Re: [Bug 87424] Re: unable to tell the difference between 32 and 64 bit builds
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 11:29:30PM -, Brian Murray wrote: Isn't the system architecture information in the uname line of the initial crash? Here is an example: 'Uname: Linux mlenz-laptop 2.6.20-8-generic #2 SMP Tue Feb 13 05:18:42 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux'. For 32bit, it will say i686, and for 64, it will say x86_64. e.g., my machine: Linux gorgon 2.6.20-8-generic #2 SMP Tue Feb 13 01:14:41 UTC 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux Or just uname -m -- Kees Cook@outflux.net -- unable to tell the difference between 32 and 64 bit builds https://launchpad.net/bugs/87424 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 87424] Re: unable to tell the difference between 32 and 64 bit builds
Another indicator is in the Registers.txt. eax is 32, and rax is 64 bit. -- unable to tell the difference between 32 and 64 bit builds https://launchpad.net/bugs/87424 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 87424] Re: unable to tell the difference between 32 and 64 bit builds
I have never seen the x86_64 but i will recheck some. ive seen smp and i686 ty and i will look at a few. -- unable to tell the difference between 32 and 64 bit builds https://launchpad.net/bugs/87424 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 87424] Re: unable to tell the difference between 32 and 64 bit builds
Isn't the system architecture information in the uname line of the initial crash? Here is an example: 'Uname: Linux mlenz-laptop 2.6.20-8-generic #2 SMP Tue Feb 13 05:18:42 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux'. -- unable to tell the difference between 32 and 64 bit builds https://launchpad.net/bugs/87424 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
