[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade
This package has been removed from Ubuntu. Closing all related bugs. ** Changed in: galeon (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67698 Title: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bsdmainutils/+bug/67698/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade
** Changed in: bsdmainutils (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade
the current gnome-session doesn't have this issue ** Changed in: gnome-session (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/karmic/irssi -- prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade
Thanks Malcolm Thanks for reporting this bug and any supporting documentation. Since this bug has enough information provided for a developer to begin work, I'm going to mark it as confirmed and let them handle it from here. Thanks for taking the time to make Ubuntu better! BugSquad ** Changed in: bsdmainutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade
bsdmainutils.prerm calls update-alternatives unconditionally in Intrepid: $ cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/bsdmainutils.prerm #!/bin/sh set -e update-alternatives --remove write /usr/bin/bsd-write so this is still a problem. ** Changed in: bsdmainutils (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade
This bug for bsdmainutils shows up as a new bug needing to be triaged. Given the time elapsed, is this bug still an issue for bsdmainutils? If so, I'll move it to Confirm. BugSquad ** Changed in: bsdmainutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade
bug is fixed in totem; while not mentioned in the changelog, the hardy totem-xine/totem-gstreamer package has: if [ "$1" = "remove" ] || [ "$1" = "deconfigure" ] ; then update-alternatives [...] fi so the alternative is not reset on upgrades. ** Changed in: totem (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade
irssi (0.8.12-2ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low * Merge with Debian, remaining Ubuntu changes: - Added debian/patches/90irc-ubuntu-com.dpatch (Launchpad #52690). - Modify Maintainer value to match the DebianMaintainerField spec. - debian/irssi.prerm: Do not alternative. LP: #67698. -- Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:13:28 +0100 ** Changed in: irssi (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade
** Changed in: irssi (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low Assignee: (unassigned) => Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu) Status: New => In Progress -- prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade
Bug fixed for gedit with this upload: gedit (2.18.0-0ubuntu1) feisty; urgency=low . * New upstream version: - Include list of active plugins in BugBuddy reports - Make plugins work with python 2.5 on 64 bits architectures - Misc bugfixes * debian/gedit.prerm: - don't remove alternative on upgrade (Ubuntu: #67698) * debian/patches/80_fix_python_plugins_amd64.patch: - dropped, fixed with the new version ** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade https://launchpad.net/bugs/67698 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade
That upload fixes the gconf2 problem: gconf2 (2.18.0-1ubuntu1) feisty; urgency=low . * Sync with Debian * New upstream version: Misc: - Make sure error strings are utf-8 - don't include xml-entry.h twice - fix leak in gconf meta info code - remove more popt gunk - when installing a batch of schema files, don't abort the entire transaction if one fails - don't close already closed file descriptors if fdwalk() is available - use g_file_test instead of gconf_file_test or gconf_file_exists - remove dead code found from coverity scan - retain file permissions on gconf database files when syncing a tree to disk - Add g_return_val_if_fail checks on type inputs for gconf_value_new_from_string * debian/control.in: - don't require the new gnome-pkg-tools package version from Debian - the Ubuntu Desktop Team maintains that package * debian/gconf2.prerm: - don't remove the alternative on upgrade (Ubuntu: #67698) * debian/rules: - don't use the rule to prevent upload to unstable ** Changed in: gconf2 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade https://launchpad.net/bugs/67698 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade
** Changed in: totem (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed ** Changed in: gnome-session (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed ** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed ** Changed in: gconf2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed ** Changed in: gconf (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed ** Changed in: gconf2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist => Low ** Changed in: galeon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed ** Changed in: gconf2 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs ** Changed in: totem (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs -- prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade https://launchpad.net/bugs/67698 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade
** Also affects: gconf (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed ** Also affects: gconf2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed ** Also affects: gedit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed ** Also affects: irssi (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed ** Also affects: totem (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade https://launchpad.net/bugs/67698 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 67698] Re: prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade
It was manual. 12:15 < seb128> removing the "update" case seems fine to me 12:15 < seb128> I'll do that for edgy+1 12:15 < pepsiman> can I add tasks for galeon, etc 12:15 < seb128> sure 12:15 < pepsiman> k, thx 12:15 < seb128> rename the bug maybe 12:15 < seb128> something like "prerm should not remove alternative on update" 12:16 < seb128> thank *you* for working on that ;) ** Summary changed: - After dist-upgrade, default session changed + prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade ** Description changed: - Before dist-upgrade my default session was GNOME. - After dist-upgrade my default session is XFCE. - - The KDE, XFCE and GNOME sessions were installed before the dist-upgrade, and are still installed afterwards. - The default session should not have changed. - - I can't remember if I had manually set the x-session-manager alternative - before upgrading, it isn't set to manual now. + Manually set alternatives are reset on upgrade if the prerm removes the + alternative when "$1" = "upgrade" ** Changed in: gnome-session (Ubuntu) Status: Needs Info => Unconfirmed ** Also affects: galeon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed ** Also affects: bsdmainutils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- prerm should not remove alternative on upgrade https://launchpad.net/bugs/67698 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
