[Bug 582035] Re: User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum

2011-09-19 Thread Ubuntu QA's Bug Bot
** Tags added: testcase

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582035

Title:
  User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while
  setting block group checksum

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/e2fsprogs/+bug/582035/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 582035] Re: User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum

2010-10-21 Thread Martin Pitt
Copied to lucid-updates. Closing manually due to typo in the changelog.

** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

-- 
User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting 
block group checksum
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582035
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 582035] Re: User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum

2010-10-06 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
SRU verification for Lucid:
I have reproduced the problem with e2fsprogs 1.41.11-1ubuntu2 in lucid and have 
verified that the version of e2fsprogs 1.41.11-1ubuntu2.1 in -proposed fixes 
the issue.

Marking as verification-done


** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: e2fsprogs
  
  Parents: Bug #571707 and Bug #577331
  
  PROBLEM
  
  Whenever fsck is cancelled by user, this error message is given:
  fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum info
  And the exit status of fsck is 8
  
  (This leads to plymouth/mountall reporting Serious errors on the
  filesystem in question when fsck is cancelled during boot, and acting
  accordingly.)
  
  TEST CASE
+ 1. Force a fsck at boot time
+   $ sudo touch /forcefsck
+ 2. Reboot your system
+ 3. When the 'Checking filesystem' prompt is displayed press 'C' to cancel
+ 4. Finish the boot sequence
+ 5. Check the content of /var/log/boot.log
  
- $ sudo fsck -f /dev/sda1
- [Ctrl+C]
- *error is reported
- !error should not be reported(?)
+ VERIFICATION-DONE
+ The boot.log contains
+ -
+ fsck from util-linux-ng 2.17.2
+ User cancelled filesystem checks
+ /dev/sda1: e2fsck canceled.
+ mountall: fsck / [235] terminated with status 32
+ -
+ 
+ VERIFICATION-FAILED
+ The boot.log contains
+ -
+ fsck from util-linux-ng 2.17.2
+ User cancelled filesystem checks
+ /dev/sda1: e2fsck canceled.
+ fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum info
+ mountall: fsck / [234] terminated with status 8
+ mountall: Unrecoverable fsck error: /
+ -
+ 
  
  OBSERVATIONS
  
  Seen on both lucid and maverick in virtualbox, and confirmed by Benjamin
  Kay on lucid non-virtual (
  
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+source/mountall/+bug/577331/comments/21
  )
  
  Same error is seen when running from maintenance shell on boot, or
  liveCD.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
  Package: e2fsprogs 1.41.11-1ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.34-2.9-generic 2.6.34-rc7
  Uname: Linux 2.6.34-2-generic i686
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Tue May 18 02:24:53 2010
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429)
  ProcEnviron:
   LANG=en_GB.utf8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: e2fsprogs

** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags removed: verification-needed

-- 
User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting 
block group checksum
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582035
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 582035] Re: User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum

2010-08-17 Thread Martin Pitt
Accepted e2fsprogs into lucid-proposed, the package will build now and
be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting 
block group checksum
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582035
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 582035] Re: User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum

2010-08-07 Thread John Dong
ACK from SRU team.

-- 
User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting 
block group checksum
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582035
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 582035] Re: User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum

2010-08-03 Thread Jonathan Riddell
waiting for ubuntu-sru approval

-- 
User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting 
block group checksum
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582035
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 582035] Re: User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum

2010-08-01 Thread Benjamin Drung
uploaded to lucid-proposed

** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: New = Fix Committed

-- 
User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting 
block group checksum
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582035
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 582035] Re: User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum

2010-06-19 Thread Benjamin Drung
** Also affects: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting 
block group checksum
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582035
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 582035] Re: User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum

2010-06-08 Thread arand
** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting 
block group checksum
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582035
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 582035] Re: User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum

2010-06-08 Thread arand
Okay, with the new version this change is in the e2fsprogs in Maverick.

I would argue that this is something that'd be worth an SRU, hence
subscribing sponsors and sru teams.

Also fixing debdiff to use lucid-proposed instead.

** Patch added: proposed_e2fsprogs_1.41.11-1ubuntu2.1.debdiff
   
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49943082/proposed_e2fsprogs_1.41.11-1ubuntu2.1.debdiff

-- 
User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting 
block group checksum
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582035
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 582035] Re: User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum

2010-05-26 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 02:53:09AM -, arand wrote:
 Since this is a fairly common, and pretty ugly problem in lucid, I'll
 try getting an SRU in order.

Are you planning on taking all of 1.41.12, or just the relevant patch
from the e2fsprogs git tree?

- Ted

-- 
User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting 
block group checksum
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582035
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 582035] Re: User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum

2010-05-26 Thread arand
For the released 10.04 I was planning on just grabbing the commit in
question , since I'm not sure if a new version with more changes would
go well with the updating policy.

For in-devel 10.10 I hope we'll simply merge with the new version from
Debian (I was thinking I might try my luck at that, but I'll have to
check if the maintainer proper has plans for it).

-- 
User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting 
block group checksum
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582035
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 582035] Re: User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum

2010-05-26 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 02:03:55PM -, arand wrote:
 For the released 10.04 I was planning on just grabbing the commit in
 question , since I'm not sure if a new version with more changes would
 go well with the updating policy.

OK, great.  1.41.12 does fix a number of high priority bugs beyond the
commit which you've grabbed, but it does introduce one, which will be
fixed in 1.41.13 (to be released in a few days).

The unfixed bugs in Ubuntu's e2fsprogs are probably only going to
matter for server workloads, and that's OK, because the 2.6.32
kernel's ext4 is missing so many bug fixes it's really not going to be
ready for server-class workloads anyway.  (Hint: take a look at all of
the ext4 patches which Red Hat rawhide has taken for 2.6.32.)

 - Ted

-- 
User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting 
block group checksum
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582035
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 582035] Re: User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum

2010-05-26 Thread arand
Hmm, it could be a good idea, however the server side of things is
something I know nothing about, so I reckon it's completely someone
else's decision to take whether the other bug-fixes are 10.04-updates
material, or if indeed pulling the whole new version of e2fsprogs in
10.04 is the best way to go.

In the meantime, here is a debdiff for this particular issue, at least.

** Patch added: e2fsprogs_1.41.11-1ubuntu2.1.debdiff
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49139005/e2fsprogs_1.41.11-1ubuntu2.1.debdiff

-- 
User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting 
block group checksum
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582035
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 582035] Re: User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum

2010-05-26 Thread arand
Hmm, there really should be a LP reference in there, new debdiff,
removing the other.

As far as the Maverick version goes, Scott James Remnant indicated that
the Ubuntu package is in fact kept in git and will be simply pulled from
your (Ted's) tree, so it's not even going through Debian merging as I
previously though (provided I've understood things correctly this time
around...).

** Patch added: abiword_2.8.2-2ubuntu1.1.debdiff
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49140960/abiword_2.8.2-2ubuntu1.1.debdiff

** Patch removed: e2fsprogs_1.41.11-1ubuntu2.1.debdiff
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49139005/e2fsprogs_1.41.11-1ubuntu2.1.debdiff

-- 
User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting 
block group checksum
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582035
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 582035] Re: User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum

2010-05-26 Thread arand
Hmm, that is quite obviously the wrong debdiff, remove and re-attach...

** Patch added: e2fsprogs_1.41.11-1ubuntu2.1.debdiff
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49141293/e2fsprogs_1.41.11-1ubuntu2.1.debdiff

** Patch removed: abiword_2.8.2-2ubuntu1.1.debdiff
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49140960/abiword_2.8.2-2ubuntu1.1.debdiff

-- 
User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting 
block group checksum
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582035
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 582035] Re: User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum

2010-05-26 Thread Brian Murray
** Tags added: patch

-- 
User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting 
block group checksum
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582035
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 582035] Re: User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum

2010-05-25 Thread arand
Since this is a fairly common, and pretty ugly problem in lucid, I'll
try getting an SRU in order.

-- 
User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting 
block group checksum
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582035
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 582035] Re: User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum

2010-05-24 Thread arand
** Also affects: e2fsprogs
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: e2fsprogs
   Status: New = Fix Released

-- 
User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting 
block group checksum
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582035
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 582035] Re: User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum

2010-05-18 Thread arand
And thanks for the fast solution!

I can confirm that the new version of e2fsprogs (1.41.12) solves this bug on my 
system.
___

As far as packaging goes, it seems that if one only applies the old ubuntu 
.diff.gz and build straight off, the resulting e2fsprogs will depend on the old 
version of e2fslibs (shlibdeps hiccups in some way? Force-installing worked 
just fine as far as testing goes).
Just thought I'd put that down here for reference just in case, although since 
it's already in Debian, if we pull from there it might be a non-issue.

-- 
User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting 
block group checksum
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582035
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 582035] Re: User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum

2010-05-17 Thread arand

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48633416/Dependencies.txt

** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: e2fsprogs
  
  Parents: Bug #571707 and Bug #577331
  
  PROBLEM
  
  Whenever fsck is cancelled by user, this error message is given:
  fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum info
  And the exit status of fsck is 8
  
  (This leads to plymouth/mountall reporting Serious errors on the
  filesystem in question when fsck is cancelled during boot, and acting
  accordingly.)
  
  TEST CASE
  
  $ sudo fsck -f /dev/sda1
  [Ctrl+C]
  *error is reported
  !error should not be reported(?)
  
  OBSERVATIONS
  
  Seen on both lucid and maverick in virtualbox, and confirmed by Benjamin
  Kay on lucid non-virtual (
  
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+source/mountall/+bug/577331/comments/21
  )
  
+ Same error is seen when running from maintenance shell on boot, or
+ liveCD.
+ 
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
  Package: e2fsprogs 1.41.11-1ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.34-2.9-generic 2.6.34-rc7
  Uname: Linux 2.6.34-2-generic i686
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Tue May 18 02:24:53 2010
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429)
  ProcEnviron:
-  LANG=en_GB.utf8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  LANG=en_GB.utf8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: e2fsprogs

-- 
User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting 
block group checksum
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582035
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 582035] Re: User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum

2010-05-17 Thread arand
I talked with psusi (Phillip Susi) in #ubuntu-devel and he seemed to
have some interesting ideas, unfortunately I had absolutely no idea what
he was talking about (me not knowing the code, or any theory of
filesystems at all), so I though I would post it here for reference by
others.

Main points (edited):

Sounds like an assertion failure triggered by the sigint... search the code for 
that string.
Sounds like the canceling tries to do some cleanup in the SIGINT handler, and 
part of that cleanup is trying to write out the inode allocation bitmap, which 
an assertion check makes sure is actually loaded first and it isn't.
It may not be loaded either because it has not been loaded yet at the time of 
the SIGINT, or because that block group's inode allocation bitmap is 
uninitialized.

First thing I'd do is search the source code for the string Inode bitmap not 
loaded while
My guess is you will find an assert() with that string in it and that assertion 
is failing because of a race condition in which the inode allocation bitmap is 
not loaded yet, but should be eventually... and that could be a little tricky 
to fix.

But I have a feeling that probably it is not loaded because that block
group's inode table is uninitialized in the first place.. meaning there
are no inodes used in that block group so the allocation table is not
actually valid and a flag says it is unused, assume it's all empty.

Fixing that should be as simple as putting in a check for the
uninitialized flag in the code trying to flush the allocation bitmap and
bail out of it is set.

/lastlog attached for completeness

** Attachment added: psusi_fsck_ubuntu-devel_lp582035.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48636353/psusi_fsck_ubuntu-devel_lp582035.txt

** Tags added: lucid

-- 
User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting 
block group checksum
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582035
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 582035] Re: User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum

2010-05-17 Thread Theodore Ts'o
Thanks for the very clear bug report.  I wish all Ubuntu bug reports
were this clear!  :-)

The fix for this bug has been committed into the 'maint' branch of
e2fsprogs, and is commit 2e6436d.   This fix is in the (just-released)
e2fsprogs 1.41.12.

-- 
User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting 
block group checksum
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582035
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs