[Bug 592336] Re: Removal of aptitude from base installation

2010-07-01 Thread Colin Watson
It is really pretty trivial to add aptitude back if you want it - 'apt-
get install aptitude' is not hard for those who can handle aptitude in
the first place.  Also, the mention of the server installation shows
that whoever said it hadn't actually checked the maverick server
installation - it's still installed by default on servers (due to its
optional use for interactive package selection during server
installations).

Regarding upgrades, aptitude has a different dependency resolver which
handles things quite differently from apt-get, and the fact is that we
simply do not routinely test that dependency resolver.  I'd rather
encourage people to report dependency resolution problems in the tools
that we use by default (apt-get, update-manager, the release upgrader)
rather than retaining and encouraging the use of a forked toolset.

The base system is constantly tight on space, and everyone wants a piece
of that space.  I'm afraid we're going to have to continue to be pretty
brutal about what we include there.  But, as mentioned, aptitude is of
course not being removed from the Ubuntu repository as a whole.

-- 
Removal of aptitude from base installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592336
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 592336] Re: Removal of aptitude from base installation

2010-06-19 Thread m4v
fixed links in bug description

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: aptitude
  
  It has come to our attention that the developers want remove aptitude
  from the base installation again. Most of us that run a testing version
  use aptitude safe-upgrade, in order to not break the installation when
  upgrading new packages, especially when we've been notified of new
  packages that could cause severe breakage. I find aptitude with it's
  options is a very useful tool during testing, removing it will make the
  job a lot harder.
  
  NOTES ON THE DECISION
  (This is based on a conversation with Colin Watson on IRC and the references 
given)
  The initial rationale is basically size; approximately 2MB (which in the 
scope of things are very precious on the liveCD) will be gained by removing 
tasksel and aptitude.
  
  The initial reason why aptitude was included in ubuntu was that the
  desktop installer (ubiquity) depended on it, but now the desktop
  installer has been rewritten to not require it unless in particular
  cases, and hence it goes.
  
  The alternate install CD will still install aptitude and tasksel, since
  the debian-installer which is used in installation requires it.
  
  Likewise the server install of ubuntu will still include it (presumably
  also since it uses debian-installer)
  
- This was part of the "Maverick Spring Cleaning" which was discussed during 
UDS-M and is specified here: 
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubu...pring-cleaning
+ This was part of the "Maverick Spring Cleaning" which was discussed during 
UDS-M and is specified here: 
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-m-spring-cleaning
  As "Install tasksel and aptitude dynamically"
  
- More info here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FoundationsT...SpringCleaning
+ More info here: 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FoundationsTeam/Specs/MaverickSpringCleaning
  "We could substantially reduce the size of the minimal seed by installing 
tasksel and aptitude dynamically, so that we don't end up with them on 
live-installed systems. We will still need to keep tasksel in the server seed."
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
  Package: aptitude 0.4.11.11-1ubuntu10
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-2.3-generic 2.6.35-rc2
  Uname: Linux 2.6.35-2-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Thu Jun 10 09:52:34 2010
  EcryptfsInUse: Yes
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 (20100429)
  ProcEnviron:
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_CA.utf8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: aptitude

-- 
Removal of aptitude from base installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592336
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 592336] Re: Removal of aptitude from base installation

2010-06-18 Thread FreeUser
I use aptitude ALOT, especially to uninstall things.

And from my experince it's MUCH better to solve dependices than apt-get,
and at fixing broken packages.

Also Debians, documenation prefers aptitude over apt-get, and I belive
they have a good reasor for this.

http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-
reference/ch02.en.html#_basic_package_management_operations_with_commandline


Personally I can't belive such a great tool as aptiude should be deleted just 
to save a few MBs...

-- 
Removal of aptitude from base installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592336
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 592336] Re: Removal of aptitude from base installation

2010-06-13 Thread Verstraete Linard
It should remain included in the base install, since aptitude has the
value when things go wrong. If your system gets broken beyond just
fixing a configuration file, when you loose your comfy graphical
X-server, ... then aptitude's value is needed. And you (as a user for
who fixing a broken system isn't trivial, or as the person who needs to
fix it for someone else) can actually use it since it's already present.

-- 
Removal of aptitude from base installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592336
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 592336] Re: Removal of aptitude from base installation

2010-06-13 Thread Doug McMahon
cariboo907 wrote > I find aptitude with it's options is a very useful tool 
during testing, removing it will make the job a lot harder.
Then just install it, it's not like it's been removed from the repo's

The question is not whether aptitude has value (certainly does), but
whether it needs to be on the base install (live cd

Have not yet  seen any reasons presented as to why it needs to be
included.

-- 
Removal of aptitude from base installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592336
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 592336] Re: Removal of aptitude from base installation

2010-06-13 Thread lithorus
I find aptitude absolute essential.
+1 for keeping aptitude

-- 
Removal of aptitude from base installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592336
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 592336] Re: Removal of aptitude from base installation

2010-06-13 Thread kozimodo
+1 for keeping aptitude.

-- 
Removal of aptitude from base installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592336
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 592336] Re: Removal of aptitude from base installation

2010-06-12 Thread Iain Buclaw
Stephan, there are DVD installers available. And the 700MB CD-size
should never be knocked, as there are still quite a number of us who
still depend on it.

In the meantime, there is a discussion about this change in the
development ML, you can read it here: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives
/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2010-June/011659.html

Regards

-- 
Removal of aptitude from base installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592336
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 592336] Re: Removal of aptitude from base installation

2010-06-11 Thread Stephan Muhs
I also find aptitude more useful than apt-get in many cases and would
not want to see it omitted.

If 2 MB of space on the image is a concern, there are other ways to make
room: remove some wallpapers and other non-functional stuff on the Live-
CD. Also, at this point in time, one should start to consider if the
limitation to the 700MB CD-size isn't a bit archaic. Most any computer
nowadays has DVD capability and many "Live CDs" get copied to USB-sticks
anyway.

-- 
Removal of aptitude from base installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592336
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 592336] Re: Removal of aptitude from base installation

2010-06-11 Thread Philip Muškovac
Am I the only one that finds apt-cache search too limited? Aptitude has
search patterns
http://algebraicthunk.net/~dburrows/projects/aptitude/doc/en/ch02s03s05.html

-- 
Removal of aptitude from base installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592336
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 592336] Re: Removal of aptitude from base installation

2010-06-11 Thread Iain Buclaw
I'll be the bad guy here, and say that I +1 to aptitude's removal.

Most, if not all things you can do in aptitude can be done in apt-get,
apt-cache and dpkg, and at a quicker execution speed too.

Someone mentioned show and search. Why not use the below two instead?

apt-cache show pkg
apt-cache search regex

-- 
Removal of aptitude from base installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592336
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 592336] Re: Removal of aptitude from base installation

2010-06-11 Thread Philip Muškovac
This isn't a bug in aptitude but in the ubuntu meta packages where the
change happened.

** Package changed: aptitude (Ubuntu) => ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
Removal of aptitude from base installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592336
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 592336] Re: Removal of aptitude from base installation

2010-06-10 Thread oldos2er
 Please reconsider the decision to remove aptitude from the base
install. CLI tools are important for the desktop, as well as a server,
and we (Ubuntu desktop users) have few enough of them installed by
default as it is.

-- 
Removal of aptitude from base installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592336
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 592336] Re: Removal of aptitude from base installation

2010-06-10 Thread Irihapeti
I use aptitude (the ncurses interface) extensively when creating a
minimal install from a command-line version. I especially like the "no
recommends" option, which allows me to pick and choose components when
building up a system. apt-get requires me to know the exact name of a
package ahead of time, and often wants to install a whole lot of other
stuff that I don't want.

-- 
Removal of aptitude from base installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592336
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 592336] Re: Removal of aptitude from base installation

2010-06-10 Thread arand
Updated description with references to the decision.

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: aptitude
  
  It has come to our attention that the developers want remove aptitude
  from the base installation again. Most of us that run a testing version
  use aptitude safe-upgrade, in order to not break the installation when
  upgrading new packages, especially when we've been notified of new
  packages that could cause severe breakage. I find aptitude with it's
  options is a very useful tool during testing, removing it will make the
  job a lot harder.
+ 
+ NOTES ON THE DECISION
+ (This is based on a conversation with Colin Watson on IRC and the references 
given)
+ The initial rationale is basically size; approximately 2MB (which in the 
scope of things are very precious on the liveCD) will be gained by removing 
tasksel and aptitude.
+ 
+ The initial reason why aptitude was included in ubuntu was that the
+ desktop installer (ubiquity) depended on it, but now the desktop
+ installer has been rewritten to not require it unless in particular
+ cases, and hence it goes.
+ 
+ The alternate install CD will still install aptitude and tasksel, since
+ the debian-installer which is used in installation requires it.
+ 
+ Likewise the server install of ubuntu will still include it (presumably
+ also since it uses debian-installer)
+ 
+ This was part of the "Maverick Spring Cleaning" which was discussed during 
UDS-M and is specified here: 
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubu...pring-cleaning
+ As "Install tasksel and aptitude dynamically"
+ 
+ More info here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FoundationsT...SpringCleaning
+ "We could substantially reduce the size of the minimal seed by installing 
tasksel and aptitude dynamically, so that we don't end up with them on 
live-installed systems. We will still need to keep tasksel in the server seed."
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
  Package: aptitude 0.4.11.11-1ubuntu10
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-2.3-generic 2.6.35-rc2
  Uname: Linux 2.6.35-2-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Thu Jun 10 09:52:34 2010
  EcryptfsInUse: Yes
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 (20100429)
  ProcEnviron:
-  PATH=(custom, no user)
-  LANG=en_CA.utf8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  PATH=(custom, no user)
+  LANG=en_CA.utf8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: aptitude

-- 
Removal of aptitude from base installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592336
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 592336] Re: Removal of aptitude from base installation

2010-06-10 Thread Tim Cuthbertson
aptitude is the only package manager I use, 99% of the time. Please keep
it in the base installation. Thank you.

-- 
Removal of aptitude from base installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592336
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 592336] Re: Removal of aptitude from base installation

2010-06-10 Thread vmc
I use Aptitude and all its functions, including "show", "search", etc.
Please include it back in the tool set. There's a lot of features that
Aptitude brings that just can't be replaced!

-- 
Removal of aptitude from base installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592336
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 592336] Re: Removal of aptitude from base installation

2010-06-10 Thread Tom Pino
This is a tool that is not only handy in testing, there are times when
it is just the best thing for the job and those are times when it may be
real hard to get it due to malfunctions in other package tools.

We have several partitioners, sfdisk is I would say little used.  It
would be easy to install, for those who even know about it, using
aptitude.

-- 
Removal of aptitude from base installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592336
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 592336] Re: Removal of aptitude from base installation

2010-06-10 Thread cariboo907

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50081925/Dependencies.txt

-- 
Removal of aptitude from base installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592336
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs