[Bug 837946] Re: Lucid cannot boot from filesystems with multiple signatures

2011-08-31 Thread Chris Jones
While it is perhaps the case (as is argued in 428318) that blkid cannot
be expected to be omniscient and choose the correct signature, the
reality is that this is a regression in functionality and telling people
to reformat is not really very good.

Perhaps it would therefore be useful for do-release-upgrade to perform a
quick test to see if the mounted filesystems have ambivalent results
with a new blkid and if so either refuse to upgrade until the user has
fixed the situation, or if we have a high degree of trust in the tools,
remove the signatures which don't match the filesystem type which the
partition is actually mounted as.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/837946

Title:
  Lucid cannot boot from filesystems with multiple signatures

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/837946/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 837946] Re: Lucid cannot boot from filesystems with multiple signatures

2011-08-31 Thread Chris Jones
(fwiw the additional filesystem signatures were two VFAT ones named
'DellUtility' so presumably relate to recovery partitions that were not
entirely erased when we formatted and installed Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/837946

Title:
  Lucid cannot boot from filesystems with multiple signatures

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/837946/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs