[Bug 86919] Re: transport shouldn't indirect through control_files
** Changed in: bzr (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/86919 Title: transport shouldn't indirect through control_files -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 86919] Re: transport shouldn't indirect through control_files
The use of LockableFiles as a wrapper for a Transport no longer exists. This class could still be cleaned up a bit, for which see bug 88848. ** Changed in: bzr Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- transport shouldn't indirect through control_files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/86919 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 86919] Re: transport shouldn't indirect through control_files
bzr no longer indirects through control_files for IO-type operations, which was the original purpose of this bug. The main purpose of LockableFiles as it currently exists is to coordinate a transaction object with the state of the lock. It also still provides the _find_modes method. _find_modes is already softly deprecated in favor of BzrDir._find_creation_modes; if/when the class as a whole is deprecated the attributes that it creates will be gone. Alternatively we could turn them into deprecated properties. If this reasoning is correct, then Branch, which does not use get_transaction, should never need a control_files. (Removing it may strictly be a compatibility break for Branch though.) There are also quite a large number of methods on Branch that just forward to the control_files, that can go to a CountedLock instead. -- transport shouldn't indirect through control_files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/86919 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 86919] Re: transport shouldn't indirect through control_files
** Changed in: bzr (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: New = Triaged -- transport shouldn't indirect through control_files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/86919 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 86919] Re: transport shouldn't indirect through control_files
** Also affects: bzr Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: bzr Importance: Undecided = Medium Assignee: (unassigned) = Martin Pool (mbp) Status: New = Confirmed -- transport shouldn't indirect through control_files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/86919 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
