[Bug 940230] Re: openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

2022-05-07 Thread Oibaf
Can you still reproduce this issue on a newer and supported Ubuntu
release?

** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940230

Title:
  openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/940230/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 940230] Re: openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

2013-01-22 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940230

Title:
  openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/940230/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 940230] Re: openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

2012-08-19 Thread cc
Just checking in 3 months later.  Any chance on getting some movement on
this for the next Precise update?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940230

Title:
  openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/940230/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 940230] Re: openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

2012-08-19 Thread cc
** Also affects: precise-backports
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940230

Title:
  openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/940230/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 940230] Re: openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

2012-08-19 Thread cc
** No longer affects: precise-backports

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940230

Title:
  openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/940230/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 940230] Re: openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

2012-06-27 Thread cc
Any decision on this?

The stopgap is not that hard. Disable ASM for 64bit and retest to see
the performance numbers.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940230

Title:
  openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/940230/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 940230] Re: openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

2012-03-28 Thread cc
Can you post some numbers to compare?  Post the output of   openssl
speed aes for different scenarios at a minimum and specify your
processor type.

There should be a comparison of both 32bit to 64bit on precise (which is
what I think you are comparing) AND a comparison of ssl performance on
precise and earlier distributions.

Here are the results of my latest round of testing, my hardy results are
from a 32bit build:

http://pastebin.com/XrFUT8Zq

So looking at the results of aes-128 (which arguably is more important
currently than -192 or -256 because of wider usage), results of 16 - 256
bytes are off significantly.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940230

Title:
  openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/940230/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 940230] Re: openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

2012-03-28 Thread cc
** Tags added: performance

** Description changed:

  Posting output of openssl speed on precise alpha and 10.04. Some quick
  googling seems to indicate issues with 64bit asm vs. the C version
  (might be a good idea to disable 64bit asm). This is on a processor
- without AES-NI (which is still very common).
+ *without* AES-NI (which is still very common).
  
  Precise:
  type 16 bytes 64 bytes256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes
  aes-128 cbc  61725.52k67902.33k69264.13k   146084.86k   148518.23k
  aes-192 cbc  5.95k56592.77k57542.04k   122330.11k   125277.32k
  aes-256 cbc  44912.70k48644.01k49539.94k   105978.88k   107372.74k
  
  Lucid:
  type 16 bytes 64 bytes256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes
  aes-128 cbc  74876.87k   118355.41k   138862.76k   144140.50k   141562.78k
  aes-192 cbc  82093.08k   110813.18k   120764.33k   118315.44k   118527.32k
  aes-256 cbc  74760.65k96842.01k   104520.45k   106615.81k   103481.34k
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
  Package: openssl 1.0.0g-1ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-12.21-generic 3.2.2
  Uname: Linux 3.2.0-12-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 1.93-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Fri Feb 24 02:33:44 2012
  EcryptfsInUse: Yes
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha amd64 
(20120201.1)
  ProcEnviron:
-  TERM=xterm-256color
-  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  TERM=xterm-256color
+  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: openssl
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940230

Title:
  openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/940230/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 940230] Re: openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

2012-03-27 Thread Scott Moser
Just a reference, I've seen something similar at bug 963420, but my
initial tests have not shown significant difference in i386 compared to
amd64.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940230

Title:
  openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/940230/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 940230] Re: openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

2012-03-17 Thread JH
Here's a post that talks about the old assembly for 64bit x86. 
http://zombe.es/post/405783/openssl-outmoded-asm

Performance is up to 50% worse for AES ciphers so I would think this is
a must fix.

Patch available for RC4 on x86_64.
http://cvs.openssl.org/filediff?f=openssl/crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-x86_64.plv1=1.12v2=1.13

For the rest, the option should be to disable ASM for 64bit and rely on AESNI 
for processors with AES-NI support. 
Possible patch here: 
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/24257718/openssl-1.0.0d-noasm_aes_rc4.patch


Another data point:
http://old.nabble.com/64-bit-OpenSSL-FIPS-1.2.3-with-asm-slow-performance-problems-on-AES-td32773268.html

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940230

Title:
  openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/940230/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 940230] Re: openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

2012-02-24 Thread Jauder Ho
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940230

Title:
  openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/940230/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs