[Bug 81232] Re: ld-linux.so.2 segfaults in _dl_make_stack_executable

2008-11-05 Thread Adam Niedling
Edgy is not supported anymore. Please reopen this report if this is
still an issue in a later version of Ubuntu.

** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
ld-linux.so.2 segfaults in _dl_make_stack_executable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/81232
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 81232] Re: ld-linux.so.2 segfaults in _dl_make_stack_executable

2007-01-24 Thread Colin Watson
** Changed in: libc (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: libc = glibc

-- 
ld-linux.so.2 segfaults in _dl_make_stack_executable
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81232

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 81232] Re: ld-linux.so.2 segfaults in _dl_make_stack_executable

2007-01-24 Thread Jeff Bailey
It's hard to tell without the code in hand, but my best guess is that
the oracle library is handing in a bad pointer to some function.

I'm a bit surprised to see a call right from kpummfpg into
_dl_make_stack_executable.  Does it segfault reasonably quickly, or does
it have to run for a while?

-- 
ld-linux.so.2 segfaults in _dl_make_stack_executable
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81232

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 81232] Re: ld-linux.so.2 segfaults in _dl_make_stack_executable

2007-01-24 Thread Sean Burke
Hi Jeff,

Apache segfaults right way on the first attempt to
connect to the database.

Note that the oracle library works correctly
from /usr/bin/perl - the fault occurs only when run
within Apache.

Also, a coworker has verified that, on Fedora Core 6,
this fault does not occur, even within Apache.

I agree that it is strange for this library to call
_dl_make_stack_executable, and i don't think that
it does.  objdump --dynamic-syms on the oracle
library does not show any reference to _make_stack_executable.

So it could be that the stack trace we see has been corrupted.
I don't know what sort of stack frame magic ld-linux may employ,
or if gdb can interpret a 'trampoline' correctly, so i'm uncertain on
this point.

I thought that ld-linux.so may have thought it necessary
to make this call. Apache originally had the elf header

   $readelf -l /usr/sbin/apache | grep STACK
   GNU_STACK  0x00 0x 0x 0x0 0x0 RW  0x4

whereas libclntsh.so lacks the GNU_STACK header.
So, that seemed like a reason why ld-linux might call
_dl_make_stack_executable.

However, editing /usr/sbin/apache to change the
GNU_STACK permissions to RWE, so that the stack
would be executable from the start, did not change
the fault.

My Ubuntu system's glibc was built on 2006-10-10:

   $ /lib/libc-2.4.so
   ...
   Compiled on a Linux 2.6.17-10 system on 2006-10-10.

As this is not the most recent build, I will try to update to
the January build to see if the fault is still present.

-SEan

On Jan 24, 2007, at 6:38 AM, Jeff Bailey wrote:

 It's hard to tell without the code in hand, but my best guess is that
 the oracle library is handing in a bad pointer to some function.

 I'm a bit surprised to see a call right from kpummfpg into
 _dl_make_stack_executable.  Does it segfault reasonably quickly, or  
 does
 it have to run for a while?

 -- 
 ld-linux.so.2 segfaults in _dl_make_stack_executable
 https://launchpad.net/bugs/81232

-- 
ld-linux.so.2 segfaults in _dl_make_stack_executable
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81232

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs