[Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2010-06-14 Thread Jeremy Foshee
This bug report was marked as Incomplete and has not had any updated
comments for quite some time.  As a result this bug is being closed.
Please reopen if this is still an issue in the current Ubuntu release
http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download . Also, please be sure to
provide any requested information that may have been missing.  To reopen
the bug, click on the current status under the Status column and change
the status back to New.  Thanks.

[This is an automated message.  Apologies if it has reached you
inappropriately; please just reply to this message indicating so.]


** Tags added: kj-expired

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Expired

-- 
ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96692
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2009-10-16 Thread Anton
Happens also for with Macbook2,1 and latest Karmic upgraded to 20091016
(2.6.31-14)

Computer is very very very slow when doing I/O (basically bloated even
when copying some files)

uname -a:
Linux x 2.6.31-14-generic #47-Ubuntu SMP Thu Oct 15 02:08:08 UTC 2009 i686 
GNU/Linux

dmesg: 
[0.869569] ata_piix :00:1f.1: version 2.13
[0.869613] ata_piix :00:1f.1: power state changed by ACPI to D0
[0.869621]   alloc irq_desc for 18 on node -1
[0.869624]   alloc kstat_irqs on node -1
[0.869629] ata_piix :00:1f.1: PCI INT A - GSI 18 (level, low) - IRQ 18
[0.869672] ata_piix :00:1f.1: setting latency timer to 64
[0.869787] scsi0 : ata_piix
[0.869958] scsi1 : ata_piix
[0.870573] ata1: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x1f0 ctl 0x3f6 bmdma 0x20b0 irq 14
[0.870577] ata2: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x170 ctl 0x376 bmdma 0x20b8 irq 15
[0.870600]   alloc irq_desc for 19 on node -1
[0.870602]   alloc kstat_irqs on node -1
[0.870607] ata_piix :00:1f.2: PCI INT B - GSI 19 (level, low) - IRQ 19
[0.870613] ata_piix :00:1f.2: MAP [ P0 P2 -- -- ]
[0.998987] ACPI: Battery Slot [BAT0] (battery present)
[1.035298] ata_piix :00:1f.2: setting latency timer to 64
[1.035430] scsi2 : ata_piix
[1.035535] scsi3 : ata_piix
[1.036519] ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x20c8 ctl 0x20ec bmdma 0x20a0 irq 19
[1.036522] ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x20c0 ctl 0x20e8 bmdma 0x20a8 irq 19


lspci -vvnn:
00:1f.1 IDE interface [0101]: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) IDE 
Controller [8086:27df] (rev 02) (prog-if 8a [Master SecP PriP])
Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:7270]
Control: I/O+ Mem- BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- 
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- 
TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- INTx-
Latency: 0
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 18
Region 0: I/O ports at 01f0 [size=8]
Region 1: I/O ports at 03f4 [size=1]
Region 2: I/O ports at 0170 [size=8]
Region 3: I/O ports at 0374 [size=1]
Region 4: I/O ports at 20b0 [size=16]
Kernel driver in use: ata_piix

00:1f.2 IDE interface [0101]: Intel Corporation 82801GBM/GHM (ICH7 Family) SATA 
IDE Controller [8086:27c4] (rev 02) (prog-if 8f [Master SecP SecO PriP PriO])
Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:7270]
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- 
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- 
TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- INTx-
Latency: 0
Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 19
Region 0: I/O ports at 20c8 [size=8]
Region 1: I/O ports at 20ec [size=4]
Region 2: I/O ports at 20c0 [size=8]
Region 3: I/O ports at 20e8 [size=4]
Region 4: I/O ports at 20a0 [size=16]
Region 5: Memory at 90445000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1K]
Capabilities: access denied
Kernel driver in use: ata_piix

-- 
ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96692
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2009-04-09 Thread Kai Krueger
I am having the same issue on my macbook. 9.04 beta is using the
ata_piix driver instead of the AHCI driver. As others mentioned earlier
in this thread, the problem seems to be that the Apple bios emulator
puts the controler into legacy mode (for which the ata_piix probably is
the correct driver). ( http://forum.onmac.net/showthread.php?t=2739 has
a reasonable summery of the problem and a solution). In a previous
install of ubuntu, I had tried the fix using the modified stage1 grub
and it worked perfectly fine. However, I would rather not install code
into my MBR from a random untrusted webpage again and thus I would
prefer, If ubuntu could provide a correctly patched stage1 for grub that
reenables the AHCI mode on the MacBook. It is also necessary to make
sure that you have the correct one (either RAID version or the AHCI
version) and I wasn't sure which version the ones found on the various
websites are.

Would it be possible for Ubuntu to provide this modified grub and
perhaps add some comments about this issue on the documentation pages
for running Ubuntu on a intel mac?

-- 
ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96692
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2009-04-08 Thread Shaw Terwilliger
I just had an opportunity to upgrade from 8.10 to 9.04 Beta on my Mac
Pro (actually did an installation to a new disk, not an upgrade), and
the kernel that came with it (2.6.28-11-generic) still has this problem:
piix is used instead of AHCI, and the drive is pretty slow.

-- 
ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96692
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2008-08-28 Thread Leann Ogasawara
The Ubuntu Kernel Team is planning to move to the 2.6.27 kernel for the
upcoming Intrepid Ibex 8.10 release.  As a result, the kernel team would
appreciate it if you could please test this newer 2.6.27 Ubuntu kernel.
There are one of two ways you should be able to test:

1)  If you are comfortable installing packages on your own, the linux-
image-2.6.27-* package is currently available for you to install and
test.

--or--

2)  The upcoming Alpha5 for Intrepid Ibex 8.10 will contain this newer
2.6.27 Ubuntu kernel.  Alpha5 is set to be released Thursday Sept 4.
Please watch http://www.ubuntu.com/testing for Alpha5 to be announced.
You should then be able to test via a LiveCD.

Please let us know immediately if this newer 2.6.27 kernel resolves the
bug reported here or if the issue remains.  More importantly, please
open a new bug report for each new bug/regression introduced by the
2.6.27 kernel and tag the bug report with 'linux-2.6.27'.  Also, please
specifically note if the issue does or does not appear in the 2.6.26
kernel.  Thanks again, we really appreicate your help and feedback.

** Tags added: cft-2.6.27

-- 
ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96692
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2008-01-29 Thread Shaw Terwilliger
Christian Kellner wrote:
 There exists a work-around by patching grub stage1. Find the patch and
 the binary here: http://boeglin.org/blog/. I did it here and its working
 like a charm.

This is a neat hack.  If I get a morning or afternoon clear (with a boot
disc handy), I might try it.  I hacked on trying to do it via initramfs,
but I think the PCI configuration was locked down at that point (no
changes I made to the controller would stick).

I still wish there were a good long-term solution for the kernel.  If it
was as simple as writing some smart detection code, I'd do it.  But it
appears the hardest part of the problem is understanding just what Apple
did to the hardware classification that makes it incompatible with the
standard IDs.

-- 
Shaw Terwilliger `echo sterwill1tinfig2com | tr 12 @.`

-- 
ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96692
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2008-01-27 Thread Christian Kellner
There exists a work-around by patching grub stage1. Find the patch and
the binary here: http://boeglin.org/blog/. I did it here and its working
like a charm.

-- 
ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96692
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2008-01-06 Thread Christian Kellner
I have a sata based dvdrom on the only available sata port and of course
it is one of the ports that don't work due to that bug, so my DVD drive
is not recognized due to that bug. /-:

-- 
ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96692
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2007-10-05 Thread Shaw Terwilliger
Matthew Garrett wrote:
 The firmware programs the sata controller into piix mode, not ahci mode.
 On this specific hardware, the ahci driver is able to reprogram it -
 however, that isn't guaranteed in general, and attempts to do so have
 led to unfortunate behaviour like missing CD drives. Right now, the
 easiest thing to do would be to convince Apple to program the device
 into AHCI mode.

I doubt convincing Apple to release new firmware will be easy, even if
it's the best solution.  I have no idea how to go about that.  Adding a
single line to ahci.c is definitely easy, though it may be a hack.

With a status of Wishlist, we'll have another Ubuntu release where this
problem will be left unsolved.  This is an old bug (actually a
regression--it used to work!) and I wish it could be solved in a way
that didn't require constant kernel patching on the behalf of all Mac
Pro users.

-- 
Shaw Terwilliger `echo sterwill1io2nu | tr 12 @.`

-- 
ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96692
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2007-10-05 Thread Matthew Garrett
Just adding the ID to ahci.c would break a large number of other
machines, so while easy it's not possible.

-- 
ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96692
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2007-10-05 Thread Shaw Terwilliger
Matthew Garrett wrote:
 Just adding the ID to ahci.c would break a large number of other
 machines, so while easy it's not possible.

I spent a few hours one day trying to reprogram the controller using
setpci from initramfs and didn't have any luck.  It appeared that once
the controller had its mode set (by the Apple firmware?), the registers
were read-only.

A boot-time solution like this would make me very happy as a Mac Pro
user, if it were possible (and it may be).  I'd volunteer to
write/submit/maintain a Mac Pro AHCI package that provided the initramfs
scripts in this case.

-- 
Shaw Terwilliger `echo sterwill1io2nu | tr 12 @.`

-- 
ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96692
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2007-10-04 Thread Matthew Garrett
The firmware programs the sata controller into piix mode, not ahci mode.
On this specific hardware, the ahci driver is able to reprogram it -
however, that isn't guaranteed in general, and attempts to do so have
led to unfortunate behaviour like missing CD drives. Right now, the
easiest thing to do would be to convince Apple to program the device
into AHCI mode.

** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
   Status: Incomplete = Confirmed

-- 
ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96692
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2007-10-03 Thread Stephen Touset
Has this been fixed?

It was reported that there was a patch in testing, but I've seen no
activity since. This seems to still be in Gutsy.

-- 
ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96692
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2007-10-03 Thread Shaw Terwilliger
Stephen Touset wrote:
 Has this been fixed?
 
 It was reported that there was a patch in testing, but I've seen no
 activity since. This seems to still be in Gutsy.

The bug is still present in Gutsy as of a previous beta (I'm about 2
months out-of-date).  I can retest this week with the latest kernel, but
as far as I know it was never fixed in a released Ubuntu kernel.

-- 
Shaw Terwilliger `echo sterwill1io2nu | tr 12 @.`

-- 
ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96692
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2007-06-04 Thread Norman Molhant
Same problem/bug/feature found on Supermicro's X7DBE+ motherboard: the Intel 
ESB2 IDE+SATA controller gets the ata_piix driver instead of the ahci driver 
under Fiesty (Ubuntu kernel 2.6.20-15-generic).  On top of making the IDE 
controller flaky, this removes 1/3 of the SATA  controller: the ata_piix dirver 
recognizes only 4 SATA drives instead of 6.  :(  :(
Here are the two salient lines of the lspci -vvnn report:

 IDE interface [0101]: Intel Corporation 631xESB/632xESB IDE Controller 
[8086:269e] (rev 09) (prog-if 8f [Master SecP SecO PriP PriO])
 IDE interface [0101]: Intel Corporation 631xESB/632xESB/3100 Chipset SATA 
Storage Controller IDE [8086:2680] (rev 09) (prog-if 8f [Master SecP SecO PriP 
PriO])

Exactly the same problem as reported by Shaw hereabove.

I work with a small ISP in Canada, where we use this Supermicro motherboard in 
our servers, with two dual-core Xeon 5150 apiece.  Losing 2 of our 6 SATA drive 
is as real problem as having our servers running way too slow.  (We are using 
KVM + kqemu in these servers.)
I've been trying to patch the driver as mentionned by Christian hereabove, 
using the source I got from
 apt-get install linux-source-2.6.20
and the .config I got from
 apt-get install linux-headers-2.6.20-15-generic
but I keep getting strangely bloated modules (I guess all symbols are still in 
there), many times bigger than the modules that came with the install cdrom 
(Ubuntu 7.04 server for x86_64)

Any help would be welcome.
Norman.

-- 
ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96692
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2007-04-05 Thread Kyle McMartin
Can you please post the lspci -vvnn from feisty so we can see what the
device is claiming to be?

Cheers,
 Kyle

-- 
ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro
https://launchpad.net/bugs/96692

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2007-03-30 Thread Kyle McMartin
Patch in testing to fix this issue.

-- 
ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro
https://launchpad.net/bugs/96692

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2007-03-28 Thread Christian Kellner
You mentioned something about combined mode issue and that might be
fixed upstream? Do you have any details or pointers? The fix that I did
for 2.6.17 and that got committed (see bug 64433) was to add the ID to
the list of ahci chipsets. I looked and that id is still missing
upstream (2.6.21-rc4). Did they fix it some other way? It's really sad
that my uber-fast MacPro machine is outperformed by my X60 tablet with
its little notebook harddrive ;-(

-- 
ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro
https://launchpad.net/bugs/96692

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2007-03-28 Thread Kyle McMartin
** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Kyle McMartin
   Status: Unconfirmed = Needs Info

-- 
ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro
https://launchpad.net/bugs/96692

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2007-03-28 Thread Shaw Terwilliger
I'm not sure if the combined mode stuff even applies for the Mac Pro's
IDE controller.  I read about the patch that added the ID to the AHCI
chipsets, but I didn't test it.  Now that you've confirmed it works (or
worked), the best fix would be to add the ID to the  Feisty kernel.

** Attachment added: lspci -vvnn on 2.6.20-12
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7036054/macpro-lspci-vvnn

-- 
ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro
https://launchpad.net/bugs/96692

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2007-03-28 Thread Christian Kellner
Sure. Here you go!

** Attachment added: lspci on a MacPro on feisty (2.6.20)
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7036057/lspci.txt

-- 
ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro
https://launchpad.net/bugs/96692

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2007-03-28 Thread Christian Kellner

00:1f.1 IDE interface [0101]: Intel Corporation 631xESB/632xESB IDE Controller 
[8086:269e] (rev 09) (prog-if 8f [Master SecP SecO PriP PriO])
Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device [8086:7270]
Control: I/O+ Mem- BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- 
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- 
TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR-
Latency: 0
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 20
Region 0: I/O ports at 30e8 [size=8]
Region 1: I/O ports at 30fc [size=4]
Region 2: I/O ports at 30e0 [size=8]
Region 3: I/O ports at 30f8 [size=4]
Region 4: I/O ports at 30c0 [size=16]

00:1f.2 IDE interface [0101]: Intel Corporation 631xESB/632xESB/3100 Chipset 
SATA Storage Controller IDE [8086:2680] (rev 09) (prog-if 8f [Master SecP SecO 
PriP PriO])
Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device [8086:7270]
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- 
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- 
TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR-
Latency: 0
Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 21
Region 0: I/O ports at 30d8 [size=8]
Region 1: I/O ports at 30f4 [size=4]
Region 2: I/O ports at 30d0 [size=8]
Region 3: I/O ports at 30f0 [size=4]
Region 4: I/O ports at 3020 [size=16]
Region 5: Memory at 52f04400 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1K]
Capabilities: [70] Power Management version 2
Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA 
PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold-)
Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
---

This time with sudo so the Capabilities are shown instead of Permission 
denied ;-)
So yeah, 2680 is still missing on the ahci device list. Not sure why because 
IIRC that is also in the spec for esb2.

-- 
ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro
https://launchpad.net/bugs/96692

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2007-03-28 Thread Matthew Garrett
New Intel IDs aren't being added to ahci because ahci controllers have
their own PCI class ID (0x010601) which ahci can key off. Apple seem to
have declined to program yours as an ahci device - it's still claiming
to be an IDE device (0x0101), and so ata_piix is the correct driver to
be using.

Of course, this ignores the fact that in reality we'd prefer to use
ahci. The easiest way to do this would probably be to add a PCI quirk
that reprograms it, but Apple seem to have declined to provide an Apple
subsystem ID to key off and argh it hurts.

-- 
ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro
https://launchpad.net/bugs/96692

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2007-03-27 Thread Christian Kellner
This is acutally a dup of bug 64433 I filed a while ago. I am pretty
sure it was fixed at some point but is now back again. The slow disk
speed is damn annoying.

-- 
ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro
https://launchpad.net/bugs/96692

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2007-03-26 Thread Shaw Terwilliger

** Attachment added: dmesg from feisty (using piix)
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/6988633/feisty-piix

-- 
ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro
https://launchpad.net/bugs/96692

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 96692] Re: ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro

2007-03-26 Thread Shaw Terwilliger

** Attachment added: dmesg from edgy (using ahci)
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/6988631/edgy-ahci

-- 
ata_piix used instead of AHCI for Mac Pro
https://launchpad.net/bugs/96692

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs