[Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free

2015-07-05 Thread rjasmin
IS MPL2 GPL compatible then? Theres no harm in adding in more Debain 
packages.UBUNTU clearly abuses that privilege enough already. Why tread on user 
freedoms and claim yourself free when you arent? Do like Debian does and 
disable non-free until the user makes the choice to use it. Inform the user of 
the NON-FREE changes like Debian does.PROBLEM SOLVED. No legal mumbo jumbo 
needed.
Iceweasel and ICeDove and IceApe/gftp are FREE. Firefox and thunderbird and 
filezilla ARE NOT. They are mozilla's means to an end and thier sacred cow on 
OSes like windows and Mac.They have every right to restrict themselves 
accordingly. It is unfortunate that Canonocial and Debian and Fedora teams have 
to sit by and take this NON-FREE abuse.

RedHat themselves can ship whatever they want as long as they tell you
its NON-FREE.They have made it very clear that if you use RPMFusions
software Fedora team WILL NOT support you.If Canonocial wants to go that
route they are welcome to do so. Will come the patent nightmare and
licensing issues. Will come the need to charge users to use things like
DVD playback(already broken) and MP3 audio.

Linus himself is stumbling in the darkness and needs to be shown the
way.Being FREE is a concentrated effort, you cant just blow it off and
call everything free because you dont charge for it.The removal of MP3
codec from UBUNTU should have been enough of a patent nightmare wake up
call. I see how you stumbled with THAT ONE. What I dont see is this so
called FREEDOM on FREE software that is getting distributed on the net
everywhere by everyone. You cant have FREEDOM if NON-FREE is forced on
you.You have to be able to CHOOSE.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83118

Title:
  Some Firefox components are non-free

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/83118/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free

2012-10-02 Thread Sam Morris
The logo is now licensed under MPL 2, according to
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-
central/source/browser/branding/official/LICENSE. The upstream bug was
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=541761.

** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #541761
   https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=541761

** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83118

Title:
  Some Firefox components are non-free

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/83118/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free

2012-10-01 Thread Thomas Hotz
Can you please retest with a supported Firefox version? Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83118

Title:
  Some Firefox components are non-free

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/83118/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free

2012-10-01 Thread Thomas Hotz
Is this still present because I use Chromium?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83118

Title:
  Some Firefox components are non-free

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/83118/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free

2011-02-15 Thread Martin Pitt
** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Chris Coulson (chrisccoulson) = (unassigned)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83118

Title:
  Some Firefox components are non-free

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free

2011-01-06 Thread Alexander Sack
** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Alexander Sack (asac) = Chris Coulson (chrisccoulson)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83118

Title:
  Some Firefox components are non-free

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free

2010-01-14 Thread Przemysław Kulczycki
The about:license page doesn't include this section anymore;
Image files containing the trademarks and logos of the Mozilla Foundation, 
which may not be reproduced without permission. (Copyright ©2004-2006 The 
Mozilla Foundation. All Rights Reserved.)

Checked on Firefox 3.5, Ubuntu 9.10 (Karmic)

But I didn't check the source package for exact license of each file.
However, If these images are released under GPL/MPL, this would mean that we 
can redistribute them but not use them as trademarks for versions of Firefox 
built on source unapproved by Mozilla.

(IANAL)

-- 
Some Firefox components are non-free
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83118
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free

2009-05-26 Thread John Vivirito
This was fixed with the package abrowser this is a unbranded version
of firefox built using same source just name and frieds were changed.


** Package changed: firefox (Ubuntu) = firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
Some Firefox components are non-free
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83118
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free

2009-05-26 Thread Sam Morris
No it wasn't. The 'firefox' package which contains non-free content
still exists in main.

** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Released = Confirmed

-- 
Some Firefox components are non-free
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83118
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free

2008-05-13 Thread Alexander Sack
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 12:15:07PM -, Nick Bauermeister wrote:
 As I see it, there still has been no reason given, why moving Firefox to
 the restricted component wouldn't be a good solution.
 
 Ubuntu already installs packages from restricted by default, so where would 
 be the harm if Firefox was one of them?
 The regular user wouldn't even know about it and doing so would resolve this 
 bug pretty easily.
 It's a win-win situation, in my opinion.
 
 
 I would like to add that I am a dedicated Firefox user (after all, it 
 introduced my to free software) and I was pleased when the official logo was 
 used in Edgy (or was it Feisty?) -- that means I'm fine with it being 
 non-free but this doesn't stop this bug from being perfectly valid.
 

Anyone willing to put work into providing a real free firefox and
forking out artwork branding to a separate package is invited to jump
in #ubuntu-mozillateam on irc.freenode.net and help to get this sorted.


 - Alexander

-- 
Some Firefox components are non-free
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83118
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free

2008-05-13 Thread Lenny Domnitser
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Anyone willing to put work into providing a real free firefox and
  forking out artwork branding to a separate package is invited to jump
  in #ubuntu-mozillateam on irc.freenode.net and help to get this sorted.

As I understand, Mozilla's trademark policy is that the browser can't
be called Firefox unless it includes the non-free artwork (this is why
Debian calls it Iceweasel). If this is correct (IANAL), there can't be
a free and legal firefox package, since removing the non-free artwork
is violation of the trademark Firefox name.

-- 
Some Firefox components are non-free
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83118
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free

2008-05-04 Thread Nick Bauermeister
As I see it, there still has been no reason given, why moving Firefox to
the restricted component wouldn't be a good solution.

Ubuntu already installs packages from restricted by default, so where would 
be the harm if Firefox was one of them?
The regular user wouldn't even know about it and doing so would resolve this 
bug pretty easily.
It's a win-win situation, in my opinion.


I would like to add that I am a dedicated Firefox user (after all, it 
introduced my to free software) and I was pleased when the official logo was 
used in Edgy (or was it Feisty?) -- that means I'm fine with it being non-free 
but this doesn't stop this bug from being perfectly valid.

-- 
Some Firefox components are non-free
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83118
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free

2008-03-04 Thread Sam Morris
I guess there has still been no progress on this issue. What a
disappointment.

-- 
Some Firefox components are non-free
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83118
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free

2007-10-24 Thread StefanPotyra
setting to confirmed as I can easily confirm the copyright statement. If
that's inadequate for the recent changes to the license applying for
main (http://www.ubuntu.com/community/ubuntustory/components) please
mark this bug as invalid for ubuntu and open a task for gobunto.
Otherwise, if the licensing terms don't match actual license policy,
please file a bug against the ubuntu website.

Cheers,
Stefan.

** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Confirmed

-- 
Some Firefox components are non-free
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83118
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs