[Bug 799613] Re: [regression] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of HW, fallback to performance governor

2011-10-19 Thread Joseph Salisbury
I'll mark this as fix-released, since the current Oneiric kernel fixes
the issue.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799613

Title:
  [regression] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of
  HW, fallback to performance governor

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/799613/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 799613] Re: [regression] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of HW, fallback to performance governor

2011-10-18 Thread Robert Schmidt
Ok, first things first:

When I started trying with the mainline kernels I realized that I wasn't
using the official Ubuntu kernel but one from a ppa repository
(https://launchpad.net/~voria/+archive/ppa).

After switching back to the official 3.0.0-12.20 I don't see the problem
anymore. So the bug is in the changes this repository made to the
kernel. Sorry about that.

But as I was changing the kernel anyway I tried also with the following and 
none of them showed the problem:
3.0.4-030004.201108301138
3.0.6-030006.201110050043
3.1.0-0301rc10.201110181253

So again sorry for not checking correctly what I was running.

** Tags removed: regression-release

** Tags removed: needs-upstream-testing
** Tags added: regression-release

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799613

Title:
  [regression] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of
  HW, fallback to performance governor

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/799613/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 799613] Re: [regression] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of HW, fallback to performance governor

2011-10-17 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Would it be possible for you to test the latest upstream kernel?  It
will allow additional upstream developers to examine the issue. Refer to
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds . Please test the release
candidate kernel versus the daily build.  Once you've tested the
upstream kernel, please remove the 'needs-upstream-testing' tag. This
can be done by clicking on the yellow pencil icon next to the tag
located at the bottom of the bug description and deleting the 'needs-
upstream-testing' text. Please let us know your results.

Thanks in advance.

** Tags added: needs-upstream-testing regression-release

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799613

Title:
  [regression] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of
  HW, fallback to performance governor

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/799613/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 799613] Re: [regression] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of HW, fallback to performance governor

2011-10-17 Thread Robert Schmidt
Where does this robot gets the version number from?
It is still there in the newest version.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Confirmed

** Tags removed: amd64 kernel-request-3.0.0-11.17 unity-2d

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799613

Title:
  [regression] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of
  HW, fallback to performance governor

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/799613/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 799613] Re: [regression] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of HW, fallback to performance governor

2011-10-17 Thread Robert Schmidt
The real problem seems to be indicated by the scaling driver:

p4-clockmod: Warning: EST-capable CPU detected. The acpi-cpufreq module
offers voltage scaling in addition to frequency scaling. You should use
that instead of p4-clockmod, if possible.

Following the advise by simply renaming p4-clockmod.ko makes the kernel use 
acpi-cpufreq and then frequency scaling works again.
So the bug is that the kernel loads the wrong scaling driver despite knowing 
better.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799613

Title:
  [regression] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of
  HW, fallback to performance governor

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/799613/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 799613] Re: [regression] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of HW, fallback to performance governor

2011-10-17 Thread Brad Figg
Thank you for taking the time to file a bug report on this issue.

However, given the number of bugs that the Kernel Team receives during
any development cycle it is impossible for us to review them all.
Therefore, we occasionally resort to using automated bots to request
further testing. This is such a request.

We have noted that there is a newer version of the development kernel
than the one you last tested when this issue was found. Please test
again with the newer kernel and indicate in the bug if this issue still
exists or not.

If the bug still exists, change the bug status from Incomplete to
Confirmed. If the bug no longer exists, change the bug status from
Incomplete to Fix Released.

Thank you for your help, we really do appreciate it.


** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Incomplete

** Tags added: kernel-request-3.0.0-12.20

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799613

Title:
  [regression] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of
  HW, fallback to performance governor

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/799613/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 799613] Re: [regression] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of HW, fallback to performance governor

2011-10-17 Thread Robert Schmidt
I have the same issue on an atom netbook I just updated to final oneiric
which uses kernel 3.0.0-12.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799613

Title:
  [regression] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of
  HW, fallback to performance governor

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/799613/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 799613] Re: [regression] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of HW, fallback to performance governor

2011-09-12 Thread Brad Figg
Thank you for taking the time to file a bug report on this issue.

However, given the number of bugs that the Kernel Team receives during
any development cycle it is impossible for us to review them all.
Therefore, we occasionally resort to using automated bots to request
further testing. This is such a request.

We have noted that there is a newer version of the development kernel
currently in the release pocket than the one you tested when this issue
was found. Please test again with the newer kernel and indicate in the
bug if this issue still exists or not.

If the bug still exists, change the bug status from Incomplete to
Confirmed. If the bug no longer exists, change the bug status from
Incomplete to Fix Released.

Thank you for your help.


** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Incomplete

** Tags added: kernel-request-3.0.0-11.17

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799613

Title:
  [regression] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of
  HW, fallback to performance governor

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/799613/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 799613] Re: [regression] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of HW, fallback to performance governor

2011-09-06 Thread Julian Wiedmann
With 3.0, the x86 cpufreq drivers were moved into the /drivers/cpufreq
directory (previously containing only the cpufreq governors). Debian's
cpufrequtils had some issues with loading these "new" modules, this bug
might be related.

Details:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/13/77
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635348
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636141

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #635348
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635348

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #636141
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636141

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799613

Title:
  [regression] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of
  HW, fallback to performance governor

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/799613/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 799613] Re: [regression] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of HW, fallback to performance governor

2011-07-05 Thread Fabien Tassin
during boot, i see an error saying pcc-cpufreq.ko  is missing.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799613

Title:
  [regression] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of
  HW, fallback to performance governor

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/799613/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 799613] Re: [regression] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of HW, fallback to performance governor

2011-06-20 Thread Brad Figg
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799613

Title:
  [regression] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of
  HW, fallback to performance governor

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/799613/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 799613] Re: [regression] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of HW, fallback to performance governor

2011-06-20 Thread Fabien Tassin
** Attachment added: "3.0-0.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/799613/+attachment/2175567/+files/3.0-0.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799613

Title:
  [regression] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of
  HW, fallback to performance governor

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/799613/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 799613] Re: [regression] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of HW, fallback to performance governor

2011-06-20 Thread Fabien Tassin
Here are the bootlogs before and after this upgrade.

** Attachment added: "2.6.39-3.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/799613/+attachment/2175566/+files/2.6.39-3.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799613

Title:
  [regression] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of
  HW, fallback to performance governor

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/799613/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 799613] Re: [regression] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of HW, fallback to performance governor

2011-06-20 Thread Fabien Tassin
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799613

Title:
  [regression] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of
  HW, fallback to performance governor

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/799613/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs