed to cope with.  It's not
going to introspect the fstab options for each filesystem type to detect
when a mount has dependencies on files stored on other filesystems.  For
your use case, I think the only appropriate solution is to mark the
filesystem 'noauto' and use an upstart like this to mount it at the
right time:

  start on mounted MOUNTPOINT=/home and network-device-up IFACE=$my_interface
  task
  pre-start exec mount /media/swdev

We could conceivably *also* hide the error messages from mount rather
than displaying them since we know that in many cases they will be
spurious; but then how do we ensure debuggability of the system when
there really is a problem with a network mount?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575293

Title:
  mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/575293/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 575293] Re: mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0

2012-05-20 Thread Steve Langasek
oops, I think that 'task' bit in the sample upstart job is wrong.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575293

Title:
  mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/575293/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 575293] Re: mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0

2012-05-19 Thread Steve Langasek
The bug description talks about checking mounts with pass=0; but the log
output included in the bug shows errors when trying to *mount* the cifs
mounts.  What exactly is the problem you're experiencing?

** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575293

Title:
  mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/575293/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 575293] Re: mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0

2011-06-14 Thread Colin Watson
** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu Lucid)
 Assignee: Canonical Foundations Team (canonical-foundations) = James Hunt 
(jamesodhunt)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575293

Title:
  mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/575293/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 575293] Re: mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0

2010-12-21 Thread Robbie Williamson
** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** Also affects: mountall (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Importance: Undecided = Low

** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu Lucid)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Canonical Foundations Team 
(canonical-foundations)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575293

Title:
  mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 575293] Re: mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0

2010-05-31 Thread Paul Crawford
It seems my system has been updated to 2.15 but there are still the odd 
warnings about CIFS mounts in fstab
Also the stage 2 of 3 pass had no text on the plymouth screen, but it came back 
for stage 3 of 3.

-- 
mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575293
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 575293] Re: mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0

2010-05-30 Thread yeti
mountall 2.15 is available as a backport to 10.04 LTS.
Try apt or synaptic.
Dev group is working on (at least) mountall 2.5, but I don't know where you'd 
get that.
I don't know if either of these will help, but it may be worth a try at least 
for 2.15

-- 
mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575293
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 575293] Re: mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0

2010-05-30 Thread yeti
Forget the previous mountall 2.5 comment, that's a much earlier version
of mountall.

I'm not happy that mountall 2.15 forces long-winded fscks of presumably
clean ext3 partitions.  In my case, it's a trivial two-minute wait, once
every 20 mounts, but I don't think this delay should be there for a
journaled system mounted read-only.

-- 
mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575293
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 575293] Re: mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0

2010-05-05 Thread Paul Crawford
Tested again with updates from Arand's unstable PPA for plymouth and
mountall (though mountall --version still says 2.14!?) and it still
complains about CIFS mounts when I forced a check of file systems:

sudo touch /forcefsck

reboot

boot.log shows:

fsck from util-linux-ng 2.17.2

/dev/sda7: 169050/3227648 files (0.1% non-contiguous), 1662457/12893952
blocks

mount error: cifs filesystem not supported by the system

mount error(19): No such device

Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs)

mount error: cifs filesystem not supported by the system

mount error(19): No such device

Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs)

mount error: cifs filesystem not supported by the system

mount error(19): No such device

Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs)

mountall: mount /media/scratch [877] terminated with status 32

mountall: mount /media/mp3 [881] terminated with status 32

mountall: mount /media/pscpc [869] terminated with status 32

-- 
mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575293
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs