[Bug 787051] Re: mk-sbuild is untruthful
This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-dev-tools - 0.124 --- ubuntu-dev-tools (0.124) unstable; urgency=low [ Benjamin Drung ] * Move add-patch, edit-patch, suspicious-source, what-patch, and wrap-and-sort from ubuntu-dev-tools into devscripts (Closes: #568481). [ Daniel Holbach ] * bitesize: - display error message properly (LP: #785973). - error out if bug is already marked as 'bitesize'. - rephrase bug comment and subscribe person who adds the comment. - work-around LP:336866 and LP:254901. [ Stefano Rivera ] * mk-sbuild: - maintainer_name isn't mandatory any more (LP: #787051) -- Ubuntu Archive Auto-Sync arch...@ubuntu.com Thu, 26 May 2011 10:54:47 + ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787051 Title: mk-sbuild is untruthful -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 787051] Re: mk-sbuild is untruthful
** Branch linked: lp:debian/ubuntu-dev-tools -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787051 Title: mk-sbuild is untruthful -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 787051] Re: mk-sbuild is untruthful
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787051 Title: mk-sbuild is untruthful -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 787051] Re: mk-sbuild is untruthful
Rather, it's just outdated. There's some other cruft in there (for instance, the current created sbuild.conf entries will generate deprecation warnings, and they should have been put in conf.d anyway to avoid maintainer script merge issues). I don't know that it's worth fixing it: mk-sbuild should better be folded into sbuild-createchroot. ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787051 Title: mk-sbuild is untruthful -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 787051] Re: mk-sbuild is untruthful
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu-dev-tools -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787051 Title: mk-sbuild is untruthful -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 787051] Re: mk-sbuild is untruthful
According to persia, this was once necessary. Fixing for now. mk-sbuild will hopefully go away soon ( https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu- dev-tools/+spec/other-o-udt-upstreaming ) ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = In Progress ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Stefano Rivera (stefanor) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787051 Title: mk-sbuild is untruthful -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
